Dyslexia heterogeneity: cognitive profiling of Portuguese children with dyslexia
- 978 Downloads
Recent studies have emphasized that developmental dyslexia is a multiple-deficit disorder, in contrast to the traditional single-deficit view. In this context, cognitive profiling of children with dyslexia may be a relevant contribution to this unresolved discussion. The aim of this study was to profile 36 Portuguese children with dyslexia from the 2nd to 5th grade. Hierarchical cluster analysis was used to group participants according to their phonological awareness, rapid automatized naming, verbal short-term memory, vocabulary, and nonverbal intelligence abilities. The results suggested a two-cluster solution: a group with poorer performance on phoneme deletion and rapid automatized naming compared with the remaining variables (Cluster 1) and a group characterized by underperforming on the variables most related to phonological processing (phoneme deletion and digit span), but not on rapid automatized naming (Cluster 2). Overall, the results seem more consistent with a hybrid perspective, such as that proposed by Pennington and colleagues (2012), for understanding the heterogeneity of dyslexia. The importance of characterizing the profiles of individuals with dyslexia becomes clear within the context of constructing remediation programs that are specifically targeted and are more effective in terms of intervention outcome.
KeywordsReading disorders Dyslexia Profile analysis Portuguese orthography
This work was supported by Fundação para a Ciência e Tecnologia (SFRH/BD/27337/2006; PTDC/PSI/110734/2009; IBB/CBME, LA, FEDER/POCI2010; PEst-OE/EQB/LA0023/2013), the Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics, the Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Vetenskapsrådet, the Swedish Dyslexia Foundation.
- Blomert, L., & Vaessen, A. (2009). 3DM differential diagnostics for dyslexia, cognitive analysis of reading and spelling. Amsterdam: Boom Test Publishers.Google Scholar
- Faísca, L., Bramão, I., Araújo, S., Pacheco, A., & Reis, A. (2006). Corpus linguístico construído a partir de manuais escolares (Linguistic corpus from children textbooks). Paper presented at the VI Simpósio Nacional de Investigação em Psicologia, Universidade de Évora, Portugal.Google Scholar
- Gathercole, S. E., & Baddeley, A. D. (1993). Working memory and language. Hillside, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
- Hair, J., Anderson, R., Tatham, R., & Black, W. (1992). Multivariate data analysis with readings. New York, NY: Macmillan Publishing Company.Google Scholar
- Heim, S., Tschierse, J., Amunts, K., Wilms, M., Vossel, S., Willmes, K., et al. (2008). Cognitive subtypes of dyslexia. Acta Neurobiologiae Experimentalis, 68(1), 73–82.Google Scholar
- Raven, J., Raven, J. C., & Court, J. H. (2009). CPM-P Matrizes Progressivas Coloridas, Forma Paralela (CPM-P Raven Coloured Progressive Matrices Test, Parallel Form). Lisboa: Cegoc-Tea.Google Scholar
- Reis, A., Castro, S. L., Inácio, F., Pacheco, A., Araújo, S., Santos, M., et al. (2011). Versão portuguesa da bateria 3DM para avaliação da leitura e da escrita (3DM Portuguese Version to assess reading and spelling skills). Manuscript in preparation.Google Scholar
- Wechsler, D. (2006). Wechsler intelligence scale for children—third edition (WISC-III). Lisboa: Cegoc-Tea.Google Scholar
- World Health Organization. (2008). International statistical classification of diseases and related health problems (2008th ed.). Geneva: World Health Organization.Google Scholar