Advertisement

Reading and Writing

, Volume 25, Issue 5, pp 935–950 | Cite as

The dynamics of reading in non-Roman writing systems: a Reading and Writing Special Issue

  • Ronan ReillyEmail author
  • Ralph Radach
Article

Abstract

This paper provides a short overview of current issues in research on continuous reading in non-Roman orthographies. At the same time it also serves as an introduction to the present Reading and Writing Special Issue on this topic. The main questions examined in the contributions to this volume are closely related to issues that have been central to research debates on reading in English, German and French. However, we argue that these innovative approaches to the dynamics of reading in Chinese, Japanese and Korean go far beyond a simple comparative research strategy. Instead, by illuminating phenomena like word segmentation, parafoveal processing and semantic analysis from their unique perspectives, they provide valuable insights into the more general question of to what extent information processing in reading is universal as opposed to language specific. Moreover, we expect that these initial studies will trigger more basic research on non-alphabetic reading, providing a foundation for useful application.

Keywords

Reading Non-Roman writing systems Chinese Korean Japanese Eye movements 

References

  1. Abubaker, A. A. A., McGowan, V. A., White, S. J., Jordan, T. R., & Paterson, K. B. (2011). Reading Arabic text: Effects of word length on landing positions and fixation durations. Poster presented at the European Conference on eye movements, Marseille, August 21–25.Google Scholar
  2. Angele, B., & Rayner, K. (2011). Parafoveal processing of word n + 2 during reading: Do the preceding words matter? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 37, 1210–1220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Angele, B., Slattery, T. J., Yang, J., Kliegl, R., & Rayner, K. (2008). Parafoveal processing in reading: Manipulating n + 1 and n + 2 previews simultaneously. Visual Cognition, 16, 697–707.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bertram, R., Pollatsek, A., & Hyönä, J. (2004). Morphological parsing and the use of segmentation cues in reading Finnish compounds. Journal of Memory and Language, 51, 325–345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Chace, K. H., Rayner, K., & Well, A. D. (2005). Eye movements and phonological parafoveal preview: Effects of reading skill. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 59, 209–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Chen, H.-C., Song, H., Lau, W. Y., Wong, K. F. E., & Tang, S. L. (2003). Development characteristics of eye movements in reading Chinese. In C. McBride-Chang & H.-C. Chen (Eds.), Reading development in Chinese children (pp. 157–169). Wesport, CT: Praeger Publishers.Google Scholar
  7. Deutsch, A., Frost, R., Pelleg, S., Pollatsek, A., & Rayner, K. (2003). Early morphological effects in reading: evidence from parafoveal preview benefit in Hebrew. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 10, 415–422.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Engbert, R., & Krugel, A. (2010). Readers use Bayesian estimation for eye movement control. Psychological Science, 21, 366–371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Engbert, R., Nuthmann, A., Richter, E., & Kliegl, R. (2005). SWIFT: A dynamical model of saccade generation during reading. Psychological Review, 112, 777–813.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Everson, M. (2002). Leaks in the unicode pipeline: Script, script, script. Paper presented to the 21st Unicode Conference, Dublin, Ireland.Google Scholar
  11. Feng, G., Miller, K., Shu, H., & Zhang, H. (2009). Orthography, and the development of reading processes: An eye-movement study of Chinese and English. Child Development, 80, 720–735.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Goswami, U. (2009). The development of reading across languages. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1145, 1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Grainger, J. (2008). Cracking the orthographic code: An introduction. Language and Cognitive Processes, 23, 1–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Harris, W. V. (1989). Ancient literacy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Hohenstein, S., Laubrock, J., & Kliegl, R. (2010). Semantic preview benefit in eye movements during reading: A parafoveal fast-priming study. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 36, 1150–1170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hoosain, R. (1991). Psycholinguistic implications for linguistic relativity: A case study of Chinese. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  17. Huey, E. B. (1908). The psychology and pedagogy of reading. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  18. Hyönä, J. (1995). Do irregular letter combinations attract readers’ eye movements? Evidence from fixation location in words. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 21, 68–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Inhoff, A. W., & Liu, W. (1998). The perceptual span and oculomotor activity during the reading of Chinese sentences. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 24, 20–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Inhoff, A. W. & Radach, R. (1998). Definition and computation of oculomotor measures in the study of cognitive processes. In G. Underwood (Ed.), Eye guidance in reading and scene perception (pp. 29–54). Oxford: Elsevier.Google Scholar
  21. Inhoff, A. W., Radach, R., & Heller, D. (2000). Complex compounds in German: Interword spaces facilitate segmentation but hinder assignment of meaning. Journal of Memory and Language, 42, 23–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Inhoff, A. W., & Weger, U. (2003) Advancing the methodological middle ground. In J. Hyönä, R. Radach, & H. Deubel (Eds.). The mind’s eye: Cognitive and applied aspects of eye movement research (pp. 335–344). Oxford: Elsevier.Google Scholar
  23. Inhoff, A. W., & Wu, C. (2005). Eye movements and the identification of spatially ambiguous words during Chinese sentence reading. Memory & Cognition, 33, 1345–1356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Jacobs, A. M. (2000). Five questions about cognitive models and some answers from three models of reading. In A. Kennedy, R. Radach, D. Heller, & J. Pynte (Eds.), Reading as a perceptual process (pp. 721–732). Amsterdam: North-Holland.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Just, M. A., & Carpenter, P. A. (Eds.). (1987). The psychology of reading and language comprehension. Newton, MA: Allyn and Bacon.Google Scholar
  26. Kajii, N., Nazir, T. A., & Osaka, N. (2001). Eye movement control in reading unspaced text: The case of the Japanese script. Vision Research, 41, 2503–2510.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Kennison, S. M., & Clifton, C. (1995). Determinants of parafoveal preview benefit in high and low working memory capacity readers: Implications for eye movement control. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21, 68–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Kliegl, R., Risse, S., & Laubrock, J. (2007). Preview benefit and parafoveal-on-foveal effects from word n + 2. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 33, 1250–1255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Kupermann, V., & Van Dyke, J. A. (2011). Effects of individual differences in verbal skills on eye-movement patterns during sentence reading. Journal of Memory and Language, 65, 42–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Lee, H.-W., Rayner, K., & Pollatsek, A. (1999). The time course of phonological, semantic, and orthographic coding in reading: Evidence from the fast-priming technique. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 4, 624–634.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Li, X., Liu, P., & Rayner, K. (2011). Eye movement guidance in Chinese reading: Is there a preferred viewing location? Vision Research, 51, 1146–1156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Li, X. S., Rayner, K., & Cave, K. R. (2009). On the segmentation of Chinese words. Cognitive Psychology, 58, 525–552.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Liu, Y., Dunlap, S., Fiez, J., & Perfetti, C. (2007). Evidence for neural accommodation to a writing system following learning. Human Brain Mapping, 28, 1223–1234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Mair, V. (1996). Modern Chinese writing. In P. Daniels & W. Bright (Eds.), Writing systems of the world (pp. 200–208). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  35. McConkie, G. W., Grimes, J. M., Kerr, P. W., & Zola, D. (1991). Children’s eye movements during reading. In J. F. Stein (Ed.), Vision and visual dyslexia (pp. 251–262). London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  36. McDonald, S. A. (2006). Parafoveal preview benefit in reading is only obtained from the saccade goal. Vision Research, 46, 4416–4424.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Osaka, N. (1992). Size of saccade and fixation duration of eye movements during reading: Psychophysics of Japanese text processing. Journal of the Optical Society of America, 9, 5–13.Google Scholar
  38. Radach, R., Huestegge, L., & Reilly, R. (2008). The role of top down factors in local eye movement control during reading. Psychological Research, 72, 675–688.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Radach, R., Inhoff, A. W., & Heller, D. (2004). Orthographic regularity gradually modulates saccade amplitudes in reading. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 16, 27–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Radach, R., & Kennedy, A. (2004). Theoretical perspectives on eye movements in reading: Past controversies, current deficits and an agenda for future research. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 16, 3–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Radach, R., Reilly, R., &Inhoff, A. W. (2007). Models of oculomotor control in reading: Towards a theoretical foundation of current debates. In R. van Gompel, M. Fischer, W. Murray, & R. Hill (Eds.). Eye movements: A window on mind and brain (pp. 237–270). Elsevier: Oxford.Google Scholar
  42. Rayner, K. (1975). The perceptual span and peripheral cues during reading. Cognitive Psychology, 7, 65–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Rayner, K. (1979). Eye guidance in reading: Fixation locations within words. Perception, 8, 21–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Rayner, K., Balota, D. A., & Pollatsek, A. (1986). Against parafoveal semantic preprocessing during eye fixations in reading. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 40, 473–483.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Rayner, K., Fischer, M. H., & Pollatsek, A. (1998). Unspaced text interferes with both word identification and eye movement control. Vision Research, 38, 1129–1144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Rayner, R., Foorman, B. R., Perfetti, C. A., Pesetsky, D., & Seidenberg, M. S. (2001). How psychological science informs the teaching of reading. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 2, 31–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Rayner, K., Juhasz, B. J., & Brown, S. J. (2007a). Do readers obtain preview benefit from word n + 2? A test of serial attention shift versus distributed lexical processing models of eye movement control in reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 33, 230–245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Rayner, K., Li, X., & Pollatsek, A. (2007b). Extending the E-Z reader model of eye movement control to Chinese readers. Cognitive Science, 31, 1021–1033.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Rayner, K., Well, A. D., Pollatsek, A., & Bertera, J. H. (1982). The availability of useful information to the right of fixation in reading. Perception & Psychophysics, 31, 537–550.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Rayner, K., White, S. J., Kambe, G., Miller, B., & Liversedge, S. P. (2003). On the processing of meaning from parafoveal vision during eye fixations in reading. In J. Hyönä, R. Radach, & H. Deubel (Eds.), The mind’s eye: Cognitive and applied aspects of eye movement research (pp. 213–234). Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
  51. Reichle, E. D., Pollatsek, A., Fisher, D. L., & Rayner, K. (1998). Toward a model of eye movement control in reading. Psychological Review, 105, 125–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Reilly, R. G., Aranyanak, I., Yu, L., Yan, G., & Tang, S. (2011). Eye movement control in reading Thai and Chinese. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 9, 35–44.Google Scholar
  53. Reilly, R. G., & O’Regan, J. K. (1998). Eye movement control during reading: A simulation of some word-targeting strategies. Vision Research, 38, 303–317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Reilly, R. G., & Radach, R. (2006). Some empirical tests of an interactive activation model of eye movement control in reading. Journal of Cognitive Systems Research, 7, 34–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Sainio, M., Hyönä, J., Bingushi, K., & Bertram, R. (2007). The role of interword spacing in reading Japanese: An eye movement study. Vision Research, 47, 2575–2584.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Schotter, E. R., Angele, B., & Rayner, K. (2012). Parafoveal processing in reading. Attention, Perception and Psychophysics, 74, 5–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Sun, F., & Feng, D. (1999). Eye movements in reading Chinese and English text. In J. Wang, A. W. Inhoff, & H.-C. Chen (Eds.), Reading Chinese script: A cognitive analysis (pp. 189–206). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  58. Sun, F., Morita, M., & Stark, L. W. (1985). Comparative patterns of reading eye movement in Chinese and English. Perception and Psychophysics, 37, 502–506.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Tan, L., Laird, A., & Li, K. (2005). Neuroanatomical correlates of phonological processing of Chinese characters and alphabetic words: A meta-analysis. Human Brain Mapping, 25, 83–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Vincent, D. (2000). The rise of mass literacy. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  61. White, S. J., & Liversedge, S. P. (2004). Orthographic familiarity influences initial eye fixation positions in reading. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 16, 52–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Wotschack, C., & Kliegl, R. (2011). Reading strategy modulates parafoveal-on-foveal effects in sentence reading. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, September 20. [Epub ahead of print]. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2011.625094.
  63. Yan, M., Kliegl, R., Richter, E., Nuthmann, A., & Shu, H. (2010a). Flexible saccade-target selection in Chinese reading. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 63, 705–725.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Yan, M., Kliegl, R., Shu, H., Pan, J., & Zhou, X. (2010b). Parafoveal load of word n+1 modulates preprocessing effectiveness of word n+2 in Chinese reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 36, 1669–1676.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Yan, M., Richter, E., Shu, H., & Kliegl, R. (2009). Readers of Chinese extract semantic information from parafoveal words. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 16, 561–566.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Yan, G., Tian, H., Bai, X., & Rayner, K. (2006). The effect of word and character frequency on the eye movements of Chinese readers. British Journal of Psychology, 97, 259–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Yang, H. M., & McConkie, G. W. (1999). Reading Chinese: Some basic eye-movement characteristics. In H.-C. Chen (Ed.), Reading Chinese script: A cognitive analysis (pp. 207–222). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.Google Scholar
  68. Yang, J., Wang, S., Xu, Y., & Rayner, K. (2009). Do Chinese readers obtain preview benefit from word n + 2? Evidence from eye movements. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 35, 1192–1204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Yen, M.-H., Radach, R., Tzeng, O. J.-L., Hung, D. L., & Tsai, J.-L. (2009). Early parafoveal processing in reading Chinese sentences. Acta Psychologica, 131, 24–33. Under review.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Zang, C., Liversedge, S. P., Liang, F., Bai, X., & Yan, G. (2011). Interword spacing and landing position effects during Chinese reading in children and adults. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, under review.Google Scholar
  71. Ziegler, J., & Goswami, U. (2005). Reading acquisition, developmental dyslexia, and skilled reading across languages: A psycholinguistic grain size theory. Psychological Bulletin, 131, 3–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Computer ScienceNUI MaynoothMaynooth Co. KildareIreland
  2. 2.General and Biological PsychologyUniversity of WuppertalWuppertalGermany

Personalised recommendations