Reading and Writing

, Volume 23, Issue 2, pp 257–262 | Cite as

Review of Nunes, T., and Bryant, P. (2006). Improving literacy by teaching morphemes. London: Routledge

Article

References

  1. Anglin, J. M. (1993). Vocabulary development: A morphological analysis. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 58(10), Serial # 238.Google Scholar
  2. Arnbak, E., & Elbro, C. (2000). The effects of morphological awareness training on the reading and spelling skills of young dyslexics. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 44, 229–251. doi:10.1080/00313830050154485.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Baumann, J. F., Edwards, E. C., Font, G., Tereshinski, C. A., Kame’enui, E. J., & Olejnik, S. F. (2002). Teaching morphemic and contextual analysis to fifth-grade students. Reading Research Quarterly, 37, 150–176. doi:10.1598/RRQ.37.2.3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Carlisle, J. F. (1988). Knowledge of derivational morphology and spelling ability in fourth, sixth, and eighth graders. Applied Psycholinguistics, 9, 247–266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Carlisle, J. F. (2002). Awareness of the structure and meaning of morphologically complex words: Impact on reading. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 12, 169–190. doi:10.1023/A:1008131926604.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Gombert, J. E. (1993). Metalinguistic development. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  7. Henry, M. K. (1989). Children’s word structure and knowledge: Implications for decoding and spelling instruction. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 1, 135–152. doi:10.1007/BF00377467.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Mann, V., & Singson, M. (2003). Linking morphological knowledge to English decoding ability: Large effects of little suffixes. In E. M. H. Assink & D. Sandra (Eds.), Reading complex words: Cross-linguistic studies (pp. 1–25). NY: Kluwer Academic.Google Scholar
  9. Nagy, W. E., & Scott, J. A. (2000). Vocabulary processes. In M. L. Kamil, P. Mosenthal, P. D. Pearson, & R. Barr (Eds.), Handbook of reading research, Vol. III. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  10. Nunes, T., & Bryant, P. (2006). Improving literacy by teaching morphemes. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  11. Reichle, E. D., & Perfetti, C. A. (2003). Morphology in word identification: A word-experience model that accounts for morpheme frequency effects. Scientific Studies of Reading, 7, 219–237. doi:10.1207/S1532799XSSR0703_2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of MichiganMichiganUSA

Personalised recommendations