Advertisement

Reading and Writing

, Volume 30, Issue 4, pp 871–886 | Cite as

The influence of working memory on reading comprehension in vowelized versus non-vowelized Arabic

  • Hossam Elsayyad
  • John Everatt
  • Tilly Mortimore
  • Charles Haynes
Article

Abstract

Unlike English, short vowel sounds in Arabic are represented by diacritics rather than letters. According to the presence and absence of these vowel diacritics, the Arabic script can be considered more or less transparent in comparison with other orthographies. The purpose of this study was to investigate the contribution of working memory to vowelized and non-vowelized reading comprehension and determine whether working memory is more involved in non-vowelized than vowelized reading comprehension. Forty-nine Arabic speaking children from grade six (age 11) undertook two measures of reading comprehension (one vowelized and one non-vowelized). They were also given measures of word reading fluency, vocabulary, phonological awareness, rapid naming and listening span as a measure of working memory. The results indicated that both vowelized and non-vowelized texts were associated with the measure of working memory after controlling for vocabulary, word reading and phonological processing. Although the results are more consistent with common influences of working memory across the two orthographies, slightly larger effects of working memory on non-vowelized reading comprehension suggest that further research, potentially with younger cohorts of Arabic readers would be appropriate. The findings are discussed and future directions for research are suggested.

Keywords

Working memory Reading comprehension Word reading Arabic orthography 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We thank the principals, staff and parents from the participating schools for their willingness in allowing us to proceed with this work.

References

  1. Abu Al Diyar, M., Everatt, J., Elbeheri, G., & Mahfoudhi, A. (2015). A standardized test of working memory for children (in Arabic). Kuwait: Centre for Child Evaluation & Teaching.Google Scholar
  2. Abu-Rabia, S. (2001). The role of vowels in reading Semitic scripts: Data from Arabic and Hebrew. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 14, 39–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Abu-Rabia, S. (2002). Reading in a root-based morphology language. Journal of Research in Reading, 25, 299–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Abu-Rabia, S., Share, D., & Mansour, M. (2003). Word recognition and basic cognitive processes among reading-disabled and normal readers in Arabic. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 16, 423–442.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Al-Mannai, H. A., & Everatt, J. (2005). Phonological processing skills as predictors of literacy amongst Arabic speaking Bahraini school children. Dyslexia, 11, 269–291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Al-Menaye, N. (2009). Memory and executive functioning in Arabic literacy skills (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Surrey, UK.Google Scholar
  7. Alptekin, C., & Ercetin, G. (2010). The role of L1 and L2 working memory in literal and inferential comprehension in L2 reading. Journal of Research in Reading, 2, 206–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Al-Rashidi, M. (2010). Predictors of Arabic reading comprehension: The development and identification of measures for the assessment of literacy and literacy learning difficulties (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Surrey, UK.Google Scholar
  9. Azzam, R. (1993). The nature of Arabic reading and spelling errors of young children. Reading and Writing Journal, 5, 355–385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Baddeley, A. D. (2003). Working memory and language: An overview. Journal of Communication Disorders, 36, 189–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Baddeley, A. D., & Hitch, G. (1974). Working memory. In G. Bower (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation (pp. 47–90). New York, NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  12. Bar-Kochva, I., & Breznit, Z. (2014). Reading scripts that differ in orthographic transparency: A within–participant–and–language investigation of underlying skills. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 121, 12–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Caravolas, M., Volín, J., & Hulme, C. (2005). Phoneme awareness is a key component of alphabetic literacy skills in consistent and inconsistent orthographies: Evidence from Czech and English children. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 92, 107–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Carretti, B., Borella, E., Cornoldi, C., & De Beni, R. (2009). The role of working memory in explaining the performance of individuals with specific. Learning and Individual Differences, 19, 246–251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Chiappe, P., & Siegel, L. S. (2006). A longitudinal study of reading development of Canadian children from diverse linguistic background. The Elementary School Journal, 107, 135–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Conway, A. R. A., Cowan, N., & Bunting, M. F. (2001). The cocktail party revisited: The importance of working memory capacity. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 8, 331–335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Daneman, M., & Carpenter, P. A. (1980). Individual differences in working memory and reading. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behaviour, 19, 450–466.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. De Beni, R., Pazzaglia, F., Meneghetti, C., & Mondoloni, A. (2007). Working memory components and imagery instructions in the elaboration of a spatial mental model. Psychological Research, 71, 373–382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Elbeheri, G., Abu Al Diyar, M., Taibah, N., Everatt, J., Mahfoudhi, A., & Haynes, C. (2013). A test of reading & spelling for children (in Arabic). Kuwait: Centre for Child Evaluation & Teaching.Google Scholar
  20. Elbeheri, G., & Everatt, J. (2007). Literacy ability and phonological processing skills amongst dyslexic and non-dyslexic speakers of Arabic. Reading and Writing, 20, 273–294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Elsheikh, M. (2012). Psycho-linguistic predictors of L1-Arabic and L2-English reading and writing skills for Arabic speaking children (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Surrey, UK.Google Scholar
  22. Everatt, J., Ocampo, D., Veii, K., Nenopoulou, S., Smythe, I., Al-Mannai, H., et al. (2010). Dyslexia in biscriptal reader. In N. Brunswick, S. McDougall, & P. de Mornay Davies (Eds.), Reading and dyslexia in different orthographies (pp. 221–245). Hove: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
  23. Eviatar, Z., Ibrahim, R., & Ganayim, D. (2004). Orthography and the hemispheres: Visual and linguistic aspects of letter processing. Neuropsychology, 18, 174–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Florit, E., & Cain, K. (2011). The simple view of reading: Is it valid for different types of alphabetic orthographies? Educational Psychology Review, 24, 553–576.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Furnes, B., & Samuelsson, S. (2010). Predicting reading and spelling difficulties in transparent and opaque orthographies: A Comparison between Scandinavian and US/Australian children. Dyslexia, 16, 119–142.Google Scholar
  26. Gathercole, S. E., & Alloway, T. P. (2008). Working memory and learning: A practical guide for teachers. London: Sage Publications Lt.Google Scholar
  27. Georgiou, G., Parilla, R., & Papadopoulos, T. (2008). Predictors of word decoding and reading fluency across languages varying in orthographic consistency. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100, 566–580.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Ibrahim, R., Eviatar, Z., & Aharon-Peretz, J. (2002). The characteristics of Arabic orthography slow its processing. Neuropsychology, 16, 322–326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Kintsch, W., & Rawson, K. A. (2005). Comprehension. In M. Snowling & C. Hulme (Eds.), The science of reading: A handbook (pp. 209–219). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  30. Kirby, J. R., Georgiou, G. K., Martinussen, R., & Parrila, R. (2010). Naming speed and reading: From prediction to instruction. Reading Research Quarterly, 45, 341–362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Mann, V., & Wimmer, H. (2002). Phoneme awareness and pathways into literacy: A comparison of German and American children. Reading and Writing, 15, 653–682.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Mohamed, W., Elbert, T., & Landerl, K. (2010). The development of reading and spelling abilities in the first 3 years of learning Arabic. Reading and Writing, 24, 1043–1060.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Moll, K. R., Franck, B., Jürgen, B., Jennifer, K., Sarah, T. D., & Ferenc, C. V. (2014). Cognitive mechanisms underlying reading and spelling development in five European orthographies. Learning and Instruction, 29, 65–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Nation, I. S. P. (2001). Learning vocabulary in another language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Patel, T. K., Snowling, M. J., & de Jong, P. F. (2004). A cross-linguistic comparison of children learning to read in English and Dutch. Journal of Educational, 96, 785–797.Google Scholar
  36. Perfetti, C. A. (1985). Reading ability. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  37. Pickering, S. J., & Gathercole, S. E. (2001). Working memory test battery for children (in English). London: Pearson Assessment.Google Scholar
  38. Seigneuric, A., & Ehrlich, M. F. (2005). Contribution of working memory capacity to children’s reading comprehension: A longitudinal investigation. Reading and Writing, 18, 617–656.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Seigneuric, A., Ehrlich, M. F., Oakhill, J. V., & Yuill, N. M. (2000). Working memory resources and children’s reading comprehension. Reading and Writing, 13, 8–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Seymour, P., Aro, M., & Erskine, J. M. (2003). Foundation literacy acquisition in European orthographies. British Journal of Psychology, 94, 143–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Smythe, I., Everatt, J., Al-Menaye, N., He, X., Capellini, S., Gyarmathy, E., et al. (2008). Predictors of word-level literacy amongst grade 3 children in five diverse languages. Dyslexia, 14, 170–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Spencer, L. H., & Hanley, J. R. (2003). Effects of orthographic transparency on reading and phoneme awareness in children learning to read in Wales. British Journal of Psychology, 94, 1–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Taibah, N., Elbeheri, G., Abu Al-Diyar, M., Everatt, J., Mahfoudhi, A., & Haynes, C. (2011). A test of phonological processing for children (in Arabic). Kuwait: Centre for Child Evaluation & Teaching.Google Scholar
  44. Taibah, N., & Haynes, C. (2011). Contributions of phonological processing skills to reading skills in Arabic speaking children. Reading and Writing, 24, 1019–1042.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Tunmer, W. E., & Hoover, W. (1992). Cognitive and linguistic factors in learning to read. In P. B. Gough, L. C. Ehri, & R. Treiman (Eds.), Reading acquisition (pp. 175–214). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  46. Wagner, R. K., & Torgesen, J. K. (1987). The Nature of phonological processing and its casual role in the acquisition of reading skills. Psychological Bulletin, 101, 192–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Wilson, V. L., & Rupley, W. H. (1997). A structural equation model for reading comprehension based on background, phonemic, and strategy knowledge. Scientific Studies of Reading, 1, 45–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Wolf, M., O’Rourke, A. G., Gidney, C., Lovett, M., Cirino, P., & Morris, R. (2002). The second deficit: An investigation of the independence of phonological and naming-speed deficits in developmental dyslexia. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 15, 43–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Ziegler, J. C., Bertrand, D., Tóth, D., Csépe, V., Reis, A., & Faísca, L. (2010). Orthographic depth and its impact on universal predictors of reading: A cross-language investigation. Psychological Science, 21, 551–559.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Hossam Elsayyad
    • 1
  • John Everatt
    • 2
  • Tilly Mortimore
    • 1
  • Charles Haynes
    • 3
  1. 1.Bath Spa UniversityBathUK
  2. 2.University of CanterburyChristchurchNew Zealand
  3. 3.MGH Institute of Health ProfessionsBostonUSA

Personalised recommendations