Advertisement

Reading and Writing

, Volume 33, Issue 1, pp 67–96 | Cite as

Written verb use and diversity in children with Developmental Language Disorder: stepping stones to academic writing

  • Nichola J. Stuart
  • Vincent ConnellyEmail author
  • Julie E. Dockrell
Article

Abstract

Verb use and the production of verb argument structure in the written texts of children in elementary school is a key stepping stone towards academic writing success that has remained relatively unexplored and is a notable gap in our understanding of writing development. To evaluate the role of verbs in the written narrative texts of children, we compared verb use in 10 year old children that had specific weaknesses in oral language, those with Developmental Language Disorder (DLD), and samples of children of the same age (CA) and the same raw scores on an oral language task (language ability or LAb). Standardised measures of oral language, reading fluency, and spelling were completed. Participants then completed a standardised writing task and the texts were examined for verb argument structure, verb production and verb diversity. No between-group differences were found in the written narrative texts in relation to the production of verb argument structures. By contrast, the number of verbs produced, and the number of different verbs used differed significantly. The total number of verbs and number of different verbs produced by the children with DLD was commensurate with their LAb peers but not their CA matched peers. All children relied on a small group of high frequency verbs in their writing, although there was evidence of greater verb diversity in the older typically developing children. Verbs produced and their diversity in narrative writing was predicted by both an oral language formulated sentences task and reading fluency, thus demonstrating the close links between expressive oral language, reading, and writing production in all children.

Keywords

Verbs Writing Developmental Language Disorder 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This research was supported in part by a Grant from the Leverhulme Trust (F/00 382/I) and the UK Economic and Social Science Research Council (RES-189-25-0316) to Vincent Connelly and Julie E. Dockrell. Thanks to Sarah Critten and Kirsty Walter for their data collection efforts.

Supplementary material

11145_2019_9978_MOESM1_ESM.docx (34 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 33 kb)

References

  1. Abbott, R. D., Berninger, V. W., & Fayol, M. (2010). Longitudinal relationships of levels of language in writing and between writing and reading in grades 1 to 7. Journal of Educational Psychology,102, 281–298.Google Scholar
  2. Ahmed, Y., Wagner, R. K., & Lopez, D. (2014). Developmental relations between reading and writing at the word, sentence, and text levels: A latent change score analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology,106, 419–434.Google Scholar
  3. Altenberg, B., & Granger, S. (2001). The grammatical and lexical patterning of MAKE in native and non-native student writing. Applied Linguistics,22, 173–195.  https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/22.2.173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Altman, D. G. (1991). Practical statistics for medical research. London: Chapman and Hall.Google Scholar
  5. Babayigit, S. (2015). The dimensions of written expression: Language group and gender differences. Learning and Instruction,35, 33–41.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2014.08.006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Beard, R. (2000). Children’s writing in the primary school. Sevenoaks: Hodder & Stoughton.Google Scholar
  7. Beitchman, J. H., Jiang, H., Koyama, E., Johnson, C. J., Escobar, M., Atkinson, L., et al. (2008). Models and determinants of vocabulary growth from kindergarten to adulthood. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry,49, 626–634.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7610.2008.01878.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Berninger, V. W. (2000). Development of language by hand and its connections with language by ear, mouth, and eye. Topics in Language Disorders,20, 65–84.  https://doi.org/10.1097/00011363-200020040-00007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bishop, D. V. M. (2017). Why is it so hard to reach agreement on terminology? The case of Developmental Language Disorder (DLD). International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders,52, 671–680.  https://doi.org/10.1111/1460-6984.12335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bishop, D. V. M., Snowling, M. J., Thompson, P. A., Greenhalgh, T., & the CATALISE-2 consortium. (2017). Phase 2 of CATALISE: A multinational and multidisciplinary Delphi consensus study of problems with language development: Terminology. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry,58, 1068–1080.  https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpp.12721.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Castillo, C., & Tolchinsky, L. (2018). The contribution of vocabulary knowledge and semantic orthographic fluency to text quality through elementary school in Catalan. Reading and Writing,31, 293–323.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-017-9786-5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Cohen, J. (1960). A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educational and Psychological Measurement,20(1), 37–46.  https://doi.org/10.1177/001316446002000104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Common Core State Standards. (2010). National governors association and council of chief school officers. Retrieved November 2018, from http://www.corestandards.org/ELA-Literacy/W/.
  14. Connelly, V., & Dockrell, J. E. (2015). Writing development and instruction for students with learning disabilities: Using diagnostic categories to study writing difficulties. In C. MacArthur, S. Graham, & J. Fitzgerald (Eds.), Handbook of writing research (2nd ed., pp. 349–363). New York: Guildford Publications.Google Scholar
  15. Connelly, V., Dockrell, J. E., Walter, K., & Critten, S. (2012). Predicting the quality of composition and written language bursts from oral language, spelling, and handwriting skills in children with and without specific language impairment. Written Communication,29, 278–302.Google Scholar
  16. Conti-Ramsden, G., & Jones, M. (1997). Verb use in specific language impairment. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research,40, 1298–1313.  https://doi.org/10.1044/jslhr.4006.1298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Department of Education. (2014). National curriculum in England: English programmes of study. Updated 16 July 2014.Google Scholar
  18. Dockrell, J. E., & Connelly, V. (2015). The role of oral language in underpinning the text generation difficulties in children with specific language impairment. Journal of Research in Reading,38, 18–34.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9817.2012.01550.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Dockrell, J. E., & Connelly, V. (2016). The relationships between oral and written sentence generation in English speaking children: The role of language and literacy skills. In J. Perera, M. Aparici, E. Rosado, & N. Salas (Eds.), Written and spoken language development across the lifespan (pp. 161–177). London: Springer.Google Scholar
  20. Dockrell, J. E., Connelly, V., & Arfè, B. (2019). Struggling writers in elementary school: Capturing drivers of performance. Learning and Instruction,60, 75–84.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2018.11.009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Dockrell, J. E., Connelly, V., Walter, K., & Critten, S. (2015). Assessing children’s writing products: The role of curriculum based measures. British Educational Research Journal,41(4), 575–595.  https://doi.org/10.1002/berj.3162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Dockrell, J. E., Lindsay, G., & Connelly, V. (2009). The impact of specific language impairment on adolescents’ written text. Exceptional Children,75, 427–446.Google Scholar
  23. Dockrell, J. E., Lindsay, G., Connelly, V., & Mackie, C. (2007). Constraints in the production of written text in children with specific language impairments. Exceptional Children,73, 147–164.Google Scholar
  24. Dockrell, J. E., Messer, D., & George, R. (2001). Patterns of naming objects and actions in children with word finding difficulties. Language and Cognitive Processes,16, 261–286.Google Scholar
  25. Dockrell, J. E., Ricketts, J., Charman, T., & Lindsay, G. (2014). Exploring writing in products in students with language impairments and autism spectrum disorders. Learning and Instruction,32, 81–90.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2014.01.008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Donaldson, M. L., & Cooper, L. S. (2013). Developmental relationships between speech and writing: Is verb phrase anaphora production a special case? British Journal of Educational Psychology,83, 521–534.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8279.2012.02078.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Dunn, L. M., Dunn, L. M., & NEFR. (2009). British picture vocabulary scale 3 (rev ed.). Windsor: NFER-Nelson.Google Scholar
  28. Durrant, P., & Brenchley, M. (2018). Development of vocabulary sophistication across genres in English children’s writing. Reading and Writing.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-018-9932-8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Elliott, C. D., Murray, D. J., & Pearson, L. S. (1997). British ability scales II: Matrices. Windsor, England: NFER-Nelson.Google Scholar
  30. Fang, Z. (2006). The language demands of science reading in middle school. International Journal of Science Education,28, 491–520.Google Scholar
  31. Fang, Z. (2012). Language correlates of disciplinary literacy. Topics in Language Disorders,32, 19–34.Google Scholar
  32. Fearn, L., & Farnan, N. (2007). When is a verb? Using functional grammar to teach writing. Journal of Basic Writing,26(1), 63–87.Google Scholar
  33. Gillam, R., & Johnston, J. (1992). Spoken and written language relationships in language/learning-impaired and normally achieving school-age children. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research,35, 1303–1315.Google Scholar
  34. Grela, B. (2003). The omission of subject arguments in children with specific language impairments. Clinical Linguistics and Phonetics,17, 153–169.Google Scholar
  35. Grela, B., & Leonard, L. (1997). The use of subject arguments by children with specific language impairment. Clinical Linguistics and Phonetics,11, 443–453.Google Scholar
  36. Harley, J. (Ed.). (2018). Why closing the word gap matters: Oxford language report. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  37. Hasselgren, A. (1994). Lexical teddy bears and advanced learners: A study into the ways Norwegian students cope with English vocabulary. International Journal of Applied Linguistics,4, 237–258.Google Scholar
  38. Joye, N., Broc, L., Olive, T., & Dockrell, J. (2019). Spelling performance in children with Developmental Language Disorder: A meta-analysis across European languages. Scientific Studies of Reading,23, 129–160.  https://doi.org/10.1080/10888438.2018.1491584.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Kelly, D. (1997). Patterns in verb use by preschoolers with normal language and specific language impairment. Applied Psycholinguistics,18, 199–218.Google Scholar
  40. Kim, Y. S., Al Otaiba, S., Wanzek, J., & Gatlin, B. (2015). Toward an understanding of dimensions, predictors, and the gender gap in written composition. Journal of Educational Psychology,107(1), 79–95.  https://doi.org/10.1037/a0037210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Kim, Y. S. G., & Schatschneider, C. (2016). Expanding the developmental models of writing: A direct and indirect effects model of developmental writing (DIEW). Journal of Educational Psychology,109, 35–50.  https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Levin, B. (1993). English verb classes and alternations: A preliminary investigation. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  43. Mackie, C., & Dockrell, J. E. (2004). The nature of written language deficits in children with SLI. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research,47, 1469–1483.Google Scholar
  44. Mackie, C. J., Dockrell, J. E., & Lindsay, G. (2013). An evaluation of the written texts of children with SLI: The contributions of oral language, reading and phonological short-term memory. Reading and Writing,26, 865–888.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-012-9396-1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Nippold, M. A., Ward-Longerman, J. M., & Fanning, J. L. (2005). Persuasive writing in children, adolescents, and adults: A study of syntactic, semantic, and pragmatic development. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools,36, 125–138.Google Scholar
  46. Olinghouse, N. G., & Leaird, J. T. (2009). The relationship between measures of vocabulary and narrative writing quality in second- and fourth-grade students. Reading and Writing,22, 545–565.Google Scholar
  47. Olinghouse, N. G., & Wilson, J. (2013). The relationship between vocabulary and writing quality in three genres. Reading and Writing,26, 45–65.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-012-9392-5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Owen, A. J., & Leonard, L. B. (2002). Lexical diversity in the spontaneous speech of children with specific language impairment: Application of D. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research,45, 927–937.  https://doi.org/10.1044/1092-4388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Perera, K. (1984). Children’s writing and reading: Analysing classroom language. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
  50. Pulverman, R., Hirsh-Pasek, K., Golinkoff, R. M., Pruden, S., & Salkind, S. J. (2006). Conceptual foundations for verb learning: Celebrating the event. In K. Hirsh-Pasek & R. M. Golinkoff (Eds.), Action meets word: How children learn verbs (pp. 134–159). New York, NY, US: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  51. Quigley, A. (2018). Closing the vocabulary gap. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  52. Rice, M., & Bode, J. (1993). GAPS in the verb lexicons of children with specific language impairment. First Language,13, 113–131.Google Scholar
  53. Roessingh, H., Elgie, S., & Kover, P. (2015). Using lexical profiling tools to investigate children’s written vocabulary in Grade 3: An exploratory study. Language Assessment Quarterly,12, 67–86.  https://doi.org/10.1080/15434303.2014.936603.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Rust, J. (1996). The manual of the Wechsler objective language dimensions (WOLD) (UK ed.). London: Psychological Corporation.Google Scholar
  55. Savage, R., Kozakewich, M., Genesee, F., Erdos, C., & Haigh, C. (2017). Predicting writing development in dual language instructional contexts: Exploring cross-linguistic relationships. Developmental Science,20(1), e12406.Google Scholar
  56. Scott, C. M., & Windsor, J. (2000). General language performance measures in spoken and written narrative and expository discourse of school-age children with language learning disabilities. Journal of Speech, Language and Hearing Research,43, 324–339.Google Scholar
  57. Semel, E., Wiig, E. H., & Secord, W. A. (2006). Clinical evaluation of language fundamentals, fourth edition: UK standardisation (CELF-4 UK). London: Psychological Corporation.Google Scholar
  58. Shanahan, T. (2016). Relationships between reading and writing development. In C. A. MacArthur, S. Graham, & J. Fitzgerald (Eds.), Handbook of writing research (2nd ed., pp. 349–363). New York: Guildford Publications.Google Scholar
  59. Silliman, E. R., Wilkinson, L. C., & Brea-Spahn, M. (2018). Writing the science register and multiple levels of language: Implications for English learners. In A. L. Bailey, C. A. Maher, & L. C. Wilkinson (Eds.), Language, literacy, and learning in the STEM Disciplines: How language counts for English learners (pp. 115–139). New York: Taylor and Francis.  https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315269610.Google Scholar
  60. Stanovich, K. E. (1986). Matthew effects in reading: Some consequences of individual differences in the acquisition of literacy. Reading Research Quarterly,21, 360–407.  https://doi.org/10.1598/RRQ.21.4.1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Sumner, E., Connelly, V., & Barnett, A. L. (2016). The influence of spelling ability on vocabulary choices when writing for children with dyslexia. Journal of Learning Disabilities,49, 293–304.Google Scholar
  62. Thordardottir, E., & Ellis Weismer, S. (2001). High frequency verbs and verb diversity in the spontaneous speech of school-age children with specific language impairment. International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders,36, 221–244.Google Scholar
  63. Thordardottir, E., & Ellis Weismer, S. (2002). Verb argument structure weakness in specific language impairment in relation to age and utterance length. Clinical Linguistics and Phonetics,16, 233–250.Google Scholar
  64. Tomblin, J. B., Zhang, X. Y., Buckwalter, P., & Catts, H. (2000). The association of reading disability, behavioral disorders, and language impairment among second-grade children. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry and Allied Disciplines,41, 473–482.Google Scholar
  65. Torgesen, J. K., Wagner, R. K., & Rashotte, C. A. (1999). Test of word reading efficiency (TOWRE). Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.Google Scholar
  66. Troia, G., Harbaugh, A., Shankland, R., Wolbers, K., & Lawrence, A. (2012). Relationships between writing motivation, writing activity, and writing performance: Effects of grade, sex, and ability. Reading and Writing,26, 17–44.Google Scholar
  67. Van Heuven, W. J. B., Mandera, P., Keuleers, E., & Brysbaert, M. (2014). Subtlex-UK: A new and improved word frequency database for British English. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,67, 1176–1190.Google Scholar
  68. Wells, G., & Chang, G. (1986). From speech to writing: Some evidence on the relationship between oracy and literacy. In A. Wilkinson (Ed.), From speech to writing: Some evidence on the relationship between oracy and literacy (pp. 109–131). Milton Keynes: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  69. Windsor, J., Scott, C. M., & Street, C. K. (2000). Verb and noun morphology in the spoken and written language of children with language learning disabilities. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research,43, 1322–1336.Google Scholar
  70. Yu, G. (2009). Lexical diversity in writing and speaking task performances. Applied Linguistics,31, 236–259.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Psychology, Health and Professional DevelopmentOxford Brookes UniversityOxfordUK
  2. 2.Psychology and Human Development, Institute of EducationUniversity College LondonLondonUK

Personalised recommendations