Reading and Writing

, Volume 31, Issue 5, pp 1209–1229 | Cite as

The role of syllables in intermediate-depth stress-timed languages: masked priming evidence in European Portuguese

  • Ana Duarte Campos
  • Helena Mendes Oliveira
  • Ana Paula Soares
Article
  • 34 Downloads

Abstract

The role of syllables as a sublexical unit in visual word recognition and reading is well established in deep and shallow syllable-timed languages such as French and Spanish, respectively. However, its role in intermediate stress-timed languages remains unclear. This paper aims to overcome this gap by studying for the first time the role of syllables at early stages of visual word recognition in Portuguese (European), a language where the spelling-sound correspondences are less transparent than Spanish but less opaque than French, and also with fuzzier syllabic boundaries than both languages. To that purpose, 36 native speakers of Portuguese performed a lexical decision task combined with a masked priming paradigm. Ninety-six dissyllabic Portuguese target words, and 96 nonwords, half of which with a CV (ru.mor [rumor]) and the other half with a CVC first-syllable structure (forno [oven]), were preceded by a briefly presented nonword prime (50 ms) that could be syllable congruent (e.g., ru.mis-RU.MOR, for.pa-FOR.NO), syllable incongruent (e.g., rum.pa-RU.MOR, fo.rou-FOR.NO), or unrelated (e.g., ca.fas-RU.MOR, pou.me-FOR.NO) with the targets. Results were clear-cut and showed a facilitative syllabic priming effect in Portuguese, as target words preceded by syllable congruent primes were recognized faster and more accurately than when preceded either by incongruent or unrelated primes, although the effect was restricted to CV words. For nonwords there were no signs of syllabic effects. The findings are discussed attending to the characteristics of the Portuguese language and to current models of visual word recognition.

Keywords

Syllable Visual word recognition Priming Sublexical unit 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This study was conducted at Psychology Research Centre (UID/PSI/01662/2013), University of Minho, and supported by the Portuguese Foundation for Science and Technology and the Portuguese Ministry of Science, Technology and Higher Education through national funds and co-financed by FEDER through COMPETE2020 under the PT2020 Partnership Agreement (POCI-01-0145-FEDER-007653).

References

  1. Adda-Decker, M., Mareuil, P. B., Adda, G., & Lori, L. (2005). Investigating syllabic structure and its variation in speech from French radio interviews. Speech Comunication, 46(2), 119–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Álvarez, C. J., Carreiras, M., & de Vega, M. (2000). Syllable-frequency effect in visual word recognition: Evidence of sequential-type processing. Psicológica, 21, 341–374.Google Scholar
  3. Álvarez, C. J., Carreiras, M., & Perea, M. (2004). Are syllables phonological units in visual word recognition? Language and Cognition Processes, 19(3), 427–452.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Álvarez, C. J., Carreiras, M., & Taft, M. (2001). Syllables and morphemes: Contrasting frequency effects in Spanish. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 27, 545–555.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Álvarez, C. J., de Vega, M., & Carreiras, M. (1998). La sílaba como unidad de activatión léxica en la lectura de palabras trissílabas [The syllable as an activational unit in reading trisyllabic words]. Psycothema, 10, 371–386.Google Scholar
  6. Álvarez, C. J., Taft, M., & Hernández-Cabrera, J. A. (2016). Syllabic strategy as opposed to coda optimization in the segmentation of Spanish letter-strings using word spotting. Scientific Studies of Reading, 21(2), 99–108.  https://doi.org/10.1080/10888438.2016.1254220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Baayen, R. H., Piepenbrock, R., & van Rijn, H. R. (1993). The CELEX lexical database [CD-ROM]. Philadelphia, PA: Linguistic Data Consortium.Google Scholar
  8. Barber, H., Vergara, M., & Carreiras, M. (2004). Syllable-frequency effects in visual word recognition: Evidence from ERPs. Neuroreport, 15, 545–548.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bradley, D. G., Sanchez-Casas, R., & Garcia-Albea, J. E. (1993). The status of the syllable in the perception of Spanish and English. Language and Cognitive Processes, 8, 197–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Brand, M., Rey, A., & Peereman, R. (2003). Where is the syllable priming effect in visual word recognition? Journal of Memory and Language, 48, 435–443.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Carreiras, M., Álvarez, C. J., & de Vega, M. (1993). Syllable frequency and visual word recognition in Spanish. Journal of Memory and Language, 32, 766–780.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Carreiras, M., & Perea, M. (2002). Masked priming effects with syllabic neighbours in a lexical decision task. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 28, 1228–1242.Google Scholar
  13. Carreiras, M., & Perea, M. (2011). Efectos de la estructura silábica en el priming silábico. Revista de Logopedia, Foniatría y Audiología, 31(1), 30–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Carreiras, M., Vergara, M., & Barber, H. (2005). Early event-related potential effects of syllable processing during visual word recognition. Journal of Cognitive Neroscience, 17(1), 1803–1817.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Chetail, F., Colin, C., & Content, A. (2012). Electrophysiological markers of syllable frequency during written word recognition in French. Neuropsychologia, 50(14), 3429–3439.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Chetail, F., & Mathey, S. (2009). Syllabic priming in lexical decision and naming tasks: They syllable congruency effect re-examined in French. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 63, 40–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Coltheart, M., Rastle, K., Perry, C., Langdon, R., & Ziegler, J. (2001). DRC: A dual route cascaded model of visual word recognition and reading aloud. Psychological Review, 108, 204–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Comesaña, M., Soares, A. P., Marcet, A., & Perea, M. (2016). On the nature of consonant/vowel differences in letter position coding: Evidence from developing and adult readers. British Journal of Psychology, 107, 651–674.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Conrad, M., Carreiras, M., & Jacobs, A. M. (2008). Contrasting effects of token and type syllable frequency in lexical decision. Language and Cognitive Processes, 23, 296–326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Conrad, M., Carreiras, M., Tamm, S., & Jacobs, A. M. (2009). Syllables and bigrams: Orthographic redundancy and syllabic units affect visual word recognition at different processing levels. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 35(2), 461–479.Google Scholar
  21. Conrad, M., Grainger, J., & Jacobs, A. M. (2007). Phonology as the source of syllable frequency effects in visual word recognition: Evidence from French. Memory and Cognition, 35(5), 938–974.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Conrad, M., & Jacobs, A. M. (2004). Replicating syllable-frequency effects in Spanish in German: One more challenge to computational models of visual word recognition. Language and Cognitive Processes, 19(3), 369–390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Conrad, M., Stenneken, P., & Jacobs, A. M. (2006). Associated or dissociated effects of syllable frequency in lexical decision and naming. Psyconomic Bulletin and Review, 13(2), 339–345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Conrad, M., Tamm, S., Carreiras, M., & Jacobs, A. M. (2010). Simulating syllable frequency effects within an interactive activation framework. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 22(5), 861–893.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Cutler, A., Mehler, J., Norris, D. G., & Segui, J. (1983). A language specific comprehension strategy. Nature, 304, 159–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Cutler, A., Mehler, J., Norris, D. G., & Segui, J. (1986). The syllable’s differing role in the segmentation of French and English. Journal of Memory and Language, 25, 385–400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Davis, C. J. (2010). The spatial coding model of visual word identification. Psychological Review, 117(3), 713–758.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Delgado-Martins, M. R. (2002). Fonética do Português. Trinta anos de investigação [Portuguese Phonetics. Thirty years of investigation]. Lisboa: Editorial Caminho.Google Scholar
  29. Doignon, N., & Zagar, D. (2005). Illusory conjunctions in French: The nature of sublexical units in visual word recognition. Language and Cognitive Processes, 20(3), 443–464.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Doignon-Camus, N., Seigneuric, A., Perrier, A., Sisti, E., & Zagar, D. (2013). Evidence for a preserved sensitivity to orthographic redundancy and an impaired access to phonological syllables in French developmental dyslexics. Annals of Dyslexia, 63, 117–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Duhon, A., Perea, M., Sebastián-Gallés, N., Martí, A., & Carreiras, M. (2013). EsPal: One-stop shopping for Spanish word properties. Behavior Research Methods, 45(4), 1246–1258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Ecalle, J., Kleinsz, N., & Magnan, A. (2013). Computer-assisted learning in young poor readers: The effect of grapho-syllabic training on the development of word reading and reading comprehension. Computers in Human Behaviour, 29(4), 1368–1376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Ferrand, L., & New, B. (2003). Syllabic length effects in visual word recognition and naming. Acta Psychologica, 113, 167–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Ferrand, L., Segui, J., & Humphreys, G. W. (1997). The syllable’s role in word naming. Memory and Cognition, 25, 458–470.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Forster, K. I. (1988). The pros and cons of masked priming. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 27(2), 203–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Forster, K. I., & Davis, C. (1984). Repetition and frequency attenuation in lexical access. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 10(4), 680–698.Google Scholar
  37. Forster, K. I., & Forster, J. C. (2003). DMDX: A Windows display program with millisecond accuracy. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers, 35, 116–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Frost, R. (1998). Towards a strong phonological theory of visual word recognition: True issues and false trails. Psychological Bulletin, 123, 71–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Frota, S., & Vigário, M. (2001). On the correlates of rhythmic distinctions: The European/Brazilian Portuguese case [On the correlates of rhythmic distinctions: the European/Brazilian Portuguese case]. Probus, 13, 247–275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Goslin, J., Grainger, J., & Holcomb, P. J. (2006). Syllable frequency effects in French visual word recognition: An ERP study. Brain Research, 1115, 121–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Grainger, J., & Jacobs, A. M. (1996). Orthographic processing in visual word recognition: A multiple read-out model. Psychological Review, 103(3), 518–565.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Huey, E. B. (1908). The psychology and pedagogy of reading. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  43. Hutzler, F., Bergmann, J., Conrad, M., Kronbichler, M., Stenneken, P., & Jacobs, A. M. (2004a). Inhibitory effects of first syllable-frequency in lexical decision: An event-related potential study. Neuroscience Letters, 372, 179–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Hutzler, F., Conrad, M., & Jacobs, A. M. (2004b). Effects of syllable-frequency in lexical decision and naming: An eye-movement study. Brain and Language, 92(2), 138–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Kinoshita, S., & Lupker, S. J. (Eds.). (2003). Masked priming: State of the art. New York: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
  46. Lima, C. F., & Castro, S. L. (2010). Reading strategies in orthographies of intermediate depth are flexible: Modulation of length effects in Portuguese. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 22(2), 190–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Lupker, S. J., Perea, M., & Davis, C. J. (2008). Transposed letter priming effects: Consonants, vowels and letter frequency. Language and Cognitive Processes, 23, 93–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Macizo, P., & Van Petten, C. (2007). Syllable frequency in lexical decision and naming of English words. Reading and Writing, 20(4), 295–330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Marín, J., & Carreiras, M. (2002). Syllable processing upon illusory conjunction paradigm. Paper presented at the 8th annual conference on architectures and mechanisms for language processing, Tenerife, Spain.Google Scholar
  50. Mateus, M. H., & Andrade, E. (2000). The phonology of Portuguese. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  51. Mathey, S., & Zagar, D. (2002). Lexical similarity in visual word recognition: The effect of syllabic neighborhood in French. Current Psychology Letters: Behavior, Brain and Cognition, 8, 107–121.Google Scholar
  52. Mattys, S. L., & Melhorn, J. F. (2005). How do syllables contribute to the perception of spoken English? Insight from the migration paradigm. Language and Speech, 48(2), 223–253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Mehler, J., Dommergues, J., Frauenfelder, U., & Segui, J. (1981). The syllable’s role in speech segmentation. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 20, 298–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Morais, J., Content, A., Cary, L., Mehler, J., & Segui, J. (1989). Syllabic segmentation and literacy. Language and Cognitive Processes, 4, 57–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Muncer, S. J., & Knight, D. C. (2012). The bigram trough hypothesis and the syllable number effect in lexical decision. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 65(11), 2221–2230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Nespor, M., Shukla, M., & Mehler, J. (2011). Stress-timed vs. syllable-timed languages. In M. van Oostendorp, C. J. Ewen, E. Hume, & K. Rice (Eds.), The Blackwell companion to phonology (Vol. 5, pp. 1147–1159). Malden: Wiley.Google Scholar
  57. Newman, R. L., Jared, D., & Haigh, C. A. (2012). Does phonology play a role when skilled readers read high-frequency words? Evidence from ERPs. Language and Cognitive Processes, 27, 1361–1384.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Norris, D., & Kinoshita, S. (2012). Reading through a noisy channel: Why there’s nothing special about the perception of orthography. Psychological Review, 119(3), 517–545.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Pelli, D. G., Farell, B., & Moore, D. C. (2003). The remarkable inefficiency of word recognition. Nature, 423(6941), 752–756.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Perea, M., & Acha, J. (2009). Does letter position coding depend on consonant/vowel status? Evidence with the masked priming technique. Acta Psychologica, 130, 127–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Perea, M., & Carreiras, M. (1998). Effects of syllable frequency and syllable neighbourhood frequency in visual word recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 24(1), 1341–1344.Google Scholar
  62. Perea, M., & Lupker, S. J. (2004). Can CANISO activate CASINO? Transposed-letter similarity effects with nonadjacent letter positions. Journal of Memory and Language, 51, 231–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Perry, C., Ziegler, J. C., & Zorzi, M. (2010). Beyond single syllables: Large-scale modeling of reading aloud with the Connectionist Dual Process (CDP++) model. Cognitive Psychology, 61, 106–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Plaut, D. C., McClelland, J. L., Seidenberg, M. S., & Patterson, K. (1996). Understanding normal and impaired word reading: Computational principles. Psychological Review, 103, 56–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Pollatsek, A., & Well, A. D. (1995). On the use of counterbalanced designs in cognitive research: A suggestion for a better and more powerful analysis. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21(3), 785–794.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Prinzmetal, W., Treiman, R., & Rho, S. H. (1986). How to see a reading unit. Journal of Memory and Language, 24, 461–475.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Rapp, B. C. (1992). The nature of sublexical orthographic organization: The bigram trough hypothesis examined. Journal of Memory and Language, 31, 33–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Rastle, K., & Brysbaert, M. (2006). Masked phonological priming effects in English: Are they real? Do they matter? Cognitive Psychology, 53(2), 97–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Rastle, K., Davis, M. H., & New, B. (2004). The broth in my brother’s brothel: Morpho-orthographic segmentation in visual word recognition. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 11(6), 1090–1098.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Schiller, N. O. (1999). Masked syllable priming of English nouns. Brain and Language, 68, 300–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Schiller, N. O. (2000). Single word production in English: The role of subsyllabic units during phonological encoding. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 26, 512–528.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Schilling, H. E. H., Rayner, K., & Chumbley, J. I. (1989). Comparing naming, lexical decision, and eye fixation times: Word frequency effects and individual differences. Memory and Cognition, 26(6), 1270–1281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Sebastián-Gallés, N., Dupoux, E., Segui, J., & Mehler, J. (1992). Contrasting syllabic effect in catalan and spanish. Journal of Memory and Language, 31, 18–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Seidenberg, M. S. (1987). Sublexical structures in visual word recognition: Access units or orthographic redundancy? In M. Coltheart (Ed.), Attention and performance XII: The psychology of reading (pp. 245–263). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  75. Seidenberg, M. S. (1988). Cognitive neuropsychology and language: The state of the art. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 5(4), 403–426.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Seidenberg, M. S., & McClelland, J. L. (1989). A distributed developmental model of word recognition and naming. Psychological Review, 96, 523–568.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Soares, A. P., Iriarte, A., de Almeida, J. J., Simões, A., Costa, A., França, P., et al. (2014). Comesaña, M. (2014). Procura-PALavras (P-PAL): Uma nova medida de frequência lexical do Português Europeu contemporâneo [Procura-PALavras (P-PAL): A new measure of word frequency for contemporary European Portuguese]. Psicologia: Reflexão e Crítica, 27(1), 1–14.Google Scholar
  78. Soares, A. P., Machado, J., Costa, A., Iriarte, A., Simões, A., de Almeida, J. J., et al. (2015). On the advantages of frequency measures extracted from subtitles: The case of Portuguese. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 68, 680–696.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Stenneken, P., Conrad, M., & Jacobs, A. M. (2007). Processing of syllables in production and recognition tasks. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 36(1), 65–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Taft, M. (1979). Lexical access via an orthographic code: The BOSS. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 18, 21–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Taft, M. (1992). The body of the BOSS: Subsyllabic units in the lexical processing of polysyllabic words. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 18, 1004–1014.Google Scholar
  82. Taft, M. (2001). Processing of orthographic structure by adults of different reading ability. Language and Speech, 44, 361–376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Taft, M. (2002). Orthographic processing of polysyllabic words by native and nonnative English speakers. Brain and Language, 81, 532–544.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Taft, M., & Forster, K. I. (1976). Lexical storage and retrieval of polymorphemic and polysyllabic words. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 15, 607–620.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Treiman, R., & Danis, C. (1988). Short-term memory errors for spoken syllables are affected by the linguistic structure of the syllables. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 14, 145–152.Google Scholar
  86. Van den Bussche, E., Van den Noortgate, W., & Reynvoet, B. (2009). Mechanisms of masked priming: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 135(3), 452–477.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Vitevitch, M. S., & Rodriguez, E. (2005). Neighborhood density effects in spoken Word recognition in Spanish. Journal of Multiligual Communication Disorders, 3, 64–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Yap, M. J., Tse, C. S., & Balota, D. A. (2009). Individual differences in the joint effects of semantic priming and word frequency: The role of lexical integrity. Journal of Memory and Language, 61, 303–325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Zhang, Q., & Wang, C. (2014). Syllable frequency and word frequency effects in spoken and written word production in a non-alphabetic script. Frontiers in Psychology, 18(5), 120.  https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00120.Google Scholar
  90. Ziegler, J. C., Perry, C., & Coltheart, M. (2000). The DRC model of visual word recognition and reading aloud: An extension to German. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 12, 413–430.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Zorzi, M., Houghton, G., & Butterworth, B. (1998). The development of spelling-sound relationships in a model of phonological reading. Language and Cognitive Processes, 13(2–3), 337–371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V., part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ana Duarte Campos
    • 1
  • Helena Mendes Oliveira
    • 1
  • Ana Paula Soares
    • 1
  1. 1.Human Cognition Lab, CIPsi, School of PsychologyUniversity of MinhoBragaPortugal

Personalised recommendations