Advertisement

Reading and Writing

, Volume 32, Issue 5, pp 1295–1317 | Cite as

Dimensions of the Adult Reading History Questionnaire and their relationships with reading ability

  • Suzanne E. WelcomeEmail author
  • Rebecca A. Meza
Article
  • 57 Downloads

Abstract

The Adult Reading History Questionnaire (ARHQ; Lefly & Pennington, 2000) is a widely used measure of self-reported reading difficulties. We explored the factor structure underlying this questionnaire using both exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis. A six-factor solution emerged, with childhood reading ability, current reading attitude, spelling skill, reversal, print media use, and memory factors. We created subscales reflecting these factors and explored relationships between subscale scores and different reading abilities (word reading, nonword reading, and passage comprehension). The total ARHQ score, as well as scores on the childhood reading ability, current reading attitude, and spelling skill subscales were significantly associated with word reading, nonword reading, and passage comprehension. The spelling skills subscale showed a stronger relationship with nonword reading than other reading skills, while scores on the current reading attitude subscale showed a weaker relationship between nonword Reading skill and other measures of reading. Overall, the results suggest that reading history is multidimensional and should be regarded as such in future research. Importantly, this self-report measure of lifetime reading experience was associated with adult reading skill in a population of university students showing typical variation in reading skill, with different aspects of the scale relating to different reading subskills.

Keywords

Factor analysis Phonological decoding Reading comprehension Reading history University students 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by a University of Missouri Research Board Grant to the first author.

References

  1. Acheson, D. J., Wells, J. B., & MacDonald, M. C. (2008). New and updated tests of print exposure and reading abilities in college students. Behavior Research Methods, 40, 278–289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bach, S., Richardson, U., Brandeis, D., Martin, E., & Brem, S. (2013). Print-specific multimodal brain activation in kindergarten improves prediction of reading skills in second grade. Neuroimage, 82, 605–615.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Berninger, V. W., Abbott, R. D., Vermeulen, K., & Fulton, C. M. (2006). Paths to reading comprehension in at-risk second-grade readers. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 39, 334–351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bjornsdottir, G., Halldorsson, J. G., Steinberg, S., Hansdottir, I., Kristjansson, K., Stefansson, H., et al. (2014). The adult reading history questionnaire (ARHQ) in Icelandic: Psychometric properties and factor structure. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 47, 532–542.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Black, J. M., Tanaka, H., Stanley, L., Nagamine, M., Zakerani, N., Thurston, A., et al. (2012). Maternal history of reading difficulty is associated with reduced language-related gray matter in beginning readers. Neuroimage, 59, 3021–3032.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Brown, J. I., Fishco, V. V., & Hanna, G. (1993). Nelson–Denny reading test. Chicago, IL: Riverside.Google Scholar
  7. Browne, M. W., & Cudeck, R. (1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. Sage Focus Editions, 154, 136.Google Scholar
  8. Byrne, B. M. (1994). Testing for the factorial validity, replication, and invariance of a measuring instrument: A paradigmatic application based on the Maslach Burnout Inventory. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 29, 289–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Chiarello, C., Lombardino, L. J., Kacinik, N. A., Otto, R., & Leonard, C. M. (2006). Neuroanatomical and behavioral asymmetry in an adult compensated dyslexic. Brain and Language, 98, 169–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Chiarello, C., Welcome, S. E., Halderman, L. K., & Leonard, C. M. (2009). Does degree of asymmetry relate to performance? An investigation of word recognition and reading in consistent and mixed handers. Brain and Cognition, 69(3), 521–530.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Conlon, E. G., Zimmer-Gembeck, M. J., Creed, P. A., & Tucker, M. (2006). Family history, self-perceptions, attitudes and cognitive abilities are associated with early adolescent reading skills. Journal of Research in Reading, 29, 11–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Cunningham, A. E., Perry, K. E., & Stanovich, K. E. (2001). Converging evidence for the concept of orthographic processing. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 14, 549–568.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Cunningham, A. E., & Stanovich, K. E. (1998). The impact of print exposure on word recognition. In J. L. Metsala & L. C. Ehri (Eds.), Word recognition in beginning literacy (pp. 235–262). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.Google Scholar
  14. Deacon, S. H., Cook, K., & Parrila, R. (2012). Identifying high-functioning dyslexics: Is self-report of early reading problems enough? Annals of Dyslexia, 62, 120–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Depue, B. E., Burgess, G. C., Bidwell, L. C., Willcutt, E. G., & Banich, M. T. (2010). Behavioral performance predicts grey matter reductions in the right inferior frontal gyrus in young adults with combined type ADHD. Psychiatry Research: Neuroimaging, 182, 231–237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Felton, R. H., Naylor, C. E., & Wood, F. B. (1990). Neuropsychological profile of adult dyslexics. Brain and Language, 39, 485–497.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Finucci, J. M., Whitehouse, C. C., Isaacs, S. D., & Childs, B. (1984). Derivation and validation of a quantitative definition of specific reading disability for adults. Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology, 26, 143–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Friedman, M. C., Chhabildas, N., Budhiraja, N., Willcutt, E. G., & Pennington, B. F. (2003). Etiology of the comorbidity between RD and ADHD: Exploration of the non-random mating hypothesis. American Journal of Medical Genetics Part B: Neuropsychiatric Genetics, 120, 109–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. García, J. R., & Cain, K. (2014). Decoding and reading comprehension: A meta-analysis to identify which reader and assessment characteristics influence the strength of the relationship in English. Review of Educational Research, 84, 74–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Griffiths, S., & Frith, U. (2002). Evidence for an articulatory awareness deficit in adult dyslexics. Dyslexia, 8, 14–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hair, J. F., Tatham, R. L., Anderson, R. E., & Black, W. (1998). Multivariate data analysis (5th ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  22. Hannon, B. (2012). Understanding the relative contributions of lower-level word processes, higher-level processes, and working memory to reading comprehension performance in proficient adult readers. Reading Research Quarterly, 47, 125–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hatcher, J., Snowling, M. J., & Griffiths, Y. M. (2002). Cognitive assessment of dyslexic students in higher education. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 72, 119–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hogan, T. P., Catts, H. W., & Little, T. D. (2005). The relationship between phonological awareness and reading: Implications for the assessment of phonological awareness. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 36(4), 285–293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6, 1–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Ingvar, M., af Trampe, P., Greitz, T., Eriksson, L., Stone-Elander, S., & von Euler, C. (2002). Residual differences in language processing in compensated dyslexics revealed in simple word reading tasks. Brain and Language, 83, 249–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Jackson, N. E. (2005). Are university students’ component reading skills related to their text comprehension and academic achievement? Learning and Individual Differences, 15, 113–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Katzir, T., Kim, Y., Wolf, M., Kennedy, B., Lovett, M., & Morris, R. (2006). The relationship of spelling recognition, RAN, and phonological awareness to reading skills in older poor readers and younger reading-matched controls. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 19, 845–872.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Kemp, N., Parrila, R. K., & Kirby, J. R. (2009). Phonological and orthographic spelling in high-functioning adult dyslexics. Dyslexia, 15, 105–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Kirby, J. R., Silvestri, R., Allingham, B. H., Parrila, R., & La Fave, C. B. (2008). Learning strategies and study approaches of postsecondary students with dyslexia. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 41, 85–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Landerl, K., & Wimmer, H. (2008). Development of word reading fluency and spelling in a consistent orthography: An 8-year follow-up. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100, 150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Leinonen, S., Müller, K., Leppänen, P. H., Aro, M., Ahonen, T., & Lyytinen, H. (2001). Heterogeneity in adult dyslexic readers: Relating processing skills to the speed and accuracy of oral text reading. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 14, 265–296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Lefly, D. L., & Pennington, B. F. (1991). Spelling errors and reading fluency in compensated adult dyslexics. Annals of Dyslexia, 41, 141–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Lefly, D. L., & Pennington, B. F. (2000). Reliability and validity of the adult reading history questionnaire. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 33, 286–296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Lervåg, A., & Hulme, C. (2010). Predicting the growth of early spelling skills: Are there heterogeneous developmental trajectories? Scientific Studies of Reading, 14, 485–513.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Liechti, M. D., Valko, L., Müller, U. C., Döhnert, M., Drechsler, R., Steinhausen, H. C., et al. (2013). Diagnostic value of resting electroencephalogram in attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder across the lifespan. Brain Topography, 26, 135–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. MacCallum, R. C., Browne, M. W., & Sugawara, H. M. (1996). Power analysis and determination of sample size for covariance structure modeling. Psychological Methods, 1, 130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Marsh, H. W., Balla, J. R., & McDonald, R. P. (1988). Goodness-of-fit indexes in confirmatory factor analysis: The effect of sample size. Psychological Bulletin, 103, 391.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Martino, N. L., & Hoffman, P. R. (2002). An investigation of reading and language abilities of college freshmen. Journal of Research in Reading, 25, 310–318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Maurer, U., Bucher, K., Brem, S., Benz, R., Kranz, F., Schulz, E., et al. (2009). Neurophysiology in preschool improves behavioral prediction of reading ability throughout primary school. Biological Psychiatry, 66, 341–348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. McGonnell, M., Parrila, R., & Deacon, H. (2007). The recruitment and description of university students who self-report difficulty acquiring early reading skills. Exceptionality Education International, 17, 155–174.Google Scholar
  42. Mimeau, C., Ricketts, J., & Deacon, S. H. (2018). The role of orthographic and semantic learning in word reading and reading comprehension. Scientific Studies of Reading, 22, 384–400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Myers, C. A., Vandermosten, M., Farris, E. A., Hancock, R., Gimenez, P., Black, J. M., et al. (2014). White matter morphometric changes uniquely predict children’s reading acquisition. Psychological Science, 25, 1870–1883.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. (2012). Literacy, numeracy, and problem solving in technology-rich environments: Framework for the OECD survey of adult skills. OECD Publishing. http://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/education/literacy-numeracy-and-problem-solving-in-technology-rich-environments_9789264128859-en.
  45. Parrila, R., Corkett, J., Kirby, J., & Hein, S. (2003). Adult reading history questionnaire-revised. Unpublished questionnaire. University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB.Google Scholar
  46. Parrila, R., Georgiou, G., & Corkett, J. (2007). University students with a significant history of reading difficulties: What is and is not compensated? Exceptionality Education International, 17, 195–220.Google Scholar
  47. Pennington, B. F., & Lefly, D. L. (2001). Early reading development in children at family risk for dyslexia. Child Development, 72, 816–833.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Pew Research Center. (2014). Internet Project Omnibus Survey. Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  49. Ricketts, J., Nation, K., & Bishop, D. V. (2007). Vocabulary is important for some, but not all reading skills. Scientific Studies of Reading, 11, 235–257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Schneps, M. H., Brockmole, J. R., Sonnert, G., & Pomplun, M. (2012). History of reading struggles linked to enhanced learning in low spatial frequency scenes. PLoS ONE, 7(4), e35724.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Siegel, L. S. (1999). Issues in the definition and diagnosis of learning disabilities: A perspective on Guckenberger v. Boston University. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 32, 304–319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Shaywitz, S. E., Shaywitz, B. A., Fulbright, R. K., Skudlarski, P., Mencl, W. E., Constable, R. T., et al. (2003). Neural systems for compensation and persistence: Young adult outcome of childhood reading disability. Biological Psychiatry, 54, 25–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Sprenger-Charolles, L., Siegel, L. S., Jimenez, J. E., & Ziegler, J. C. (2011). Prevalence and reliability of phonological, surface, and mixed profiles in dyslexia: A review of studies conducted in languages varying in orthographic depth. Scientific Studies of Reading, 15, 498–521.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Stefansson, H., Meyer-Lindenberg, A., Steinberg, S., Magnusdottir, B., Morgen, K., Arnarsdottir, S., et al. (2014). CNVs conferring risk of autism or schizophrenia affect cognition in controls. Nature, 505, 361–366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Stevens, J. P. (1992). Applied multivariate statistics for the social sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  56. Swanson, H. L., Trainin, G., Necoechea, D. M., & Hammill, D. D. (2003). Rapid naming, phonological awareness, and reading: A meta-analysis of the correlation evidence. Review of Educational Research, 73, 407–440.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Torgesen, J., Wagner, R. K., & Rashotte, C. A. (1999). Comprehensive test of phonological processing. Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.Google Scholar
  58. Valko, L., Schneider, G., Doehnert, M., Müller, U., Brandeis, D., Steinhausen, H. C., et al. (2010). Time processing in children and adults with ADHD. Journal of Neural Transmission, 117, 1213–1228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Wechsler, D. (1999). Wechsler abbreviated scale of intelligence. San Antonio, TX: The Psychological Corporation.Google Scholar
  60. Welcome, S. E., Leonard, C. M., & Chiarello, C. (2010). Alternate reading strategies and variable asymmetry of the planum temporale in adult resilient readers. Brain and Language, 113, 73–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Wolff, U., & Lundberg, I. (2003). A technique for group screening of dyslexia among adults. Annals of Dyslexia, 53, 324–339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Woodcock, R. W. (1998). Woodcock reading mastery tests-revised: Forms G and H. Examiner’s manual. American Guidance Service.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Psychological SciencesUniversity of Missouri – St. LouisSt. LouisUSA

Personalised recommendations