Literacy development beyond early schooling: a 4-year follow-up study of Croatian
The purpose of this study was to investigate literacy development beyond the early school years. We investigated mean-level and rank-order changes in two reading (word decoding speed and reading comprehension) and two spelling (word and pseudoword spelling accuracy) tasks during a 4-year period from beginning to the later grades of elementary school, and examined whether rank-order changes in literacy skills could be predicted from verbal working memory, phonological awareness, and morpho-syntactic awareness. The sample consisted of Croatian speaking children, poor (n = 50) and good (n = 61) readers. Croatian is a language with a highly transparent orthography but a rather complex grammar. Word decoding speed and word spelling accuracy improved significantly over the study period, word decoding speed more so among good than among poor readers, supporting the Matthew effect hypothesis. Literacy skills were moderately stable, with the highest stability coefficients obtained for word decoding speed, and the lowest for pseudoword spelling. The predictors of rank-order changes varied across literacy outcomes, but did not differ for poor and good readers. Morpho-syntactic awareness predicted rank-order development of all outcomes except for word spelling. Phonological awareness predicted rank-order development of reading comprehension and word spelling. Verbal working memory predicted rank-order development of word spelling only, and at a low level. The finding that the more language related cognitive variables, i.e., morpho-syntactic and phonological skills, were stronger predictors of literacy development than working memory, for both poor and good readers, suggests remedial focus on these more predictive variables.
KeywordsReading Spelling Transparent orthography Predictors Later stages of literacy development
The authors would like to thank all the children who participated in the study, as well as their parents. We are also grateful to Edita Ilijašević, Kristina Kos, Nataša Lalić, Irena Rasonja, Melanija Slaviček, Silva Strnad-Jerbić, and Tanja Subotičanec, school psychologists, Maja Brozičević and Mirjana Ugarković, graduate psychology students who helped in data collection, and Julie Kim who helped in the data analysis.
The study was financed by a Grant from the Swedish Research Council, Award Number 421-2006-2318, and the Sten A Olsson Foundation for Research and Culture (date of approval December 17th, 2010).
- Ajdukovic, M., & Kolesaric, V. (2003). Eticki kodeks istrazivanja s djecom [Code of research with children ethics]. Zagreb: Vijece za djecu Vlade Republike Hrvatske i Drzavni zavod za zastitu obitelji, materinstva i mladezi.Google Scholar
- Barbosa, T., Miranda, M. C., Santos, R. F., & Bueno, O. F. A. (2009). Phonological working memory, phonological awareness and language in literacy difficulties in Brazilian children. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 22, 201–218. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-007-9109-3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Caravolas, M., Volin, J., & Hulme, C. (2005). Phonological awareness is a key component of alphabetic literacy skills in consistent and inconsistent orthographies: Evidence from Czech and English children. Journal of Experimental Child Psyhology, 92, 107–139. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2005.04.003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Caspi, A., Roberts, B. W., & Shiner, R. L. (2005). Personality development: Stability and change. Annual Review of Psychology, 56, 453–484. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.55.090902.141913.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Ehri, L. C. (1997). Learning to read and learning to spell are one and the same, almost. In C. A. Perfetti, L. Rieben, & M. Fayol (Eds.), Learning to spell: Research, theory, and practice across languages (pp. 237–269). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
- Ehri, L. C. (2002). Phases of acquisition in learning to read words and implications for teaching. In R. Stainthorp & P. Tomlinson (Eds.), Learning and teaching reading (pp. 7–28). London: British Journal of Educational Psychology Monograph Series II.Google Scholar
- Jacobson, C. (2001). Manual till Ordkedjetestet [The Wordchains test Manual]. Sockholm: Psykologiförlaget.Google Scholar
- Klicpera, C., & Schabmann, A. (1993). Do German-speaking children have a chance to overcome reading and spelling difficulties? A longitudinal survey from the second until the eighth grade. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 8, 307–323. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03174084.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Landerl, K., Ramus, F., Moll, K., Lyytinen, H., Leppänen, P. H. T., Lohvansuu, K., …, & Schulte-Körne, G. (2013). Predictors of developmental dyslexia in European orthographies with varying complexity. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 54, 686–694. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpp.12029.
- Lee, I. A., & Preacher, K. J. (2013). Calculation for the test of the difference between two dependent correlations with no variable in common [Computer software]. Available from http://quantpsy.org.
- Lerner, R. M. (2002). Concepts and theories of human development (3rd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
- Lindeblad, E., Nilsson, S., Gustafson, S., & Svensson, I. (2016). Assistive technology as reading interventions for children with reading impairments with a one-year follow-up. Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology, 12, 713–724. https://doi.org/10.1080/17483107.2016.1253116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Lundberg, I. (2001). Vilken bild är rätt? [Which picture is the correct one?]. Stockholm: Natur och Kultur.Google Scholar
- Moll, K., Ramus, F., Bartling, J., Bruder, J., Kunze, S., Neuhoff, N., … & Landerl, K. (2014). Cognitive mechanisms underlying reading and spelling development in five European orthographies. Learning and Instruction, 29, 65–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2013.09.003.
- Perry, C., & Ziegler, J. C. (2004). Beyond the two-strategy model of skilled spelling: Effects of consistency, grain size, and orthographic redundancy. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology A, Human Experimental Psychology, 57, 325–356. https://doi.org/10.1080/02724980343000323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Peti-Stantic, A. (2015). How much grammar is needed in lexicon? In M. Smolej (Ed.), Slovnica in slovar: Aktualni jezikovni opis [Grammar and Dictionary: Current language description] (pp. 569–577). Ljubljana: Center za slovenscino kot drugi/tuji jezik, Filozofska fakulteta v Ljubljani.Google Scholar
- Pfost, M., Dörfler, T., & Artelt, C. (2012). Reading competence development of poor readers in a German elementary school sample: An empirical examination of the Matthew effect model. Journal of Research in Reading, 35, 411–426. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9817.2010.01478.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Rutter, M. (1987). Continuities and discontinuities from infancy. In J. Osofsky (Ed.), Handbook of infancy (2nd ed., pp. 1256–1296). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
- Scarborough, H. S. (2001). Connecting early language and literacy to later reading (dis)abilities: Evidence, theory, and practice. In S. Neuman & D. Dickinson (Eds.), Handbook for research in early literacy (pp. 97–110). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
- Siegel, L. S., & Ryan, E. B. (1989a). The development of working memory in normally achieving and subtypes of learning disabled children. Child Development, 60, 973–980. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.1989.tb03528.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Swanson, H. L., & Alexander, J. (1997). Cognitive processes as predictors of word recognition and reading comprehension in learning disabled and skilled readers: Revisiting the specificity hypothesis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89, 128–158. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-06220.127.116.11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Tabachnick, G. B., & Fidell, L. (2001). Using multivariate statistics (5th ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson.Google Scholar
- Zentall, S. S., & Lee, J. (2012). A reading motivation intervention with differential outcomes for students at risk for reading disabilities, ADHD, and typical comparisons: “Clever is and clever does”. Learning Disability Quarterly, 35, 248–259. https://doi.org/10.1177/0731948712438556.CrossRefGoogle Scholar