Mean-Reversion in REITs Discount to NAV & Risk Premium

  • Kanak Patel
  • Ricardo A. M. G. Pereira
  • Kirill V. Zavodov


REITs discount to NAV is a puzzling regularity. The sharp increase in volatility of REITs prices over the past few years has spurred a relatively new concern amongst academics, managers and investors about the consequences of, and causes of, property risk premium on discount to NAV. The two interrelated questions arising from the recent increase in volatility of REITs prices are: Is the increased volatility responsible for the observed widening in discount to NAV? What does the observed private and public risk premium tell us about discount to NAV? We attempt to address these questions by analysing risk premiums in private and public real estate markets. The analysis is conducted in the most recent years of high stock price volatility. Our analysis reveals two major results: a tendency for discount to NAV to revert to the long term mean value of 20% and, more significantly, a lower risk premium in equivalent yields in private market than in public market. These results suggest that investors in public market have a different conception of property risk and complexity of lease options than what is conveyed by private property valuation.


REITs Net asset value Property risk premium REIT volatility 



We would like to thank the anonymous referee for helpful comments and suggestions that have led to substantial improvements in the quality of this paper. The usual disclaimer applies.


  1. Barkham, R., & Ward, C. W. (1999). Investor sentiment and noise traders: discount to net asset value in listed property companies in the UK. Journal of Real Estate Research, 18(2), 291–312.Google Scholar
  2. Chaudhuri, K., & Wu, Y. (2003). Random walk versus breaking trend in stock prices: evidence from emerging markets. Journal of Banking and Finance, 27, 575–592. doi: 10.1016/S0378-4266(01)00252-7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Chordia, T., Swaminathan, B. (1996). Market segmentation, imperfect information, and closed-end fund discounts. Working Paper, Owen Graduate School of Management, Vanderbilt University.Google Scholar
  4. Clayton, J., MacKinnon, G. (2002). Explaining the discount to NAV in REIT pricing: Noise or information? RERI Working Paper, January 2001.Google Scholar
  5. Crosby, N., Lavers, A., & Murdoch, J. (1998). Property valuation variation and the “margin of error”. Journal of Property Research, 15(4), 305–330. doi: 10.1080/095999198368310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Crosby, N., Lavers, A., Murdoch, J. (1999). Performance of expert witnesses in valuation disputes. The Cutting Edge 1999 Property Research Conference of the RICS, University of Cambridge.Google Scholar
  7. Derrig, R. A., & Orr, E. (2004). Equity risk premium: expectations great and small. North American Actuarial Journal, 8(1), 45–69.Google Scholar
  8. Dimson, E., Minio-Paluello, C. (2002). The closed-end funds discount. The Research Foundation of the Association for Investment Management and Research.Google Scholar
  9. Engle, R., & Granger, C. (1987). Cointegration and error correction: representation estimation and testing. Econometrica, 55, 251–276. doi: 10.2307/1913236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. European Public Real Estate Association (2006). Best practices policy recommendations.
  11. Exley, J., Mehta, S., Smith, A. (2004). Mean reversion. Working Paper, Faculty & Institute of Actuaries Finance and Investment Conference.Google Scholar
  12. Gentry, W. M., Jones, C. M., Mayer, C. J. (2004). REIT reversion: Stock price adjustments to fundamental value. Working paper, Columbia University.Google Scholar
  13. Granger, C. W. J. (1969). Investigating causal relations by econometric models and cross-spectral methods. Econometrica, 37, 424–438. doi: 10.2307/1912791.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Investment Property Databank (2007). The IPD Index Guide. London.Google Scholar
  15. Jones Lang LaSalle (2008). Jones Lang LaSalle Report, Happy Birthday REITs, January 2008.Google Scholar
  16. Kawakatsu, H., & Morey, M. R. (1999). An empirical examination of financial liberalization and the efficiency of emerging market stock prices. Journal of Finance Research, XXII(4), 385–412.Google Scholar
  17. Key, T., Marcato, G. (2007). Index smoothing and the volatility of UK commercial property. Investment Property Forum.Google Scholar
  18. Lee, C., Shleifer, A., & Thaler, R. (1991). Investor sentiment and the closed-end fund puzzle. Journal of Finance, 46, 75–109. doi: 10.2307/2328690.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Morri, G., McAllister, P., Ward, C. (2005). Explaining deviations from NAV in UK property companies: Rationality and sentimentality. Working Paper, presented at the 12th European Real Estate Society Annual Meeting, Dublin, 2005.Google Scholar
  20. Royal Institution of Chartered Surveyors (2000). Appraisal and Valuation Manual (the ‘Red Book’). London.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kanak Patel
    • 1
  • Ricardo A. M. G. Pereira
    • 1
  • Kirill V. Zavodov
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Land EconomyUniversity of CambridgeCambridgeUK

Personalised recommendations