Decisions about consonant doubling among non-native speakers of English: graphotactic and phonological influences

  • Li YinEmail author
  • R. Malatesha Joshi
  • Daoxin Li
  • Seon-Kee Kim


Graphotactic as well as phonological factors influence native English speakers’ decisions about consonant doubling in the spelling of nonwords, e.g., zimen versus zimmen. This study examined the extent to which such influences apply to non-native speakers of English, who presumably have less knowledge of English graphotactics and phonology and less opportunity to be explicitly instructed, and whether such influences vary as a function of first language (L1) background. Eighty-five university students in Beijing who study English as a second language (ESL) with contrasting L1 backgrounds (46 Chinese and 39 Korean, Mage = 20.51 years, SD = 1.95) completed a nonword spelling task and a standardized English spelling ability test. In the nonword spelling task, participants were asked to spell items in which the initial consonant or cluster was followed by a stressed vowel with medial consonant that would generally double in English. Half of the first syllables in the nonwords had short vowels and half of them had long vowels. Similar to native English speakers, ESL learners were more likely to use medial consonant doubling when the preceding vowel was short, spelled with one letter, and ended with spellings associated with higher rate of doubling in the English system. Phonological influence was stronger in more skilled spellers than in less skilled spellers, whereas the strength of graphotactic influence did not differ across the range of spelling ability. No significant difference of L1 background was found in the use of consonant doubling. Findings highlight the generality of statistical learning underlying spelling across different first language backgrounds and varying English spelling abilities.


Graphotactics Phonology Second language learning Spelling Statistical learning 



This research was supported by grants from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 81371497) and the Tsinghua University Initiative Scientific Research Program (Grant No. 2016THZWYY07).


  1. Abu-Rabia, S. (1997). Reading in Arabic orthography: The effect of vowels and context on reading accuracy of poor and skilled native Arabic readers. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal,9, 65–78. Scholar
  2. Akamatsu, N. (1999). The effects of first language orthographic features on word recognition processing in English as a second language. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal,11, 381–403. Scholar
  3. Akamatsu, N. (2002). A similarity in word-recognition procedures among second language readers with different first language backgrounds. Applied Psycholinguistics,23, 117–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Applegate, A. J., & Applegate, M. D. (2004). The Peter effect: Reading habits and attitudes of teacher candidates. The Reading Teacher,57, 554–563.Google Scholar
  5. Arciuli, J., & Simpson, I. C. (2012). Statistical learning is related to reading ability in children and adults. Cognitive Science,36, 286–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Barry, C., & Seymour, P. H. K. (1988). Lexical priming and sound-to-spelling contingency effects in nonword spelling. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,40A, 5–40. Scholar
  7. Berg, K. (2016). Double consonants in English: Graphemic, morphological, prosodic and etymological determinants. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal,29, 453–474. Scholar
  8. Carney, E. (1994). Survey of English spelling. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  9. Carreker, S. (2005). Teaching spelling. In J. R. Birsh (Ed.), Multisensory teaching of basic language skills (2nd ed., pp. 257–295). Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes Publishing Company.Google Scholar
  10. Cassar, M., & Treiman, R. (1997). The beginnings of orthographic knowledge: Children’s knowledge of double letters in words. Journal of Educational Psychology,89, 631–644. Scholar
  11. Conway, C. M., Bauernschmidt, A., Huang, S. S., & Pisoni, D. B. (2010). Implicit statistical learning in language processing: Word predictability is the key. Cognition,114, 356–371. Scholar
  12. Cummins, J. (1981). The role of primary language development in promoting educational success for language minority students. In California State Department of Education (Ed.), Schooling and language minority students: A theoretical framework (pp. 3–49). Los Angeles: Evaluation, Dissemination, and Assessment Center, California State University.Google Scholar
  13. Deacon, S. H., Leblanc, D., & Sabourin, C. (2011). When cues collide: Children’s sensitivity to letter- and meaning-patterns in spelling words in English. Journal of Child Language,38, 809–827. Scholar
  14. Figueredo, L. (2006). Using the known to chart the unknown: A review of first-language influence on the development of English-as-a-second-language spelling skill. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal,19, 873–905. Scholar
  15. Fitt, S. (2008). Unisyn lexicon [Computer software]. Available at
  16. Flemming, E., & Johnson, S. (2007). Rosa’s roses: Reduced vowels in American English. Journal of the International Phonetic Association,37, 83–96. Scholar
  17. Goldfus, C. (2012). Knowledge foundations for beginning reading teachers in EFL. Annals of Dyslexia,62, 204–221. Scholar
  18. Graham, S., & Santangelo, T. (2014). Does spelling instruction make students better spellers, readers, and writers? A metaanalytic review. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal,27, 1703–1743. Scholar
  19. Hayes-Harb, R. (2006). Native speakers of Arabic and ESL texts: Evidence for the transfer of written word identification processes. TESOL Quarterly,40, 321–339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Haynes, M., & Carr, T. H. (1990). Writing system background and second language reading: A component skills analysis of English reading by native speaker-readers of Chinese. In T. H. Carr & B. A. Levy (Eds.), Reading and Its Development: Component Skills Approaches (pp. 375–421). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  21. Hersch, J., & Andrews, S. (2012). Lexical quality and reading skill: Bottom-up and top-down contributions to sentence processing. Scientific Studies of Reading,16, 240–262. Scholar
  22. Holmes, V. M., & Ng, E. (1983). Word-specific knowledge, word recognition strategies, and spelling ability. Journal of Memory and Language,32, 230–257. Scholar
  23. Houghton, G., & Zorzi, M. (2003). Normal and impaired spelling in a connectionist dual-route architecture. Cognitive Neuropsychology,20, 115–162. Scholar
  24. IBM Knowledge Center. (2016). SPSS Statistics V24.0 documentation. Retrieved October 10, 2019, from
  25. Joshi, R. M., & Aaron, P. G. (Eds.). (2006). Handbook of orthography and literacy. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  26. Joshi, R. M., Hoien, T., Feng, X., Chengappa, R., & Boulware-Gooden, R. (2006). Learning to spell by ear and by eye: A cross-linguistic comparison. In R. M. Joshi & P. G. Aaron (Eds.), Handbook of orthography and literacy (pp. 569–577). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  27. Kessler, B., Pollo, T. C., Treiman, R., & Cardoso-Martins, C. (2013). Frequency analyses of prephonological spellings as predictors of success in conventional spelling. Journal of Learning Disabilities,46, 252–259. Scholar
  28. Koda, K. (1999). Development of L2 intraword orthographic sensitivity and decoding skills. The Modern Language Journal,83, 51–64. Scholar
  29. Ktori, M., & Pitchford, N. J. (2008). Effect of orthographic transparency on letter position encoding: A comparison of Greek and English monoscriptal and biscriptal readers. Language and Cognitive Processes,23, 258–281. Scholar
  30. Lee, Y.-A. (2014). Teachers’ knowledge and perceptions about phonemic awareness and phonics. Primary English Education,20(4), 321–347.Google Scholar
  31. Martin, K. (2017). The impact of L1 writing system on ESL knowledge of vowel and consonant spellings. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal,30, 279–298. Scholar
  32. McBride-Chang, C., Cho, J.-R., Liu, H., Wagner, R. K., Shu, H., Zhou, A., et al. (2005). Changing models across cultures: Associations of phonological awareness and morphological structure awareness with vocabulary and word recognition in second graders from Beijing, Hong Kong, Korea, and the United States. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology,92, 140–160. Scholar
  33. Muljani, D., Koda, K., & Moates, D. R. (1998). The development of word recognition in a second language. Applied Psycholinguistics,19, 99–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Pacton, S., Sabaco, A., Fayol, M., & Treiman, R. (2013). How does graphotactic knowledge influence children’s learning of new spellings? Frontiers in Psychology,4, 701. Scholar
  35. Pittman, R. T., Joshi, R. M., & Carreker, S. (2014). Improving the spelling ability among speakers of African American English through explicit instruction. Literacy Research and Instruction,53, 107–133. Scholar
  36. Pollo, T. C., Kessler, B., & Treiman, R. (2009). Statistical patterns in children’s early writing. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology,104, 410–426. Scholar
  37. Saffran, J. R., Aslin, R. N., & Newport, E. L. (1996). Statistical learning by eight-month-old infants. Science,274, 1926–1928. Scholar
  38. Saigh, K., & Schmitt, N. (2012). Difficulties with vocabulary word form: The case of Arabic ESL learners. System,40, 24–36. Scholar
  39. Tong, X., & McBride, C. (2014). Chinese children’s statistical learning of orthographic regularities: Positional constraints and character structure. Scientific Studies of Reading,18, 291–308. Scholar
  40. Treiman, R. (2018). Statistical learning and spelling. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools,49, 644–652.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Treiman, R., & Boland, K. (2017). Graphotactics and spelling: Evidence from consonant doubling. Journal of Memory and Language,92, 254–264. Scholar
  42. Treiman, R., Cardoso-Martins, C., Pollo, T. C., & Kessler, B. (2019). Statistical learning and spelling: Evidence from Brazilian prephonological spellers. Cognition,182, 1–7. Scholar
  43. Treiman, R., & Kessler, B. (2016). Choosing between alternative spellings of sounds: The role of context. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition,42, 1154–1159.Google Scholar
  44. Treiman, R., Kessler, B., Boland, K., Clocksin, H., & Chen, Z. (2018). Statistical Learning and spelling: Older prephonological spellers produce more wordlike spellings than younger prephonological spellers. Child Development,89, e431–e443. Scholar
  45. Treiman, R., & Wolter, S. (2018). Phonological and graphotactic influences on spellers’ decisions about consonant doubling. Memory and Cognition,46, 614–624. Scholar
  46. Turk-Browne, N. B., Jungé, J., & Scholl, B. J. (2005). The automaticity of visual statistical learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,134, 552–564. Scholar
  47. Wang, M., & Geva, E. (2003). Spelling acquisition of novel English phonemes in Chinese children. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal,16, 325–348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Wang, M., & Koda, K. (2005). Commonalities and differences in word identification skills among learners of English as a second language. Language Learning,55, 71–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Wang, M., Koda, K., & Perfetti, C. A. (2003). Alphabetic and nonalphabetic L1 effects in English word identification: a comparison of Korean and Chinese English L2 learners. Cognition,87, 129–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Yeon, S., Bae, H. S., & Joshi, R. M. (2017). Cross-Language transfer of meta-linguistic skills: Evidence from spelling English words by Korean students in grades 4, 5, and 6. Dyslexia,23, 428–443. Scholar
  51. Yin, L., & McBride, C. (2015). Chinese kindergartners learn to read characters analytically. Psychological Science,26, 424–432. Scholar
  52. Yin, L., & McBride, C. (2017). Unspoken knowledge: Kindergarteners are sensitive to patterns in Chinese pinyin before formally learning it. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience.,33, 65–76. Scholar
  53. Zhang, L., & Treiman, R. (2015). Writing dinosaur large and mosquito small: Prephonological spellers' use of semantic information. Scientific Studies of Reading, 19, 434–445. Scholar
  54. Zhao, J., Joshi, R. M., Dixon, L. Q., & Huang, L. (2016a). Chinese EFL teachers’ knowledge of basic language constructs and their self-perceived teaching abilities. Annals of Dyslexia,66, 127–146. Scholar
  55. Zhao, J., Quiroz, B., Dixon, L. Q., & Joshi, M. (2016b). Comparing bilingual to monolingual learners on English spelling: A meta-analytic review. Dyslexia,22, 193–213. Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Tsinghua UniversityBeijingChina
  2. 2.Texas A&M UniversityCollege StationUSA

Personalised recommendations