Reading and Writing

, Volume 23, Issue 9, pp 1071–1083 | Cite as

Individual differences in reading comprehension gains from assisted reading practice: pre existing conditions, vocabulary acquisition, and amounts of practice

Article

Abstract

We conducted a study of the effects of assisted reading practice (Shany & Biemiller, 1995). In this paper we examined the original data to find factors affecting gains in reading comprehension. We contrasted 14 children who had below median gains in reading comprehension and 15 who had above median gains. There were no significant correlations between pre-program language and reading measures and reading comprehension gains. High comprehension gainers made significantly larger gains in vocabulary. In the previous report on this research, we found that reading practice had large beneficial impact on reading comprehension. In this study we also found that children who gained significantly more vocabulary had also significantly higher gains in reading comprehension. Implications are discussed.

Keywords

Assisted reading practice Reading comprehension Vocabulary 

References

  1. Al Otaiba, S., & Fuchs, D. (2002). Characteristics of children who are unresponsive to early literacy intervention: A review of the literature. Remedial and Special Education, 23(5), 300–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Allen, L., Cipielewski, J., & Stanovich, K. E. (1991). The construct validity of measures of reading habits and attitudes. Unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar
  3. Allington, R. (2007). Fluency as an Instructional Problem. Retrieved on January 15, 2009 from http://www.tcrecord.org ID Number: 13585.
  4. Anderson, R. C., & Freebody, P. (1985). Vocabulary knowledge. In H. Singer & R. B. Ruddell (Eds.), Theoretical models and processes of reading (3rd ed., pp. 343–371). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.Google Scholar
  5. Anderson, R. C., Wilson, P. T., & Fielding, L. G. (1988). Growth in reading and how children spend their time outside of school. Reading Research Quarterly, 23, 285–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Blum, I., Koskinen, P. A., Tennant, N., Parker, E. M., Straub, M., & Curry, C. (1995). Using audiotaped books to extend classroom literacy instruction into the homes of second-language learners. Journal of Reading Behavior, 27, 535–563. Google Scholar
  7. Biemiller, A. (1981). Biemiller test of reading processes. Toronto: Guidance Center, Faculty of Education, University of Toronto.Google Scholar
  8. Cain, K., & Oakhill, J. (2003). Reading comprehension difficulties. In T. Nunes & P. Bryant (Eds.), Handbook of children’s literacy (pp. 313–338). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.Google Scholar
  9. Carver, R. P. (1990). Reading rate. A review of research and theory. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  10. Chafouleas, S. M., Martens, B. K., Dobson, R. L., Weinstein, K. S., & Gardner, K. B. (2004). Fluent reading as the improvement of stimulus control: Additive effects of performance-based interventions to repeated reading on students’ reading and error rates. Journal of Behavioral Education, 13(2), 67–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Chall, J. S. (1983). Stages of reading development. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  12. Chall, J. S., Jacobs, V. A., & Baldwin, L. E. (1990). The reading crisis: Why poor children fall behind. Cambridge, MA.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Chomsky, C. (1976). After decoding: What? In S. J. Samuels (Ed.), What research has to say about reading instruction (pp. 288–296). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.Google Scholar
  14. Compton, D. (2000). Modeling the response of normally achieving and at-risk first grade children to word reading instruction. Annals of Dyslexia, 50, 53–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Connor, C. M. (2009). Instruction, student engagement, and reading skill growth in reading first classrooms. The Elementary School Journal, 109, 3–4. The University of Chicago.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Cunningham, A. E., & Stanovich, K. E. (1990). Assessing print exposure and orthographic processing skill in children: A Quick measure of reading experience. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82(4), 733–740.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Cunningham, A. E., & Stanovich, K. E. (1991). Tracking the unique effects of print exposure in children: Associations with vocabulary, general knowledge, and spelling. Journal of Educational Psychology, 83(2), 264–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Curtis, M. E. (1980). Development of components of reading skill. Journal of Educational Psychology, 72, 656–669.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Denton, C. A., Vaughn, S., & Fletcher, J. M. (2003). Bringing research-based practice in reading intervention to scale. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 18(3), 201–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Dowhower, S. L. (1987). Effects of repeated reading of second-grade transitional readers’ fluency and comprehension. Reading Research Quarterly, 22(4), 389–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Dunn, L. M. (1985). Peabody picture vocabulary test. Circle Pines, MN: American Guuidance service.Google Scholar
  22. Durrell, D. D. (1980). Durrell analysis of reading difficulty. New York: Harcourt, Brace, Javanovich.Google Scholar
  23. Ehren, B. J. (2005). Looking for evidence-based practice in reading comprehension instruction. Topics in Language Disorders, 25, 310–321.Google Scholar
  24. Ferrara, S. L. (2005). Promote reader self-efficacy. Intervention in School & Clinic, 41, 36–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Fuchs, L., Fuchs, D., Hosp, M., & Jenkins, J. (2001). Oral reading fluency as an indicator of reading competence: A theoretical, empirical, and historical analysis. Scientific Studies of Reading, 5, 239–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Green, F. E. (1999). Brain and learning research: Implications for meeting the needs of diverse learners. Education, 119, 682–691.Google Scholar
  27. Griffith, L. W., & Rasinski, T. V. (2004). A focus on fluency: How one teacher incorporated fluency with her reading curriculum. The Reading Teacher, 58(2), 126–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Gunn, B., Smollowski, K., Biglan, A., Black, C., & Blair, J. (2005). Fostering the development of reading skill through supplemental instruction: Results for Hispanic and non-Hispanic students. Journal of Special Education, 39(2), 66–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Herman, P. A. (1985). The effect of repeated readings on reading rate speech pauses, and word recognition accuracy. Reading Research Quarterly, 20(5), 553–565.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Homan, S. P. (1991). A comparison of repeated reading with other oral reading methods. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago, Illinois.Google Scholar
  31. Jastak, S. U., & Wilkinson, G. S. (1984). Wide range achievement test—Revised. Wilmington, DE: Jastak Associates.Google Scholar
  32. King, E. (1982). Canadian tests of basic skills. Toronto, Canada: Nelson Canada.Google Scholar
  33. Koskinen, P. S., Bisson, I. H., Phillips, S. A., Creamer, T. S., & Baker, T. K. (1999). Shared reading, books and audiotapes: Supporting diverse students in school and at home. The Reading Teacher, 52(5), 430–445.Google Scholar
  34. Levy, B. A., Nicholls, A., & Kohen, D. (1993). Repeated readings: Process benefits for good and poor readers. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 56, 303–327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Lovett, M. W., Benson, N. J., & Olds, J. (1990). Individual difference predictors of treatment outcome in the remediation of specific reading disability. Learning and Individual Differences, 2(3), 287–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Mason, B., & Krashen, S. (1997). Extensive reading in English as a foreign language. System, 25(1), 91–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Meyer, M. S., & Felton, R. H. (1999). Repeated reading to enhance fluency: Old approaches and new directions. Annals of Dyslexia, 49, 283–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Peterson, S. K., Scott, J., & Sroka, K. (1990). Using the language experience approach with precision. Teaching Exceptional Children, 22(3), 28–31.Google Scholar
  39. Pressley, M., Disney, L., & Anderson, K. (2007). Landmark vocabulary instructional research and the vocabulary instructional research that make sense now. In R. K. Wagner, A. E. Muse, & K. R. Tannenbaum (Eds.), Vocabulary acquisition implication for reading comprehension (pp. 205–232). New York.: The Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  40. Rashotte, C. A., & Torgesen, J. K. (1985). Repeated reading and reading fluency in learning disabled children. Reading Research Quarterly, 20(2), 180–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Rasinski, T. V. (1990). Effects of repeated reading and listening-while-reading on reading fluency. Journal of Educational Research, 83(3), 147–150.Google Scholar
  42. Reutzel, D. R. & Hollingsworth, P. M. (1993). Effects of fluency training on second graders’ reading comprehension. Journal of Educational Research, 86(6), 325–332.Google Scholar
  43. Samuels, S. J., & Flor, R. F. (1997). The importance of automaticity for developing expertise in reading. Reading and Writing Quarterly, 13, 107–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Scanlon, D. M., & Vellutino, F. R. (1997). A comparison of the instructional backgrounds and cognitive profiles of poor, average, and good readers who were initially identified as at risk for reading failure. Scientific Studies of Reading, 1(3), 191–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Shany, M., & Biemiller, A. (1995). Assisted reading practice: Effects on performance for poor readers in grades 3 and 4. Reading Research Quarterly, 30, 382–395.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Stahl, S. A., & Nagy, W. E. (2005). Teaching word meanings. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  47. Stanovich, K. E. (1986). Matthew effects in reading: Some consequences of individual differences in the acquisition of literacy. Reading Research Quarterly, 21, 360–407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Stanovich, K. E., & West, R. F. (1989). Exposure to print and orthographic processing. Reading Research Quarterly, 24, 402–433.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Sternberg, R., & Wagner, R. (1982). Automatization failure in learning disabilities. Topics in Learning and Learning Disabilities, 17, 296–301.Google Scholar
  50. Taguchi, E. (1997). The effects of repeated readings on the development of lower identification skills of FL readers. Reading in a Foreign Language, 11, 97–119.Google Scholar
  51. Taguchi, E. & Gorsuch, G. J. (2002). Transfer effects of repeated EFL reading on reading new passages: A preliminary investigation. Reading in a Foreign Language, 14(1), 43–65.Google Scholar
  52. Taguchi, E., Takayasu-Maass, M., & Gorsuch, G. J. (2004). Developing reading fluency in EFL: How assisted repeated reading and extensive reading affect fluency development. Reading in a Foreign Language, 16(2). Retrieved on January 15, 2009 from http://www.nflrc.hawaii.edu/RFL/October2004/taguchi/taguchi.html.
  53. Taylor, N. E., Wade, M. R., & Yekovich, F. R. (1985). The effects of text manipulation and multiple reading strategies on the reading performance of good and poor readers. Reading Research Quarterly, 20(5), 566–573.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Thomas, A., & Clapp, T. (1989). A comparison of computer assisted component reading skills training and repeated reading for adolescent poor readers. Canadian Journal of Special Education, 5(2), 135–144.Google Scholar
  55. Torgesen, J. K. (2000). Individual differences in response to early interventions in reading: The lingering problem of treatment resisters. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 15(1), 55–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Tracey, D. H., & Young, J. W. (2002). Mothers’ helping behaviors during children’s at-home oral-reading practice: Effects of children’s reading ability, children’s gender, and mothers’ educational psychology. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94, 729–737.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Vellutino, F. R., Scanlon, D., & Lyon, G. R. (2000). Differentiating between difficult-to-remediate and readily remediated poor readers: More evidence against IQ-achievement discrepancy of reading disability. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 33, 223–238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Vellutino, F. R., Scanlon, D. M., Small, S., & Fanuele, D. P. (2006). Response to intervention as a vehicle for distinguishing between children with and without reading disabilities: Evidence for the role of kindergarten and first-grade interventions. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 39(2), 157–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Welsch, R. G. (2006). Increase oral reading fluency. Intervention in School & Clinic, 41, 180–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Woodcock, R. W. (1973). Woodcock reading mastery tests. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.The Faculty of Education, Department of Learning DisabilitiesThe University of HaifaMount Carmel, HaifaIsrael
  2. 2.Institute of Child StudyOISE/UT, University of TorontoTorontoCanada

Personalised recommendations