Reading and Writing

, Volume 25, Issue 6, pp 1239–1258 | Cite as

An analysis of differential response patterns on the Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test-IIIB in struggling adult readers and third-grade children

  • Hye K. Pae
  • Daphne Greenberg
  • Rihana S. Williams


This study examines the Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test-IIIB (PPVT-IIIB) performance of 130 adults identified as struggling readers, in comparison to 175 third-grade children. Response patterns to the items on the PPVT-IIIB by these two groups were investigated, focusing on items, semantic categories, and lexical features, including word length, word class, and word frequency. The score distributional properties of the two groups were different, but there were similarities and differences found in different response patterns. Analyses of word length, word class, and word frequency in the two groups’ performance resulted in counterintuitive findings for the adult participants. The struggling adult learners’ vocabulary repertoire might have been shaped by their real-life experiences rather than formal schooling. Implications and future research directions are discussed.


Receptive vocabulary Differential response patterns Semantic referents and categories Lexical characteristics 


  1. Adams, M. J. (1990). Beginning to read: Thinking and learning about print. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  2. Anderson, P., & Freebody, R. C. (1983). Reading comprehension and the assessment and acquisition of word knowledge. Advances in Reading/Language Research, 2, 231–256.Google Scholar
  3. Anderson, R. C., & Nagy, W. E. (1992). The vocabulary conundrum. American Educator, 16(14–18), 44–47.Google Scholar
  4. Bates, E., Bretherton, I., & Synder, L. (1988). From first words to grammar: Individual differences and dissociable mechanisms. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Beck, I. L., & McKeown, M. G. (1983). Learning words well—A program to enhance vocabulary and comprehension. The Reading Teacher, 36, 622–625.Google Scholar
  6. Beck, I. L., & McKeown, M. G. (1991). Conditions of vocabulary acquisition. In R. Barr, M. Kamil, P. Mosenthal, & P. D. Pearson (Eds.), Handbook of reading research (Vol. 2, pp. 789–814). New York: Longman.Google Scholar
  7. Biemiller, A. (2001). Teaching vocabulary: Early, direct and sequential. American Educator, 25, 24–28. Washington, DC: American Federation of Teachers.Google Scholar
  8. Biemiller, A., & Slonim, N. (2001). Estimating root word vocabulary growth in normative and advantaged populations: Evidence for a common sequence of vocabulary acquisition. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93(3), 498–520.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bolger, D. J., Balass, M., Landen, E., & Perfetti, C. A. (2008). Contextual variation and definitions in learning the meanings of words. Discourse Processes, 45, 122–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Choi, S., & Gopnik, A. (1995). Early acquisition of verbs in Korean: A cross-linguistic study. Journal of Child Language, 22, 497–529.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Dale, E., & O’Rourke, J. (1986). Vocabulary building: A process approach. Columbus, OH: Zaner-Bloser.Google Scholar
  12. Davies, M. (2009). The corpus of contemporary American English (COCA). Retrieved from
  13. Dunn, L. M., & Dunn, L. M. (1997). Peabody picture vocabulary test (3rd ed.). Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.Google Scholar
  14. Edit Central. (2009). Edit central. Retrieved from
  15. Gentner, D. (1982). Why nouns are learned before verbs: Linguistic relativity versus natural partitioning. In S. Kuczaj II (Ed.), Language development, vol. 2: Language, thought and culture (pp. 301–334). Hilsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  16. Golinkoff, R., & Hirsh-Pasek, K. (2008). How toddlers learn verbs. Trends in Cognitive Science, 12, 397–403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Grabe, W. (2004). Research on teaching reading. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 24, 44–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hart, B., & Risley, T. R. (1995). Meaningful differences in the everyday experience of young American children. Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes Publishing.Google Scholar
  19. Hirsch, D., & Nation, P. (1992). What vocabulary size is needed to read unsimplified texts for pleasure? Reading in a Foreign Language, 8, 689–696.Google Scholar
  20. Kamil, M. L., & Hiebert, E. H. (2005). The teaching and learning of vocabulary: Perspectives and persistent issues. In E. H. Hiebert & M. Kamil (Eds.), Teaching and learning vocabulary: Bringing scientific research to practice (pp. 1–26). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  21. Kintsch, W. (1994). Text comprehension, memory, and learning. American Psychologist, 49, 294–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Lee, J. (2011). Size matters: Early vocabulary as a predictor of language and literacy competence. Applied Psycholinguistics, 32(1), 69–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Leopold, E. (1998). Frequency spectra within word-length classes. Journal of Quantitative Linguistics, 5, 224–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Lucariello, J., Kyratzis, A., & Nelson, K. (1992). Taxonomic knowledge: What kind and when? Child Development, 63, 978–998.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Manly, J., Byrd, D., Touradji, P., Sanchez, D., & Stern, Y. (2004). Literacy and cognitive change among ethnically diverse elders. International Journal of Psychology, 39, 47–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Miller, L. T., & Lee, C. J. (1993). Construct validation of the Peabody picture vocabulary test-revised: A structural equation model of the acquisition order of words. Psychological Assessment, 5, 438–441.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Monsell, S. (1991). The nature and locus of word frequency effects. In D. Besner & G. W. Humphreys (Eds.), Basic processes in reading: Visual word recognition (pp. 148–197). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  28. Nagy, W. E., Anderson, R. C., & Herman, P. A. (1987). Learning word meanings from context during normal reading. American Educational Research Journal, 24, 237–270.Google Scholar
  29. Nagy, W. E., & Herman, P. A. (1987). Breadth and depth of vocabulary knowledge: Implications for acquisition and instruction. In M. McKeown & M. Curtis (Eds.), The nature of vocabulary acquisition (pp. 19–35). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  30. Nagy, W. E., & Scott, J. A. (2000). Vocabulary processes. In M. L. Kamil, P. Mosenthal, P. D. Pearson, & R. Barr (Eds.), Handbook of reading research (Vol. 3, pp. 269–284). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  31. National Reading Panel (NRP)-Report of the subgroups. (2000). Teaching children to read: An evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction. Washington, DC: National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NIH pub. No. 004754).Google Scholar
  32. Nelson, K., & Nelson, A. P. (1990). Category production in response to script and category cues by Kindergarten and second grade children. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 11, 431–446.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Oakland, T., De Mesquita, P., & Buckley, K. (1988). Psychological, linguistic, and sociocultural correlates of reading among Mexican American elementary students. School Psychology International, 9, 219–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Pearson, P. D., Hiebert, E. H., & Kamil, M. L. (2007). Vocabulary assessment: What we know and what we need to learn. Reading Research Quarterly, 42(2), 282–296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Pinker, S. (1987). Words and rules: The ingredients of language. New York, NY: HarperCollins Publishers.Google Scholar
  36. Riva, D., Nichelli, F., & Devoti, M. (2000). Developmental aspects of verbal fluency and confrontation naming in children. Brain and Language, 71(2), 267–284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Storch, S. A., & Whitehurst, G. J. (2002). Oral language and code-related precursors to reading: Evidence from a longitudinal structural model. Developmental Psychology, 38, 934–947.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Tannenbaum, K. R., Torgesen, J. K., & Wagner, R. K. (2006). Relationships between word knowledge, and reading comprehension in third-grade children. Scientific Studies of Reading, 10, 381–398.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Tardif, T. (1996). Nouns are not always learned before verbs: Evidence from Mandarin speakers’ early vocabularies. Developmental Psychology, 32, 492–504.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Woodcock, R. W., McGrew, K. S., & Mather, N. (2001). Woodcock-Johnson III tests of achievement. Itasca, IL: Riverside Publishing.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Hye K. Pae
    • 1
  • Daphne Greenberg
    • 2
  • Rihana S. Williams
    • 3
  1. 1.University of CincinnatiCincinnatiUSA
  2. 2.Georgia State UniversityAtlantaUSA
  3. 3.Emmanuel CollegeFranklin SpringsUSA

Personalised recommendations