Accuracy feedback improves word learning from context: evidence from a meaning-generation task
- 537 Downloads
The present study asked whether accuracy feedback on a meaning generation task would lead to improved contextual word learning (CWL). Active generation can facilitate learning by increasing task engagement and memory retrieval, which strengthens new word representations. However, forced generation results in increased errors, which can be detrimental for learning if they are not corrected. The goal of this study was to determine whether immediate feedback on response accuracy would ameliorate this risk. The study was conducted using an intelligent tutoring system, which presents target words in multiple contexts and prompts users to generate a target word meaning after each context. One group of participants (feedback group) received immediate feedback based on Markov Estimation of Semantic Association (MESA), which estimates the distance between the learner response and the target word meaning. The control group did not receive feedback. Results from conventional (pre/post-test) measures showed greater gains in accuracy and confidence for the feedback group. Moreover, when contextual support was decreased mid-way through the training (from trial 3 to trial 4), MESA measures showed a corresponding drop in accuracy, but only for the No-Feedback group. These findings suggest that accuracy feedback can improve outcomes in CWL, particularly when there is an increased risk of errors. This strengthens the case for meaning generation as a tool to build high-quality lexical representations.
KeywordsLearning Reading Vocabulary Context
We thank Theresa Maglio, Christina Yarbrough, Elizabeth Dlouhy and Jonathan McNair for their assistance with stimulus development, and recruitment and running of participants. We thank MacKenzie Bechtel-Hall, Yu Meng, and John Grese for their contributions to the design and implementation of the ITS. This research was funded by a grant from the Language & Literacy Initiative at Georgia State. It was also funded in part by an IES grant (R305A140647, Collins-Thompson & Frishkoff) and by a gift from Microsoft Research.
- Beck, I., McKeown, M., & Kucan, L. (2013). Bringing words to life: Robust vocabulary instruction. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
- Cain, K., Oakhill, J., & Lemmon, K. (2004). Individual differences in the inference of word meanings from context: The influence of reading comprehension, vocabulary knowledge, and memory capacity. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96(4), 671–681. doi: 10.1037/0022-06220.127.116.111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Collins-Thompson, K., & Callan, J. (2007). Automatic and human scoring of word definition responses. In C. L. Sidner, T. Schultz, M. Stone, & C. Zhai (Eds.), Proceedings of the human language technology conference of the North American chapter of the association of computational linguistics (pp. 476–483).Google Scholar
- Collins-Thompson, K., Frishkoff, G., & Crossley, S. A. (2012). Definition response scoring with probabilistic ordinal regression. Proceedings of the International Conference on Computers in Education, 6, 101–105.Google Scholar
- Efron, B., & Tibshirani, R. J. (1994). An introduction to the bootstrap. London: Chapman and Hall.Google Scholar
- Francis, W. N., & Kučera, H. (1982). Frequency analysis of English usage: Lexicon and grammar. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
- Frishkoff, G., Collins-Thompson, K., Nam, S. J., Hodges, L. E., & Crossley, S. (2015). Dynamic support of contextual vocabulary acquisition for reading (DSCoVAR): An intelligent tutoring system for contextual word learning. In S.A. Crossley & D. S. McNamara (Eds.), Handbook on educational technologies for literacy (in press). Google Scholar
- Lampinen, J. M., & Faries, J. M. (1994). Levels of semantic constraint and learning novel words. In Proceedings of the sixteenth annual conference of the cognitive science society: August 13–16, 1994, cognitive science program, Georgia Institute of Technology (pp. 530–536).Google Scholar
- Loucky, J. P. (2013). TELL and CALL for ALL: Successful strategy use in second language learning. In Paper presented at the 2013 international conference on advanced ICT and education (ICAICTE-13).Google Scholar
- National Reading Panel (U.S.), & National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (U.S.). (2000). Report of the National Reading Panel: Teaching children to read: An evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction: Reports of the subgroups. Washington, D.C.: National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, National Institutes of Health.Google Scholar
- Taylor, W. L. (1953). “Cloze procedure”: A new tool for measuring readability. Journalism Quarterly, 30, 415–433.Google Scholar
- Yonek, L. M. (2008). The effects of rich vocabulary instruction on students’ expository writing. Doctoral dissertation, University of Pittsburgh. Retrieved from http://d-scholarship.pitt.edu/9995/1/yoneklisa122008.pdf.