Reading and Writing

, Volume 23, Issue 3–4, pp 311–336

Cross-language transfer of insight into the structure of compound words

  • Jie Zhang
  • Richard C. Anderson
  • Hong Li
  • Qiong Dong
  • Xinchun Wu
  • Yan Zhang
Article

Abstract

Cross-language transfer of awareness of the structure of compound words was investigated among native speakers of Chinese who were learning English as a second language. Chinese fifth graders received instruction in the morphology of four types of compound words in either Chinese or English. They then completed both the Chinese and English versions of a compound word structure analogy task. Compared with children who received no instruction, children who received instruction in Chinese were able to transfer knowledge they had acquired of compound types in Chinese to comparable types in English. Reverse transfer from English to Chinese was found among children with high reading proficiency.

Keywords

Morphological awareness Cross-language transfer Compound morphology Reading proficiency 

References

  1. Anderson, R. C., & Li, W. (2005). A cross-language perspective on learning to read. In A. McKeough, J. L. Lupart, L. Phillips, & V. Timmons (Eds.), Understanding literacy development: A global view (pp. 65–91). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  2. Bauer, L. (1987). English word-formation. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Bauer, L., & Renouf, A. (2001). A corpus-based study of compounding in English. Journal of English Linguistics, 29, 101–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bialystok, E. (2001). Bilingualism in development: Language, literacy, and cognition. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Bialystok, E., McBride-Chang, C., & Luk, G. (2005). Bilingualism, language proficiency, and learning to read in two writing systems. Journal of Educational Psychology, 97, 580–590.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Carlisle, J. F. (1995). Morphological awareness and early reading achievement. In L. B. Feldman (Ed.), Morphological aspects of language processing (pp. 189–209). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  7. Carlisle, J. F. (2000). Awareness of the structure and meaning of morphologically complex words: Impact on reading. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 12, 169–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Carlisle, J. F., Beeman, M., Davis, L. H., & Spharim, G. (1999). Relationship of metalinguistic capabilities and reading achievement for children who are becoming bilingual. Applied Psycholinguistics, 20, 459–478.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Chow, B., McBride-Chang, C., & Burgess, S. (2005). Phonological processing skills and early reading abilities in Hong Kong Chinese kindergarteners learning to read English as a second language. Journal of Educational Psychology, 97, 81–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Comeau, L., Cormier, P., Grandmaison, E., & Lacroix, D. (1999). A longitudinal study of phonological processing skills in children learning to read in a second language. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91, 29–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cummins, J. (1979). Linguistic interdependence and educational development of bilingual children. Review of Educational Research, 49, 222–251.Google Scholar
  12. Cummins, J. (1991). Interdependence of first-language on second-language proficiency in bilingual children. In E. Bialystok (Ed.), Language processing in bilingual children (pp. 70–89). New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Durgunoglu, A. Y., Nagy, W. E., & Hancin-Bhatt, B. J. (1993). Cross-language transfer of phonological awareness. Journal of Educational Psychology, 85, 453–465.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Fowler, A., Feldman, L. B., Andjelkovic, D., & Oney, B. (2003). Morphological and phonological analysis by beginning readers: Evidence from Serbian and Turkish. In E. Assink & D. Santa (Eds.), Reading complex words: Cross-language studies (pp. 53–79). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.Google Scholar
  15. Geva, E., Wade-Wooley, L., & Shany, M. (1997). Development of reading efficiency in first and second language. Scientific Studies of Reading, 1, 119–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Gottardo, A., Yan, B., Siegel, L. S., & Wade-Woolley, L. (2001). Factors related to English performance in children with Chinese as a first language: More evidence of cross-language transfer of phonological processing. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93, 530–542.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hancin-Bhatt, B., & Nagy, W. E. (1994). Lexical transfer and second language morphological development. Applied Psycholinguistics, 15, 289–310.Google Scholar
  18. Huang, S. (1997). Chinese as a headless language in compounding morphology. In J. Packard (Ed.), New approaches to Chinese word formation: Morphology, phonology and the lexicon in modern and ancient Chinese. Trends in linguistics studies and monographs 105. Berlin and New York: Mouton De Gruyter.Google Scholar
  19. Ku, Y., & Anderson, R. C. (2003). Development of morphological awareness in Chinese and English. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 16, 399–422.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Kuo, L., & Anderson, R. C. (2008). Conceptual and methodological issues in comparing metalinguistic awareness across languages. In K. Koda & A. Zehler (Eds.), Learning to read across languages (pp. 39–67). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  21. Li, W., Anderson, R. C., Nagy, W., & Zhang, H. (2002). Facets of metalinguistic awareness that contribute to Chinese literacy. In W. Li, J. S. Gaffney, & J. L. Packard (Eds.), Chinese language acquisition: Theoretical and pedagogical issues (pp. 59–86). Norwell, MA: Kluwer.Google Scholar
  22. Libben, G. (2006). Why study compound processing? An overview of the issues. In G. Libben & G. Jarema (Eds.), The representation and processing of compound words (pp. 1–22). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  23. Lindsey, K. A., Manis, F. R., & Bailey, C. E. (2003). Prediction of first-grade reading in Spanish-speaking English language learners. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95, 482–494.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Marian, V., & Kaushanskaya, M. (2007). Cross-linguistic transfer and borrowing in bilinguals. Applied Psycholinguistics, 28, 369–390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. McBride-Chang, C., Cheung, H., Chow, B. W.-Y., Chow, C. S. L., & Choi, L. (2006). Metalinguistic skills and vocabulary knowledge in L1 and L2. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 19, 695–716.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. McBride-Chang, C., Liu, H., Wagner, R., Shu, H., Zhou, A., Cheuk, C. S.-M., et al. (2005). Changing models across cultures: Associations of phonological and morphological awareness to reading in Beijing, Hong Kong, Korea, and America. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 92, 140–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. McBride-Chang, C., Shu, H., Zhou, A. B., Wat, C. P., & Wagner, R. K. (2003). Morphological awareness uniquely predicts young children’s Chinese character recognition. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95, 743–751.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Mehta, P. D., Foorman, B. R., Branum-Martin, L., & Taylor, W. P. (2005). Literacy as a unidimensional multilevel construct: Validation, sources of influence, and implications in a longitudinal study in grades 1 to 4. Scientific Studies of Reading, 9(2), 85–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Nagy, W. E., & Anderson, R. C. (1984). How many words are there in printed school English? Reading Research Quarterly, 19, 304–330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Nagy, W. E., Berninger, V. W., & Abbott, R. C. (2006). Contributions of morphology beyond phonology to literacy outcomes of upper elementary and middle-school students. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98, 134–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Nagy, W. E., Berninger, V. W., Abbott, R. C., Vaughan, K., & Vermeulen, K. (2003). Relationship of morphology and other language skills to literacy skills in at-risk second-grade readers and at-risk fourth-grade writers. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95, 730–742.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Nicoladis, E. (1999). “Where is my brush teeth?” Acquisition of compound nouns in a French–English bilingual child. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 2(3), 245–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Nicoladis, E. (2002). What’s the difference between ‘toilet paper’ and ‘paper toilet’? French–English bilingual children’s cross-linguistic transfer in compound nouns. Journal of Child Language, 29, 843–863.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Nicoladis, E. (2003). Cross-linguistic transfer in deverbal compounds of preschool bilingual children. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 6(1), 17–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Nunes, T., Bryant, P., & Olsson, J. (2003). Learning morphological and phonological spelling rules: An intervention study. Scientific Studies of Reading, 7, 289–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Packard, J. L. (2000). The morphology of Chinese: A linguistic and cognitive approach. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  37. Proctor, C. P., August, D., Carlo, M. S., & Snow, C. (2006). The intriguing role of Spanish language vocabulary knowledge in predicting English reading comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98, 159–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Sandra, D. (1990). On the representation and processing of compound words: Automatic access to constituent morphemes does not occur. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 42, 529–567.Google Scholar
  39. Selkirk, E. (1982). The syntax of words. Cambridge, MA: MIT.Google Scholar
  40. Taft, M., & Zhu, X. (1995). The representation of bound morphemes in the lexicon: A Chinese study. In L. B. Feldman (Ed.), Morphological aspects of language processing (pp. 293–316). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  41. Tyler, A., & Nagy, W. E. (1990). Use of derivational morphology during reading. Cognition, 36, 17–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. van Jaarsveld, H. J., & Rattink, G. E. (1988). Frequency effects in the processing of lexicalized and novel nominal compounds. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 17, 447–473.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Verhoeven, L. (1994). Transfer in bilingual development: The linguistic interdependency hypothesis revisited. Language Learning, 44, 381–415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Wang, M., Cheng, C., & Chen, S. W. (2006). Contribution of morphological awareness to Chinese–English biliteracy acquisition. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98, 542–553.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. White, T. G., Power, M. A., & White, S. (1989). Morphological analysis: Implication for teaching and understanding vocabulary growth. Reading Research Quarterly, 24, 283–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Yuan, C., & Huang, C. (1998). Chinese morpheme and morphology study based on morpheme database. Yu Yan Wen Zi Ying Yong, 3, 83–88. (in Chinese).Google Scholar
  47. Zhang, J. (2004). Development and intervention of morphological awareness in Chinese. Unpublished master’s thesis, Beijing Normal University, Beijing.Google Scholar
  48. Zhang, J., Anderson, R. C., Packard, J., Wu, X., & Tang, S. (2007). Development of knowledge about compound word structures in Chinese and English. Champaign, IL: Center for the Study of Reading.Google Scholar
  49. Zhang, B. Y., & Peng, D.-L. (1992). Decomposed storage in the Chinese lexicon. In H.-C. Chen & O. J. L. Tzeng (Eds.), Language processing in Chinese (pp. 131–148). Amsterdam: North-Holland.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jie Zhang
    • 1
  • Richard C. Anderson
    • 1
  • Hong Li
    • 2
  • Qiong Dong
    • 2
  • Xinchun Wu
    • 2
  • Yan Zhang
    • 2
  1. 1.Center for the Study of ReadingUniversity of Illinois at Urbana-ChampaignChampaignUSA
  2. 2.Department of PsychologyBeijing Normal UniversityBeijingPeople’s Republic of China

Personalised recommendations