Reading and Writing

, Volume 23, Issue 9, pp 1021–1053 | Cite as

Reading and spelling acquisition in Thai children

Article

Abstract

Thai, a tonal language, has its own distinctive alphabetic orthography. The study investigates reading and spelling development in Thai children, with an aim of examining the grain size that is predominantly used when reading and spelling. Furthermore, word and nonword lists were developed to examine the acquisition of the complex system of vowels and tone rules in Thai. Reading and spelling of words and nonwords were assessed in 60 Thai children ranging in age from 7 to 9 years 8 months from Grade(s) 1, 2, and 3. A lexicality effect was found for both reading and spelling. Spelling lagged behind reading in the Grade 1 children. Development rapidly increased between the youngest Grade 1 children and the older Grade 2 and 3 children. For word reading there were significantly more lexical errors than phonological errors. Beginning readers appear to predominantly use a larger lexico-syllabic grain size to read Thai.

Keywords

Development Grain size Reading Spelling Thai Lexicality effect 

References

  1. Abu-Rabia, S., & Taha, H. (2004). Reading and spelling error analysis of native Arabic dyslexic readers. Reading and Writing: An interdisciplinary Journal, 17, 651–689.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Alcock, K. J., & Ngorosho, D. (2003). Learning to spell a regularly spelled language is not a trivial task—patterns of errors in Kiswahili. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 16, 635–666.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Borzone de Manrique, A. M., & Signorini, A. (1994). Phonological awareness, spelling and reading abilities in Spanish-speaking children. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 64, 429–439.Google Scholar
  4. Bruck, M., & Treiman, R. (1990). Phonological awareness and spelling in normal children and dyslexics: The case of initial consonant clusters. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 50, 156–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Caravolas, M., Hulme, C., & Snowling, M. (2001). The foundations of spelling ability: Evidence from a 3-year longitudinal study. Journal of Memory and Language, 45, 751–774.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cassar, M., Treiman, R., Moats, L., Pollo, T. C., & Kessler, B. (2005). How do the spellings of children with dyslexia compare with those of nondyslexic children? Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 18, 27–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cho, J. R., & McBride-Chang, C. (2005). Correlates of Korean Hangul acquisition among kindergarteners and second graders. Scientific Studies of Reading, 9, 3–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cossu, G., Gugliotta, M., & Marshall, J. C. (1995). Acquisition of reading and written spelling in a transparent orthography: Two non-parallel processes? Reading and Writing: An interdisciplinary Journal, 7, 9–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Curtin, S., Manis, F. R., & Seidenberg, M. S. (2001). Parallels between the reading and spelling deficits of two subgroups of developmental dyslexics. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 14, 515–547.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Defior, S., Martos, F., & Cary, L. (2002). Differences in reading acquisition development in two shallow orthographies: Portuguese and Spanish. Applied Psycholinguistics, 23, 135–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Duncan, L. G., Seymour, M. P. H. K., & Hill, S. (2000). A small-to-large unit progression in metaphonological awareness and reading? The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 53A, 1081–1104.Google Scholar
  12. Ehri, L. C. (1992). Reconceptualising the development of sight word reading and its relation to recoding. In P. B. Gough, L. C. Ehri, & R. Treiman (Eds.), Reading acquisition (pp. 107–143). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  13. Fernandes, S., Ventura, P., Querido, L., & Morais, J. (2008). Reading and spelling acquisition in European Portuguese: A preliminary study. Reading and Writing: An interdisciplinary Journal, 21, 805–821.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Frith, U. (1985). Beneath the surface of developmental dyslexia. In K. Patterson, J. Marshall, & M. Coltheart (Eds.), Surface dyslexia, neuropsychological and cognitive studies of phonological reading (pp. 301–330). London: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  15. Frith, U., Wimmer, H., & Landerl, K. (1998). Differences in phonological recoding in German and English-speaking children. Scientific Studies in Reading, 2, 31–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Frost, R. (2006). Becoming literate in Hebrew: the grain size hypothesis and Semitic orthographic systems. Developmental Science, 5, 439–440.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Geva, E., Wade-Woolley, L., & Shany, M. (1993). The concurrent development of spelling and decoding in two different orthographies. Journal of Reading Behaviour, 25, 383–406.Google Scholar
  18. Goswami, U. (2000). Phonological representations, reading development and dyslexia: Towards a cross-linguistic theoretical framework. Dyslexia, 6, 133–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Goswami, U. (2003). Why the theories about developmental dyslexia require developmental designs. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7, 534–540.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Goswami, U., Ziegler, J. C., Dalton, L., & Schneider, W. (2003). Nonword reading across orthographies: How flexible is the choice of reading units? Applied Psycholinguistics, 24, 235–247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Gupta, A. (2004). Reading difficulties of Hindi-speaking children with developmental dyslexia. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 17, 79–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Holmes, V. M., & Carruthers, J. (1998). The relation between reading and spelling in skilled adult readers. Journal of Memory and Language, 39, 264–289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Howell, D. C. (2002). Statistical methods for psychology. Pacific Grove, CA: Thompson Learning.Google Scholar
  24. Hudak, T. J. (1990). Thai. In B. Comrie (Ed.), The major languages of East and South-East Asia (pp. 757–773). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  25. Kim, Y.-S. (2007). Phonological skills and literacy skills in Korean: An examination of the unique role of body-coda units. Applied Psycholinguistics, 1, 69–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Kim, Y.-S. (2009). Crosslinguistic influence on phonological awareness for Korean-English bilingual children. Reading and Writing: An interdisciplinary Journal. doi:  10.1007/s11145-008-9131-0 (in press).
  27. Lennox, C., & Siegel, L. S. (1993). Visual and phonological spelling errors in subtypes of children with learning disabilities. Applied Psycholinguistics, 14, 473–488.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Luksaneeyanawin, S. (2004). The Thai one million word database. Bangkok: Chulaglongkorn University, Center for Research in Speech and Language Processing (CRSLP).Google Scholar
  29. Öney, B., & Durgunoğlu, A. Y. (1997). Beginning to read in Turkish: A phonologically transparent orthography. Applied Psycholinguistics, 18, 1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Padakannaya, P., Rekka, D., Vaid, J., & Joshi, M. (2002). Simultaneous acquisition of literacy skills in English and Kannada. A longitudinal study. Poster presented at the 13th World Congress of the International Association of Applied Linguistics, Singapore.Google Scholar
  31. Perry, C., & Ziegler, J. C. (2004). Beyond the two-strategy model of skilled spelling: Effects of consistency, grain size, and orthographic redundancy. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology A, Human Experimental Psychology, 57A, 325–356.Google Scholar
  32. Perry, C., Ziegler, J. C., & Coltheart, M. (2002). A dissociation between orthographic awareness and spelling production. Applied Psycholinguistics, 23, 43–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Pinheiro, A. M. V. (1995). Reading and spelling development in Brazillian Portuguese. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 7, 111–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Porpodas, C. D., Pantelis, S. N., & Hantziou, E. (1990). Phonological and lexical encoding processes in beginning readers: Effects of age and word characteristics. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 2, 197–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Rahbari, N., & Sénéchal, M. (2009). Lexical and nonlexical processes in the skilled reading and spelling of Persian. Reading and Writing: An interdisciplinary journal. doi:  10.1007/s11145-008-9122-1 (in press).
  36. Rahbari, N., Sénéchal, M., & Arab-Moghaddam, N. (2007). The role of orthographic and phonological processing skills in reading and spelling of monolingual Persian children. Reading and Writing: An interdisciplinary Journal, 20, 511–533.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Rickard Liow, S. J., & Lee, L. C. (2004). Metalinguistic awareness and semi-syllabic scripts: Children’s spelling errors in Malay. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 17, 7–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Schoknecht, C. (2000). Appendix: Three systems of Thai transcription. In D. Burnham, S. Luksaneeyanawin, C. Davis, & M. Lafourcade (Eds.), Interdisciplinary approaches to language processing: The international conference on human and machine processing of language and speech (pp. 329–336). Bangkok: National Electronic and Computer Technology Center.Google Scholar
  39. Seymour, P. H. K., & Elder, L. (1986). Beginning reading with phonology. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 3, 1–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Seymour, P. H. K., Aro, M., & Erskine, J. M. (2003). Foundation literacy acquisition in European orthographies. British Journal of Psychology, 94, 143–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Spencer, L. H., & Hanley, J. R. (2003). Effects of orthographic transparency on reading and phoneme awareness in children learning to read in Wales. British Journal of Psychology, 94, 1–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Sprenger-Charolles, L., & Siegel, L. S. (1997). A longitudinal study of the effects of syllabic structure on the development of reading and spelling skills in French. Applied Psycholinguistics, 18, 485–505.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Sprenger-Charolles, L., Siegel, L. S., & Bonnett, B. (1998). Reading and spelling acquisition in French: The role of phonological mediation and orthographic factors. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 68, 134–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Stuart, M. (2005). Phonemic analysis and reading development: some current issues. Journal of Research in Reading, 28, 39–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Stuart, M., & Coltheart, M. (1988). Does reading develop in a sequence of stages? Cognition, 30, 139–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Thorstad, G. (1991). The effect of orthography on the acquisition of literacy skills. British Journal of Psychology, 82, 527–537.Google Scholar
  47. Treiman, R. (1993). Beginning to spell: A study of first grade children. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  48. Treiman, R. (1997). Beginning to spell in English. In C. Hulme & R. M. Joshi (Eds.), Reading and spelling: development and disorders (pp. 371–393). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  49. Treiman, R., & Weatherston, P. (1992). Effects of linguistic structure on children’s ability to isolate initial consonants. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84, 174–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Treiman, R., & Zukowski, A. (1988). Units in reading and spelling. Journal of Memory and Language, 27, 466–477.Google Scholar
  51. Treiman, R., & Zukowski, A. (1996). Children’s sensitivity to syllables, onsets, rimes and phonemes. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 61, 193–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Treiman, R., Kessler, B., & Bick, S. (2002). Context sensitivity in the spelling of English vowels. Journal of Memory and Language, 47, 448–468.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Vaid, J., & Padakannaya, P. (2004). Reading and writing in semi-syllabic scripts: An introduction. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 17, 1–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Wimmer, H., & Goswami, U. (1994). The influence of orthographic consistency on reading development: Word recognition in English and German children. Cognition, 51, 91–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Wimmer, H., & Hummer, P. (1990). How German speaking first graders read and spell: Doubts on the importance of the logographic stage. Applied Psycholinguistics, 11, 349–368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Winskel, H. (2009). Reading in Thai: The case of misaligned vowels. Reading and Writing. An Interdisciplinary Journal, 22, 1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Winskel, H., & Widjaja, V. (2007). Phonological awareness, letter knowledge and literacy development in Indonesian beginner readers and spellers. Applied Psycholinguistics, 28, 21–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Worthy, M. J. (1990). Spelling errors of normal and disabled students on achievement levels one through four: Instructional implications. Annals of Dyslexia, 40, 138–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Ziegler, J. C., & Goswami, U. (2005). Reading acquisition, developmental dyslexia, and skilled reading across languages: A psycholinguistic gram size theory. Psychological Bulletin, 131, 3–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Ziegler, J. C., & Goswami, U. (2006). Becoming literate in different languages: similar problems, different solutions. Developmental Science, 9, 429–453.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Ziegler, J. C., Stone, G. O., & Jacobs, A. M. (1997). Phonology can help or hurt the perception of print. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 23, 845–860.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of PsychologyUniversity of Western SydneyPenrith SouthAustralia
  2. 2.Center for Research in Speech and Language Processing (CRSLP)Chulalongkorn UniversityPathumwan, BangkokThailand

Personalised recommendations