Advertisement

Journal of Regulatory Economics

, Volume 31, Issue 1, pp 57–81 | Cite as

Pollution abatement with limited enforcement power and citizen suits

  • Christian Langpap
Original Article

Abstract

Federal environmental laws in the U.S. can be enforced by government agencies or by private parties through citizen suits against polluters. Here, I extend the standard enforcement model to examine the role played by citizen suits. The main results from the paper suggest that in a model with limited enforcement power and citizen suits the regulator fully exercises his enforcement power when the expected penalty from a citizen suit is low, but increases his reliance on citizen suits as the expected penalty rises. Whether an enforcement regime that allows private enforcement is efficient depends not only on the relative costs of private and agency enforcement, but also on the changes in inspection costs that may be caused by private enforcement and the expected penalty from losing a citizen suit. These results suggest that in practice private enforcement may lower social costs as long as relatively inexpensive agency enforcement options, such as administrative proceedings, do not preclude citizen suits.

Keywords

Pollution control Environmental regulation Compliance Self-reporting Enforcement Citizen suits 

JEL Classifications

D62 L51 K32 K42 Q25 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Baik K.H., Shogren J.F. (1994). Environmental conflicts with reimbursement for citizen suits. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 27, 1–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Becker G.S. (1968). Crime and punishment: An economic approach. Journal of Political Economy, 76, 169–217CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Fadil A. (1985). Citizen suits against polluters: Picking up the pace. Harvard Environmental Law Review, 9(1):23–84Google Scholar
  4. Hall, R. M., Jr. (2000). EPA’s administrative enforcement: Where the action is. C&M Toxic Torts and Environmental Litigation Newsletter, Spring 2000. Online at http://www.crowell.com/content/resources/publications/browsebyPracticeGroup/NaturalResources/, visited 6/20/2005.Google Scholar
  5. Harford J.D. (1991). Measurement error and state-dependent pollution control enforcement. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 21, 67–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Harford J.D., Harrington W. (1991). A reconsideration of enforcement leverage when penalties are restricted. Journal of Public Economics, 45, 391–395CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Harrington W. (1988). Enforcement leverage when penalties are restricted. Journal of Public Economics, 37, 290-53CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Heyes A.G. (1997). Environmental regulation by private contest. Journal of Public Economics, 63, 407–428CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Heyes A.G. (1998). Making things stick: Enforcement and compliance. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 14(4):50–63CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Heyes A.G. (2000). Implementing environmental regulation: Enforcement and compliance. Journal of Regulatory Economics, 17(2):107–129CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Heyes A.G., Rickman N. (1999). Regulatory dealing – revisiting the Harrington paradox. Journal of Public Economics, 72, 361–378CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Innes R. (1999). Remediation and self-reporting in optimal law enforcement. Journal of Public Economics, 72, 379–393CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Kaplow L. (1986). Private versus social costs in bringing suit. Journal of Legal Studies, 15, 371–386CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Kaplow L., Shavell S. (1994). Optimal law enforcement with self-reporting of behavior. Journal of Political Economy, 102(3):583–606CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Livernois J., McKenna C.J. (1999). Truth or consequences. Enforcing pollution standards with self-reporting. Journal of Public Economics, 71, 415–440CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Macfarlane R., Terry L. (1997). Citizen suits: Impacts on permitting and agency enforcement. Natural Resources and Environment, 11(4):20–25Google Scholar
  17. Magat W.A., Viscusi W.K. (1990). Effectiveness of the EPA’s regulatory enforcement: The case of industrial effluent standards. Journal of Law and Economics, 33, 331–360CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Malik A.S. (1993). Self-reporting and the design of policies for regulating, stochastic pollution. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 24, 241–257CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. May, J. R. (2003). Now more than ever: Recent trends in environmental citizen Suits. Manuscript, Widener University School of Law Symposium. Environmental Citizen Suits at Thirty something: A Celebration and Summit.Google Scholar
  20. Miller, J. G., & Environmental Law Institute. (1987). Citizen suits: Private enforcement of federal pollution control laws. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
  21. Myerson R.B. (1979). Incentive compatibility and the bargaining problem. Econometrica, 47, 61–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Montero J.P. (2002). Prices versus quantities with incomplete enforcement. Journal of Public Economics, 85, 435–454CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Mookherjee D., Png I.P.L. (1994). Marginal deterrence in enforcement of law. Journal of Political Economy, 102(5):1039–1066CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Naysnerski W., Tietenberg T. (1992). Private enforcement of federal environmental law. Land Economics, 68(1):28–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Russell, C. S. (1990). Monitoring and enforcement. In, Public policies for environmental protection. Paul R. Portney (Ed.), Washington, DC: Resources for the Future.Google Scholar
  26. Russell C.S., Harrington W., Vaughan W.J. (1986). Enforcing pollution control laws. Washington, DC, Resources for the FutureGoogle Scholar
  27. Settle, C., Hurley, T. M. & Shogren, J. F. (2001). Citizen suits. In, The law and economics of the environment. Anthony G. Heyes (Ed.), Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  28. Shavell S. (1982). Suit, settlement, and trial: A theoretic analysis under alternative methods for the allocation of legal costs. Journal of Legal Studies, 11, 55–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Shavell S. (1997). The Fundamental divergence between the private and the social motive to use the legal system. Journal of Legal Studies, 26, 575–612CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Shavell S. (1999). The level of litigation: Private versus social optimality of suit and of settlement. International Review of Law and Economics, 19, 99–115CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Yaeger P. (1991). The limits of the law: The public regulation of private pollution. Cambridge, Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of EconomicsTulane UniversityNew OrleansUSA

Personalised recommendations