Writing and reading performance in Year 1 Australian classrooms: associations with handwriting automaticity and writing instruction

  • Anabela Abreu MalpiqueEmail author
  • Deborah Pino-Pasternak
  • Magda Sofia Roberto


Theories of writing development and accumulating evidence indicate that handwriting automaticity is related to the development of effective writing skills, and that writing and reading skills are also associated with each other. However, less is known about the nature of these associations and the role of instructional factors in the early years. The present study examines: (1) the influence of handwriting automaticity in the writing and reading performance of Year 1 students, both concurrently and across time; (2) associations between students’ writing and reading performance and writing instruction. The current study involved 154 children enrolled in 24 classrooms from seven government-funded primary schools in Western Australia. Handwriting automaticity and word-reading were assessed at the end of kindergarten (Mage = 70 months, SD = 4.37 months) and a year later at the end of Year 1 (Mage = 82 months, SD = 3.64 months). Child-level measures of writing quality and production as well as teacher-reported measures of writing instruction were added in Year 1. Teachers reported on amount and type of writing instruction (i.e., teaching basic skills and teaching writing processes) and amount of writing practice in their classrooms. Data analyses included multilevel modelling. Handwriting automaticity predicted writing quality and production concurrently and across time after accounting for gender and initial word-reading skills. Handwriting automaticity predicted reading performance across time. Writing and reading performance were associated with amount of writing practice, while teaching planning and revising were positively associated with writing performance. Implications for writing development and writing instruction are discussed.


Early education Handwriting automaticity Reading development Writing development Writing instruction 



This research was funded by the Australian Research Council through the Discovery Early Career Award Funding Scheme (DECRA 150100731).


  1. Ahmed, Y., Wagner, R. K., & Lopez, D. (2014). Developmental relations between reading and writing at the word, sentence, and text levels: A latent change score analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology,106(2), 419. Scholar
  2. Alves, R. A., Limpo, T., Fidalgo, R., Carvalhais, L., Pereira, L. Á., & Castro, S. L. (2016). The impact of promoting transcription on early text production: Effects on bursts and pauses, levels of written language, and writing performance. Journal of Educational Psychology,5, 665–679. Scholar
  3. Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2015). Average weekly earnings, Australia, May 2015 (cat. no. 6302.0). Retrieved July 2018, from
  4. Australian Curriculum, Assessment and Reporting Authority (ACARA). (2012). Guide to understanding ICSEA. Sydney, Australia: ACARA. Retrieved February 2016, from
  5. Australian Curriculum and Assessment Reporting Authority (ACARA). (2018). National assessment program: literacy and numeracy. Retrieved December 2018, from
  6. Bates, D., Maechler, M., Bolker, B., & Walker, S. (2015). Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software,67(1), 1–48. Scholar
  7. Bazerman, C., Applebee, A. N., Berninger, V. W., Brandt, D., Graham, S., Matsuda, P., et al. (2017). Taking the long view on writing development. Research in the Teaching of English,51(3), 351–360.Google Scholar
  8. Berninger, V. W. (1999). Coordinating transcription and text generation in working memory during composing: Automatic and constructive processes. Learning Disabilities Quarterly,22, 99–112. Scholar
  9. Berninger, V. W., Abbott, R. D., Abbott, S. P., Graham, S., & Richards, T. (2002). Writing and reading: Connections between language by hand and language by eye. Journal of Learning Disabilities,35(1), 39–56. Scholar
  10. Berninger, V. W., Abbott, R. D., Augsburger, A., & Garcia, N. (2009). Comparison of pen and keyboard transcription modes in children with and without learning disabilities. Learning Disability Quarterly,32(3), 123–141. Scholar
  11. Berninger, V. W., Abbott, R. D., Jones, J., Wolf, B. J., Gould, L., Anderson-Youngstrom, M., et al. (2006). Early development of language by hand: Composing, reading, listening, and speaking connections; three letter-writing modes; and fast mapping in spelling. Developmental Neuropsychology,29(1), 61–92. Scholar
  12. Berninger, V. W., & Rutberg, J. (1992). Relationship of finger function to beginning writing: Application to diagnosis of writing disabilities. Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology,34, 198–215. Scholar
  13. Berninger, V. W., & Swanson, H. L. (1994). Children’s writing: Toward a process theory of the development of skilled writing. In E. Butterfield (Ed.), Children’s writing: Toward a process theory of development of skilled writing (pp. 57–81). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.Google Scholar
  14. Berninger, V. W., Vaughan, K., Abbott, R., Abbott, S., Brooks, A., Rogan, L. W., et al. (1997). Treatment of handwriting fluency problems in beginning writing: Transfer from handwriting to composition. Journal of Educational Psychology,89, 652–666. Scholar
  15. Berninger, V. W., & Winn, W. D. (2006). Implications of advancements in brain research and technology for writing development, writing instruction, and educational evolution. In C. MacArthur, S. Graham, & J. Fitzgerald (Eds.), Handbook of writing research (pp. 96–114). New York, NY: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  16. Bingham, G. E., Quinn, M. F., & Gerde, H. K. (2017). Examining early childhood teachers’ writing practices: Associations between pedagogical supports and children’s writing skills. Early Childhood Research Quarterly,39, 35–46. Scholar
  17. Christensen, C. A. (2005). The role of orthographic–motor integration in the production of creative and well-structured written text for students in secondary school. Educational Psychology,25, 441–453. Scholar
  18. Coker, D. L., Jr., Farley-Ripple, E., Jackson, A. F., Wen, H., MacArthur, C. A., & Jennings, A. S. (2016). Writing instruction in first grade: An observational study. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal,29, 793–832. Scholar
  19. Coker, D. L., Jr., Jennings, A. S., Farley-Ripple, E., & MacArthur, C. A. (2018). When the type of practice matters: The relationship between typical writing instruction, student practice, and writing achievement in first grade. Contemporary Educational Psychology,54, 235–246. Scholar
  20. Cordeiro, C., Castro, S. L., & Limpo, T. (2018). Examining potential sources of gender differences in writing: The role of handwriting fluency and self-efficacy beliefs. Written Communication,35(4), 448–473. Scholar
  21. Cutler, L., & Graham, S. (2008). Primary grade writing instruction: A national survey. Journal of Educational Psychology,100, 907–919. Scholar
  22. Dockrell, J. E., Marshall, C. R., & Wyse, D. (2016). Teachers’ reported practices for teaching writing in England. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal,29, 409–434. Scholar
  23. Feng, L., Lindner, A., Ji, X. R., & Joshi, R. M. (2017). The roles of handwriting and keyboarding in writing: A meta-analytic review. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal,32, 33–63. Scholar
  24. Fitzgerald, J., & Shanahan, T. (2000). Reading and writing relations and their development. Educational Psychologist,35, 39–50. Scholar
  25. Gilbert, J., & Graham, S. (2010). Teaching writing to elementary students in grades 4–6: A national survey. The Elementary School Journal,110, 494–518. Scholar
  26. Graham, S. (2018). A revised writer(s)-within-community model of writing. Educational Psychologist,53, 258–279. Scholar
  27. Graham, S. (2019). Changing how writing is taught. Review of Research in Education,43, 277–303. Scholar
  28. Graham, S., Berninger, V. W., Abbott, R. D., Abbott, S. P., & Whitaker, D. (1997). Role of mechanics in composing of elementary school students: A new methodological approach. Journal of Educational Psychology,89, 170–182. Scholar
  29. Graham, S., Bollinger, A., Olson, C. B., D’Aoust, C., MacArthur, C., McCutchen, D., & Olinghouse, N. (2012). Teaching elementary school students to be effective writers: A practice guide. NCEE 2012-4058. What Works Clearinghouse. Retrieved November 2017, from
  30. Graham, S., & Hebert, M. (2011). Writing to read: A meta-analysis of the impact of writing and writing instruction on reading. Harvard Educational Review,81(4), 710–744. Scholar
  31. Graham, S., Hebert, M., Paige Sandbank, M., & Harris, K. R. (2016). Assessing the writing achievement of young struggling writers: Application of generalizability theory. Learning Disability Quarterly,39(2), 72–82. Scholar
  32. Graham, S., Liu, K., Bartlett, B., Ng, C., Harris, K. R., Aitken, A., et al. (2017). Reading for writing: A meta-analysis of the impact of reading and reading instruction on writing. Review of Educational Research,88, 243–284. Scholar
  33. Graham, S., McKeown, D., Kiuhara, S., & Harris, K. R. (2012b). A meta-analysis of writing instruction for students in the elementary grades. Journal of Educational Psychology,104(4), 879. Scholar
  34. James, K. H., & Engelhardt, L. (2012). The effects of handwriting experience on functional brain development in pre-literate children. Trends in Neuroscience and Education,1(1), 32–42. Scholar
  35. Jones, D., & Christensen, C. (1999). Relationship between automaticity in handwriting and students’ ability to generate written text. Journal of Educational Psychology,91, 44–49. Scholar
  36. Juel, C., Griffith, P. L., & Gough, P. B. (1986). Acquisition of literacy: A longitudinal study of children in first and second grade. Journal of Educational Psychology,78, 243–255. Scholar
  37. Kent, S. C., & Wanzek, J. (2016). The relationship between component skills and writing quality and production across developmental levels: A meta-analysis of the last 25 years. Review of Educational Research,86(2), 570–601. Scholar
  38. Kent, S., Wanzek, J., Petscher, Y., Al Otaiba, S., & Kim, Y. S. (2014). Writing fluency and quality in kindergarten and first grade: The role of attention, reading, transcription, and oral language. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal,27, 1163–1188. Scholar
  39. Kim, Y. S., Al Otaiba, S., Puranik, C., Folsom, J. S., & Gruelich, L. (2014). The contributions of vocabulary and letter writing automaticity to word reading and spelling for kindergartners. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal,27, 237–253. Scholar
  40. Kim, Y. S., Al Otaiba, S., Puranik, C., Sidler, J. F., Greulich, L., & Wagner, R. K. (2011). Componential skills of beginning writing: An exploratory study. Learning and Individual Differences,21, 517–525. Scholar
  41. Kim, Y. S., Al Otaiba, S., Sidler, J. F., & Greulich, L. (2013). Language, literacy, attentional behaviors, and instructional quality predictors of written composition for first graders. Early Childhood Research Quarterly,28, 461–469. Scholar
  42. Kim, Y. S., Al Otaiba, S., & Wanzek, J. (2015). Kindergarten predictors of third grade writing. Learning and Individual Differences,37, 27–37. Scholar
  43. Kuznetsova, A., Brockhoff, P., & Christensen, R. (2017). lmerTest package: tests in linear mixed effects models. Journal of Statistical Software,82(13), 1–26. Scholar
  44. Łaszkiewicz, E. (2013). Sample size and structure for multilevel modelling: Monte Carlo investigation for the balanced design. Quantitative Methods in Economics,14(2), 19–28.Google Scholar
  45. Luke, S. G. (2017). Evaluating significance in linear mixed-effects models in R. Behavior Research Methods,49(4), 1494–1502. Scholar
  46. Malpique, A. A., Pino-Pasternak, D., & Valcan, D. (2017). Handwriting automaticity and writing instruction in Australian kindergarten: An exploratory study. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal,30, 1789–1812. Scholar
  47. McCutchen, D. (2000). Knowledge, processing and working memory: Implications for a theory of writing. Educational Psychologist,35, 13–23. Scholar
  48. McMaster, K. L., Du, X., & Pétursdóttir, A. L. (2009). Technical features of curriculum-based measures for beginning writers. Journal of Learning Disabilities,42, 41–60. Scholar
  49. McNeish, D., & Stapleton, L. (2016). Modeling clustered data with very few clusters. Multi-variate Behavioral Research,51(4), 495–518. Scholar
  50. Northwest Regional Educational Laboratory (NREL) (2011). 6 + 1 Trait® Writing. Retrieved February 2016, from
  51. Pelling, N., & Burton, L. (2017). The elements of applied psychological practice in Australia: preparing for the National Psychology Examination. London: Psychology Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Pugh, K. R., Mencl, W. E., Jenner, A. R., Katz, L., Frost, S. J., Lee, J. R., et al. (2001). Neurobiological studies of reading and reading disability. Journal of Communication Disorders,34(6), 479–492. Scholar
  53. Puranik, C., & Al Otaiba, S. (2012). Examining the contribution of handwriting and spelling to written expression in kindergarten children. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal,25, 1523–1546. Scholar
  54. Rietdijk, S., van Weijen, D., Janssen, T., van den Bergh, H., & Rijlaarsdam, G. (2018). Teaching writing in primary education: Classroom practice, time, teachers’ beliefs and skills. Journal of Educational Psychology,110(5), 640–663. Scholar
  55. School Curriculum and Standards Authority (SCSA). (2017a). Judging standards in Year 1. Retrieved December 2017, from
  56. School Curriculum and Standards Authority (SCSA). (2017b). Handwriting guidelines. Retrieved December 2017, from
  57. R Core Team (2017). R: a language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical. Retrieved February 2018, from
  58. Troia, G. A., Harbaugh, A. G., Shankland, R. K., Wolbers, K. A., & Lawrence, A. M. (2013). Relationships between writing motivation, writing activity, and writing performance: Effects of grade, sex, and ability. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal,26(1), 17–44. Scholar
  59. Wechsler, D. (2007). Wechsler individual achievement test—second edition, Australian standardised edition (WIAT-II Australian). San Antonio: The Psychological Corporation.Google Scholar
  60. White, K. M. (2013). Associations between teacher–child relationships and children’s writing in kindergarten and first grade. Early Childhood Research Quarterly,28(1), 166–176. Scholar
  61. Wollscheid, S., Sjaastad, J., & Tømte, C. (2016). The impact of digital devices vs. Pen (cil) and paper on primary school students’ writing skills—a research review. Computers & Education,95, 19–35. Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of EducationMurdoch UniversityMurdochAustralia
  2. 2.CICPSI, Faculdade de PsicologiaUniversidade de LisboaLisbonPortugal
  3. 3.University of CanberraCanberraAustralia

Personalised recommendations