Advertisement

Reading and Writing

, Volume 27, Issue 6, pp 1015–1042 | Cite as

Teaching writing to middle school students: a national survey

  • Steve GrahamEmail author
  • Andrea Capizzi
  • Karen R. Harris
  • Michael Hebert
  • Paul Morphy
Article

Abstract

A random sample of language arts, social studies, and science middle school teachers from the United States were surveyed about their preparation to teach writing, beliefs about responsibilities for teaching writing, use of evidence-based writing practices, assessment of writing, use of technology, and adaptations for struggling writers. The findings from this survey raised concerns about the quality of middle school writing instruction. Many teachers believed their preservice and inservice preparation to teach writing was inadequate. Middle school students spend little time writing or being taught how to write. While most teachers used a variety of evidenced-based writing practices and made adaptations for struggling writers, such methods were applied infrequently. Most teachers did not appear to use assessment data to shape how they taught writing, and computers played a relatively minor role in middle school writing instruction. Even though teachers generally agreed that writing was a collective responsibility, language arts teachers placed a greater emphasis on writing instruction than social studies and science teachers.

Keywords

Writing Middle schools National survey 

References

  1. Applebee, A., & Langer, J. (2006). The state of writing instruction: What existing data tell us. Albany, NY: Center on English Learning and Achievement.Google Scholar
  2. Applebee, A., & Langer, J. (2011). A snapshot of writing instruction in middle and high schools. English Journal, 100, 14–27.Google Scholar
  3. Bridge, C. A., & Hiebert, E. H. (1985). A comparison of classroom writing practices, teachers’ perceptions of their writing instruction, and textbook recommendations on writing practices. Elementary School Journal, 86, 155–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Common Core State Standards: National Governors Association and Council of Chief School Officers. (2010) . http://www.corestandards.org/.
  5. Cutler, L., & Graham, S. (2008). Primary grade writing instruction: A national survey. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100, 907–919.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Dillman, D. (2000). Mail and internet surveys (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Wiley.Google Scholar
  7. Gilbert, J., & Graham, S. (2010). Teaching writing to elementary students in grades 4 to 6: A national survey. Elementary School Journal, 110, 494–518.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Graham, S., Harris, K. R., Fink-Chorzempa, B., & MacArthur, C. (2003). Primary grade teachers’ instructional adaptations for struggling writers: A National survey. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95, 279–292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Graham, S., Harris, K. R., & Hebert, M. (2011a). Informing writing: The benefits of formative assessment. Alliance for Excellence in Education. Washington, D.C. (Commissioned by the Carnegie Corp. of New York).Google Scholar
  10. Graham, S., Hebert, M., & Harris, K. R. (2011b). Throw em’ out or make em’ better? High-stakes writing assessments. Focus on Exceptional Children, 44, 1–12.Google Scholar
  11. Graham, S., & Perin, D. (2007). Writing next: Effective strategies to improve writing of adolescents in middle and high schools. New York: Carnegie Corporation of New York.Google Scholar
  12. Hillocks, G. (1986). Research on written composition: New directions for teaching. Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English.Google Scholar
  13. Kiuhara, S., Graham, S., & Hawken, L. (2009). Teaching writing to high school students: A national survey. Journal of Educational Psychology, 101, 136–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Klein, P. (2000). Elementary students’ strategies for writing-to-learn in science. Cognition & Instruction, 18, 317–348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Langer, J., & Applebee, A. (2011). How writing shapes thinking: A study of teaching and learning. NCTE Research Report No. 22, Urbana, IL.Google Scholar
  16. National Center for Education Statistics (2012). The Nation’s Report Card: Writing 2011. Institute of Education Sciences, US Department of Education, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  17. National Commission on Writing in America’s Schools and Colleges. (2004). Writing: A ticket to work…or a ticket out. New York, NY: College Board.Google Scholar
  18. National Commission on Writing in America’s Schools and Colleges. (2005). Writing: A powerful message from state government. New York, NY: College Board.Google Scholar
  19. Pressley, M., Raphael, L., Gallagher, J., & DiBella, J. (2004). Providence-St. Mel School: How a school that works for African-American students works. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96, 216–235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Rogers, L., & Graham, S. (2008). A meta-analysis of single subject design writing intervention research. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100, 879–906.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Sheils, M. (1975). Why Johnny can’t write. Newsweek, p. 58.Google Scholar
  22. Stein, M., & Wang, M. (1988). Teacher development and school improvement: The process of teacher change. Teaching & Teacher Education, 4, 171–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Steve Graham
    • 1
    Email author
  • Andrea Capizzi
    • 2
  • Karen R. Harris
    • 1
  • Michael Hebert
    • 3
  • Paul Morphy
    • 4
  1. 1.Arizona State UniversityTempeUSA
  2. 2.Vanderbilt UniversityNashvilleUSA
  3. 3.University of Nebraska–LincolnLincolnUSA
  4. 4.University of OregonEugeneUSA

Personalised recommendations