Decisions about consonant doubling among non-native speakers of English: graphotactic and phonological influences
Graphotactic as well as phonological factors influence native English speakers’ decisions about consonant doubling in the spelling of nonwords, e.g., zimen versus zimmen. This study examined the extent to which such influences apply to non-native speakers of English, who presumably have less knowledge of English graphotactics and phonology and less opportunity to be explicitly instructed, and whether such influences vary as a function of first language (L1) background. Eighty-five university students in Beijing who study English as a second language (ESL) with contrasting L1 backgrounds (46 Chinese and 39 Korean, Mage = 20.51 years, SD = 1.95) completed a nonword spelling task and a standardized English spelling ability test. In the nonword spelling task, participants were asked to spell items in which the initial consonant or cluster was followed by a stressed vowel with medial consonant that would generally double in English. Half of the first syllables in the nonwords had short vowels and half of them had long vowels. Similar to native English speakers, ESL learners were more likely to use medial consonant doubling when the preceding vowel was short, spelled with one letter, and ended with spellings associated with higher rate of doubling in the English system. Phonological influence was stronger in more skilled spellers than in less skilled spellers, whereas the strength of graphotactic influence did not differ across the range of spelling ability. No significant difference of L1 background was found in the use of consonant doubling. Findings highlight the generality of statistical learning underlying spelling across different first language backgrounds and varying English spelling abilities.
KeywordsGraphotactics Phonology Second language learning Spelling Statistical learning
This research was supported by grants from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 81371497) and the Tsinghua University Initiative Scientific Research Program (Grant No. 2016THZWYY07).
- Applegate, A. J., & Applegate, M. D. (2004). The Peter effect: Reading habits and attitudes of teacher candidates. The Reading Teacher,57, 554–563.Google Scholar
- Carney, E. (1994). Survey of English spelling. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Carreker, S. (2005). Teaching spelling. In J. R. Birsh (Ed.), Multisensory teaching of basic language skills (2nd ed., pp. 257–295). Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes Publishing Company.Google Scholar
- Cummins, J. (1981). The role of primary language development in promoting educational success for language minority students. In California State Department of Education (Ed.), Schooling and language minority students: A theoretical framework (pp. 3–49). Los Angeles: Evaluation, Dissemination, and Assessment Center, California State University.Google Scholar
- Fitt, S. (2008). Unisyn lexicon [Computer software]. Available at http://www.cstr.ed.ac.uk/projects/unisyn/
- Haynes, M., & Carr, T. H. (1990). Writing system background and second language reading: A component skills analysis of English reading by native speaker-readers of Chinese. In T. H. Carr & B. A. Levy (Eds.), Reading and Its Development: Component Skills Approaches (pp. 375–421). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar
- IBM Knowledge Center. (2016). SPSS Statistics V24.0 documentation. Retrieved October 10, 2019, from https://www.ibm.com/support/knowledgecenter/en/SSLVMB_24.0.0/components/glmm/glmm_table.html
- Joshi, R. M., & Aaron, P. G. (Eds.). (2006). Handbook of orthography and literacy. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
- Joshi, R. M., Hoien, T., Feng, X., Chengappa, R., & Boulware-Gooden, R. (2006). Learning to spell by ear and by eye: A cross-linguistic comparison. In R. M. Joshi & P. G. Aaron (Eds.), Handbook of orthography and literacy (pp. 569–577). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
- Lee, Y.-A. (2014). Teachers’ knowledge and perceptions about phonemic awareness and phonics. Primary English Education,20(4), 321–347.Google Scholar
- McBride-Chang, C., Cho, J.-R., Liu, H., Wagner, R. K., Shu, H., Zhou, A., et al. (2005). Changing models across cultures: Associations of phonological awareness and morphological structure awareness with vocabulary and word recognition in second graders from Beijing, Hong Kong, Korea, and the United States. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology,92, 140–160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2005.03.009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Treiman, R., & Kessler, B. (2016). Choosing between alternative spellings of sounds: The role of context. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition,42, 1154–1159.Google Scholar