Advertisement

Reading and Writing

, Volume 31, Issue 2, pp 457–481 | Cite as

A comparative examination of Canadian and American pre-service teachers’ self-efficacy beliefs for literacy instruction

  • Katia Ciampa
  • Tiffany L. Gallagher
Article
First Online:

Abstract

This study explored Canadian and American pre-service elementary teachers’ self-efficacy beliefs for literacy instruction, as well as the contextual factors (i.e., course and field experiences) that contribute to these self-efficacy beliefs. Survey data were collected over a two-year period at the beginning and end of a required elementary literacy methods course that assessed pre-service teachers’ self-efficacy for literacy instruction. A content analysis of the American and Canadian literacy methods course syllabi was also conducted. Paired t test results showed no significant difference in pre-service teachers’ literacy teaching self-efficacy scores from pre-test to post-test; however, there was a significant difference in the pre-service teachers’ literacy efficacy beliefs related to oral reading from the beginning to the end of the course. A weak negative correlation was found between the Canadian pre-service teachers’ total Teachers’ Sense of Efficacy for Literacy Instruction (TSELI; Tschannen-Moran & Hoy, 2011) scores and their teaching experience specific to literacy instruction, r = − .1, p = .04. There was a positive correlation between Canadian pre-service teachers’ self-efficacy scores related to engagement and differentiated instruction and their volunteer and work experiences. A positive correlation existed between Canadian and American pre-service teachers’ self-efficacy for reading/writing connections and university coursework related to literacy instruction. Implications for literacy teacher educators and recommendations for literacy instruction are discussed.

Keywords

Literacy teacher education Pre-service teacher preparation Self-efficacy TSELI 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Allinder, R. M. (1994). The relationship between efficacy and the instructional practices of special education teachers and consultants. Teacher Education and Special Education, 17(2), 86–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Al-Otaiba, S., Lake, V. E., Greulich, L., Folsom, J. S., & Guidry, L. (2012). Preparing beginning reading teachers: An experimental comparison of initial early literacy field experiences. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 25(1), 109–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Armor, D. (1976). Analysis of the school preferred reading program in selected Los Angeles minority schools (Report No. R-2007-LAUSD). Santa Monica, CA: Rand Corporation.Google Scholar
  4. Ashton, P. T., Webb, R. B., & Doda, N. (1983). A study of teachers’ sense of efficacy (Final Report, National Institute of Education Contract No. 400-79-0075). Gainesville, FL: University of Florida (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 231 834).Google Scholar
  5. Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory, Prentice-Hall series in social learning theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  6. Barr, S. M., Eslami, Z. R., Joshi, R. M., Slattery, G. P., Jr., & Hammer, J. (2016). Perceptions and knowledge of literacy constructs by elementary school teachers of ELLs. The Educational Forum, 80(1), 61–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bostock, L., & Boon, H. (2012). Pre-service teachers’ literacy self-efficacy and literacy competence. Australian and International Journal of Rural Education, 22(1), 19–37.Google Scholar
  8. Cakiroglu, E. (2008). The teaching efficacy beliefs of pre-service teachers in the USA and Turkey. Journal of Education for Teaching, 34(1), 33–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Canadian Language and Literacy Research Network (CLLRN). (2009). National strategy for early literacy: A summary report. London, ON: CLLRN.Google Scholar
  10. Carreker, S., Joshi, M., & Boulware-Gooden, R. (2010). Spelling-related teacher knowledge: The impact of professional development on identifying appropriate instructional activities. Learning Disability Quarterly, 33, 148–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. CAST. (2011). Universal design for learning guidelines version 2.0. Wakefield, MA: Author.Google Scholar
  12. Caudle, L. A., & Moran, M. J. (2012). Changes in understandings of three teachers’ beliefs and practice across time: Moving from teacher preparation to in-service teaching. Journal of Early Childhood Teacher Education, 33(1), 38–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Clark, S. (2016). An exploratory study examining the influence of the number of reading methods courses on pre-service and in-service teacher perceptions of ability to teach reading. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 44(2), 125–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Common Core State Standards Initiative. (2016). Key shifts in English language arts. Retrieved from: http://www.corestandards.org/.
  15. Council of Ministers of Education, Canada. (2009). Key factors to support literacy success in school-aged populations. Canadian Education Statistics Council. ISBN 978-0-88987-191-5.Google Scholar
  16. Creswell, J. W. (2012). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research (4th ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson Education.Google Scholar
  17. Danielson Group. (2014). The framework. Retrieved from http://www.danielsongroup.org/framework/.
  18. Dillman, D. A. (1978). Mail and telephone surveys: The total design method. New York, NY: Wiley.Google Scholar
  19. Duffy, A. M., & Atkinson, T. S. (2001). Learning to teach struggling (and nonstruggling) elementary school readers: An analysis of pre-service teachers’ knowledge. Reading Research and Instruction, 41(1), 83–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Enochs, L. G., Smith, P. L., & Huinker, D. (2000). Establishing factorial validity of the mathematics teaching efficacy beliefs instrument. School Science and Mathematics, 100, 194–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Feifer, S. G., Nader, R. G., Flanagan, D. P., Fitzer, K. R., & Hicks, K. (2014). Identifying specific reading disability subtypes for effective educational remediation. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 20(1), 18–30.Google Scholar
  22. Gibson, S., & Dembo, M. (1984). Teacher efficacy: A construct validation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 76, 569–582.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Guskey, T. R. (1988). Teacher self-efficacy, self-concept, and attitudes toward the implementation of instructional innovation. Teaching and Teacher Education, 4, 63–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Guskey, T. R., & Passaro, P. D. (1994). Teacher efficacy: A study of construct dimensions. American Educational Research Journal, 31(3), 627–643.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Haverback, H. R., & Parault, S. J. (2008). Pre-service reading teacher efficacy and tutoring: A review. Educational Psychology Review, 20(3), 237–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Haverback, H. R., & Parault, S. J. (2011). High efficacy and the preservice reading teacher: A comparative study. Teaching and Teacher Education, 27(4), 703–711.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Helfrich, S. R., & Clark, S. K. (2016). A comparative examination of pre-service teacher self-efficacy related to literacy instruction. Reading Psychology, 37(7), 943–961.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Hiebert, E. H., & Mesmer, H. A. E. (2013). Upping the ante of text complexity in the Common Core State Standards: Examining its potential impact on young readers. Educational Researcher, 42(1), 44–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Hoddinott, J., Lethbridge, L., & Phipps, S. (2002). Is history destiny? Resources, transitions and child education attainments in Canada: Final report. Ottawa, ON: Human Resources Development Canada, Applied Research Branch, Strategic Policy.Google Scholar
  30. Holsti, O. R. (1969). Content analysis for the social sciences and humanities. Reading: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
  31. Hoy, A. W., & Spero, R. B. (2005). Changes in teacher efficacy during the early years of teaching: A comparison of four measures. Teaching and Teacher Education, 21(4), 343–356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. International Dyslexia Association. (2010). Knowledge and practice standards for teachers of reading. Baltimore, MD: Author.Google Scholar
  33. International Literacy Association. (2017). International Literacy Association’s 2017 standards for the preparation of literacy professionals. Newark, DE; Urbana, IL: Authors.Google Scholar
  34. International Literacy Association and National Council of Teachers of English. (2017). Literacy teacher preparation [Research advisory]. Newark, DE; Urbana, IL: Authors.Google Scholar
  35. International Reading Association. (2010). Standards for reading professionals—Revised 2010. Newark, DE: Authors.Google Scholar
  36. Leader-Janssen, E. M., & Rankin-Erickson, J. L. (2013). Preservice teachers’ content knowledge and self-efficacy for teaching reading. Literacy Research and Instruction, 52(3), 204–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Learning Disabilities Association of Niagara Region. (2017). Programs. Retrieved from http://ldaniagara.org/programs/.
  38. Lipp, J., & Helfrich, S. R. (2016). Pre-service teachers’ growth in understandings of best practice literacy instruction through paired course and field experience. Reading Horizons (Online), 55(2), 44–87.Google Scholar
  39. Malmberg, L. E., Hagger, H., & Webster, S. (2014). Teachers’ situation-specific mastery experiences: Teacher, student group and lesson effects. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 29(3), 429–451.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Maloch, B., Flint, A., Eldridge, D., Harmon, J., Loven, R., Fine, J., et al. (2003). Understanding, beliefs, and reported decision making of first-year teachers from different reading teacher preparation programs. The Elementary School Journal, 103(5), 431–459.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. McGhie-Richmond, D., Irvine, A., Loreman, T., Cizman, J. L., & Lupart, J. (2013). Teacher perspectives on inclusive education in rural Alberta. Canada. Canadian Journal of Education, 36(1), 195–239.Google Scholar
  42. Midgley, C., Feldlaufer, H., & Eccles, J. S. (1989). Change in teacher efficacy and student self-and task-related beliefs in mathematics during the transition to junior high school. Journal of Educational Psychology, 81(2), 247–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Moats, L. (2009). Knowledge foundations for teaching reading and spelling. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 22(4), 379–399.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Moats, L. (2014). What teachers don’t know and why they aren’t learning it: addressing the need for content and pedagogy in teacher education. Australian Journal of Learning Difficulties, 19(2), 75–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. National Center for Education Statistics. (2012). National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP) 2012 reading report card. Washington, DC: Institute of Education Sciences, US Department of Education.Google Scholar
  46. National Center for Education Statistics. (2015). National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP) 2015 reading report card. Washington, DC: Institute of Education Sciences, US Department of Education.Google Scholar
  47. National Center for Educational Statistics. (2013). Characteristics of public and private elementary and secondary school teachers in the United States: Results from the 2011–12 schools and staffing survey. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.Google Scholar
  48. National Council of Teachers of English and International Reading Association. (1996). Standards for the English language arts . Urbana, IL, & Newark, DE: Authors.Google Scholar
  49. National Council for Accreditation of Teacher Education. (2010). Transforming teacher education through clinical practice: A national strategy to prepare effective teachers. Report of blue ribbon panel on clinical preparation and partnerships for improved student learning. Washington, DC.: NCATE.Google Scholar
  50. National Research Council. (2010). Preparing teachers: Building evidence for sound policy. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.Google Scholar
  51. NVivo 11. (2017). Qualitative data analysis computer software. Doncaster, VIC: QSR International Pty Ltd.Google Scholar
  52. Okumus, F., & Wong, K. K. (2007). A content analysis of strategic management syllabi in tourism and hospitality schools. Journal of Teaching in Travel & Tourism, 7(1), 77–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Ontario Ministry of Education. (2006). The Ontario curriculum grades 1–8: Language revised. Toronto, ON: Author.Google Scholar
  54. Retallick, M. S., & Miller, G. (2010). Teacher preparation in career and technical education: A model for developing and researching early field experiences. Journal of Career and Technical Education, 25(1), 62–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Scherer, M. (2012). The challenges of supporting new teachers: A conversation with Linda Darling-Hammond. Educational Leadership, 69(8), 18–23.Google Scholar
  56. Skaalvik, E. M., & Skaalvik, S. (2007). Dimensions of teacher self-efficacy and relations with strain factors, perceived collective teacher efficacy, and teacher burnout. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99(3), 611–625.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Spear-Swerling, L., Brucker, P. O., & Alfano, M. P. (2005). Teachers’ literacy-related knowledge and self-perceptions in relation to preparation and experience. Annals of Dyslexia, 55(2), 266–296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. SPSS Software. (2012). PASW statistics. Chicago, IL: SPSS Inc.Google Scholar
  59. Statistics Canada. (2009). Literacy counts. Ottawa, ON: Author.Google Scholar
  60. Stein, M. K., & Wang, M. C. (1988). Teacher development and school improvement: The process of teacher change. Teaching and Teacher Education, 4(2), 171–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Stemler, S. (2001). An overview of content analysis. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 7(17), 137–146.Google Scholar
  62. Theoharis, G., & Causton-Theoharis, J. (2011). Preparing pre-service teachers for inclusive classrooms: Revising lesson-planning expectations. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 15(7), 743–761.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Tschannen-Moran, M., & Hoy, A. W. (2001). Teacher efficacy: Capturing an elusive construct. Teaching and Teacher Education, 17(7), 783–805.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Tschannen-Moran, M., & Johnson, D. (2011). Exploring literacy teachers’ self-efficacy beliefs: Potential sources at play. Teaching and Teacher Education, 27(4), 751–761.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Ware, H., & Kitsantas, A. (2007). Teacher and collective efficacy beliefs as predictors of professional commitment. The Journal of Educational Research, 100(5), 303–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Washburn, E. K., Binks-Cantrell, E. S., Joshi, R. M., Martin-Chang, S., & Arrow, A. (2016). Preservice teacher knowledge of basic language constructs in Canada, England, New Zealand, and the USA. Annals of dyslexia, 66(1), 7–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Education, Hospitality, and Continuing StudiesWidener UniversityChesterUSA
  2. 2.Department of Teacher EducationBrock UniversitySaint CatharinesCanada

Personalised recommendations

Cite article

Buy options