Diacritics improve comprehension of the Arabic script by providing access to the meanings of heterophonic homographs
Abstract
The diacritical markers that represent most of the vowels in the Arabic orthography are generally omitted from written texts. Previous research revealed that the absence of diacritics reduces reading comprehension performance even by skilled readers of Arabic. One possible explanation is that many Arabic words become ambiguous when diacritics are missing. Words of this kind are known as heterophonic homographs and are associated with at least two different pronunciations and meanings when written without diacritics. The aim of the two experiments reported in this study was to investigate whether the presence of diacritics improves the comprehension of all written words, or whether the effects are confined to heterophonic homographs. In Experiment 1, adult readers of Arabic were asked to decide whether written words had a living meaning. The materials included heterophonic homographs that had one living and one non-living meaning. Results showed that diacritics significantly increased the accuracy of semantic decisions about ambiguous words but had no effect on the accuracy of decisions about unambiguous words. Consistent results were observed in Experiment 2 where the materials comprised sentences rather than single words. Overall, the findings suggest that diacritics improve the comprehension of heterophonic homographs by facilitating access to semantic representations that would otherwise be difficult to access from print.
Keywords
Arabic reading Diacritics Word recognition Reading comprehension Heterophonic homographsReferences
- Abu-Leil, A. K., Share, D. L., & Ibrahim, R. (2014). How does speed and accuracy in reading relate to reading comprehension in Arabic? Psicológica, 35, 251–276.Google Scholar
- Abu-Rabia, S. (1996). The role of vowels and context in reading of highly skilled native Arabic readers. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 25, 629–641.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Abu-Rabia, S. (1997). Reading in Arabic orthography: The effect of vowels and context on reading accuracy of poor and skilled native Arabic readers in reading paragraphs, sentences, and isolated words. Journal of Research in Reading, 20, 137–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Abu-Rabia, S. (1998). Reading Arabic texts: Effects of text type, reader type and vowelization. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 10, 105–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Abu-Rabia, S. (1999). The effect of vowels on the reading comprehension of second- and sixth-grade native Arabic children. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 28, 93–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Abu-Rabia, S. (2001). The role of vowels in reading Semitic scripts: Data from Arabic and Hebrew. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 14, 39–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Abu-Rabia, S. (2002). Reading in a root-based-morphology language: The case of Arabic. Journal of Research in Reading, 25, 299–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Abu-Rabia, S., & Siegel, L. S. (2003). Reading skills in three orthographies: The case of Arabic–Hebrew–English-speaking Arab children. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 16, 611–634.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Bentin, S., & Frost, R. (1987). Processing lexical ambiguity and visual word recognition in a deep orthography. Memory and Cognition, 15, 13–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Bourisly, A. K., Haynes, C., Bourisly, N., & Mody, M. (2013). Neural correlates of diacritics in Arabic: An fMRI study. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 26, 195–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Coltheart, M., Rastle, K., Perry, C., Langdon, R., & Ziegler, J. (2001). DRC: A dual route cascaded model of visual word recognition and reading aloud. Psychological Review, 108, 204–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Folk, J. R., & Morris, R. K. (1995). Multiple lexical codes in reading: Evidence from eye movements, naming time, and oral reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21, 1412–1429.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Gottlob, L. R., Goldinger, S. D., Stone, G. O., & Van Orden, G. C. (1999). Reading homographs: Orthographic, phonological and semantic dynamics. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 25, 561–574.Google Scholar
- Ibrahim, R. (2013). Reading in Arabic: New evidence for the role of vowel signs. Creative Education, 4, 248–253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Ibrahim, R., Eviatar, Z., & Aharon-Peretz, J. (2002). The characteristics of Arabic orthography slows its processing. Neuropsychology, 16, 322–326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Koriat, A. (1985). Lexical access for low- and high-frequency words in Hebrew. Memory and Cognition, 13, 37–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Plaut, D., McClelland, J., Seidenberg, M., & Patterson, K. (1996). Understanding normal and impaired word reading. Psychological Review, 103, 56–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Saiegh-Haddad, E., & Geva, E. (2008). Morphological awareness, phonological awareness, and reading in English–Arabic bilingual children. Reading and Writing, 21, 481–504.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Saiegh-Haddad, E., & Henkin-Roitfarb, R. (2014). The structure of Arabic language and orthography. In E. Saiegh-Haddad & M. Joshi (Eds.), Handbook of Arabic Literacy: Insights and Perspectives (pp. 31–54). Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Taouk, M., & Coltheart, M. (2004). The cognitive processes involved in learning to read Arabic. Reading and Writing, 17, 27–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Vaknin-Nusbaum, V., & Miller, P. (2014). The impact of pointing on the short-term memory (STM) of heterophonic homographs. Reading and Writing, 27, 769–792.CrossRefGoogle Scholar