Advertisement

Reading and Writing

, Volume 30, Issue 2, pp 401–416 | Cite as

Socioeconomic status, parent report of children’s early language skills, and late literacy skills: a long term follow-up study among Chinese children

  • Jinger Pan
  • Yan Kong
  • Shuang Song
  • Catherine McBride
  • Hongyun Liu
  • Hua Shu
Article

Abstract

Previous research on the longitudinal prediction of literacy development has focused mainly on the relationship between early cognitive/language skills and late literacy skills. The present study aimed to test the reliability of a number of measures reported by parents as compared to measuring cognitive and language skills in predicting subsequent reading achievement. Two hundred sixty-two Chinese children were administered four cognitive and language skills over three years at the preliterate stage. Additional information on children’s family socioeconomic status (SES), children’s early language skills, familial reading performance and habits, and familial handedness based on the observations of parents was collected. Performance on these variables in relation to subsequent literacy skills at 11 years of age was examined. SES and children’s early language skills significantly predicted subsequent literacy skills. Even with a number of cognitive and language skills statistically controlled, parental reports of children’s early language skills still contributed to reading comprehension. Poor readers defined at 11 years of age had lagged behind in early language skills, as well as family reading performance and habits, as compared to typically developing readers. These findings suggest that SES and parental estimates of children’s early language skills are useful for predicting children’s subsequent reading achievement.

Keywords

SES Parent questionnaire Early language skills Familial risk Chinese reading 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We thank National Key Basic Research Program of China (2014CB846103), Natural Science Foundation of China (31271082, 81461130018), Beijing Municipal Science & Technology Commission (Z151100003915122), and Fundamental Research Fund for the Central Universities for supporting this research. And we thank Grant #CUHK8/CRF/13G for partly supporting this research. Jinger Pan is supported by Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft Grant LA2884/2-1.

References

  1. Annett, M. (2011). Dyslexia and handedness: Developmental phonological and surface dyslexias are associated with different biases for handedness. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 112, 417–425.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bates, E., Dale, P. S., & Thal, D. (1995). Individual differences and their implications for theories of language development. In P. Fletcher & B. MacWhinney (Eds.), The handbook of child language (pp. 96–151). Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  3. Bates, E., & Goodman, J. C. (2001). On the inseparability of grammar and the lexicon: Evidence from acquisition. In M. Tomasello & E. Bates (Eds.), Language development. The essential readings (pp. 134–162). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  4. Bishop, D. V. M. (1990). Handedness and developmental disorder. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  5. Bishop, D. V. M., & Snowling, M. J. (2004). Developmental dyslexia and specific language impairment: Same or different? Psychological Bulletin, 130, 858–886.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Brito, N. H., & Noble, K. G. (2014). Socioeconomic status and structural brain development. Frontiers in Neuroscience, 8, 276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Dale, P. S., Price, T. S., Bishop, D. V. M., & Plomin, R. (2003). Outcomes of early language delay: 1. Predicting persistent and transient language difficulties at 3 and 4 years. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 46, 544–560.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Elbro, C., Borstrom, I., & Peterson, D. K. (1998). Predicting dyslexia from kindergarten: The importance of distinctness of phonological representations. Reading Research Quarterly, 33, 36–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Gabrieli, J. D. E. (2009). Dyslexia: A new synergy between education and cognitive neuroscience. Science, 325, 280–283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Gutiérrez-Clellen, V. F., & Kreiter, J. (2003). Understanding child bilingual acquisition using parent and teacher reports. Applied Psycholinguistics, 24, 267–288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hart, S. A., Petrill, S. A., DeThorne, L. S., Deater-Deckard, K., Thompson, L. A., Schatschneider, C., et al. (2009). Environmental influences on the longitudinal covariance of expressive vocabulary: Measuring the home literacy environment in a genetically sensitive design. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 50, 911–919.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Ho, C. S.-H., Chan, D. W.-O., Lee, S.-H., Tsang, S.-M., & Luan, V. H. (2004). Cognitive profiling and preliminary subtyping in Chinese developmental dyslexia. Cognition, 91, 43–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hoff, E. (2003). The specificity of environmental influence: Socioeconomic status affects early vocabulary development via maternal speech. Child Development, 74, 1368–1378.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Lee, J. (2011). Size matters: Early vocabulary as a predictor of language and literacy competence. Applied Psycholinguistics, 32, 69–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Lei, L., Pan, J., Liu, H., McBride-Chang, C., Li, H., Zhang, Y., et al. (2011). Developmental trajectories of reading development and impairment from age 3 to 8 years in Chinese children. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 52, 212–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Lervåg, A., Bråten, I., & Hulme, C. (2009). The cognitive and linguistic foundations of early reading development: A Norwegian latent variable longitudinal study. Developmental Psychology, 45, 764–781.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Li, X.-T. (1983). The distribution of left and right handedness in Chinese people. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 3, 268–276 (Original work in Chinese).Google Scholar
  18. Lin, C., Li, J., & Zhang, X. (1987). Gesell量表—0-3岁智力发育诊断量表 [Gesell Developmenal Schedules: Age 0 to age 3 intelligence quotient development diagnostic scales]. Beijing: Peking University Medical Press.Google Scholar
  19. Lyytinen, P., Eklund, K., & Lyytinen, H. (2005). Language development and literacy skills in late-talking toddlers with and without familial risk for dyslexia. Annals of Dyslexia, 55, 166–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Lyytinen, H., Erskine, J., Hämäläinen, J., Torppa, M., & Ronimus, M. (2015). Dyslexia—early identification and prevention: Highlights from the Jyväskylä longitudinal study of dyslexia. Current Developmental Disorders Reports, 2, 330–338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Lyytinen, H., Erskine, J., Tolvanen, A., Torppa, M., Poikkeus, A. M., & Lyytinen, P. (2006). Trajectories of reading development: A follow-up from birth to school age of children with and without risk for dyslexia. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 52, 514–546.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. McBride-Chang, C., Lam, F., Lam, C., Chan, B., Fong, C. Y.-C., Wong, T. T.-Y., et al. (2011). Early predictors of dyslexia in Chinese children: Familial history of dyslexia, language delay, and cognitive profiles. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 52, 204–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. McBride-Chang, C., Lam, F., Lam, C., Doo, S., Wong, S. W. L., & Chow, Y. Y. Y. (2008). Word recognition and cognitive profiles of Chinese pre-school children at risk for dyslexia through language delay or familial history of dyslexia. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 49, 211–218.Google Scholar
  24. McBride-Chang, C., Liu, P. D., Wong, T., Wong, A., & Shu, H. (2012). Specific reading difficulties in Chinese, English, or both: Longitudinal markers of phonological awareness, morphological awareness, and RAN in Hong Kong Chinese children. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 45, 503–514.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Noble, K. G., Farah, M. J., & McCandliss, B. D. (2006). Socioeconomic background modulates cognition-achievement relationships in reading. Cognitive Development, 21, 349–368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Noble, K. G., Houston, S. M., Brito, N. H., Bartsch, H., Kan, E., Kuperman, J. M., et al. (2015). Family income, parental education and brain structure in children and adolescents. Nature Neuroscience, 18, 773–778.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Pan, J., McBride-Chang, C., Shu, H., Liu, H., Zhang, Y., & Li, H. (2011). What is in the naming? A 5-year longitudinal study of early rapid naming and phonological sensitivity in relation to subsequent reading skills in both native Chinese and English as a second language. Journal of Educational Psychology, 103, 897–908.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Pan, J., Song, S., Su, M., McBride, C., Liu, H., Zhang, Y., et al. (2015). On the relationship between phonological awareness, morphological awareness and Chinese literacy skills: Evidence from an 8-year longitudinal study. Developmental Science.Google Scholar
  29. Pennington, B. F., & Lefly, D. L. (2001). Early reading development in children at family risk for dyslexia. Child Development, 72, 816–833.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Preston, J. L., Frost, S. J., Mencl, W. E., Fulbright, R. K., Landi, N., Grigorenko, E., et al. (2010). Early and late talkers: School-age language, literacy and neurolinguistic differences. Brain, 133, 2185–2195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Ramus, F., Marshall, C. R., Rosen, C., & van der Lely, H. K. J. (2013). Phonological deficits in specific language impairment and developmental dyslexia: Towards a multidimensional model. Brain, 136, 630–645.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Raven, J. C., Court, J. H., & Raven, J. (1996). Standard progressive matrices. Oxford, UK: Oxford Psychologists Press.Google Scholar
  33. Rescorla, L. (2009). Age 17 language and reading outcomes in late-talking toddlers: Support for a dimensional perspective on language delay. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 52, 16–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Rescorla, L., & Alley, A. (2001). Validation of the language development survey (LDS): A parent report tool for identifying language delay in toddlers. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 44, 434–445.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Rowe, M. L., & Goldin-Meadow, S. (2009). Differences in early gesture explain SES disparities in child vocabulary size at school entry. Science, 323, 951–953.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Rowe, M. L., Raudenbush, S. W., & Goldin-Meadow, S. (2012). The pace of vocabulary growth helps predict later vocabulary skill. Child Development, 83, 508–525.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Scarborough, H. S. (1990). Very early language deficits in dyslexic children. Child Development, 61, 1728–1743.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Shu, H., Chen, X., Anderson, R. C., Wu, N., & Xuan, Y. (2003). Properties of school Chinese: Implications for learning to read. Child Development, 74, 27–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Shu, H., Li, W., Anderson, R., Ku, Y. M., & Yue, X. (2002). The role of home-literacy environment in learning to read Chinese. In W. Li, J. S. Gaffney, & J. L. Packard (Eds.), Chinese children’s reading acquisition: Theoretical and pedagogical issues (pp. 207–224). London: Kluwer Academic.Google Scholar
  40. Shu, H., McBride-Chang, C., Wu, S., & Liu, H. (2006). Understanding Chinese developmental dyslexia: Morphological awareness as a core cognitive construct. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98, 122–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Snowling, M. J., Muter, V., & Carroll, J. (2007). Children at family risk of dyslexia: A follow-up in early adolescence. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 48, 609–618.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Song, S., Su, M., Kang, C., Liu, H., Zhang, Y., McBride-Chang, C., et al. (2015). Tracing children’s vocabulary development from preschool through the school-age years: An 8-year longitudinal study. Developmental Science, 18, 119–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Stothard, S. E., Snowling, M. J., Bishop, D. V. M., Chipchase, B. B., & Kaplan, C. A. (1998). Language-impaired preschoolers: A follow-up into adolescence. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 41, 407–418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Tardif, T., Fletcher, P., Zhang, Z., & Liang, W. (2008). The Chinese communicative development inventory (Putonghua and Cantonese versions): Manual, forms, and norms. Beijing: Peking University Medical Press.Google Scholar
  45. Torppa, M., Lyytinen, P., Erskine, J., Eklund, K., & Lyytinen, H. (2010). Language development, literacy skills, and predictive connections to reading in Finnish children with and without familial risk for dyslexia. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 43, 308–321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Whitehurst, G. J., & Lonigan, C. J. (1998). Child development and emergent literacy. Child Development, 69, 848–872.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Zhang, Y., Tardif, T., Shu, H., Li, H., Liu, H., Mcbride-Chang, C., et al. (2013). Phonological skills and vocabulary knowledge mediate socioeconomic status effects in predicting reading outcomes for Chinese children. Developmental Psychology, 49, 665–671.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Ziegler, J. C., Bertrand, D., Tórth, D., Csépe, V., Reis, A., Faísca, L., et al. (2010). Orthographic depth and its impact on universal predictors of reading: A cross-language investigation. Psychological Science, 21, 551–559.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Zubrick, S. R., Taylor, C. L., Rice, M. L., & Slegers, D. W. (2007). Late language emergence at 24 months: An epidemiological study of prevalence, predictors, and covariates. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 50, 1562–1592.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.State Key Laboratory of Cognitive Neuroscience and Learning & IDG/McGovern Institute for Brain ResearchBeijing Normal UniversityBeijingPeople’s Republic of China
  2. 2.Department of PsychologyUniversity of PotsdamPotsdamGermany
  3. 3.Brain Mind InstituteThe Chinese University of Hong KongHong KongPeople’s Republic of China
  4. 4.School of PsychologyBeijing Normal UniversityBeijingPeople’s Republic of China

Personalised recommendations