Reading and Writing

, Volume 27, Issue 9, pp 1567–1583 | Cite as

Knowledge and processes that predict proficiency in digital literacy

  • Monica E. Bulger
  • Richard E. Mayer
  • Miriam J. Metzger
Article

Abstract

Proficiency in digital literacy refers to the ability to read and write using online sources, and includes the ability to select sources relevant to the task, synthesize information into a coherent message, and communicate the message with an audience. The present study examines the determinants of digital literacy proficiency by asking 150 students who had 50 min of access to the Internet and a word processor to produce a research report on whether or not their college should require all students to own a laptop computer. The resulting essay received a holistic rating from 1 to 5. Concerning knowledge underlying digital literacy, the major predictors of digital literacy proficiency (as measured by essay rating) were academic experience (undergraduate versus graduate status) and domain knowledge (based on a questionnaire), rather than technical knowledge about how to use computers (based on a questionnaire). Concerning processing during the task, the major predictors of digital literacy proficiency were integrating processes (such as number of unique sources, citations, or supporting details) rather than search processes (such as number of actions, web pages, websites, links, or search terms). In short, proficiency in digital literacy depended mainly on academic experience rather than technical experience, and on how learners organize and integrate the information they find rather than on how much information they peruse. Findings from this study suggest that the basic tenets of good scholarship apply to digital media.

Keywords

Digital literacy Information use New literacies Composition 

References

  1. Barton, D. (2001). Directions for literacy research: Analysing language and social practices in a textually mediated world. Language and Education, 15, 92–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bennett, S., Maton, K., & Kervin, L. (2008). The ‘digital natives’ debate: A critical review of the evidence. British Journal of Educational Technology, 39, 775–786.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Brand-Gruwel, S., Wopereis, I., & Vermetten, Y. (2005). Information problem solving by experts and novices: Analysis of a complex cognitive skill. Computers in Human Behavior, 21, 487–508.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bråten, I., Strømsø, H. I., & Salmerón, L. (2011). Trust and mistrust when students read multiple information sources about climate change. Learning and Instruction, 21, 180–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Coiro, J., Knobel, M., Lankshearm, C., & Leu, D. J. (Eds.). (2008). Handbook of research on new literacies. New York, NY: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  6. Gee, J. P. (2003). What video games have to teach us about learning and literacy. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  7. Glister, P. (2000). Digital literacy. In R. Pea (Ed.), The Jossey-Bass reader on technology and learning (pp. 215–225). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass Inc.Google Scholar
  8. Hargittai, E., Fullerton, L., Menchen-Trevino, E., & Thomas, K. Y. (2010). Trust online: Young adults’ evaluation of web content. International Journal of Communication, 4, 468–494.Google Scholar
  9. Jenkins, H. (2006). Convergence culture. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Jmerik, A. (2004). Boss Everyware. (Customized version) [Computer software]. Boss Everyware, Inc. Retrieved July 14, 2004. http://www.bosseveryware.com.
  11. Lazonder, A. W. (2000). Exploring novice users’ training needs in searching information on the WWW. Journal of Computer Assisted learning, 16, 326–335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Lenhart, A., Lewis, O., & Rainie, L. (2001). Teenage life online. Washington DC: Pew Internet & American Life Project.Google Scholar
  13. Livingstone, S., & Helsper, E. (2007). Gradations in digital inclusion: Children, young people, and the digital divide. New Media & Society, 9, 671–696.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Lombard, M., Snyder-Duch, J., & Bracken, C. C. (2002). Content analysis in mass communication: Assessment and reporting of intercoder reliability. Human Communication Research, 28, 587–604.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Mayer, R. E. (2009). Multimedia learning (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Metzger, M. (2007). Making sense of credibility on the Web: Models for evaluating online information and recommendations for future research. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 58, 2078–2091.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Nasah, A., DaCosta, B., Kinsell, C., & Seok, S. (2010). The digital literacy debate: An investigation of digital propensity and information and communication technology. Educational Technology Research and Development, 58, 531–555.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Oblinger, D. G. & Oblinger, J. L. (2005). Educating the net generation. Boulder, CO: Educause. Retrieved from http://www.educause.edu/educatingthenetgen.
  19. Palfrey, J., & Gasser, U. (2008). Born digital: Understanding the first generation of digital natives. Philadelphia, PA: Perseus Books Group.Google Scholar
  20. Prensky, M. (2001). Digital natives, digital immigrants. On the Horizon, 9, 1–6. Retrieved from http://www.marcprensky.com/writing/.
  21. Rouet, J.-F. (2003). What was I looking for? The influence of task specificity and prior knowledge on students’ search strategies in hypertext. Interacting with Computers, 15, 409–428.Google Scholar
  22. Rouet, J.-F. (2006). The skills of document use. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  23. Salen, K. (2007). Gaming literacies: A game design study in action. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 16, 301–322.Google Scholar
  24. Tapscott, D. (1997). Growing up digital: The rise of the net generation. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  25. Wiley, J., Goldman, S. R., Graesser, A. C., Sanchez, C. A., Ash, I. K., & Hemmerich, J. A. (2009). Source evaluation, comprehension, and learning in Internet science inquiry tasks. American Educational Research Journal, 46, 1060–1106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Wineburg, S. S. (1991). Historical problem solving: A study of the cognitive process used in the evaluation of documentary and pictorial evidence. Journal of Educational Psychology, 83, 73–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Monica E. Bulger
    • 1
  • Richard E. Mayer
    • 2
  • Miriam J. Metzger
    • 3
  1. 1.Oxford Internet InstituteUniversity of OxfordOxfordUK
  2. 2.Department of Psychological and Brain SciencesUniversity of CaliforniaSanta BarbaraUSA
  3. 3.Department of CommunicationUniversity of CaliforniaSanta BarbaraUSA

Personalised recommendations