Why Do REITs Go Private? Differences in Target Characteristics, Acquirer Motivations, and Wealth Effects in Public and Private Acquisitions

Article

Abstract

This paper first identifies the characteristics of publicly-traded REITs associated with an increased probability of becoming the target of an announced merger or acquisition bid. Second, conditional on being a target, we determine which target characteristics influence the probability of the bidder being a private versus a public firm. Third, we document the magnitude of the wealth effects that accrue to the shareholders of target REITs in both privatizations and public-to-public transactions and how these effects vary with the characteristics of the target firms. Finally, we investigate the extent to which privatizations differ from “staying public” acquisitions in the type of financing employed and the motivation of the two investor types. We find that REITs more likely to become acquisition targets are smaller and less liquid with higher dividend yields than non-targets. The existence of an umbrella partnership (UPREIT) structure reduces the probability of becoming a target. Private acquirers are more likely to bid on underleveraged REITs with poor operating performance. Conversely, public buyers are more focused on acquiring highly levered REITs with greater institutional ownership and superior operating results. The determinants of abnormal returns also differ in privatizations and public-to-public deals.

Keywords

Mergers Privatization Corporate control Real estate investment trusts 

References

  1. Allen, P. R., & Sirmans, C. F. (1987). An analysis of gains to acquiring firm’s shareholders: the special case of REITs. Journal of Financial Economics, 18(1), 175–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ambrose, W. B., & Megginson, W. L. (1992). The role of asset structure, ownership structure, and takeover defenses in determining acquisition likelihood. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 27(4), 575–589.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Andrade, G., Mitchell, M., & Stafford, E. (2001). New evidence and perspectives on mergers. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 15(2), 103–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Agrawal, A., & Jaffe, J. (2003). Do takeover targets underperform? Evidence from operating and stock returns. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 38(3), 721–747.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bianco, C., Ghosh, C., & Sirmans, C. F. (2007). The impact of corporate governance on the performance of REITs. Journal of Portfolio Management, 33, 175–491.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Campbell, R. (2002). Shareholder wealth effects in equity REIT restructuring transactions: sell-offs, mergers and joint ventures. Journal of Real Estate Literature, 10(2), 205–222.Google Scholar
  7. Campbell, R., Ghosh, C., & Sirmans, C. F. (2010). The information content of method of payment in mergers: evidence from Real Estate Investment Trusts (REITs). Real Estate Economics, 29(3), 361–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Campbell, R. D., Ghosh, C., & Sirmans, C. F. (2005). Value creation and governance structure in REIT mergers. Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, 31(2), 225–239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Campbell, R.D., Ghosh, C., Petrova, M., & Sirmans, C.F. (2010). Corporate Governance and Performance in the Market for Corporate Control: The Case of REITs. Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, forthcoming.Google Scholar
  10. Clark, K., & Ofek, E. (1994). Mergers as a means of restructuring distressed firms: an empirical investigation. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 29(4), 541–565.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Del Guercio, D. (1996). The distorting effect of the prudent-man laws on institutional equity investments. Journal of Financial Economics, 40(1), 31–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Eichholtz, P. M. A., & Kok, N. (2008). How does the market for corporate control function for property companies. Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, 36(2), 141–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Einhorn, D. M., Emmerich, A. O., & Panovka, R. (2007). REITs: mergers and acquisitions. New York: Law Journal Press.Google Scholar
  14. Elayan, F. A., & Young, P. J. (1994). The value of control: evidence from full and partial acquisitions in the real estate industry. Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, 8(2), 167–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Gompers, P. A., & Metrick, A. (1998). How are large institutions different from other investors? Why do these differences matter? Harvard Institute of Economic Research Working Paper, 1830, Harvard Institute of Economic ResearchGoogle Scholar
  16. Halpern, P., Kieschnick, R., & Rotenberg, W. (1999). On the heterogeneity of leveraged going private transactions. Review of Financial Studies, 12(2), 281–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Huang, Y., & Walkling, R. A. (1987). Target abnormal returns associated with acquisition announcement: payment, acquisition form, and managerial resistance. Journal of Financial Economics, 19(2), 329–349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Haughney, C. (2005). RealEstateJournal.com, Wall Street Journal, October 31, 2005.Google Scholar
  19. Jensen, M. C. (1986). Agency costs of free cash flow, corporate finance, and takeovers. American Economic Review, 76(2), 323–329.Google Scholar
  20. Lehn, K., & Poulsen, A. (1989). Free cash flow and stockholder gains in going private transactions. Journal of Finance, 44(3), 771–787.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Li, J., Elayan, F. A., & Meyer, T. O. (2001). Acquisitions by Real Estate Investment Trusts as a strategy for minimisation of investor tax liability. Journal of Economics and Finance, 25(1), 115–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Masulis, R. W., Wang, C., & Xie, F. (2007). Corporate governance and acquirer returns. Journal of Finance, 62(4), 1851–1889.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. McIntosh, W., Officer, D. T., & Born, J. A. (1989). The wealth effects of merger activities: further evidence from Real Estate Investment Trusts. Journal of Real Estate Research, 4(4), 141–155.Google Scholar
  24. Mikkelson, W. H., & Partch, M. M. (1988). Withdrawn security offerings. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 23(2), 184–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Mitchell, M. L., & Mulherin, J. H. (1996). The impact of industry shocks on takeover and restructuring activity. Journal of Financial Economics, 41(2), 193–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Mitchell, M. L., & Stafford, E. (2000). Managerial decisions and long-term stock-price performance. Journal of Business, 73(3), 289–329.Google Scholar
  27. Morck, R., Schleifer, A., & Vishny, R. W. (1988). Characteristics of targets of hostile and friendly takeovers. In A. J. Auerbach (Ed.), Corporate takeovers: causes and consequences. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  28. North, D. (2001). The role of managerial incentives in corporate acquisitions: the 1990s evidence. Journal of Corporate Finance, 7(4), 125–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Opler, T., & Titman, S. (1993). The determinants of leveraged buyout activity: free cash flow vs financial distress costs. Journal of Finance, 48(5), 1985–1999.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Palepu, K. G. (1986). Predicting takeover targets: a methodological and empirical analysis. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 8(1), 3–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Sahin, O. F. (2005). The performance of acquisitions in the real estate investment trust industry. The Journal of Real Estate Research, 27(1), 321–342.Google Scholar
  32. Servaes, H. (1991). Tobin’s q and the gains from takeovers. Journal of Finance, 46(1), 409–419.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. W. (1986). Large shareholders and corporate control. The Journal of Political Economy, 94(3), 461–488.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. W. (1988). A survey of corporate governance. Journal of Finance, 52(2), 737–783.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Shumway, T. (2001). Forecasting bankruptcy more accurately: a simple hazard model. Journal of Business, 74(1), 101–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Song, M., & Walkling, R. (1993). The impact of managerial ownership on acquisition attempts. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 28(3), 439–457.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Trahan, E. (1993). Financial characteristics of acquiring firms and their relation to the wealth effects of acquisition announcements. Journal of Economics and Finance, 17(2), 21–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Wang, K., Erikson, J., & Chan, S. H. (1995). Does the REIT stock market resemble the general stock market? Journal of Real Estate Research, 10(4), 445–460.Google Scholar
  39. Wansley, J. W., Lane, W. R., & Yang, H. C. (1987). Gains to acquiring firms in cash and securities transactions. The Financial Review, 22(4), 403–414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Weir, C., & Lang, D. (2003). Ownership structure, board composition and the market for corporate control in the UK: an empirical analysis. Applied Economics, 35(16), 1747–1759.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Weir, C., & Wright, M. (2006). Governance and takeovers: are public-to-private transactions different from traditional acquisitions of listed corporations? Accounting and Business Research, 36(4), 289–307.Google Scholar
  42. Wruck, K. H. (1990). Financial distress, reorganization, and organizational efficiency. Journal of Financial Economics, 27(2), 419–444.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Finance, Insurance and Real Estate, Hough Graduate School of Business AdministrationUniversity of FloridaGainesvilleUSA
  2. 2.Department of Finance, Whitman School of ManagementSyracuse UniversitySyracuseUSA

Personalised recommendations