Advertisement

Reading and Writing

, Volume 26, Issue 2, pp 139–161 | Cite as

Auditory processing interventions and developmental dyslexia: a comparison of phonemic and rhythmic approaches

  • Jennifer M. ThomsonEmail author
  • Victoria Leong
  • Usha Goswami
Article

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to compare the efficacy of two auditory processing interventions for developmental dyslexia, one based on rhythm and one based on phonetic training. Thirty-three children with dyslexia participated and were assigned to one of three groups (a) a novel rhythmic processing intervention designed to highlight auditory rhythmic information in non-speech and speech stimuli; (b) a commercially-available phoneme discrimination intervention; and (c) a no-intervention control. The intervention lasted for 6 weeks. Both interventions yielded equivalent and significant gains on measures of phonological awareness (at both rhyme and phoneme levels), with large effect sizes at the phoneme level. Both programs had medium effect sizes on literacy outcome measures, although gains were non-significant when compared to the controls. The data suggest that rhythmic training has an important role to play in developing the phonological skills that are critical for efficient literacy acquisition. It is suggested that combining both prosodic/rhythmic and phonemic cues in auditory training programs may offer advantages for children with developmental dyslexia. This may be especially true for those who appear resistant to conventional phonics training methods.

Keywords

Auditory processing Developmental dyslexia Intervention Rhythm 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank the staff and students of the participating schools in East Anglia, UK. This study was funded by the Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC), grant RES-000-23-0475, awarded to UG, while support to UG for writing this paper came from the Leverhulme Trust.

References

  1. Anthony, J. L., & Lonigan, C. J. (2004). The nature of phonological awareness: Converging evidence from four studies of preschool and early grade school children. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96, 43–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Christophe, A., Mehler, J., & Sebastian-Galles, N. (2001). Perception of prosodic boundary correlates by newborn infants. Infancy, 2, 385–394.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Cohen, W., Hodson, A., O’Hare, A., Boyle, J., Durrani, T., & McCartney, E. (2005). Effects of computer-based intervention through acoustically modified speech (Fast ForWord) in severe mixed receptive-expressive language impairment: Outcomes from a randomized controlled trial. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 48, 715–729.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Corriveau, K. H., & Goswami, U. (2009). Rhythmic motor entrainment in children with speech and language impairments: Tapping to the beat. Cortex, 45, 119–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. De Martino, S., Espesser, R., Rey, V., & Habib, M. (2001). The “temporal processing deficit” hypothesis in dyslexia: New experimental evidence. Brain and Cognition, 46, 104–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Drullman, R., Festen, J. M., & Plomp, R. (1994a). Effect of reducing slow temporal modulations on speech reception. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 95, 2670–2680.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Drullman, R., Festen, J. M., & Plomp, R. (1994b). Effect of temporal envelope smearing on speech reception. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 95, 1053–1064.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Echols, C. H. (1996). A role for stress in early speech segmentation. In J. L. Morgan & K. Demuth (Eds.), Signal to Syntax: Bootstrapping from speech to grammar in early acquisition (pp. 151–170). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  9. Farmer, M. E., & Klein, R. M. (1995). The evidence for a temporal processing deficit linked to dyslexia: A review. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 2, 460–493.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Findlay, J. M. (1978). Estimates on probability functions: A more virulent PEST. Perception and Psychophysics, 23, 181–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Frederickson, N., Frith, U., & Reason, R. (1997). Phonological assessment battery (Standardised ed.). Windsor, UK: NFER Nelson.Google Scholar
  12. Gillam, R. B., Loeb, D. F., Hoffman, L. M., Bohman, T., Champlin, C. A., Thibodeau, L., et al. (2008). The efficacy of Fast ForWord Language intervention in school-age children with language impairment: A randomized controlled trial. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 51, 97–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Goswami, U. (2011). A temporal sampling framework for developmental dyslexia. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 15, 3–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Goswami, U., Fosker, T., Huss, M., Mead, N., & Szucs, D. (2011a). Rise time and formant transition duration in the discrimination of speech sounds: The BA-WA distinction in developmental dyslexia. Developmental Science, 14, 34–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Goswami, U., Gerson, D., & Astruc, L. (2010). Amplitude envelope perception, phonology and prosodic sensitivity in children with developmental dyslexia. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 23, 995–1019.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Goswami, U., Thomson, J., Richardson, U., Stainthorp, R., Hughes, D., Rosen, S., et al. (2002). Amplitude envelope onsets and developmental dyslexia: A new hypothesis. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 99, 10911–10916.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Goswami, U., Wang, H. L. S., Cruz, A., Fosker, T., Mead, N., & Huss, M. (2011b). Language-universal sensory deficits in developmental dyslexia: English, Spanish, and Chinese. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 23, 325–337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Greenberg, S. (2006). A multi-tier framework for understanding spoken language. In S. Greenberg & W. A. Ainsworth (Eds.), Listening to speech: An auditory perspective (pp. 411–433). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.Google Scholar
  19. Hamalainen, J., Leppanen, P., Eklund, K., Thomson, J. M., Richardson, U., Guttorm, T., et al. (2009). Common variance in amplitude envelope perception tasks and their impact on phoneme duration perception and reading and spelling in Finnish children with reading disabilities. Applied Psycholinguistics, 30, 511–530.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hamalainen, J., Leppanen, P. H., Torppa, M., Muller, K., & Lyytinen, H. (2005). Detection of sound rise time by adults with dyslexia. Brain and Language, 94, 32–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hatcher, P. J. (2000). Reading intervention need not be negligible: Response to Cossu (1999). Reading and Writing, 13(3), 349–355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hawkey, D. J. C., Amitay, S., & Moore, D. R. (2004). Early and rapid perceptual learning. Nature Neuroscience, 7, 1055–1056.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Heath, S. M., & Hogben, J. H. (2004a). Cost-effective prediction of reading difficulties. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 47, 751–765.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Heath, S. M., & Hogben, J. H. (2004b). The reliability and validity of tasks measuring perception of rapid sequences in children with dyslexia. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 45, 1275–1287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Huss, M., Verney, J. P., Fosker, T., Mead, N., & Goswami, U. (2011). Music, rhythm, rise time perception and developmental dyslexia: Perception of musical meter predicts reading and phonology. Cortex, 47, 674–689.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Jusczyk, P. W., Houston, D. M., & Newsome, M. (1999). The beginnings of word segmentation in English-learning infants. Cognitive Psychology, 39, 159–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Kitzen, K. R. (2001). Prosodic sensitivity, morphological ability and reading ability in young adults with and without childhood histories of reading difficulty (Doctoral dissertation, University of columbia, 2001). Dissertation Abstrcts International, 6(2), 0460A.Google Scholar
  28. Leong, V., Hamalainen, J., Soltesz, F., & Goswami, U. (2010). Rise time perception and detection of syllable stress in adults with developmental dyslexia. Unpublished manuscript submitted for publication.Google Scholar
  29. Mahncke, H., Connor, B., Appelman, J., Ahsanuddin, O., Hardy, J., Wood, R., et al. (2006). Memoery enhancement in healthy older adults using a brain plasticity-based training program: A randomized controlled study. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 103, 12523–12528.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Marshall, C. M., Snowling, M. J., & Bailey, P. J. (2001). Rapid auditory processing and phonological ability in normal readers and readers with dyslexia. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 44, 925–940.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Mattys, S. L., & Jusczyk, P. W. (2001). Do infants segment words or recurring contiguous patterns? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 27, 644–655.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. McAnally, K. I., Hansen, P. C., Cornelissen, P. L., & Stein, J. F. (1997). Effect of time and frequency manipulation on syllable perception in developmental dyslexics. Journal of Speech, Language and Hearing Research, 40, 912–924.Google Scholar
  33. McArthur, G. M., Ellis, D., Atkinson, C. M., & Coltheart, M. (2008). Auditory processing deficits in children with reading and language impairments: Can they (and should they) be treated? Cognition, 107, 946–977.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. McBride-Chang, C., & Ho, C. S.-H. (2005). Predictors of beginning reading in Chinese and English: A 2-year longitudinal study of Chinese Kindergartners. Scientific Studies of Reading, 9, 117–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. McBride-Chang, C., Tong, X., Shu, H., Wong, A. M. Y., Leung, K.-W., & Tardif, T. (2008). Syllable, phoneme, and tone: Psycholinguistic units in early Chinese and English word recognition. Scientific Studies of Reading, 12, 171–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Mehler, J., Jusczyk, P., Lambertz, G., Halsted, N., Bertoncini, J., & Amiel-Tison, C. (1988). A precursor of language acquisition in young infants. Cognition, 29, 143–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Menell, P., McAnally, K. I., & Stein, J. F. (1999). Psychophysical sensitivity and physiological response to amplitude modulation in adult dyslexic listeners. Journal of Speech, Language and Hearing Research, 42, 797–803.Google Scholar
  38. Moore, D. R., & Amitay, S. (2007). Auditory training: Rules and applications. Seminars in Hearing, 28, 99–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Moore, D. R., Halliday, L. F., & Amitay, S. (2009). Use of auditory learning to manage listening problems in children. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London: B Biological Sciences, 364, 409–420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Moore, D. R., Rosenberg, J. F., & Coleman, J. S. (2005). Discrimination training of phonemic contrasts enhances phonological processing in mainstream school children. Brain and Language, 94, 72–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Muneaux, M., Ziegler, J. C., Truc, C., Thomson, J., & Goswami, U. (2004). Deficits in beat perception and dyslexia: Evidence from French. Neuroreport, 15, 1255–1259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Nagarajan, S. S., Wang, X., Merzenich, M. M., Schreiner, C. E., Johnston, P., Jenkins, W. M., et al. (1998). Speech modifications algorithms used for training language learning-impaired children. IEEE Transactions on Rehabilitation Engineering, 6, 257–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. NICHD. (2000). Report of the National Reading Panel. Teaching children to read: An evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction: Reports of the sub-groups. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
  44. Nittrouer, S. (1999). Do temporal processing deficits cause phonological processing problems? Journal of Speech, Language and Hearing Research, 42, 925–942.Google Scholar
  45. Nittrouer, S. (2006). Children hear the forest. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 120, 1799–1802.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Overy, K., Nicolson, R. I., Fawcett, A. J., & Clarke, E. F. (2003). Dyslexia and music: Measuring musical timing skills. Dyslexia, 9, 18–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Pasquini, E. S., Corriveau, K. H., & Goswami, U. (2007). Auditory processing of amplitude envelope rise time in adults diagnosed with developmental dyslexia. Scientific Studies of Reading, 11, 259–286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Pickering, S., & Gathercole, S. E. (2001). Working memory test battery for children (WMTB-C). London, UK: The Psychological Corporation.Google Scholar
  49. Pierrehumbert, J. B. (2003). Phonetic diversity, statistical learning, and acquisition of phonology. Language and Speech, 46, 115–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Poelmans, H., Luts, H., Vandermosten, M., Boets, B., Ghesquière, P., & Wouters, J. (2011). Reduced sensitivity to slow-rate dynamic auditory information in children with dyslexia. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 32, 2810–2819.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Port, R. (2007). How are words stored in memory? Beyond phones and phonemes. New Ideas in Psychology, 25, 143–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Reed, M. A. (1989). Speech perception and the discrimination of brief auditory cues in reading disabled children. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 48, 270–292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Richardson, U., Thomson, J. M., Scott, S. K., & Goswami, U. (2004). Auditory processing skills and phonological representation in dyslexic children. Dyslexia, 10, 215–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Rosen, S., & Manganari, E. (2001). Is there a relationship between speech and nonspeech auditory processing in children with dyslexia? Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research, 44, 720–736.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Scientific Learning Corporation. (1998). Retrieved from: http://www.scilearn.com/products/index.php.
  56. Shannon, R. V., Zeng, F.-G., Kamath, V., & Wygonski, J. (1995). Speech recognition with primarily temporal cues. Science, 270, 303–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Shu, H., Peng, H., & McBride-Chang, C. (2008). Phonological awareness in young Chinese children. Developmental Science, 11, 171–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Suranyi, Z., Csepe, V., Richardson, U., Thomson, J. M., Honbolygo, F., & Goswami, U. (2009). Sensitivity to rhythmic parameters in dyslexic children: A comparison of Hungarian and English. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 22, 41–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Tallal, P. (1980). Auditory temporal perception, phonics, and reading disabilities in children. Brain and Language, 9, 182–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Tallal, P. (2004). Improving language and literacy is a matter of time. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 5, 721–728.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Tallal, P., Miller, S. L., Bedi, G., Byma, G., Wang, X., Nagarajan, S. S., et al. (1996). Language comprehension in language-learning impaired children improved with acoustically modified speech. Science, 271, 81–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Thomson, J. M., Fryer, B., Maltby, J., & Goswami, U. (2006). Auditory and motor rhythm awareness in adults with dyslexia. Journal of Research in Reading, 29, 334–348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Thomson, J. M., & Goswami, U. (2008). Rhythmic processing in children with developmental dyslexia: Auditory and motor rhythms link to reading and spelling. Journal of Physiology, Paris, 102, 120–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Thomson, J. M., & Goswami, U. (2010). Learning novel phonological representations in developmental dyslexia: Associations with basic auditory processing of rise time and phonological awareness. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 23, 453–473.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Torgesen, J. K. (2000). Individual differences in response to early interventions in reading: The lingering problem of treatment resisters. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 15, 55–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Torgesen, J. K., Alexander, A. W., Wagner, R. K., Rashotte, C. A., Voeller, K. K., & Conway, T. (2001). Intensive remedial instruction for children with severe reading disabilities: Immediate and long-term outcomes from two instructional approaches. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 34(33–58), 78.Google Scholar
  67. Torgesen, J. K., Wagner, R. K., & Rashotte, C. A. (1999). Test of word reading efficiency (TOWRE). Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.Google Scholar
  68. Vihman, M., & Croft, W. (2007). Phonological development: Toward a ‘radical’ templatic phonology. Linguistics, 45, 683–725.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Waber, D. P., Weiler, M. D., Wolff, P. H., Bellinger, D., Marcus, D. J., Ariel, R., et al. (2001). Processing of rapid auditory stimuli in school-age children referred for evaluation of learning disorders. Child Development, 72, 37–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Wang, H.-L. S., Huss, M., Hamalainen, J., & Goswami, U. (2011). Basic auditory processing and developmental dyslexia in Chinese. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal.Google Scholar
  71. Weber, C., Hahne, A., Friedrich, M., & Friederici, A. D. (2004). Discrimination of word stress in early infant perception: Electrophysiological evidence. Cognitive Brain Research, 18, 149–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Wechsler, D. (1992). Wechsler intelligence scales for children—III, UK. Kent, UK: The Psychological Corporation.Google Scholar
  73. Whalley, K., & Hansen, J. (2006). The role of prosodic sensitivity in children’s reading development. Journal of Research in Reading, 29, 288–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Wilkinson, G., & Robertson, G. (2004). Wide Range Acheivement Test. Lutz, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.Google Scholar
  75. Witton, C., Talcott, J. B., Hansen, P. C., Richardson, A. J., Griffiths, T. D., Rees, A., et al. (1998). Sensitivity to dynamic auditory and visual stimuli predicts nonword reading ability in both dyslexic and normal readers. Current Biology, 8, 791–797.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jennifer M. Thomson
    • 1
    Email author
  • Victoria Leong
    • 2
  • Usha Goswami
    • 2
  1. 1.Harvard Graduate School of EducationCambridgeUSA
  2. 2.University of CambridgeCambridgeUK

Personalised recommendations