The Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics

, Volume 45, Issue 3, pp 678–704 | Cite as

Information Asymmetry and Corporate Liquidity Management: Evidence from Real Estate Investment Trusts

Article

Abstract

We examine the impact of information asymmetry on a firm’s choice between cash and credit lines for corporate liquidity management using a panel data set from real estate investment trusts (REITs). Information asymmetry, as measured by analyst forecast error and dispersion, is negatively related to the use of lines of credit. Specifically, firms with more severe information asymmetry are less likely to have access to bank credit lines. Concurrently, more transparent firms are more likely to utilize bank credit lines as opposed to cash for liquidity management. The results are robust to alternative information asymmetry proxies and specifications. These findings suggest that information asymmetry plays an important role in corporate liquidity management.

Keywords

Information asymmetry Liquidity management REITs 

JEL Classifications

G21 G32 

References

  1. Alford, A. W., & Berger, P. G. (1999). A simultaneous equations analysis of forecast accuracy, analyst following, and trading volume. Journal of Accounting Auditing and Finance, 14(3), 219–246.Google Scholar
  2. Almeida, H., Campello, M., & Weisbach, M. S. (2004). The cash flow sensitivity of cash. Journal of Finance, 59(4), 219–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. An, H., Cook, D., & Zumpano, L. (2010). Corporate transparency and firm growth: evidence from real estate investment trusts (REITs). Real Estate Economics, In press.Google Scholar
  4. Bates, T. W., Kahle, K. M., & Stulz, R. M. (2009). Why do U.S. firms hold so much more cash than they used to? Journal of Finance, 64(5), 1985–2021.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bhagat, S., Marr, M. W., & Thompson, G. R. (1985). The Rule 415 experiment: equity markets. Journal of Finance, 40(5), 1385–1401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Blackwell, D. W., Marr, M. W., & Spivey, M. F. (1990). Shelf registration and the reduced due diligence argument: implications of the underwriter certification and the implicit insurance hypotheses. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 27(2), 245–259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Boot, A., Thakor, A. V., & Udell, G. F. (1987). Competition, risk neutrality, and loan commitments. Journal of Banking and Finance, 11(3), 449–471.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Brennan, M. J., & Subrahmanyam, A. (1995). Investment analysis and price formation in securities markets. Journal of Financial Economics, 38(3), 361–381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Campello, M., Giambona, E., Graham, J. R., & Harvey, C. R. (2010). Liquidity management and corporate investment during a financial crisis. NBER paper 16309.Google Scholar
  10. Chang, X., Dasgupta, S., & Hilary, G. (2006). Analyst coverage and financial decisions. Journal of Finance, 61(6), 3009–3048.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Chatterjee, S., & Yan, A. (2008). Using innovative securities under asymmetric information: why do some firms pay with contingent value rights? Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 43(4), 1001–1036.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Chung, K. H., & Jo, H. (1996). The impact of security analyst’s monitoring and marketing functions on the market value of firms. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 31(4), 493–512.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Das, S., Levine, C., & Sivaramakrishnan, K. (1998). Earnings predictability and bias in analysts’ earnings forecasts. Accounting Review, 73(2), 277–294.Google Scholar
  14. Denis, D. J., & Mihov, V. (2003). The choice among bank debt, non-bank private debt, and public debt: evidence from new corporate borrowings. Journal of Financial Economics, 70(1), 3–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Denis, D. J., & Sibilkov, V. (2009). Financial constraints, investment, and the value of cash holdings. Review of Financial Studies, 23(1), 247–269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Devos, E., Ong, S. E., & Spieler, A. (2007). Analyst activity and firm value: evidence from the REIT sector. The Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, 35(3), 333–356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Dittmar, A., & Mahrt-Smith, J. (2007). Corporate governance and the value of cash holdings. Journal of Financial Economics, 83(3), 599–634.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Faulkender, M., & Wang, R. (2006). Corporate financial policy and the value of cash. Journal of Finance, 61(4), 1957–1990.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Faulkender, M., & Petersen, M. A. (2006). Does the source of capital affect capital structure? Review of Financial Studies, 19(1), 45–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Feng, Z., Ghosh, C., & Sirmans, C. F. (2007). On the capital structure of real estate investment trusts. Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, 34(1), 81–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Gao, P., & Yun, H. (2009). Commercial paper, lines of credit, and the real effects of the financial crisis of 2008: firm-Level evidence from the manufacturing industry? Working Paper, University of Notre Dame.Google Scholar
  22. Hardin, W. G. III., & Hill, M. D. (2010). Credit line availability and utilization in REITs. Journal of Real Estate Research, In press.Google Scholar
  23. Hardin, W. G., III, & Wu, Z. (2010). Banking relationships and REIT capital structure. Real Estate Economics, 38(2), 257–284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hardin, W. G., III, Highfield, M. J., Hill, M. D., & Kelly, G. W. (2009). The determinants of REIT cash holdings. Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, 39(1), 39–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hardin, W. G. III., Hill, M. D. & Kelly, G. W. (2010). Market value of REIT liquidity. Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, In press.Google Scholar
  26. Harford, J., Mansi, S. A., & Maxwell, W. F. (2008). Corporate governance and firm cash holdings in the U.S. Journal of Financial Economics, 87(3), 535–555.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Holmstrom, B., & Tirole, J. (1998). Private and public supply of liquidity. Journal of Political Economy, 106, 1–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Hong, H., Lim, T., & Stein, J. C. (2000). Bad news travels slowly: size, analyst coverage, and the profitability of momentum strategies. Journal of Finance, 55(1), 265–295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Jones, J. J. (1991). Earnings management during import relief investigations. Journal of Accounting Research, 29(2), 193–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Kallberg, J. G., Liu, C. H., & Srinvasan, A. (2003). Dividend pricing models and REITs. Real Estate Economics, 31(3), 425–450.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Kim, C., Mauer, D. C., & Sherman, A. E. (1998). The determinants of corporate liquidity: theory and evidence. Journal of Financial Quantitative Analysis, 33(3), 305–334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Krishnaswami, S., & Subramaniam, V. (1999). Information asymmetry, valuation, and the corporate spin-off decision. Journal of Financial Economics, 53(1), 73–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Krishnaswami, S., Spindt, P. A., & Subramaniam, V. (1999). Information asymmetry, monitoring, and the placement structure of corporate debt. Journal of Financial Economics, 51(3), 407–434.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Lang, M., & Lundholm, R. (1993). Cross-sectional determinants of analyst ratings of corporate disclosures. Journal of Accounting Research, 31(2), 246–271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Martin, J. S., & Santomero, A. M. (1997). Investment opportunities and corporate demand for lines of credit. Journal of Banking and Finance, 21(10), 1331–1350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Michaely, R., & Womack, K. L. (1999). Conflict of interest and the credibility of underwriter analyst recommendations. Review of Financial Studies, 12(4), 653–686.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Myers, S., & Majluf, N. (1984). Corporate financing and investment decisions when firms have information that investors do not have. Journal of Financial Economics, 13(2), 187–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. O’Brien, P. C. (1988). Analysts’ forecasts as earnings expectation. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 10(1), 53–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Opler, T., Pinkowitz, L., Stulz, R. M., & Williamson, R. (1999). The determinants and implications of corporate cash holdings. Journal of Financial Economics, 52(3), 3–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Ozkan, A., & Ozkan, N. (2004). Corporate cash holdings: an empirical investigation of UK companies. Journal of Banking and Finance, 28(9), 2103–2134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Pinkowitz, L., & Williamson, R. (2001). Bank power and cash holdings: evidence from Japan. Review of Financial Studies, 14(4), 1059–1082.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Riddiough, T. J., & Wu, Z. (2009). Financial constraints, liquidity management, and investment. Real Estate Economics, 37(3), 447–481.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Stiglitz, J. E., & Weiss, A. M. (1981). Credit rationing in markets with imperfect markets. American Economic Review, 71(3), 393–410.Google Scholar
  44. Sufi, A. (2007). Information asymmetry and financing arrangements: evidence from syndicated loans. Journal of Finance, 62(2), 629–668.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Sufi, A. (2009a). Bank lines of credit in corporate finance: an empirical analysis. Review of Financial Studies, 22(3), 1057–1088.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Sufi, A. (2009b). The real effects of debt certification: evidence from the introduction of bank loan ratings. Review of Financial Studies, 22(4), 1659–1691.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Thomas, S. (2002). Firm diversification and asymmetric information: evidence from analysts’ forecasts and earnings announcements. Journal of Financial Economics, 64(3), 373–396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Yu, F. (2008). Analyst coverage and earnings management. Journal of Financial Economics, 88(2), 245–271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Yun, H. (2009). The choice of corporate liquidity and corporate governance. Review of Financial Studies, 22(4), 1447–1475.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Beacom School of Businessthe University of South DakotaVermillionUSA
  2. 2.College of Business AdministrationFlorida International UniversityMiamiUSA

Personalised recommendations