Exploration of the contribution of teachers’ knowledge about reading to their students’ improvement in reading
- 576 Downloads
Recent studies of elementary teachers’ knowledge about reading have been built on the premise that teachers need thorough knowledge about language and reading processes, but these studies have provided only limited evidence that teachers’ performance on tests of such knowledge contributes to their students’ reading achievement. The present study was designed to examine the contribution of first- through third-grade teachers’ knowledge about early reading to their students’ improvement on tests of word analysis and reading comprehension, controlling for socio-demographic characteristics of students, their prior reading achievement, and teachers’ educational attainment, professional experiences, and socio-demographic characteristics. Preliminary analyses indicated that the test of teachers’ knowledge had adequate psychometric characteristics. However, performance on this measure of teachers’ knowledge did not significantly explain students’ improvement on the two reading subtests. The complexity of the factors that influence teachers’ knowledge acquisition and the context in which the study was carried out offer possible explanations for these results. In addition, teachers’ content knowledge about reading might not be closely associated with the practices they use in reading instruction, and therefore might not be significantly related to their students’ improvement in reading over a year.
KeywordsReading Elementary Teacher knowledge Reading achievement
- Borman, G. D., Hewes, G. M., Overman, L. T., & Brown, S. (2002). Comprehensive school reform and student achievement: A meta-analysis. Baltimore: Center for Research on the Education of Students.Google Scholar
- Hambleton, R., Swaminathan, H., & Rogers, H. J. (1991). Fundamentals of item response theory. London: Sage.Google Scholar
- Hapgood, S., Palincsar, A. S., Kucan, L., Gelpi-Lomangino, A., & Khasnabis, D. (2005). Investigating a new measure of teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge for teaching informational text comprehension. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Montreal, Canada.Google Scholar
- Hoover, H. D., Dunbar, S. B., & Frisbe, D. A. (2003). The Iowa tests: Norms and score conversions. Itasca, IL: Riverside Publishing Co.Google Scholar
- Mislevy, R. J., & Bock, R. D. (1997). Bilog: Item analysis and test scoring with binary models. Lincolnwood, IL: Scientific Software International.Google Scholar
- Moats, L. C. (2003). Language essentials for teachers of reading and spelling. Longmont, CO: Sopris West.Google Scholar
- Peske, H. G., & Haycock, K. (2006). Teaching inequality: How poor and minority students are shortchanged on teacher quality. Washington, CD: The Education Trust.Google Scholar
- Raudenbush, S. W., & Bryk, A. S. (2002). Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods (2nd Edn.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
- Shavelson, R. J., Webb, N. M., & Burstein, L. (1986). Measurement of teaching. In M. C. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (3rd ed., pp. 50–91). New York: Simon and Schuster MacMillan.Google Scholar
- Shulman, L. S. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations for the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57, 1–22.Google Scholar
- Snow, C. E., Griffin, P., & Burns, M. S. (2005). Knowledge to support the teaching of reading: Preparing teachers for a changing world. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
- Spybrook, J., Raudenbush, S., Liu, X., & Congdon, R. (2006). Optimal design for longitudinal and multilevel research: Documentation for the “Optimal Design” software. Downloaded from http://sitemaker.umich.edu/group-based/files/odmanual-20060919-v176.doc.
- Thissen, D., & Wainer, H. (Eds.). (2001). Test scoring. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
- U.S. Department of Education. (2002a). Guidance for the reading first program. Downloaded from www.ed.gov.
- U.S. Department of Education. (2002b). No child left behind: Executive summary. Retrieved from www.ed.gov/nclb/overview/intro/execsumm.html.
- Wilson, S., Shulman, L., & Richert, A. (1987). “150 different ways of knowing”: Representations of knowledge in teaching. In J. Calderhead (Ed.), Exploring teachers’ thinking (pp. 104–123). Eastbourne, England: Cassell.Google Scholar