Advertisement

Reading and Writing

, Volume 30, Issue 6, pp 1157–1171 | Cite as

The effects of graphic similarity on Japanese recognition of simplified Chinese characters

  • Xiaochun Teng
  • Jun Yamada
Article
First Online:

Abstract

The pedagogical and theoretical questions addressed in this study relate to the extent to which native Japanese readers with little or no knowledge of Chinese characters recognize Chinese characters that are viewed as abbreviations of the kanji they already know. Three graphic similarity functions (i.e., an orthographically acceptable similarity, a physical similarity, and an extended physical similarity function) were formulated to predict the Japanese learners’ target kanji production. Results showed that the learners’ performance was poor, with only approximately 30% correct, and that the extended physical similarity function incorporating character frequency and graphic neighbors more accurately accounted for the target production than other functions. Some pedagogical implications and issues for further research are briefly discussed.

Keywords

Japanese learners of Chinese characters Kanji Physical similarity Extended physical similarity Neighbors 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Notes

Acknowledegments

We thank Karen Carter, Jon Clenton, Robert Taferner, Clay Williams, and two anonymous reviewers of this journal for their helpful comments on earlier versions of this paper.

References

  1. Chen, Y. P., Allport, D. A., & Marshall, J. C. (1996). What are the functional orthographic units in Chinese word recognition: The stroke or the stroke pattern? Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 49A, 1024–1043. doi: 10.1080/713755668.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Chen, H.-C., d’Arcais, F., & Cheung, S.-L. (1995). Orthographic and phonological activation in recognizing Chinese characters. Psychological Research, 58, 144–153. doi: 10.1007/BF00571102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Chen, H.-C., & Juola, J. F. (1982). Dimensions of lexical coding in Chinese and English. Memory & Cognition, 10, 216–224. doi: 10.3758/BF03197632.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Chen, H.-C., Vaid, J., & Wu, J.-T. (2009). Homophone density and phonological frequency in Chinese word recognition. Language and Cognitive Processing, 24, 967–982. doi: 10.1080/01690960902804515.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Ding, G., Peng, D. L., & Taft, M. (2004). The nature of the mental representation of radicals in Chinese: A priming study. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 30, 530–539. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.30.2.530.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Feldman, L. B., & Siok, W. W. T. (1997). The role of component function in visual recognition of Chinese characters. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 23, 776–781. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.23.3.776.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Hayashi, O. (1982). Zusetsu nihongo (Graphic Japanese). Tokyo: Kadokawa.Google Scholar
  8. Liu, P. D., Chung, K. K., McBride-Chang, C., & Tong, X. (2010). Holistic versus analytic processing: Evidence for a different approach to processing of Chinese at word and character levels in Chinese children. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 107, 466–478. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2010.06.00.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Taylor, I., & Taylor, M. M. (1983). The psychology of reading. NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  10. Tong, X., & Yip, J. H. Y. (2015). Cracking the Chinese character: Radical sensitivity in learners of Chinese as a foreign language and its relationship to Chinese word reading. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 28, 159–181. doi: 10.1007/s11145-014-9519-y.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Tversky, A. (1977). Feature similarity. Psychological Review, 84, 327–352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Wang, W. S. Y. (1973). The Chinese language. Scientific American, 228(2), 50–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Williams, C. (2013). Emerging development of sematic and phonological routes to character decoding in Chinese as a foreign language learners. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 26, 293–315. doi: 10.1007/s11145-012-9368-5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Williams, C., & Bever, T. (2010). Chinese character decoding: A semantic bias? Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 23, 589–605. doi: 10.1007/s11145-010-9228-0.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Yeh, S. L., & Li, J. L. (2002). Role of structure and component in judgments of visual similarity of Chinese characters. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 28, 933–947. doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.28.4.933.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Foreign Language StudiesWenzhou Medical UniversityWenzhouChina
  2. 2.Graduate School of Integrated Arts and SciencesHiroshima UniversityHigashi HiroshimaJapan

Personalised recommendations

Cite article

Buy options