Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Can self regulation work?: a story of corruption, impunity and cover-up

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Regulatory Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper analyzes the reputation-based incentives of a Self-Regulatory Organization (SRO) to detect and expose consumer fraud committed by its members, and the members’ incentives to bribe the SRO in exchange for a cover-up to avoid an external punishment. In a corruption-free benchmark, SROs are effective in detecting, exposing and deterring fraud only if exposure yields a reputation gain to the SRO, which depends on consumers inferences about the SRO’s type. However, if this case prevails the member can succeed in bribing the SRO in exchange for a cover-up and impunity. Despite this, a bribed SRO yields more vigilance and lower fraud than no self-regulation at all.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bortolotti, B., & Fiorentini, G. (1999). Barriers to entry and the self-regulating professions: Evidence from the market of Italian accountants. In Organized interests and self-regulation; an economic approach (pp. 131–157). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  • Cho I.-K., Kreps D. (1987). Signalling games and stable equilibria. Quarterly Journal of Economics 102, 179–222

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Emons W. (1997). Credence goods and fraudulent experts. RAND Journal of Economics 28(1): 107–119

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fudenberg D., Tirole J. (1991). Game Theory. MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass

    Google Scholar 

  • Gehrig T., Jost P.-J. (1995). Quacks, lemons, and self regulation: A welfare analysis. Journal of Regulatory Economics 7, 309–325

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harsanyi, J. (1982). Morality and the theory of rational behaviour. In A. Sen & B. Williams (Eds.), Utilitarianism and beyond. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  • Laffont J.J., Tirole J. (1991). The politics of government decision-making: A theory of regulatory capture. Quarterly Journal of Economics 106(4): 1089–1127

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maxwell J., Lyon T., Hackett S. (2000). Self-regulation and social welfare: The political economy of corporate environmentalism. Journal of Law and Economics 43(2): 583–617

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Milgrom P. (1981). Good news and bad news: Representation theorems and applications. Bell Journal of Economics 12, 380–391

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Milgrom P., Roberts J. (1986). Price and advertising signals of product quality. Journal of Political Economy 94, 796–821

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nunez J. (2001). A model of self regulation. Economics Letters 74, 91–97

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pirrong S. (1995). The self-regulation of commodity exchanges: The case of market manipulation. Journal of Law and Economics 38, 141–206

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Polinsky A.M., Shavell S. (2001). Corruption and optimal law enforcement. Journal of Public Economics 81, 1–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scarpa C. (1999). The theory of quality regulation and self-regulation: Towards an application to financial markets. In: Bortolotti B., Fiorentini G. (eds). Organized interest and self-regulation. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 236–260

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaked A., Sutton J. (1981). The self-regulating profession. Review of Economic Studies 48, 217–234

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shapiro C. (1982). Consumer information, product quality and seller reputation. Bell Journal of Economics 13, 20–35

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stefanadis C. (2003). Self-regulation, innovation, and the financial industry. Journal of Regulatory Economics 23(1): 5–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tirole J. (1996). A theory of collective reputations with applications to the persistence of corruption and to quality. Review of Economic Studies 63(1): 1–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van den Bergh R. (1999). Self regulation of the medical and legal professions: Remaining barriers to competition and EC law. In: Bortolotti B., Fiorentini G. (eds). Organized interest and self-regulation. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 89–130

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Javier Núñez.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Núñez, J. Can self regulation work?: a story of corruption, impunity and cover-up. J Regul Econ 31, 209–233 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11149-006-9020-x

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11149-006-9020-x

Keywords

JEL Classifications

Navigation