Advertisement

Journal of Regulatory Economics

, Volume 29, Issue 1, pp 23–67 | Cite as

The Effects of Public Ownership and Regulatory Independence on Regulatory Outcomes

A Study of Interconnect Rates in EU Telecommunications*
  • Geoff Edwards
  • Leonard Waverman
Article

Abstract

We examine the effects of public ownership and regulatory agency independence on regulatory outcomes in EU telecommunications. Specifically, we study regulated interconnect rates paid by entrants to incumbents. We find that public ownership of the incumbent positively affects these interconnect rates, and suggest that governments influence regulatory outcomes in favor of incumbents in which they are substantially invested. However, we also find that the presence of institutional features enhancing regulatory independence from the government mitigates this effect. In order to study regulatory independence, we introduce a new cross-country time-series database—the European Union Regulatory Institutions (EURI) Database. This database describes the development of institutions bearing on regulatory independence and quality in telecommunications in the 15 founding EU member states from 1997 to 2003

Keywords

European Union European Union Regulatory Institutions (EURI) Database interconnect rates National Regulatory Authorities (NRAs) privatization public ownership regulatory independence regulatory outcomes telecommunications 

JEL Classification

H11 K23 L43 L96 O52 O57 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Alesina, A. 1988. “Macroeconomics and Politics.” In NBER Macroeconomic Annual 1998. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  2. Alesina, A. 1989“Politics and Business Cycles in Industrial Democracies”Economic Policy85598Google Scholar
  3. Bauer, J. 2003. “The Coexistence of Regulation, State Ownership and Competition in Infrastructure Industries.” Working Paper no. 03-03, Quello Center for Telecommunications Management and Law, Michigan State University.Google Scholar
  4. Berument, H. 1998“Central Bank Independence and Financing Government Spending”Journal of Macroeconomics20133152CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Besley, T., Case, A. 2003“Political Institutions and Policy Choices: Evidence From the United States”Journal of Economic Literature41773CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Besley, T., and S. Coate. 2002. “Elected Versus Appointed Regulators: Theory and Evidence.” Working Paper, Department of Economics, London School of Economics.Google Scholar
  7. Bortolotti, B., J. D’Souza, M. Fantini, and W. Megginson. 2001. “Sources of Performance Improvement in Privatised Firms: A Clinical Study of the Global Telecommunications Industry.” Working Paper, Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei.Google Scholar
  8. Cave, M. 1997a“New Developments in Telecommunications Regulation”Lamberton, D eds. The New Research Frontiers of Communications Policy.ElsevierAmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  9. Cave, M. 1997b“Cost Analysis and Cost Modelling for Regulatory Purposes: UK Experience”Melody, W eds. Telecom Reform: Principles, Policies and Regulatory Practices.Technical University of DenmarkLyngby265275Chapter 19Google Scholar
  10. Christensen, L., Cummings, D., Schoech, P. 1983“Econometric Estimation of Scale Economies in Telecommunications”Courville, L.Fontenay, A.Dobell, R eds. Economic Analysis of Telecommunications: Theory and Applications.Elsevier Science PublishersAmsterdam2754Google Scholar
  11. Costello, K. 1984“Electing Regulators”Yale Journal of Regulation283105Google Scholar
  12. Cukierman, A., Webb, S., Neyapti, B. 1992“The Measurement of Central Bank Independence and its Effect on Policy Outcomes”World Bank Economic Review6353398Google Scholar
  13. Daßler, T., Parker, D. 2004“Harmony or Disharmony in the Regulation and the Promotion of Competition in EU Telecommunications? A Survey of the Regulatory Offices”Utilities Policy12928Google Scholar
  14. Figueiredo, R., Edwards, G. 2004“Why Do Regulated Prices Vary So Much? Economic, Political and Institutional Determinants of Regulated Prices in the US Telecommunications Industry”Haas School of Business, University of CaliforniaBerkeleyWorking PaperGoogle Scholar
  15. Domah, P., M. Pollitt, and J. Stern. 2002. “Modeling the Costs of Electricity Regulation: Evidence of Human Resource Constraints in Developing Countries.” London Business School Regulation Initiative Working Paper No. 49 (October 2002).Google Scholar
  16. Durbin, J. 1954“Errors in Variables”Review of the International Statistical Institute222332Google Scholar
  17. Edwards, G. 2004. “The European Union Regulatory Institutions (EURI) Database—Codebook.” London Business School Regulation Initiative Working Paper, available at http://www.london.edu/ri/workingpapers.html.
  18. Estache, A. 1997. “Designing Regulatory Institutions for Infrastructure—Lessons from Argentina.” Public Policy for the Private Sector, Note No. 114, May 1997, The World Bank Group.Google Scholar
  19. European Commission1998aThird Report on the Implementation of the Telecommunications Regulatory Package (3rd Report)European CommissionBrusselsGoogle Scholar
  20. European Commission.1998bFourth Report on the Implementation of the Telecommunications Regulatory Package (4th Report)European CommissionBrusselsGoogle Scholar
  21. European Commission.1999Fifth Report on the Implementation of the Telecommunications Regulatory Package (5th Report)European CommissionBrusselsGoogle Scholar
  22. European Commission.2000Sixth Report on the Implementation of the Telecommunications Regulatory Package (6th Report)European CommissionBrusselsGoogle Scholar
  23. European Commission.2001Seventh Report on the Implementation of the Telecommunications Regulatory Package (7th Report)European CommissionBrusselsGoogle Scholar
  24. European Commission.2002Eighth Report on the Implementation of the Telecommunications Regulatory Package (8th Report)European CommissionBrusselsGoogle Scholar
  25. European Commission.2003Report on the Implementation of the EU Electronic Communications Regulatory Package (9th Report)European CommissionBrusselsGoogle Scholar
  26. Europe Economics. 2000. Study on the Preparation of an Adaptable Bottom-Up Costing Model for Interconnection and Access Pricing in European Union Countries, Europe Economics.Google Scholar
  27. Evans, W., Kessides, I. 1993“Localized Market Power in the U.S. Airline Industry”Review of Economics and Statistics756673Google Scholar
  28. Fesler, J. 1940“The Independence of State Utility Commissions, I”The Journal of Politics2367390Google Scholar
  29. Fink, C., A. Mattoo, and R. Rathindran 2002. “An Assessment of Telecommunications Reform in Developing Countries.” World Bank Policy Research Working Paper 2909, October 2002.Google Scholar
  30. Gönenç, R., M. Maher, and G. Nicoletti. 2001. “The Implementation and the Effects of Regulatory Reform: Past Experience and Current Issues.” OECD Economic Studies No. 32.Google Scholar
  31. Granger, C. 1969“Investigating Causal Relations by Econometric Models and Cross-Spectral Methods”Econometrica372436Google Scholar
  32. Green, R. 1999. “Checks and Balances in Utility Regulation—the U.K. Experience.” Public Policy for the Private Sector, Note No. 185, May 1999, The World Bank Group.Google Scholar
  33. Grilli, V., Masciandaro, D., Tabellini, G. 1991“Political and Monetary Institutions and Public Financial Policies in the Industrialized Countries”Economic Policy13341392Google Scholar
  34. Gual, J., and F. Trillas. 2003. “Telecommunications Policies: Determinants and Impacts.” Working Paper, IESE Business School, University of Navarra, July 2003.Google Scholar
  35. Guldmann, J. 1990“Economies of Scale and Density in Local Telephone Networks”Regional Science and Urban Economics20521535Google Scholar
  36. Gutierrez, L. 2003a“Regulatory Governance in the Latin American Telecommunications Sector”Utilities Policy11225240CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Gutierrez, L. 2003b“The Effect of Endogenous Regulation on Telecommunications Expansion and Efficiency in Latin America”Journal of Regulatory Economics23257286Google Scholar
  38. Gutierrez, L., Berg, S. 2000“Telecommunications Liberalization and Regulatory Governance: Lessons from Latin America”Telecommunications Policy24865884CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Haskins, C. 2000“The Challenge of State Regulation”Blundell, J.Robinson, C eds. Regulation Without the State: The Debate ContinuesInstitute of Economic AffairsLondon, UKGoogle Scholar
  40. Hausman, J. 1978“Specification Tests in Econometrics”Econometrica4612511271Google Scholar
  41. Henisz, W. 2000“The Institutional Environment for Economic Growth”Economics and Politics12131CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Henisz, W. 2002“The Institutional Environment for Infrastructure Investment”Industrial and Corporate Change11355389CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Henisz, W., Zelner, B. 2001“The Institutional Environment for Telecommunications Investment”Journal of Economics and Management Strategy10123147CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Holburn, G., and P. Spiller. 2002. “Interest Group Representation in Administrative Institutions: The Impact of Consumer Advocates and Elected Commissioners on Regulatory Policy in the United States.” University of California Energy Institute, Energy Policy and Economics Paper 002, available at www.ucei.org.Google Scholar
  45. International Telecommunications Union (ITU). 1998. World Telecom Development, accessed at http://www.itu.int/itudoc/itu-d/wtdc/wtdc98/docs/32.pdf on 3 September 2004.
  46. ITU2003World Telecommunications IndicatorsITUGeneva, SwitzerlandGoogle Scholar
  47. Intven, H., Oliver, J., Sepulveda, E. 2000Telecommunications Regulation HandbookWorld BankWashington, DCGoogle Scholar
  48. Jones Day. 2002. ECTA Regulatory Scorecard, Brussels: European Competitive Telecommunications Association (ECTA).Google Scholar
  49. Jones Day. 2004. ECTA Regulatory Scorecard, Brussels: European Competitive Telecommunications Association (ECTA).Google Scholar
  50. Kaufman, D., A. Kraay, and M. Mastruzzi. 2004. “Governance Matters III: Governance Indicators for 1996-2002.” Working Paper, World Bank, April 2004, available at http://www.worldbank.org/wbi/governance/pdf/govmatters3_wber.pdf.
  51. Kerf, M., M. Schiffler, and C. Torres. 2001. “Telecom Regulators—Converging Trends.” Public Policy for the Private Sector, Note No. 230, May 2001, The World Bank Group.Google Scholar
  52. Porta, R., Lopez de Silanes, F., Shleifer, A., Vishny, R. 1999“The Quality of Government”Journal of Law, Economics and Organization15222279Google Scholar
  53. Levy, B., Spiller, P. 1994“The Institutional Foundations of Regulatory Commitment: A Comparative Analysis of Telecommunications Regulation”Journal of Law, Economics and Organization10201246Google Scholar
  54. Levy, B.Spiller, P. eds. 1996Regulations, Institutions and Commitment: Comparative Studies of elecommunicationsCambridge University PressCambridge, UKGoogle Scholar
  55. Melody, W. 1997a“On the Meaning and Importance of ‘Independence’ in Telecom Reform”Telecommunications Policy21195199CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Melody, W. 1997b“Interconnection: Cornerstone of Competition”Melody, W eds. Telecom Reform: Principles, Policies and Regulatory Practices.Technical University of DenmarkLyngby4961Chapter 5Google Scholar
  57. Mustafa, M. 2002. “Benchmarking Regulators—Making Telecommunications More Effective in the Middle East.” Public Policy for the Private Sector, Note No. 247, June 2002, The World Bank Group.Google Scholar
  58. Newey, W., West, K. 1987“A Simple, Positive Semi-Definite, Heteroskedasticity and Autocorrelation Consistent Covariance Matrix”Econometrica55703708Google Scholar
  59. Noll, M. 2000“Telecommunications Privatization: Mixed Progress”Info22123CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. North, D. 1990Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic PerformanceHarvard University PressCambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  61. North, D., Thomas, R. 1973The Rise of the Western World: A New Economic HistoryHarvard University PressCambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  62. Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and development (OECD)1998International Regulation DatabaseOECDParisGoogle Scholar
  63. OECD1999OECD Communications Outlook 1999OECDParisGoogle Scholar
  64. OECD. 2000. Telecommunications Regulations: Institutional Structures and Responsibilities, DSTI/ICCP/TISP(99)15/FINAL, Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
  65. OECD.2001OECD Communications Outlook 2001OECDParisGoogle Scholar
  66. OECD.2003OECD Communications Outlook 2003OECDParisGoogle Scholar
  67. OECD.2004Economic OutlookOECDParisNo. 75 (June 2004)Google Scholar
  68. Ros, A. 2003“The Impact of the Regulatory Process and Price Cap Regulation in Latin American Telecommunications Markets”Review of Network Economics2270286Google Scholar
  69. Rossten G., and Wimmer B. 2000. “The ‘State’ of Universal Service.” SIEPR Policy Paper No. 99–18, (April 2000).Google Scholar
  70. Sidak, G., Singer, H. 2002“How Can Regulators Set Non-Arbitrary Interim Rates? The Case of Local Loop Unbundling in Ireland”Journal of Network Industries3273295CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Smith, P., and B. Wellenius. 1999. “Mitigating Regulatory Risk in Telecommunications.” Public Policy for the Private Sector, Note No. 189, July 1999, The World Bank Group.Google Scholar
  72. Smith, W. 1997a. “Utility Regulators—The Independence Debate.” Public Policy for the Private Sector, Note No. 127, October 1997, The World Bank Group.Google Scholar
  73. Smith, W. 1997b. “Utility Regulators—Roles and Responsibilities.” Public Policy for the Private Sector, Note No. 128, October 1997, The World Bank Group.Google Scholar
  74. Smith, W. 1997c. “Utility Regulators—Decisionmaking Structures, Resources and Start-up Strategy.” Public Policy for the Private Sector, Note No. 129, October 1997, The World Bank Group.Google Scholar
  75. Smith, W. 2000. “Regulating Utilities: Thinking About Location Questions.” Discussion Draft, World Bank Summer Workshop on Market Institutions, July 2000.Google Scholar
  76. Stern, J. 1997“What Makes an Independent Regulator Independent?”Business Strategy Review86774CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Stern, J., and J. Cubbin. 2003. “Regulatory Effectiveness: The Impact of Regulation and Regulatory Governance Arrangements on Electricity Industry Outcomes: A Review Paper.” London Business School Regulation Initiative Working Paper No. 56 (December 2003).Google Scholar
  78. Stern, J., Holder, S. 1999“Regulatory Governance: Criteria for Assessing the Performance of Regulatory Systems”Utilities Policy83350CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Teske, P. 1991“Interests and Institutions in State Regulation”American Journal of Political Science35139154Google Scholar
  80. Wallsten, S. 2001“An Econometric Analysis of Telecom Competition, Privatization, and Regulation in Africa and Latin America”The Journal of Industrial Economics49119Google Scholar
  81. Wallsten, S. 2002. “Does Sequencing Matter? Regulation and Privatization in Telecommunications Reform.” World Bank Working Paper.Google Scholar
  82. Waverman, L., Sirel, E. 1997“European Telecommunications Markets on the Verge of Full Liberalization”Journal of Economic Perspectives11113126Google Scholar
  83. White, H. 1980“A Heteroskedasticity-Consistent Covariance Matrix Estimator and a Direct Test for Heteroskedasticity”Econometrica48817838Google Scholar
  84. World Bank.2004World Development IndicatorsWorld BankWashington, DCGoogle Scholar
  85. Wu, D. 1973“Alternative Tests of Independence Between Stochastic Regressors and Disturbances”Econometrica41733750Google Scholar
  86. Ying, J., Shin, R. 1993“Costly Gains to Breaking Up: LECs and the Baby Bells”The Review of Economics and Statistics75357361Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, Inc. 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.CRA InternationalLondonUnited Kingdom
  2. 2.Department of EconomicsLondon Business SchoolRegent’s ParkLondonUnited Kingdom

Personalised recommendations