Testing for Bubbles in Housing Markets: A Panel Data Approach

Article

Abstract

We employ recently developed cross-sectionally robust panel data tests for unit roots and cointegration to find whether house prices reflect house related earnings. We use U.S. data for Metropolitan Statistical Areas, with house price measured by the weighted-repeated-sales index and cash-flows by market tenants’ rents. In our full sample period, an error-correction model is not appropriate, i.e. there is a bubble. We then combine overlapping 10-year periods, price–rent ratios, and the panel data tests to construct a bubble indicator. The indicator is high for the late 1980s, early 1990s and since the late 1990s. Finally, evidence based on panel data Granger causality tests suggests that house price changes are helpful in predicting changes in rents and vice versa.

Keywords

Cointegration Panel data Unit root Bubble House prices Rents 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bailey, M. J., Muth, R. F., & Nourse, H. O. (1963). A regression method for real estate price index construction. Journal of American Statistical Association, 58, 933–942.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Baumohl, B. (2005). The secrets of economic indicators. Upper Saddle River: Wharton School Publishing.Google Scholar
  3. Breitung, J. (2000). The local power of some unit root tests for panel data. In B. Baltagi (Ed.), Advances in econometrics, vol. 15: Nonstationary panels, panel cointegration, and dynamic Panels (pp. 161–178). Amsterdam: JAI Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Calhoun, C. A. (1996). OFHEO house price indexes: HPI technical description. Washington, D.C.: Office of Federal Housing Enterprise Oversight.Google Scholar
  5. Campbell, Y. J., & R. J. Shiller (1987). Cointegration and tests of present value models. Journal of Political Economy, 95(5), 1062–1088.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Capozza, D. R., & Seguin, P. J. (1996). Expectations, efficiency, and euphoria in the housing market. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 26, 369–386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Case, K. E., & Shiller, R. J. (1989). The efficiency of the market for single-family homes. The American Economic Review, 79, 152–137.Google Scholar
  8. Choi, I. (2001). Unit root tests for panel data. Journal of International Money and Finance, 20, 249–272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Clark, T. E. (1995). Rents and prices of housing across areas of the United States: A cross-section examination of the present value model. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 25, 237–247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Gallin, J. (2006). The long-run relationship between house prices and income: evidence from local housing markets. Real Estate Economics, 34(3), 417–438.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hamilton, J. D. (1986). On testing for self-fulfilling speculative price bubbles. International Economic Review, 27(3), 545–552.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hamilton, J. D. (1994). Time series analysis. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Hardi, K. (2000). Testing for stationarity in heterogeneous panel data. Econometric Journal, 3, 148–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Im, K. S., Pesaran, M. H., & Shin, Y. (2003). Testing for unit roots in heterogeneous panels. Journal of Econometrics, 115, 53–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Levin, A., Lin, C. F., & Chu, C. (2002). Unit root tests in panel data: asymptotic and finite-sample properties. Journal of Econometrics, 101, 1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Lucas, R. E. (1978). Asset prices in an exchange economy. Econometrica, 46, 1429–1445.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Maddala, G. S., & Wu, S. (1999). A comparative study of unit root tests with panel data and a new simple test. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 61, 631–652.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Malpezzi, S. (1999). A simple error correction model of house prices. Journal of Housing Economics, 8, 27–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Pedroni, P. (1999). Critical values for cointegration tests in heterogeneous panels with multiple regressors. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 61, 653–670.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Pedroni, P. (2004). Panel cointegration: Asymptotic and finite sample properties of pooled time series tests with an application to the PPP hypothesis. Econometric Theory, 20, 597–625.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Pesaran, M. H. (2007). A simple panel unit root test in the presence of cross section dependence. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 22(2), 265–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Wang, P. (2000). Market efficiency and rationality in property investment. Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, 21(2), 185–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.CERGE-EIPrague 1Czech Republic

Personalised recommendations