Phonemic awareness development in 2.5- and 3.5-year-old children: an examination of emergent, receptive, knowledge and skills
- 1.2k Downloads
- 1 Citations
Abstract
The National Institutes of Health has deemed illiteracy a national health crisis based on reading proficiency rates among American children. In 2002, the National Early Literacy Panel identified six pre-reading skills that are most crucial precursors to reading mastery and predict future reading outcomes. Of those skills, phonological awareness, and in particular phonemic awareness, is the strongest independent predictor of early reading outcomes. However, limited research has addressed the development of these component skills due in part to the fact that many of the measures used to assess sub-skills such as phonemic awareness are oral production measures that cannot easily be administered with children under the age of five, and are not designed to detect implicit or emerging knowledge. To address this limitation, we developed and administered two receptive measures of phonemic awareness to 2.5- and 3.5-year-old children. We found evidence for the emergence of this component skill earlier in ontogeny than is currently acknowledged in the literature. Overall, children performed at above chance rates on measures of receptive phonemic awareness at the level of the individual phoneme as early as 2.5-years-old. Results are discussed in terms of the need for a paradigm shift in prevailing models of how phonological awareness develops, as well as the potential to identify children at-risk for reading failure at an earlier point in ontogeny than is currently feasible.
Keywords
Phonemic awareness development Phonological awareness Pre-reading development Developmental receptive language measures Receptive phonemic awareness Literacy development Cognition Developmental psychologyReferences
- Anthony, J. L., & Lonigan, C. J. (2004). The nature of phonological awareness: Converging evidence from four studies of preschool and early grade school children. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96(1), 53–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Anthony, J. L., Lonigan, C. J., Driscoll, K., Phillips, B. M., & Burgess, S. R. (2003). Phonological sensitivity: A quasi-parallel progression of word structure units and cognitive operations. Reading Research Quarterly, 38(4), 470–487.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Bradley, L., & Bryant, P. E. (1981). Visual memory and phonological skills in reading and spelling backwardness. Psychological Research, 43(2), 193–199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Bradley, L., & Bryant, P. E. (1983). Categorizing sounds and learning to read: A Causal connection. Nature, 30, 419–421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Cardillo, G. C. (2010). Predicting the predictors: Individual differences in longitudinal relationships between infant phonetic perception, toddler vocabulary, and preschooler language and phonological awareness. Dissertation Abstracts International, 71(10) B. (UMI No: 3421541). Retrieved August 20, 2011 from Dissertation and Theses database.Google Scholar
- Castles, A., Wilson, K., & Coltheart, M. (2011). Early orthographic influences on phonemic awareness tasks: Evidence from a preschool training study. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 108, 203–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Catts, H. W., & Hogan, T. P. (2003). Language basis of reading disabilities and implications for early identification and remediation. Reading Psychology, 24(3–4), 223–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Cunningham, A. E., & Stanovich, K. E. (1993). Children’s literacy environments and early word recognition skills. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 5, 193–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Dunn, L. M., & Dunn, D. M. (2007). Peabody picture vocabulary test (4th ed.). Minneapolis, MN: Pearson Assessments.Google Scholar
- Fenson, L., Marchman, V. A., Thal, D. J., Dale, P. S., Reznick, J. S., & Bates, E. (2007). MacArthur-Bates communicative development inventories: User’s guide and technical manual (2nd ed.). Baltimore, MD: Brookes.Google Scholar
- Fox, B., & Routh, D. K. (1975). Analyzing spoken language into words, syllables, and phonemes: A developmental study. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 4, 331–342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Gombert, J. E. (1992). Metalinguistic development. New York: Harvester Wheatsheaf.Google Scholar
- Goodman, I., Libenson, A., & Wade-Woolley, L. (2010). Sensitivity to linguistic stress, phonological awareness, and early reading ability in preschoolers. Journal of Research in Reading, 33(2), 113–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Goswami, U. (1990). Phonological skills and learning to read. London: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
- Karmiloff-Smith, A. (1992). Beyond modularity: A developmental perspective on cognitive science. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
- Kuhl, P. K., Conboy, B. T., Padden, D., Nelson, T., & Pruitt, J. (2005). Early speech perception and later language development: Implications for the ‘critical period’. Language Learning and Development, 1(3–4), 273–264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Liberman, I. Y., Shankwiler, D., Fischer, F. W., & Carter, B. (1974). Explicit syllable and phoneme segmentation in young children. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 18, 201–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Lonigan, C. J., Burgess, S. R., Anthony, J. L., & Barker, T. A. (1998). Development of phonological sensitivity in 2- to 5-year-old children. Journal of Educational Psychology, 90(2), 294–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Metsala, J. L. (1999). The development of phonemic awareness in learning disabled children. Applied Psycholinguistics, 20(1), 149–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Moats, L. (1999). Teaching reading is rocket science. Washington, DC: American Federation of Teachers.Google Scholar
- Muter, V., Hulme, C., Snowling, M. J., & Taylor, S. (1997). Segmentation, not rhyming, predicts early progress in learning to read. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry and Allied Disciplines, 35, 293–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- National Assessment of Educational Progress (2015). The Nation’s Report Card: 2015 Mathematics and reading assessments. (Report No. NCES 2015136). Retrieved February 5, 2016 from https://nces.ed.gov/pubsearch/pubsinfo.asp?pubid=2015136.
- National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, NIH, DHHS. (2010). Developing early literacy: Report of the National Early Literacy Panel (NA). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
- National Reading Panel. (2000). Report of the National Reading Panel: Teaching children to read (Report No. 00-4769). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.Google Scholar
- Scarborough, H. S. (1989). Prediction of reading dysfunction from familial and individual differences. Journal of Educational Psychology, 81, 101–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Stanovich, K. E., Cunningham, A. E., & Cramer, B. B. (1984). Assessing phonological awareness in kindergarten children: Issues of task comparability. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 38(2), 175–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Verhagen, W. G. M., Aarnoutse, C. A. J., & van Leeuwe, J. F. J. (2009). The predictive power of phonemic awareness and naming speed for early Dutch word recognition. Educational Research and Evaluation, 15(1), 93–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Wackerle-Hollman, A. K., Schmitt, B. A., Bradfield, T. A., Rodriguez, M. C., & McConnell, S. R. (2015). Redefining individual growth and development indicators: Phonological awareness. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 48(5), 495–510.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Wagner, R. K., & Torgeson, J. K. (1987). The nature of phonological awareness and its causal role in the acquisition of reading skills. Psychological Bulletin, 101, 192–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Werker, J. F., & Tees, R. C. (2002). Cross-language speech perception: Evidence for perceptual reorganization during the first year of life. Infant Behavior and Development, 25, 121–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Yopp, H. K., & Yopp, R. H. (2000). Supporting phonemic awareness development in the classroom. The Reading Teacher, 54(2), 130–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar