The Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics

, Volume 43, Issue 3, pp 385–400

Inconsistency in Welfare Inferences from Distance Variables in Hedonic Regressions

  • Justin M. Ross
  • Michael C. Farmer
  • Clifford A. Lipscomb
Article

Abstract

In hedonic analysis, a common approach for eliciting information regarding the welfare significance of some landmark or (dis)amenity is to control for its distance from each observation. Unfortunately, the effects of distances to amenities on housing prices are generally not consistent indicators of the true price impact of that amenity. Instead these variables serve as proxies for the relative position of every observation in space. Whenever a household considers more than two landmarks in a housing purchase, distance variable parameter estimates are simply the best linear fitted weights for that multiple criteria location decision. Simulations illustrate extreme sensitivity in parameter estimates to the researcher’s choice of landmarks. One strategy models the location of each observation directly instead of its distances to amenities. Using the quadratic controls of longitude and latitude controls for location effects on price to assure unbiased estimates of non-distance variable regressors.

Keywords

Hedonic Distance Sensitivity analysis 

JEL codes

R0 Q5 C8 

References

  1. Brasington, D. M., & Hite, D. (2005). Demand for environmental quality: a spatial hedonic analysis. Journal of Urban Economics, 35, 57–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Cameron, T. A. (2006). Directional heterogeneity in distance profiles in hedonic property value models. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 51(1), 26–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Deaton, B. J., & Hoehn, J. P. (2004). Hedonic analysis of hazardous waste sites in the presence of other urban disamenities. Environmental Science and Policy, 7(6), 499–508.Google Scholar
  4. Fik, T. J., Ling, D. C., & Mulligan, G. F. (2003). Modeling spatial variation in housing prices: a variable interaction approach. Real Estate Economics, 31(4), 623–646.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Harrison, D., & Rubinfeld, D. (1978). Hedonic housing prices and demand for clean air. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 5, 81–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Ihlanfeldt, K. R., & Taylor, L. O. (2004). Externality effects of small-scale hazardous waste sites: evidence from urban commercial property markets. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 47(1), 117–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Kasriel, R. A. (1971). Undergraduate topology. Malabar: Krieger.Google Scholar
  8. Noonan, D. S., Krupka, D. J., & Baden, B. M. (2007). Neighborhood dynamics and price effects of superfund site clean-up. Journal of Regional Science, 47(4), 665–692.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Pace, R. K., & LeSage, J. P. (2008). A spatial Hausman test. Economic Letters, 101(3), 282–284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Palmquist, R. B. (1984). Estimating the demand for the characteristics of housing. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 66(3), 394–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Palmquist, R. B. (2004). Property value models. In K. G. Mäler & J. Vincent (Eds.), Handbook of environmental economics edition 1 (Vol. 2, pp. 763–819). North-Holland: Elsevier.Google Scholar
  12. Schmeidler, D. (1969). The nucleolus of a characteristic function game. SIAM Journal on Applied Mathematics, 17(6), 1163–1170.Google Scholar
  13. Wooldridge, J. M. (2002). Econometric analysis of cross section and panel data. Cambridge: The MIT.Google Scholar
  14. Zietz, J., Zietz, E. N., & Sirmans, G. S. (2008). Determinants of house prices: a quantile regression approach. Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, 37(4), 317–333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Justin M. Ross
    • 1
  • Michael C. Farmer
    • 2
  • Clifford A. Lipscomb
    • 3
  1. 1.School of Public & Environmental AffairsIndiana UniversityBloomingtonUSA
  2. 2.Department of Agricultural and Applied EconomicsTexas Tech UniversityLubbockUSA
  3. 3.Department of Marketing and Economics, Langdale College of Business AdministrationValdosta State UniversityValdostaUSA

Personalised recommendations