Advertisement

Reading and Writing

, Volume 31, Issue 8, pp 1893–1921 | Cite as

The crossover effects of morphological awareness on vocabulary development among children in French immersion

  • Katie Lam
  • Xi Chen
Article
  • 363 Downloads

Abstract

The purpose of the current study was to explore longitudinally the bidirectional cross-language effects between morphological awareness and vocabulary development across English and French over one year. Participants included 81 Grade 1 students and 75 Grade 2 students. All were non-native speakers of French, and demonstrated average English word reading and vocabulary skills. They received formal instruction entirely in French at school. Children were tested at two time points spaced one year apart with tasks tapping inflectional and derivational morphological awareness, and vocabulary. They also completed measures of phonological awareness, word reading, and non-verbal reasoning. The Grade 1 students were assessed in English only at pretest, and in English and French at post-test. The Grade 2 students were assessed in English and French at both time points. As predicted, regression analyses revealed that English inflectional awareness predicted unique variance in French vocabulary among Grade 1 students. Among Grade 2 students, cross-lagged analyses showed that both English inflectional and English derivational awareness predicted gains in French vocabulary between Grades 2 and 3. Conversely, counter to our expectations, French morphological awareness did not predict gains in English vocabulary over time. Taken together, these results extend the extant corpus of research to substantiate that children can leverage morphological awareness from their primary language to facilitate their vocabulary learning in their second language.

Keywords

Cross-language transfer Morphological awareness Vocabulary development Bilingual children 

References

  1. Akhtar, N., & Tomasello, M. (1997). Young children’s productivity with word order and verb morphology. Developmental Psychology, 33, 952–965.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.33.6.952.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Anglin, J. M. (1993). Vocabulary development: A morphological analysis. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development.  https://doi.org/10.2307/1166112.Google Scholar
  3. Anisfeld, M., & Tucker, R. (1968). English pluralisation rules for six-year-old children. Child Development, 38, 1201–1217.Google Scholar
  4. Bassano, D. (2000). Early development of nouns and verbs in French: Exploring the interface between lexicon and grammar. Journal of Child Language, 27, 521–559.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bassano, D., Laaha, S., Maillochon, I., & Dressler, W. U. (2004). Early acquisition of verb grammar and lexical development: Evidence from periphrastic constructions in French and Austrian German. First Language, 24, 33–70.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0142723704040704.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Berko, J. (1958). The child’s learning of English morphology. Word, 14, 150–177. Reprinted in B. Lust & C. Foley (Eds.) (2004). First language acquisition: The essential readings (pp. 253–273). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  7. Berninger, V. W., Abbott, R. D., Nagy, W., & Carlisle, J. (2010). Growth in phonological, orthographic, and morphological awareness in grades 1 to 6. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 39, 141–163.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10936-009-9130-6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Caravolas, M., Lervåg, A., Mousikou, P., Efrim, C., Litavsky, M., Onochie-Quintanilla, E., et al. (2012). Common patterns of prediction of literacy development in different alphabetic orthographies. Psychological Science, 23, 678–686.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797611434536.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Carlisle, J. F. (1995). Morphological awareness and early reading achievement. In L. Feldman (Ed.), Morphological aspects of language processing (pp. 189–209). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  10. Carlisle, J. F. (2000). Awareness of the structure and meaning of morphologically complex words: Impact on reading. Reading and Writing, 12, 169–190.  https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008131926604.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Carlisle, J. F., & Fleming, J. (2003). Lexical processing of morphologically complex words in the elementary years. Scientific Studies of Reading, 7, 239–253.  https://doi.org/10.1207/S1532799XSSR0703_3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Carstairs-McCarthy, A. (2002). An introduction to English morphology: Words and their structure. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Casalis, S., & Colé, P. (2009). On the relationship between morphological and phonological awareness: Effects of training in kindergarten and in first-grade reading. First Language, 29, 113–142.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0142723708097484.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Casalis, S., Colé, P., & Sopo, D. (2004). Morphological awareness in developmental dyslexia. Annals of Dyslexia, 54, 114–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Casalis, S., & Louis-Alexandre, M.-F. (2000). Morphological analysis, phonological analysis and learning to read French: A longitudinal study. Reading and Writing, 12, 303–335.  https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008177205648.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Cenoz, J. (2003). The additive effect of bilingualism on third language acquisition: A review. The International Journal of Bilingualism, 7, 71–87.  https://doi.org/10.1177/13670069030070010501.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Chen, X., Ramírez, G., Luo, Y. C., Geva, E., & Ku, Y.-M. (2012). Comparing vocabulary development in Spanish and Chinese-speaking ELLs: The effects of metalinguistic and sociocultural factors. Reading and Writing, 25, 1991–2020.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-011-9318-7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Chen, X., Xu, F., Nguyen, T.-K., Hong, G., & Wang, Y. (2010). Effects of cross-language transfer on first-language phonological awareness and literacy skills in Chinese children receiving English instruction. Journal of Educational Psychology, 102, 712–728.  https://doi.org/10.1037/a0018802.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Chomsky, N., & Halle, M. (1968). The sound pattern of English. New York, NY: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
  20. Chung, K. K. H., & Ho, C. S.-H. (2010). Second language learning difficulties in Chinese children with dyslexia: What are the reading-related cognitive skills that contribute to English and Chinese word reading? Journal of Learning Disabilities, 43, 195–211.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0022219409345018.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Clark, E. V., & Hecht, B. F. (1982). Learning to coin agent and instrument nouns. Cognition, 12, 1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Colé, P., Royer, C., Leuwers, C., & Casalis, S. (2004). Les connaissances morphologiques dérivationnelles et l’apprentissage de la lecture chez l’apprenti-lecteur français du CP au CE2. L’année Psychologique, 104, 701–750.  https://doi.org/10.3406/psy.2004.29686.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Deacon, S. H., Wade-Woolley, L., & Kirby, J. (2007). Cross-over: The role of morphological awareness in French immersion children’s reading. Developmental Psychology, 43, 732–746.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.43.3.732.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Derwing, B. L., & Baker, W. J. (1979). Recent research on the acquisition of English morphology. In P. Fletcher & M. Garman (Eds.), Language acquisition (pp. 209–223). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  25. Duncan, L. G., Casalis, S., & Colé, P. (2009). Early metalinguistic awareness of derivational morphology: Observations from a comparison of English and French. Applied Psycholinguistics, 30, 405–440.  https://doi.org/10.1017/S0142716409090213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Dunn, L., & Dunn, L. (2007). Peabody picture vocabulary test (4th ed.). Minneapolis, MN: Pearson Assessments.Google Scholar
  27. Dunn, L. M., Theriault-Whalen, C. M., & Dunn, L. M. (1993). Echelle de vocabulaire en images Peabody. Minneapolis, MN: Pearson Assessments.Google Scholar
  28. Elbro, C., & Arnbak, E. (1996). The role of morpheme recognition and morphological awareness in dyslexia. Annals of Dyslexia, 46, 209–240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Feldman, L. B., Rueckl, J., DiLiberto, K., Pastizzo, M., & Vellutino, F. (2002). Morphological analysis by child readers as revealed by the fragment completion task. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 9, 529–535.  https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03196309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Geva, E., Wade-Woolley, L., & Shany, M. (1997). Development of reading efficiency in first and second language. Scientific Studies of Reading, 1, 119–144.  https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532799xssr0102_2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Gottardo, A., Yan, B., Siegel, L., & Wade-Woolley, L. (2001). Factors related to English reading performance in children with Chinese as a first language: More evidence of cross-language transfer of phonological processing. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93, 530–542.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.93.3.530.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Guilbert, L. (1975). La créativité lexicale. Paris: Larousse Université.Google Scholar
  33. Hayashi, Y., & Murphy, V. A. (2013). On the nature of morphological awareness in Japanese-English bilingual children: A cross-linguistic perspective. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 16, 49–67.  https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728912000181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Hipfner-Boucher, K., Lam, K., & Chen, X. (2014). The effects of bilingual education on the English language and literacy outcomes of Chinese-speaking children. Written Language & Literacy, 17, 116–138.  https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.17.1.06hip.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Jarvis, S., & Odlin, T. (2000). Morphological type, spatial references, and language transfer. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 22, 535–556.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Kieffer, M. J., & Lesaux, N. K. (2008). The role of derivational morphological awareness in the reading comprehension of Spanish-speaking English language learners. Reading and Writing, 21, 783–804.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-007-9092-8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Koda, K. (2000). Cross-linguistic variations in L2 morphological awareness. Applied Psycholinguistics, 21, 297–320.  https://doi.org/10.1017/S0142716400003015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Koda, K. (2005). Learning to read across writing systems: Transfer, metalinguistic awareness, and second-language reading development. In V. Cook & B. Bassetti (Eds.), Second language writing systems (pp. 311–334). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
  39. Koda, K. (2007). Reading and language learning: Crosslinguistic constraints on second language reading development. Language Learning, 57(Supp. 1), 1–44.  https://doi.org/10.1111/0023-8333.101997010-i1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Koda, K., & Zehler, A. M. (Eds.). (2008). Learning to read across languages. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  41. Ku, Y., & Anderson, R. C. (2003). Development of morphological awareness in Chinese and English. Reading and Writing, 16, 399–422.  https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024227231216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Kuo, L.-J., & Anderson, R. C. (2006). Morphological awareness and learning to read: A cross-language perspective. Educational Psychologist, 41, 161–180.  https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep4103_3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Lam, K., Chen, X., Geva, E., Luo, Y., & Hong, L. (2012). The role of morphological awareness in reading achievement among young Chinese-speaking English language learners: A longitudinal study. Reading and Writing, 25, 1847–1872.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-011-9329-4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Lightfoot, D. (2009). Cuing a new grammar. In A. van Kemenade & B. Los (Eds.), The handbook of the history of English (pp. 24–44). Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
  45. Lodge, R., Armstrong, N., Ellis, Y. M. L., & Shelton, J. F. (2016). Exploring the French language. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  46. Mahony, D. L., Singson, M., & Mann, V. (2000). Reading ability and sensitivity to morphological relation. Reading and Writing, 12, 191–218.  https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008136012492.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Marec-Breton, N., Gombert, J. É., & Colé, P. (2005). Traitements morphologiques lors de la reconnaissance des mots écrits chez des apprentis lecteurs. L’année psychologique, 105, 9–45.  https://doi.org/10.3406/psy.2005/3818.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. McBride-Chang, C., Wagner, R. K., Muse, A., Chow, B. W., & Shu, H. (2005). The role of morphological awareness in children’s vocabulary acquisition in English. Applied Psycholinguistics, 26, 415–435.  https://doi.org/10.1017/S014271640505023X.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. McKeown, M. G., Beck, I. L., Omanson, R. C., & Perfetti, C. A. (1983). The effects of long-term vocabulary instruction on reading comprehension: A replication. Journal of Literacy Research, 15(1), 3–16.Google Scholar
  50. Meunier, F., & Segui, J. (2002). Cross-modal morphological priming in French. Brain and Language, 81, 89–102.  https://doi.org/10.1006/brln.2001.2509.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Naglieri, J. A. (1985). Matrix analogies test: Expanded form. San Antonio, TX: The Psychological Corporation.Google Scholar
  52. Nagy, W. E., Berninger, V. W., & Abbott, R. D. (2006). Contributions of morphology beyond phonology to literacy outcomes of upper elementary and middle-school students. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98, 134–147.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.98.1.134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Nicoladis, E., Palmer, A., & Marentette, P. (2007). The role of type and token frequency in using past tense morphemes correctly. Developmental Science, 10, 237–254.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7687.2007.00582.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Niswander, E., Pollatsek, A., & Rayner, K. (2000). The processing of derived and inflected suffixed words during reading. Language & Cognitive Processes, 15, 389–420.  https://doi.org/10.1080/01690960050119643.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Ouellette, G. P. (2006). What’s meaning got to do with it: The role of vocabulary in word reading and reading comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98, 554–566.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.98.3.554.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Parisse, C., Maillart, C., & Tommerdahl, J. (2012). F-LARSP: A computerized tool for measuring morphosyntactic abilities in French. In M. J. Ball, D. Crystal, & P. Fletcher (Eds.), Assessing grammar: The languages of LARSP (pp. 230–244). North York, ON: Multilingual Matters.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Pasquarella, A., Chen, X., Lam, K., Luo, Y. C., & Ramírez, G. (2011). Cross-language transfer of morphological awareness in Chinese-English bilinguals. Journal of Research in Reading, 34, 23–42.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9817.2010.01484.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Pedhazur, E. J. (1997). Multiple regressions in behavioral research: Explanation and prediction. Fort Worth, TX: Harcourt Brace College Publishers.Google Scholar
  59. Rabin, J., & Deacon, H. (2008). The representation of morphologically complex words in the developing lexicon. Journal of Child Language, 35, 453–465.  https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305000907008525.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Ramírez, G., Chen, X., Geva, E., & Kiefer, H. (2010). Morphological awareness in Spanish-speaking English language learners: Within and cross-language effects on word reading. Reading and Writing, 23, 337–358.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-009-9203-9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Ramírez, G., Chen, X., & Pasquarella, A. (2013). Cross-linguistic transfer of morphological awareness in Spanish-Speaking English language learners: The facilitating effect of cognate knowledge. Topics in Language Disorders, 33, 73–92.  https://doi.org/10.1097/TLD.0b013e318280f55a.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Royle, P., Drury, J. E., Bourguignon, N., & Steinhauer, K. (2012). The temporal dynamics of inflected word recognition: A masked ERP priming study of French verbs. Neuropsychologia, 50, 3542–3553.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2012.09.007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Saiegh-Haddad, E., & Geva, E. (2008). Morphological awareness, phonological awareness, and reading in English–Arabic bilingual children. Reading and Writing, 21, 481–504.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-007-9074-x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Sandra, D. (1994). The morphology of the mental lexicon: Internal word structure viewed from psycholinguistic perspective. Language and Cognitive Processes, 9, 227–269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Schiff, R., & Calif, S. (2007). Role of phonological and morphological awareness in L2 oral word reading. Language Learning, 57, 271–298.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2007.00409.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Sénéchal, M., Basque, M. T., & Leclaire, T. (2006). Morphological knowledge as revealed in children’s spelling accuracy and reports of spelling strategies. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 95, 231–254.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2006.05.003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Sparks, E., & Deacon, S. H. (2015). Morphological awareness and vocabulary acquisition: A longitudinal examination of their relationship in English-speaking children. Applied Psycholinguistics, 36, 299–321.  https://doi.org/10.1017/S0142716413000246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Tabachnick, B. C., & Fidell, L. S. (2007). Using multivariate statistics (5th ed.). Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.Google Scholar
  69. Thordardottir, E. (2005). Early lexical and syntactic development in Quebec French and English: Implications for cross-linguistic and bilingual assessment. International Journal of Language and Communication Disorders, 40, 243–278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Tyler, A., & Nagy, W. (1989). The acquisition of English derivational morphology. Journal of Memory and Language, 28(6), 649–667.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-596X(89)90002-8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Verhoeven, L., & Perfetti, C. A. (2003). Introduction to this special issue: The role of morphology in learning to read. Scientific Studies of Reading, 7, 209–218.  https://doi.org/10.1207/S1532799XSSR0703_1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Verhoeven, L., van Leeuwe, J., & Vermeer, A. (2011). Vocabulary growth and reading development across the elementary school years. Scientific Studies of Reading, 15, 8–25.  https://doi.org/10.1080/10888438.2011.536125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Wagner, R. K., Torgesen, J. K., & Rashotte, C. A. (1999). Comprehensive test of phonological processing (CTOPP). Austin, TX: PRO-ED.Google Scholar
  74. Wagner, R. K., Torgesen, J. K., Rashotte, C. A., Hecht, S. A., Barker, T. A., Burgess, S. R., et al. (1997). Changing relations between phonological processing abilities and word-level reading as children develop from beginning to skilled readers: A 5-year longitudinal study. Developmental Psychology, 33, 468–479.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Wang, M., Perfetti, C. A., & Liu, Y. (2005). Chinese–English biliteracy acquisition: Cross language and writing system transfer. Cognition, 97, 67–88.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2004.10.001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Wesche, M. B. (2002). Early French immersion: How has the original Canadian model stood the test of time? In P. Burmeister, T. Piske, & A. Rohde (Eds.), An integrated view of language development. Papers in honor of Henning Wode (pp. 357–379). Trier: Wissenschaftlicher Verlag Trier.Google Scholar
  77. Woodcock, R. W. (1984). Woodcock language proficiency battery. Allen, TX: DLM.Google Scholar
  78. Zhang, J., Anderson, R. C., Li, H., Dong, Q., Wu, X., & Zhang, Y. (2010). Cross-language transfer of insight into the structure of compound words. Reading and Writing, 23, 311–336.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-009-9205-7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Zhang, J., & Koda, K. (2014). Awareness of derivation and compounding in Chinese–English biliteracy acquisition. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 17, 55–73.  https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050.2012.736949.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V., part of Springer Nature 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Psychiatry and Behavioural NeurosciencesMcMaster UniversityHamiltonCanada
  2. 2.Applied Psychology and Human DevelopmentOntario Institute for Studies in Education, University of TorontoTorontoCanada

Personalised recommendations