Advertisement

Reading and Writing

, Volume 33, Issue 1, pp 121–142 | Cite as

Spelling error analysis of written summaries in an academic register by students with specific learning disabilities: phonological, orthographic, and morphological influences

  • Ruth Huntley BahrEmail author
  • Stephanie Lebby
  • Louise C. Wilkinson
Article
  • 161 Downloads

Abstract

Students in grades 5–9 (N = 29) with specific learning disabilities (SLDs) (dysgraphia, dyslexia, or oral and written language learning disability, OWL LD) were asked to take notes and handwrite or type summaries of social studies texts about world geography and cultures that they read or heard. This activity required activating knowledge of academic language for the disciplinary content. Fine-grained analyses of their spelling errors focused on the phonological, orthographic and morphological aspects of word spelling affected while writing in an academic register. Nonparametric statistical analyses revealed no significant differences attributable to SLD diagnosis or combinations of the mode of the source text (reading or listening) and transcription (handwriting with stylus or typing with keyboard). Students generated similar degrees of error complexity in their spelling errors when writing in this disciplinary academic register regardless of the nature of their SLD, mode of presentation of source texts, or mode of transcription. Three types of common misspelling patterns across SLDs, mode of presentation, and mode of transcription are described in this exploratory study. Instructional applications for teaching students with SLDs to spell words in English, a morphophonemic orthography, when composing in an academic register are discussed as well as proposed future research directions.

Keywords

Spelling Specific learning disability Academic vocabulary Academic writing Typing Handwriting 

Notes

Acknowledgements

Special appreciation is extended to Virginia Berninger for providing the spelling data analyzed in this paper and to Christine Johnson, Laura Winkler, and Melissa Garrity who worked on the analysis of the spelling errors for this project.

References

  1. Abbott, R., & Berninger, V. (1993). Structural equation modeling of relationships among developmental skills and writing skills in primary and intermediate grade writers. Journal of Educational Psychology,85, 478–508.Google Scholar
  2. Abbott, R., Raskind, W., Matsushita, M., Richards, T., Price, N., & Berninger, V. (2017). Patterns of biomarkers for three phenotype profiles of persisting specific learning disabilities during middle childhood and early adolescence: A preliminary study. Biomarkers and Genes, 1 (1), 1–10. An open access journal.  https://doi.org/10.15761/bg.1000103 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6407889
  3. Adlof, S., & Perfetti, C. (2014). Individual differences in word learning and reading ability. In C. A. Stone, E. R. Silliman, B. J. Ehren, & G. P. Wallach (Eds.), Handbook of language and literacy: Development and disorders (pp. 246–264). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  4. Alstad, Z., Sanders, E., Abbott, R. D., Barnett, A. L., Henderson, S. E., Connelly, V., et al. (2015). Modes of alphabet letter production during middle childhood and adolescence: Interrelationships with each other and other writing skills. Journal of Writing Research,6, 199–231.Google Scholar
  5. Alves, R. A., Limpo, T., Fidalgo, R., Carvalhais, L., Pereira, L. Á., & Castro, S. L. (2016). The impact of promoting transcription on early text production: Effects on bursts and pauses, levels of written language, and writing performance. Journal of Educational Psychology,108, 665–679.Google Scholar
  6. Alves, R. A., Limpo, T., Salas, N., & Joshi, R. M. (2018). Best practices in handwriting and spelling. In S. Graham, C. A. MacArthur, & M. Hebert (Eds.), Best practices in writing instruction (3rd ed.). New York, NY: The Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  7. Apel, K. (2011). Atom and eave: Creating better spellers. Unpublished manuscript. Bahr, R. H., Silliman, E. R., & Berninger, V. W. (2009). What spelling errors have to tell about vocabulary learning. In C. Wood, & V. Connelly (Eds.), Reading and spelling: Contemporary perspectives (pp. 109–129). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  8. Bahr, R. H., Silliman, E. R., & Berninger, V. W. (2009). What spelling errors have to tell about vocabulary development. In C. Woods & V. Connelly (Eds.), Contemporary perspectives on reading and writing (pp. 109–129). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  9. Bahr, R. H., Silliman, E. R., Berninger, V. W., & Dow, M. (2012). Linguistic pattern analysis of misspellings of typically developing writers in grades 1–9. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research,55, 1587–1599.Google Scholar
  10. Bailey, A. L., & Heritage, M. (Eds.). (2008). Formative assessment for literacy, grades K-6: Building reading and academic language skills across the curriculum. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.Google Scholar
  11. Benson-Goldberg, S. (2014). Spelling of derivationally complex words: The role of phonological, orthographic, and morphological features. Unpublished, posted and electronically accessible, Master’s thesis, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL.Google Scholar
  12. Berninger, V. (2008). Defining and differentiating dyslexia, dysgraphia, and language learning disability within a working memory model. In E. Silliman & M. Mody (Eds.), Language impairment and reading disability-Interactions among brain, behavior, and experience (pp. 103–134). New York, NY: Guilford.Google Scholar
  13. Berninger, V. W., & May, M. O. (2011). Evidence-based diagnosis and treatment for specific learning disabilities involving impairments in written and/or oral language. Journal of Learning Disabilities,44, 167–183.Google Scholar
  14. Berninger, V. W., Richards, T. L., & Abbott, R. D. (2015). Differential diagnosis of dysgraphia, dyslexia, and OWL LD: Behavioral and neuroimaging evidence. Reading and Writing,28, 1119–1153.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-015-9565-0 (A2 contains supplementary material available to authorized users: Released to PMCID 4553247 for public access).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Bishop, D. V. M., & Clarkson, B. (2003). Written language as a window into residual language deficits: A study of children with persistent and residual speech and language impairments. Cortex,39, 215–237.Google Scholar
  16. Bourassa, D., & Treiman, R. (2003). Spelling in children with dyslexia: Analysis from the Treiman-Bousarra early spelling test. Scientific Studies of Reading,7, 309–333.Google Scholar
  17. Bruck, M., & Treiman, R. (1990). Phonological awareness and spelling in normal children and dyslexics: The case of initial consonant clusters. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology,50, 156–178.Google Scholar
  18. Carlisle, J. F., & Goodwin, A. P. (2014). Morphemes matter: How morphological knowledge contributes to reading and writing. In C. A. Stone, E. R. Silliman, B. J. Ehren, & G. P. Wallach (Eds.), Handbook of language and literacy (pp. 265–282). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  19. Cassar, M., Treiman, R., Moats, L., Pollo, T. C., & Kessler, B. (2005). How do the spellings of children with dyslexia compare to those of nondyslexic children. Reading and Writing,18, 27–49.Google Scholar
  20. Connelly, V., & Dockrell, J. (2015). Writing development and instruction for student with learning disabilities: Using diagnostic categories to study writing difficulties. In C. A. Macarthur, S. Graham, & J. Fitzgerald (Eds.), Handbook of writing research (2nd ed., pp. 349–359). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  21. Critten, S., Connelly, V., Dockrell, J. E., & Walter, K. (2014). Inflectional and derivational morphological spelling abilities of children with specific languageimpairment. Frontiers in Psychology,5, 948.Google Scholar
  22. Crosson, A., McKeown, M., & Ward, A. (2019). An innovative approach to of assessing depth of knowledge of academic words. Language Assessment Quarterly,16, 196–216.  https://doi.org/10.1080/15434303.2019.1612899.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Cumming, A., Lai, C., & Cho, H. (2016). Students’ writing from sources for academic purposes: A synthesis of recent research. Journal of English for Academic Purposes,23, 47–58.Google Scholar
  24. Daffern, T. N., Mackenzie, M., & Hemmings, B. (2015). The development of a spelling assessment tool informed by triple word form theory. Australian Journal of Language & Literacy,38, 72–82.Google Scholar
  25. Ehri, L. C. (1997). Learning to read and learning to spell are one and the same, almost. In C. A. Perfetti, L. Rieben, & M. Fayol (Eds.), Learning to spell: Research, theory, and practice across languages (pp. 237–269). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  26. Fang, Z., Schleppegrell, M. J., & Moore, J. (2014). The linguistic challenges of learning across academic disciplines. In C. A. Stone, E. R. Silliman, B. J. Ehren, & G. P. Wallach (Eds.), Handbook of language and literacy: Development and disorders (2nd ed., pp. 302–322). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  27. Fayol, M. (2015). From language to text: The development and learning of translation. In C. A. Macarthur, S. Graham, & J. Fitzgerald (Eds.), Handbook of writing research (2nd ed., pp. 130–143). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  28. Garcia, N., Abbott, R., & Berninger, V. (2010). Predicting poor, average, and superior spellers in grades 1–6 from phonological, orthographic, and morphological, spelling, or reading composites. Written Language & Literacy,13, 61–98.Google Scholar
  29. Godin, M. P., Gagné, A., & Chapleau, N. (2018). Spelling acquisition in French children with developmental language disorder: An analysis of spelling error patterns. Child Language Teaching and Therapy,34, 221–223.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0265659018785938.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Good, J. E., Lance, D. M., & Rainey, J. (2018). The use of direct spelling instruction for children with language impairment. Communication Disorders Quarterly,39, 438–444.Google Scholar
  31. Goswami, U. (1999). The relationship between phonological awareness and orthographic representations in different orthographies. In M. Harris & G. Hatano (Eds.), Learning to read and write: A cross-linguistic perspective (pp. 134–156). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  32. Graham, S., & Santangelo, T. (2014). Does spelling instruction make students better spellers, readers, and writers? A meta-analytic review. Reading and Writing,27, 1703–1743.Google Scholar
  33. Hayes, J. R., & Berninger, V. (2014). Cognitive process in writing: A framework. In B. Arfé, J. E. Dockrell, & V. W. Berninger (Eds.), Writing development in children with hearing loss, dyslexia or oral language problems: Implications for assessment and instruction (pp. 3–15). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  34. Henry, M. (2010). Unlocking literacy. Effective decoding and spelling instruction (2nd ed.). Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes Publishing.Google Scholar
  35. Kohnen, S., Colenbrander, D., Krajenbrink, T., & Nickels, L. (2015). Assessment of lexical and non-lexical spelling in students in grades 1–7. Australian Journal of Learning Difficulties,20, 15–38.Google Scholar
  36. Larkin, R. F., Williams, G. J., & Blaggan, S. (2013). Delay or deficit? Spelling process in children with specific language impairment. Journal of Communication Disorders,46, 401–412.Google Scholar
  37. Learning by Design, I. (2006). In J. J., Masterson, K. Apel, & J. Wasowicz (Eds.), Spelling performance evaluation for language and literacy-2 (SPELL-2) [computer software]. Evanston, ILGoogle Scholar
  38. Masterson, J. J., & Apel, K. (2010). Linking characteristics discovered in spelling assessment to intervention goals and methods. Learning Disability Quarterly,33, 185–198.Google Scholar
  39. Moats, L. C. (1983). A comparison of the spelling errors of older dyslexic and second-grade normal children. Annals of Dyslexia,33, 121–140.Google Scholar
  40. Nagy, W., & Townsend, D. (2012). Words as tools: Learning academic vocabulary as language acquisition. Reading Research Quarterly,47, 91–108.Google Scholar
  41. Niedo, J., Tanimoto, S., Thompson, R. H., Abbott, R. D., & Berninger, V. W. (2016). Computerized instruction in translation strategies for students in upper elementary and middle school grades with persisting learning disabilities in written language. Learning Disabilities,21(2), 14–30.Google Scholar
  42. Oetting, J. B., Hadley, P. A., & Schwartz, R. (2009). Morphosyntax in child language disorders. In R. G. Schwartz (Ed.), Handbook of child language disorders (pp. 341–364). New York: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
  43. Ravid, D., Dromi, E., & Kotler, P. (2010). Linguistic complexity in school-age text production: Expository versus mathematical discourse. In M. A. Nippold & C. M. Scott (Eds.), Expository discourse in children, adolescents, and adults: Development and disorders (pp. 123–150). Oxfordshire: Taylor and Francis.Google Scholar
  44. Richards, T. L., Aylward, E. H., Berninger, V. W., Field, K. M., Grimme, A. C., Richards, A. L., et al. (2006). Individual fMRI activation in orthographic mapping and morpheme mapping after orthographic or morphological spelling treatment in child dyslexics. Journal of Neurolinguistics,19, 56–86.Google Scholar
  45. Santangelo, T., & Graham, S. (2016). A comprehensive meta-analysis of handwriting instruction. Educational Psychological Review,28, 225–265.Google Scholar
  46. Silliman, E. R., Bahr, R. H., Nagy, W., & Berninger, V. W. (2018). Language bases of spelling in writing during early and middle childhood: Grounding applications to struggling writers in typical writing development. In B. Miller, P. McCardle, & V. Connelly (Eds.), Development of writing skills in individuals with learning difficulties (pp. 99–119). Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
  47. Silliman, E. R., Bahr, R. H., & Peters, M. L. (2006). Spelling patterns in preadolescents with atypical language skills: Phonological, morphological, and orthographic factors. Developmental Neuropsychology,29, 93–123.Google Scholar
  48. Silliman, E. R., & Berninger, V. W. (2011). Cross-disciplinary dialogue about the nature of oral and written language problems in the context of developmental, academic, and phenotypic profiles. Topics in Language Disorders,31, 6–23.Google Scholar
  49. Silliman, E. R., & Wilkinson, L. C. (2014). Policy and practice issues for students at risk in language and literacy learning: Back to the future. In C. A. Stone, E. R. Silliman, B. J. Ehren, & G. P. Wallach (Eds.), Handbook of language and literacy: Development and disorders (2nd ed., pp. 105–126). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  50. Silliman, E., & Wilkinson, L. (2015). Two challenges of the academic language register for students with language learning disabilities. In R. H. Bahr & E. R. Silliman (Eds.), Routledge handbook of communication disorders (pp. 291–302). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  51. Snowling, M. J. (2000). Dyslexia (2nd ed.). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  52. Tangel, D. M., & Blachman, B. A. (1992). Effect of phoneme awareness instruction on kindergarten children’s invented spelling. Journal of Reading Behavior,24, 233–261.Google Scholar
  53. Treiman, R. (2017). Learning to spell: Phonology and beyond. Cognitive Neuropsychology,34, 83–93.Google Scholar
  54. Treiman, R. (2018). Teaching and learning spelling. Child Development Perspectives,12, 235–239.Google Scholar
  55. Treiman, R., & Bourassa, D. (2000). Children’s written and oral spelling. Applied Psycholinguistics,21, 183–204.Google Scholar
  56. Treiman, R., & Kessler, B. (2014). How children learn to write words. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  57. Venezky, R. L. (1999). The American way of spelling: The structure and origins of American English orthography. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  58. Williams, K. J., Austin, C. R., & Vaughn, S. (2018). A synthesis of spelling interventions for secondary students with disabilities. The Journal of Special Education,52, 3–15.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ruth Huntley Bahr
    • 1
    Email author
  • Stephanie Lebby
    • 1
  • Louise C. Wilkinson
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Communication Sciences and DisordersUniversity of South FloridaTampaUSA
  2. 2.School of EducationSyracuse UniversitySyracuseUSA

Personalised recommendations