Green Design and the Market for Commercial Office Space

  • Jonathan A. WileyEmail author
  • Justin D. Benefield
  • Ken H. Johnson


This paper considers the relationship between energy-efficient design and the leasing/sales markets for commercial real estate. An economic model is provided that considers lease rates and occupancy in simultaneous equilibrium. The behavior of both is predicted to be influenced by efficient design attributes. Selling price is determined by both rents and occupancy; therefore the impact of efficient design on commercial sales activity should be distributed through the leasing market. The model is tested empirically using a national sample of sales and leasing data for class A office buildings. The evidence indicates that “green” buildings achieve superior rents and sustain significantly higher occupancy. The improved performance in the rental market is reflected in a significant premium for the selling price of Energy Star-labeled and LEED-certified properties.


Green design Office Leasing Pricing 


  1. Bollinger, C. R., Ihlanfeldt, K. R., & Bowes, D. R. (1998). Spatial variation in office rents within the Atlanta region. Urban Studies, 35, 1097–1118. doi: 10.1080/0042098984501.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Brennan, T. P., Cannaday, R. E., & Colwell, P. F. (1984). Office rent in the Chicago CBD. Real Estate Economics, 12, 243–260. doi: 10.1111/1540-6229.00321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Benjamin, J. D., Jud, G. D., & Winkler, D. T. (1998). A simultaneous model and empirical test of the demand and supply of retail space. Journal of Real Estate Research, 16, 1–13.Google Scholar
  4. Cassidy, R. (2003). White paper on sustainability: A report on the Green Building Movement. Supplement to Building Design and Construction.Google Scholar
  5. Chao, M., & Parker, G. (2000). Recognition of energy costs and energy performance in commercial property valuation. New York, NY: New York State Energy Research and Development Authority.Google Scholar
  6. Chao, M., Parker, G., Mahone, D., & Kammerud, R. (1999). Recognition of energy costs and energy performance in commercial property valuation. San Francisco, CA: Pacific Gas and Electric Company.Google Scholar
  7. Clapp, J. M. (1980). The intrametropolitan location of office activities. Journal of Regional Science, 20, 387–399. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9787.1980.tb00655.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Frew, J., & Jud, G. D. (1988). The vacancy rate and rent levels in the commercial office market. Journal of Real Estate Research, 3, 1–8.Google Scholar
  9. Glascock, J. L., Jahanian, S., & Sirmans, C. F. (1990). An analysis of office market rents: Some empirical evidence. Real Estate Economics, 18, 105–119. doi: 10.1111/1540-6229.00512.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Hekman, J. S. (1985). Rental price adjustment and investment in the office market. Real Estate Economics, 13, 32–47. doi: 10.1111/1540-6229.00339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hendershott, P. H. (1996). Rental adjustment and valuation in overbuilt markets: Evidence from the Sydney office market. Journal of Urban Economics, 39, 51–67. doi: 10.1006/juec.1996.0003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hendershott, P. H., MacGregor, B. D., & Tse, R. Y. C. (2002). Estimation of the rental adjustment process. Real Estate Economics, 30, 165–183. doi: 10.1111/1540-6229.00036.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Kats, G. (2003). The costs and financial benefits of green buildings. A Report to California’s Sustainable Building Task Force.Google Scholar
  14. McHugh, J., Heschong, L., Stone, N., Vogen, A., Mills, D., & Panetti, C. (2002). Non-energy benefits as a market transformation driver. In Proceedings of the ACEEE 2002 Summer Study on Energy Efficiency in Buildings. Washington, DC: American Council for an Energy Efficient Economy.Google Scholar
  15. Pollakowski, H. O., Wachter, S. M., & Lynford, L. (1992). Did office market size matter in the 1980s? A time-series cross-sectional analysis of metropolitan area office markets. Real Estate Economics, 20, 302–324. doi: 10.1111/1540-6229.00586.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Rosen, K. T. (1984). Toward a model of the office building sector. Real Estate Economics, 12, 261–269. doi: 10.1111/1540-6229.00322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Shilling, J. D., Sirmans, C. F., & Corgel, J. B. (1987). Price adjustment process for rental office space. Journal of Urban Economics, 22, 90–100. doi: 10.1016/0094-1190(87)90051-9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Slade, B. A. (2000). Office rent determinants during market decline and recovery. Journal of Real Estate Research, 20, 357–380.Google Scholar
  19. Watchman, L. H. (2007). LEED certification: Overview and trends for the future. Real Estate Review, 36, 19–29.Google Scholar
  20. Wheaton, W. C. (1990). Vacancy, search, and prices in a housing market matching model. Journal of Political Economy, 98, 1270–1292. doi: 10.1086/261734.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Wheaton, W. C. (1999). Real estate “cycles”: Some fundamentals. Real Estate Economics, 27, 209–230. doi: 10.1111/1540-6229.00772.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Wheaton, W. C., & Torto, R. G. (1994). Office rent indices and their behavior over time. Journal of Urban Economics, 35, 121–139. doi: 10.1006/juec.1994.1008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Williams, J. T. (1995). Pricing real assets with costly search. Review of Financial Studies, 8, 55–90. doi: 10.1093/rfs/8.1.55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jonathan A. Wiley
    • 1
    Email author
  • Justin D. Benefield
    • 1
  • Ken H. Johnson
    • 2
  1. 1.College of CharlestonCharlestonUSA
  2. 2.Florida International UniversityMiamiUSA

Personalised recommendations