Knowledge and processes that predict proficiency in digital literacy
- 1.4k Downloads
Proficiency in digital literacy refers to the ability to read and write using online sources, and includes the ability to select sources relevant to the task, synthesize information into a coherent message, and communicate the message with an audience. The present study examines the determinants of digital literacy proficiency by asking 150 students who had 50 min of access to the Internet and a word processor to produce a research report on whether or not their college should require all students to own a laptop computer. The resulting essay received a holistic rating from 1 to 5. Concerning knowledge underlying digital literacy, the major predictors of digital literacy proficiency (as measured by essay rating) were academic experience (undergraduate versus graduate status) and domain knowledge (based on a questionnaire), rather than technical knowledge about how to use computers (based on a questionnaire). Concerning processing during the task, the major predictors of digital literacy proficiency were integrating processes (such as number of unique sources, citations, or supporting details) rather than search processes (such as number of actions, web pages, websites, links, or search terms). In short, proficiency in digital literacy depended mainly on academic experience rather than technical experience, and on how learners organize and integrate the information they find rather than on how much information they peruse. Findings from this study suggest that the basic tenets of good scholarship apply to digital media.
KeywordsDigital literacy Information use New literacies Composition
- Coiro, J., Knobel, M., Lankshearm, C., & Leu, D. J. (Eds.). (2008). Handbook of research on new literacies. New York, NY: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
- Gee, J. P. (2003). What video games have to teach us about learning and literacy. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
- Glister, P. (2000). Digital literacy. In R. Pea (Ed.), The Jossey-Bass reader on technology and learning (pp. 215–225). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass Inc.Google Scholar
- Hargittai, E., Fullerton, L., Menchen-Trevino, E., & Thomas, K. Y. (2010). Trust online: Young adults’ evaluation of web content. International Journal of Communication, 4, 468–494.Google Scholar
- Jenkins, H. (2006). Convergence culture. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
- Jmerik, A. (2004). Boss Everyware. (Customized version) [Computer software]. Boss Everyware, Inc. Retrieved July 14, 2004. http://www.bosseveryware.com.
- Lenhart, A., Lewis, O., & Rainie, L. (2001). Teenage life online. Washington DC: Pew Internet & American Life Project.Google Scholar
- Oblinger, D. G. & Oblinger, J. L. (2005). Educating the net generation. Boulder, CO: Educause. Retrieved from http://www.educause.edu/educatingthenetgen.
- Palfrey, J., & Gasser, U. (2008). Born digital: Understanding the first generation of digital natives. Philadelphia, PA: Perseus Books Group.Google Scholar
- Prensky, M. (2001). Digital natives, digital immigrants. On the Horizon, 9, 1–6. Retrieved from http://www.marcprensky.com/writing/.
- Rouet, J.-F. (2003). What was I looking for? The influence of task specificity and prior knowledge on students’ search strategies in hypertext. Interacting with Computers, 15, 409–428.Google Scholar
- Rouet, J.-F. (2006). The skills of document use. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
- Salen, K. (2007). Gaming literacies: A game design study in action. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 16, 301–322.Google Scholar
- Tapscott, D. (1997). Growing up digital: The rise of the net generation. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar