Advertisement

Reading and Writing

, Volume 25, Issue 4, pp 775–797 | Cite as

Rapid naming contributions to reading and writing acquisition of European Portuguese

  • Cristina P. Albuquerque
Article

Abstract

This study analyzed the relation and the specific influence of rapid naming (RN) on different reading (decoding accuracy and reading fluency) and writing components (spelling accuracy and fluency in composition) of European Portuguese. Moreover, it also compares the influence of Rapid Automatized Naming (RAN) tests (colors, digits) and of a Rapid Alternating Stimulus (RAS) test (shapes and colors). In a sample composed by normally achieving children, 70 in the first grade and 69 in the second grade, the results show that, when phonemic awareness is controlled, RN is a significant concurrent predictor of reading and writing performance. Its impact occurs mainly on reading fluency and is carried out predominantly by the RAN digit test. Nevertheless, the RAN color test and the RAS shape and color test also significantly predicted reading and writing performance. The results also indicate that RN has less impact on writing than on reading, and that, when compared with phonemic awareness, it is associated with distinct written language components. When combined, the data obtained are consistent with the orthographic characteristics of European Portuguese.

Keywords

Rapid naming Reading Spelling Composition 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The present study was supported by the Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia in Portugal (Centro de Psicopedagogia da Universidade de Coimbra).

References

  1. Albuquerque, C. P., & Simões, M. (2010). Rapid naming tests: Developmental course and relations with neuropsychological measures. The Spanish Journal of Psychology, 13(1), 88–100.Google Scholar
  2. Bacelar do Nascimento, M. F., Casteleiro, J. M., Marques, M. L. G., Barreto, F., Amaro, R., & Veloso, R. (2005). Corlex: Léxico multifuncional computorizado do Português contemporâneo [lmcpc_dec.txt] (Computorized multifunctional lexic of contemporary Portuguese). Available from Centro de Linguística da Universidade de Lisboa http://www.clul.ul.pt/sectores/linguistica_de_corpus/projecto_lmcpc.php.
  3. Badian, N. (1996). Dyslexia: A validation of the concept at two age levels. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 29, 102–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Berninger, V. W. (2000). Development of language by hand and its connections with language by ear, mouth, and eye. Topics in Language Disorders, 20(4), 65–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Berninger, V. W., & Swanson, H. L. (1994). Modifying Hayes and Flower’s model of skilled writing to explain beginning and developing writing. In E. C. Butterfield & J. S. Carlson (Eds.), Advances in cognition and educational practice (Vol. 2, pp. 57–81). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.Google Scholar
  6. Borges, S. C., & Albuquerque, C. P. (2009). Relações entre a linguagem oral e escrita (Relations between oral and written language). Psychologica, 50, 205–231.Google Scholar
  7. Bowers, P. G., & Swanson, L. B. (1991). Naming speed deficits in reading disability: Multiple measures of a singular process. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 51, 195–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cardoso-Martins, C., Corrêa, M. F., & Magalhães, L. F. S. (2010). Dificuldade específica de aprendizagem da leitura e escrita (Specific reading and writing disability). In L. F. Malloy-Diniz, D. Fuentes, P. Mattos, & N. Abreu (Org.), Avaliação neuropsicológica (pp. 133–149). Porto Alegre, Brazil: Artmed.Google Scholar
  9. Cardoso-Martins, C., & Pennington, F. B. (2004). The relationship between phoneme awareness and rapid serial naming skills and literacy acquisition: The role of developmental period and reading ability. Scientific Studies of Reading, 8(1), 27–52. doi: 10.1207/s1532799xssr0801_3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cutting, L. E., & Denckla, M. B. (2001). The relationship of rapid serial naming and word reading in normally developing readers: An exploratory model. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 14, 673–705.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. de Jong, P. F., & van der Leij, A. (2002). Effects of phonological abilities and linguistic comprehension on the development of reading. Scientific Studies of Reading, 6(1), 51–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Ehri, L. C., Nunes, S. R., Willows, D. M., Schuster, B. V., & Yaghoub-Zadeh, Z. (2001). Phonemic awareness instruction helps children learn to read: Evidence from the National Reading Panel’s meta-analysis. Reading Research Quarterly, 3, 250–283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Festas, I., Leitão, J. A., Formosinho, M. D., Albuquerque, C., Vilar, M., & Martins, C. (2006). PAL-PORT—Uma bateria de avaliação psicolinguística das afasias e de outras perturbações da linguagem para a população portuguesa (A psycholinguistic battery for the assessment of aphasias and other language disorders in the Portuguese population). In C. Martins, C. Machado, L. Almeida, A. Guisande, M. Gonçalves, & V. Ramalho (Eds.), XI Conferência Internacional Avaliação Psicológica: Formas e Contextos (pp. 719–729). Braga: Ed. Psiquilibrios.Google Scholar
  14. Georgiou, G. K., Parrila, R., & Liao, C.-H. (2008). Rapid naming speed and reading across languages that vary in orthographic consistency. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 21, 885–903. doi: 10.1007/s11145-007-9096-4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hammill, D. D., & Larsen, S. C. (1996). Test of written language—Third Edition. Examiner’s manual. Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.Google Scholar
  16. Hammill, D. D., Mather, N., Allen, E. A., & Roberts, R. (2002). Using semantics, grammar, phonology, and rapid naming tasks to predict word identification. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 35, 121–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Jiménez, J. E., Hernández-Valle, I., Rodríguez, C., Guzmán, R., Díaz, A., & Ortiz, R. (2008). The double-deficit hypothesis in Spanish developmental dyslexia. Topics in Language Disorders, 28(1), 46–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Kail, R., Hall, L. K., & Caskey, B. J. (1999). Processing speed, exposure to print, and naming speed. Applied Psycholinguistics, 20, 303–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Korhonen, T. T. (1995). The persistence of rapid naming problems in children with reading disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 28, 232–239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Landerl, K., & Wimmer, H. (2008). Development of word reading fluency and spelling in a consistent orthography: An 8-year follow-up. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100(1), 150–161. doi: 10.1037/0022-06663.100.1.150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Lervåg, A., & Hulme, C. (2009). Rapid automatized naming (RAN) taps a mechanism that places constraints on the development of early reading fluency. Psychological Science, 20, 1040–1048.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Loureiro, C., Silva, L. R., & Fernandes, T. (2002). Bateria de Avaliação da Leitura e Escrita (Reading and writing assessment battery). Lisboa: Laboratório de Estudos da Linguagem, Centro de Estudos Egas Moniz.Google Scholar
  23. Manis, F. R., Doi, L. M., & Bhadha, B. (2000). Naming speed, phonological awareness, and orthographic knowledge in second graders. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 33, 325–333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Manis, F. R., Seidenberg, M. S., & Doi, L. M. (1999). See Dick RAN: Rapid naming and the longitudinal prediction of reading subskills in first and second graders. Scientific Studies of Reading, 3(2), 129–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Martins, C. M. Z. (2005). Estudos de adaptação de um teste de escrita (Adaptation studies of a writing test). Dissertação de Mestrado não publicada. Faculdade de Psicologia e de Ciências da Educação, Universidade de Coimbra.Google Scholar
  26. Meyer, M. S., Wood, F. B., Hart, L. A., & Felton, R. H. (1998). Selective predictive value of rapid automatized naming in poor readers. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 31, 106–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Misra, M., Katzir, T., Wolf, M., & Poldrack, R. A. (2004). Neural systems for rapid automatized naming in skilled readers: Unraveling the RAN-reading relationship. Scientific Studies of Reading, 8(3), 241–256. doi: 10.1207/s1532799xssr0803_4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Moll, K., Fussenegger, B., Willburger, E., & Landerl, K. (2009). RAN is not a measure of orthographic processing. Scientific Studies of Reading, 13(1), 1–25. doi: 10.1080/10888430802631684.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Närhi, V., Ahonen, T., Aro, M., Leppäsaari, T., Korhonen, T., Tolvanen, A., et al. (2005). Rapid serial naming: Relations between different stimuli and neuropsychological factors. Brain and Language, 92, 45–57. doi: 10.1016/j.bandl.2004.05.004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Nikolopoulos, D., Goulandris, N., Hulme, C., & Snowling, M. J. (2006). The cognitive bases of learning to read and spell in Greek: Evidence from a longitudinal study. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 94, 1–17. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2005.11.006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Olinghouse, N. G. (2008). Student- and instruction-level predictors of narrative writing in third-grade students. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 21, 3–26. doi: 10.1007/s11145-007-9062-1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Plaza, M., & Cohen, H. (2004). Predictive influence of phonological processing, morphological/syntactic skill, and naming speed on spelling performance. Brain and Cognition, 55, 368–373. doi: 10.1016/j.bandc.2004.02.076.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Savage, R. S., Frederickson, N., Goodwin, R., Patni, U., Smith, N., & Tuersley, L. (2005). Relationships among rapid digit naming, phonological processing, motor automaticity and speech perception in poor, average, and good readers and spellers. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 38, 12–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Savage, R., Pillay, V., & Melidona, S. (2008). Rapid serial naming is a unique predictor of spelling in children. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 41, 235–250. doi: 10.1177/0022219408315814.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Seymour, P. H. K., Aro, M., & Erskine, J. M. (2003). Foundation literacy acquisition in European orthographies. British Journal of Psychology, 94, 143–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Simões, M., Albuquerque, C., Pinho, S., Pereira, M., Seabra-Santos, M., Alberto, I., et al. (2008). Relatório do Projecto adaptação e aferição de testes neuropsicológicos: Estudos psicométricos (Report of the Project Adaptation and normative data of neuropsychological tests: Psychometric studies) (SAPIENS/POCTI/35410/2000; 2000–2007). Coimbra: Faculdade de Psicologia e de Ciências da Educação da Universidade de Coimbra.Google Scholar
  37. Sprenger-Charolles, L., Colé, P., Lacert, P., & Serniclaes, W. (2000). On subtypes of developmental dyslexia: Evidence from processing time and accuracy scores. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 54, 88–106.Google Scholar
  38. Strattman, K., & Hodson, B. W. (2005). Variables that influence decoding and spelling in beginning readers. Child Language Teaching and Therapy, 21, 165–190. doi: 10.1191/0265659005ct287oa.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Sucena, A., Castro, S. L., & Seymour, P. (2009). Developmental dyslexia in an orthography of intermediate depth: the case of European Portuguese. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 22, 791–810. doi: 10.1007/s11145-008-9156-4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Sunseth, K., & Bowers, P. G. (2002). Rapid naming and phonemic awareness: Contributions to reading, spelling and orthographic knowledge. Scientific Studies of Reading, 6(4), 401–429. doi: 10.1207/s1532799xssr0604_05.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Swanson, L. H., Trainin, G., Necoechea, D., & Hammill, D. (2003). Rapid naming, phonological awareness and reading: A meta-analysis of the correlation evidence. Review of Educational Research, 4, 407–440.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Treiman, R., & Bourassa, D. C. (2000). The development of spelling skill. Topics in Language Disorders, 20(3), 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Vaessen, A., Gerretsen, P., & Blomert, L. (2009). Naming problems do not reflect a second independent core deficit in dyslexia: Double deficits explored. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 103, 202–221. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2008.12.004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. van den Bos, K. P., Zijlstra, J. H., & Spelberg, H. C. (2002). Life-span data on continuous-naming speeds of numbers, letters, colors, and pictured objects, and word-reading speed. Scientific Studies of Reading, 6(1), 25–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Wagner, R. K., Torgesen, J. K., Rashotte, C. A., Hecht, S. A., Barker, T. A., Burgess, S. R., et al. (1997). Changing relations between phonological processing abilities and word-level reading as children develop from beginning to skilled readers: A 5-year longitudinal study. Developmental Psychology, 33, 468–479.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Wilcox, R. R. (2005). Introduction to robust estimation and hypothesis testing (2nd ed.). San Diego, CA: Elsevier Academic Press.Google Scholar
  47. Wimmer, H., & Mayringer, H. (2002). Dysfluent reading in the absence of spelling difficulties: A specific disability in regular orthographies. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94(2), 272–277. doi: 10.1037:0022-0663.94.2.272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Wolf, M., Bally, H., & Morris, R. (1986). Automaticity, retrieval processes, and reading: A longitudinal study in average and impaired readers. Child Development, 57, 988–1000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Wolf, M., & Denckla, M. B. (2005). The rapid automatized naming and rapid alternating stimulus tests. Examiner’s manual. Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of Psychology and Educational SciencesUniversity of CoimbraCoimbraPortugal

Personalised recommendations