Journal of Regulatory Economics

, Volume 42, Issue 2, pp 115–134 | Cite as

Designing optimal gain sharing plans to promote energy conservation

Original Article


We analyze the optimal design of gain sharing plans to promote energy conservation. We show how the optimal plan varies as industry conditions and the regulator’s information change. We demonstrate the importance of allowing the energy supplier a choice among plans, some of which offer the prospect of both pronounced financial gains for superior performance and substantial losses for inferior performance.


Energy conservation Gain sharing Asymmetric information 

JEL Classification

D82 L51 Q38 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Blank L., Gegax D. (2011) Objectively designing shared savings incentive mechanisms: An opportunity cost model for electric utility efficiency programs. Electricity Journal 24(9): 31–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bolton P., Dewatripont M. (2005) Contract theory. MIT Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  3. Brennan, T. (2008). ‘Night of the living dead’ or ‘back to the future’? Electric utility decoupling, reviving rate-of-return regulation, and energy efficiency. Resources for the Future Discussion Paper 08–27 (August).Google Scholar
  4. Brennan T. (2010a) Decoupling in electric utilities. Journal of Regulatory Economics 38(1): 49–69CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Brennan T. (2010b) Optimal energy efficiency policies and regulatory demand-side management tests: How well do they match?. Energy Policy 38(8): 3874–3885CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Brennan, T. (2011). Energy efficiency policy: Surveying the puzzles. Resources for the Future Discussion Paper 11–27 (July).Google Scholar
  7. Dixon R., McGowan E., Onysko G., Scheer R. (2010) US energy conservation and efficiency policies: Challenges and opportunities. Energy Policy 38(11): 6398–6408CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Eom, J., (2009). Incentives for utility-based energy efficiency programs in California (Ph.D. dissertation, Management Science and Engineering, Stanford University, 2009).Google Scholar
  9. Eom, J., Sweeney, J. (2009). Shareholder incentives for utility-delivered energy efficiency programs in California. mimeo: Stanford University.Google Scholar
  10. Eto J., Stoft S., Kito S. (1998) DSM shareholder incentives: Recent designs and economic theory. Utilities Policy 7(1): 47–62CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Gillingham K., Newell R., Palmer K. (2009) Energy efficiency economics and policy. Annual Review of Resource Economics 1: 597–619CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Institute for Electric Efficiency. (2010). State energy efficiency regulatory frameworks. Retrieved January 28, 2010 from
  13. Laffont J-J., Martimort D. (2002) The theory of incentives: The principal-agent model. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  14. Laffont J-J., Tirole J. (1993) A theory of incentives in procurement and regulation. MIT Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  15. Lewis T., Sappington D. (1992) Incentives for conservation and quality-improvement by public utilities. American Economic Review 82(5): 1321–1340Google Scholar
  16. Loeb M., Magat W. (1979) A decentralized method for utility regulation. Journal of Law and Economics 22(2): 399–404CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Moskovitz, D. (1989). Profits and progress through least-cost planning. mimeo: National Association of Regulatory Utility Commissioners.Google Scholar
  18. Munns D. (2008) Modeling new approaches for electric energy efficiency. Electricity Journal 21(2): 20–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Shavell S. (1979) Risk sharing and incentives in the principal and agent relationship. Bell Journal of Economics 10(1): 55–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Stoft, S., Eto, J., Kito, S. (1995). DSM shareholder incentives: Current designs and economic theory. mimeo: Energy & Environment Division, Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory.Google Scholar
  21. Stoft S., Gilbert R. (1994) A review and analysis of electric utility conservation incentives. Yale Journal on Regulation 11(1): 1–42Google Scholar
  22. Tanaka K. (2011) Review of policies and measures for energy efficiency in industry sector. Energy Policy 39(1): 6532–6550CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Information and Operations Management, Marshall School of BusinessUniversity of Southern CaliforniaLos AngelesUSA
  2. 2.Department of Economics, Warrington College of BusinessUniversity of FloridaGainesvilleUSA

Personalised recommendations