Advertisement

Reading and Writing

, Volume 31, Issue 7, pp 1575–1589 | Cite as

Understanding word learning mechanisms in beginning and proficient readers of Chinese: the roles of associative learning and linguistic knowledge

  • Bonnie Wing-Yin Chow
Article
First Online:
  • 173 Downloads

Abstract

This study investigated the roles of associative learning and linguistic knowledge, in particular phonological and semantic knowledge, in word learning of Chinese readers using a cross-sectional design. Extending past research in associative learning using existing Chinese characters as word stimuli, this study resorted to pseudowords and invented words to control for participants’ possible experience with the word stimuli. Fifty-three Chinese second graders and thirty Chinese undergraduates participated in the study. They were individually administered tasks of nonverbal reasoning, phonological memory, rapid automatized naming, Chinese word reading and associative learning. The results showed that associative learning significantly predicted Chinese word reading in both beginning and proficient readers, after controlling for phonological memory and rapid automatized naming. Also, a developmental trend in the facilitative effect of pre-exposure to linguistic knowledge on word learning was observed, such that no effect of pre-exposure was observed in the beginning readers, but a significant effect was observed in the proficient readers. This study contributes to a better understanding of word learning processes in Chinese reading development.

Keywords

Word learning Chinese word reading Associative learning Linguistic knowledge 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Benson, N. J., Lovett, M. W., & Kroeber, C. L. (1997). Training and transfer-of-learning effects in disabled and normal readers: Evidence of specific deficits. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 64, 343–366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Chow, B. W.-Y. (2014). The differential roles of paired associate learning in Chinese and English word reading abilities in bilingual children. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 27, 1657–1672.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Duff, F. J., & Hulme, C. (2012). The role of children’s phonological and semantic knowledge in learning to read words. Scientific Studies of Reading, 16, 504–525.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Ehri, L. C. (2005). Learning to read words: Theory, findings, and issues. Scientific Studies of Reading, 9, 167–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Ho, C. S.-H., Chan, D., Chung, K., Tsang, S.-M., Lee, S.-H., & Cheng, R. W.-Y. (2007). The Hong Kong Test of Specific Learning Difficulties in Reading and Writing for Primary School Students-Second Edition [HKT-P(II)]. Hong Kong: Hong Kong Specific Learning Difficulties Research Team.Google Scholar
  6. Ho, C. S.-H., Chan, D. W., Tsang, S.-M., Lee, S.-H., & Chung, K. K. H. (2006). Word learning deficit among Chinese dyslexic children. Journal of Child Language, 33, 145–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Hoosain, R. (1991). Psycholinguistic implications for linguistic relativity: A case study of Chinese. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associations.Google Scholar
  8. Hsiao, J. H., & Shillcock, R. (2006). Analysis of a Chinese phonetic compound database: Implications for orthographic processing. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 35, 405–426.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Huang, H. S., & Hanley, J. R. (1995). Phonological awareness and visual skills in learning to read Chinese and English. Cognition, 54, 73–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Hulme, C., Goetz, K., Gooch, D., Adams, J., & Snowling, M. J. (2007). Paired-associate learning, phoneme awareness, and learning to read. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 96, 150–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Li, H., Shu, H., McBride-Chang, C., Liu, H. Y., & Xue, J. (2009). Paired associate learning in Chinese children with dyslexia. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 103, 135–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Litt, R. A., & Nation, K. (2014). The nature and specificity of paired associate learning deficits in children with dyslexia. Journal of Memory and Language, 71, 71–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. McBride-Chang, C. (2004). Children’s literacy development. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  14. McKague, M., Pratt, C., & Johnston, M. B. (2001). The effect of oral vocabulary on reading visually novel words: A comparison of the dual-route-cascaded and triangle frameworks. Cognition, 80, 231–262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. McKay, A., Davis, C., Savage, G., & Castles, A. (2008). Semantic involvement in reading aloud: Evidence from a nonword training study. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 34, 1495–1517.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Messbauer, V. C. S., & de Jong, P. F. (2003). Word, nonword, and visual paired associate learning in Dutch dyslexic children. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 84, 77–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Nation, K., & Cocksey, J. (2009). The relationship between knowing a word and reading it aloud in children’s word reading development. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 103, 296–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Perfetti, C. A., & Hart, L. (2002). The lexical quality hypothesis. In L. Verhoeven, C. Elbro, & P. Reitsma (Eds.), Precursors of functional literacy (pp. 189–213). Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamin.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Plaut, D. C., McClelland, J. L., Seidenberg, M. S., & Patterson, K. (1996). Understanding normal and impaired word reading: Computational principles in quasi-regular domains. Psychological Review, 103, 56–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Raven, J. C., Court, J. H., & Raven, J. (1996). Manual for Raven’s Standard Progressive Matrices. Oxford, UK: Oxford Psychologists Press.Google Scholar
  21. Schneider, W., Küspert, P., Roth, E., Visé, M., & Marx, H. (1997). Short- and long-term effects of training phonological awareness in kindergarten: Evidence from two German studies. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 66, 311–340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Schneider, W., Roth, E., & Ennemoser, M. (2000). Training phonological skills and letter knowledge in children at risk for dyslexia: A comparison of three kindergarten intervention programs. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92, 284–295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Seidenberg, M. S., & McClelland, J. L. (1989). A distributed, developmental model of word recognition and naming. Psychological Review, 96, 523–568.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Shu, H., Chen, X., Anderson, R. C., Wu, N., & Xuan, Y. (2003). Properties of school Chinese: Implications for learning to read. Child Development, 74, 27–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Song, S., Georgiou, G. K., Su, M., & Hua, S. (2016). How well do phonological awareness and rapid automatized naming correlate with Chinese reading accuracy and fluency? A meta-analysis. Scientific Studies of Reading, 20, 99–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Taylor, J. S. H., Plunkett, K., & Nation, K. (2011). The influence of consistency, frequency, and semantics on learning to read: An artificial orthography paradigm. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 37, 60–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. The Research Centre for Humanities Computing [RCHC]. (2003). Chinese Character Database. Retrieved from http://humanum.arts.cuhk.edu.hk/Lexis/lexi-can/
  28. Warmington, M., & Hulme, C. (2012). Phoneme awareness, visual–verbal paired-associate learning, and rapid automatized naming as predictors of individual differences in reading ability. Scientific Studies of Reading, 16, 45–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Windfuhr, K. L., & Snowling, M. (2001). The relationship between paired associate learning and phonological skills in normally developing readers. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 80, 160–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Zhang, Y., Tardif, T., Shu, H., Li, H., Liu, H., McBride-Chang, C., et al. (2013). Phonological skills and vocabulary knowledge mediate socioeconomic status effects in predicting reading outcomes for Chinese children. Developmental Psychology, 49, 665–671.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Zhou, L., Duff, F. J., & Hulme, C. (2015). Phonological and semantic knowledge are causal influences on learning to read words in Chinese. Scientific Studies of Reading, 19, 409–418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V., part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Applied Social SciencesCity University of Hong KongKowloonChina

Personalised recommendations

Cite article

Buy options