Journal of Regulatory Economics

, Volume 30, Issue 2, pp 199–216 | Cite as

Should uniform pricing constraints be imposed on entrants?

Original Article


This paper analyzes uniform pricing, coverage constraints and price caps in markets newly opened to competition, e.g. broadband services. We show that the requirement of uniform pricing has strong repercussions on coverage decisions. Imposed on incumbents only it may distort their coverage decision downward to avoid duopoly entry. If also imposed on entrants it increases the likelihood that entry leads to independent monopolies rather than competition. A sufficiently large coverage constraint on incumbents reestablishes incentives for duopoly entry, but may lead to higher prices.


Uniform pricing Coverage constraints Price caps Entry 

JEL Classification (2000)

L43 L51 L52 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Anton, J. J., Vander Weide, J. H., Vettas, N. 2002Entry auctions and strategic behavior under cross-market price constraintsInternational Journal of Industrial Organization20611629CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Armstrong, M., Vickers, J. 1993Price discrimination, competition and regulationThe Journal of Industrial Economics41335359CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bourguignon, H., Yáñez, J. (2003). Skimming the others’ cream: competitive effects of an asymmetric universal service obligation. CREST Working Paper 2003–2043.Google Scholar
  4. Choné, P., Flochel, L., Perrot, A. 2000Universal service obligations and competitionInformation Economics and Policy12249259CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Crandall, R.W., Waverman, L. 2000Who pays for universal service: when telephone subsidies become transparentBrookings Institution PressWashington, DCGoogle Scholar
  6. Faulhaber, G.R., Hogendorn, C. 2000The market structure of broadband telecommunicationsJournal of Industrial Economics48305329CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Foros, Ø., Kind, H. J. 2003The broadband access market: competition, uniform pricing and geographical coverageJournal of Regulatory Economics23215235CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Fudenberg, D., Tirole, J. 1984The fat–cat effect, the Puppy–dog ploy, and the Lean and Hungry lookAmerican Economic Review, Papers and Proceedings74361366Google Scholar
  9. Hoernig, S. H. (2002). Should uniform pricing constraints be imposed on entrants? Working Paper 417, FEUNL Lisboa.Google Scholar
  10. Laffont, J.-J., Tirole, J. 2000Competition in telecommunicationsMIT PressCambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  11. Valletti, T.M., Hoernig, S.H., Barros, P.P. 2002Universal service and entry: the role of uniform pricing and coverage constraintsJournal of Regulatory Economics21169190CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of EconomicsUniversidade Nova de LisboaLisboaPortugal
  2. 2.CEPRLondonUK

Personalised recommendations