Advertisement

Reading and Writing

, Volume 32, Issue 2, pp 357–375 | Cite as

The relationship between the processing of semantic relation information and morphological awareness among Hong Kong Chinese children

  • Zhengye Xu
  • Duo LiuEmail author
Article
  • 118 Downloads

Abstract

In the present study, 151 third-grade Hong Kong children participated in two expression-picture matching experiments (a relation priming paradigm). In this paradigm, an unambiguous prime was first presented, followed by an ambiguous target that could be interpreted with either of two relations (i.e., Descriptor and Possessor). Children were asked to judge which picture matched with the compounds in both the prime and target sessions. The linear mixed model analysis was applied to investigate the semantic relation processing in novel ambiguous combination and its relationship with children’s performances on morphological awareness tasks. In Experiment 1, the relation priming effect (i.e., children preferred to select the target pictures involving the same relation with the primes) was observed. At the same time, children’s morphological awareness showed a positive moderation effect on relation priming. Experiment 2 investigated whether visual features, rather than semantic relations, produced priming effect. The interaction between semantic relation processing and morphological awareness was observed as well in the situation that the hints of visual features were removed. The results indicated that children with skilled morphological awareness, but not the children with less skilled morphological awareness, showed significant relation priming effect, even without the visual cues. Compared to children with less skilled morphological awareness, children with skilled morphological awareness were better in activating semantic relation information when reading compounds. These findings may help us understand the mechanism of the association between MA and Chinese literacy acquisition.

Keywords

Compound-picture matching Morphological awareness Noun–noun combination Relation priming effect 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This study was supported by RGC Grant 18404114 of the Education University of Hong Kong in Hong Kong Special Administrative Region. We thank all the children, their parents and teachers, for their participation.

References

  1. Bowers, P. N., & Kirby, J. R. (2010). Effects of morphological instruction on vocabulary acquisition. Reading and Writing, 23(5), 515–537.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-009-9172-z.Google Scholar
  2. Carlisle, J. F. (2000). Awareness of the structure and meaning of morphologically complex words: Impact on reading. Reading and Writing, 12(3), 169–190.  https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008131926604.Google Scholar
  3. Carlisle, J. F. (2010). Effects of instruction in morphological awareness on literacy achievement: An integrative review. Reading Research Quarterly, 45(4), 464–487.  https://doi.org/10.1598/RRQ.45.4.5.Google Scholar
  4. Chen, X., Hao, M., Geva, E., Zhu, J., & Shu, H. (2009). The role of compound awareness in Chinese children’s vocabulary acquisition and character reading. Reading and Writing, 22(5), 615–631.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-008-9127-9.Google Scholar
  5. Chow, B. W. Y., McBride-Chang, C., Cheung, H., & Chow, C. S. L. (2008). Dialogic reading and morphology training in Chinese children: Effects on language and literacy. Developmental Psychology, 44(1), 233–244.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.44.1.233.Google Scholar
  6. Coolen, R., Van Jaarsveld, H. J., & Schreuder, R. (1991). The interpretation of isolated novel nominal compounds. Memory & Cognition, 19(4), 341–352.  https://doi.org/10.3758/bf03197138.Google Scholar
  7. Estes, Z. (2003). A tale of two similarities: Comparison and integration in conceptual combination. Cognitive Science, 27(6), 911–921.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogsci.2003.01.001.Google Scholar
  8. Estes, Z., & Jones, L. L. (2006). Priming via relational similarity: A copper horse is faster when seen through a glass eye. Journal of Memory and Language, 55(1), 89–101.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2006.01.004.Google Scholar
  9. Gagné, C. L. (2000). Relation-based combinations versus property-based combinations: A test of the CARIN theory and the dual-process theory of conceptual combination. Journal of Memory and Language, 42(3), 365–389.  https://doi.org/10.1006/jmla.1999.2683.Google Scholar
  10. Gagné, C. L. (2001). Relation and lexical priming during the interpretation of noun–noun combinations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 27(1), 236–254.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.27.1.236.Google Scholar
  11. Gagné, C. L., & Shoben, E. J. (2002). Priming relations in ambiguous noun–noun combinations. Memory & Cognition, 30(4), 637–646.  https://doi.org/10.3758/bf03194965.Google Scholar
  12. Glenberg, A. M., Gutierrez, T., Levin, J. R., Japuntich, S., & Kaschak, M. P. (2004). Activity and imagined activity can enhance young children’s reading comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96(3), 424–436.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.96.3.424.Google Scholar
  13. Kirk, C., & Gillon, G. T. (2007). Longitudinal effects of phonological awareness intervention on morphological awareness in children with speech impairment. Language Speech and Hearing Services in Schools, 38(4), 342–352.  https://doi.org/10.1044/0161-1461(2007/036).Google Scholar
  14. Ku, Y. M., & Anderson, R. C. (2003). Development of morphological awareness in Chinese and English. Reading and Writing, 16(5), 399–422.  https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1024227231216.Google Scholar
  15. Kuo, L. J., & Anderson, R. C. (2006). Morphological awareness and learning to read: A cross-language perspective. Educational Psychologist, 41(3), 161–180.  https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep4103_3.Google Scholar
  16. Li, W., Anderson, R. C., Nagy, W., & Zhang, H. (2002). Facets of metalinguistic awareness that contribute to Chinese literacy. Chinese Children’s Reading Acquisition.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-0859-5_5.Google Scholar
  17. Liu, D., Li, H., & Wong, K. S. R. (2017). The anatomy of the role of morphological awareness in Chinese character learning: The mediation of vocabulary and semantic radical knowledge and the moderation of morpheme family size. Scientific Studies of Reading, 21(3), 210–224.  https://doi.org/10.1080/10888438.2017.1278764.Google Scholar
  18. Liu, P. D., & McBride-Chang, C. (2010). What is morphological awareness? Tapping lexical compounding awareness in Chinese third graders. Journal of Educational Psychology, 102(1), 62–73.  https://doi.org/10.1037/a0016933.Google Scholar
  19. Mahony, D., Singson, M., & Mann, V. (2000). Reading ability and sensitivity to morphological relations. Reading and Writing, 12(3), 191–218.  https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1008136012492.Google Scholar
  20. McBride-Chang, C., Shu, H., Zhou, A., Wat, C. P., & Wagner, R. K. (2003). Morphological awareness uniquely predicts young children’s Chinese character recognition. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95(4), 743–751.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.95.4.743.Google Scholar
  21. McCutchen, D., & Logan, B. (2011). Inside incidental word learning: Children’s strategic use of morphological information to infer word meanings. Reading Research Quarterly, 46(4), 334–349.  https://doi.org/10.1002/rrq.003.Google Scholar
  22. McCutchen, D., & Stull, S. (2015). Morphological awareness and children’s writing: Accuracy, error, and invention. Reading and Writing, 28(2), 271–289.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-014-9524-1.Google Scholar
  23. Nagy, W. E., & Anderson, R. C. (1984). How many words are there in printed school English? Reading Research Quarterly, 19(3), 304–330.  https://doi.org/10.2307/747823.Google Scholar
  24. Nicoladis, E. (2003). Compounding is not contingent on level-ordering in acquisition. Cognitive Development, 18(3), 319–338.  https://doi.org/10.1016/s0885-2014(03)00037-6.Google Scholar
  25. Poon, W. Y., & Hong, P. M. (2003). A study of the Chinese characters recommended for the subject of Chinese language in primary schools. Retrieved from http://lcprichi.hkbu.edu.hk/. Accessed 26 May 2015.
  26. R Core Team. (2017). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing.Google Scholar
  27. Raffray, C. N., Pickering, M. J., & Branigan, H. P. (2007). Priming the interpretation of noun–noun combinations. Journal of Memory and Language, 57(3), 380–395.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2007.06.009.Google Scholar
  28. Raven, J. (1996). The Raven’s progressive matrices: Change and stability over culture and time. Cognitive Psychology, 41(1), 1–48.  https://doi.org/10.1006/cogp.1999.0735.Google Scholar
  29. Schmidtke, D., Kuperman, V., Gagné, C. L., & Spalding, T. L. (2016). Competition between conceptual relations affects compound recognition: The role of entropy. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 23(2), 556–570.  https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-015-0926-0.Google Scholar
  30. Shu, H., McBride-Chang, C., Wu, S., & Liu, H. (2006). Understanding Chinese developmental dyslexia: Morphological awareness as a core cognitive construct. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98(1), 122–133.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.98.1.122.Google Scholar
  31. Sun, H., Sun, D., Huang, J., Li, D., & Xing, H. (1996). The description on the corpus system of modern Chinese studies. In Z. S. Luo & S. L. Yuan (Eds.), Studies of Chinese and Chinese character in the computer era. Beijing: Tsinghua University Publisher.Google Scholar
  32. Tyler, A., & Nagy, W. (1990). Use of derivational morphology during reading. Cognition, 36(1), 17–34.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0277(90)90052-l.Google Scholar
  33. Wysocki, K., & Jenkins, J. R. (1987). Deriving word meanings through morphological generalization. Reading Research Quarterly, 22(1), 66–91.  https://doi.org/10.2307/747721.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V., part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Special Education and CounsellingThe Education University of Hong KongTai PoHong Kong

Personalised recommendations