Reading and Writing

, Volume 23, Issue 1, pp 1–18

Are phonological processes the same or different in low literacy adults and children with or without reading disabilities?

  • Juan E. Jiménez
  • Eduardo García
  • Enrique Venegas
Article
  • 211 Downloads

Abstract

The primary purpose of the study reported here was to examine whether phonological processes are the same or different in low literacy adults and children with or without reading disabilities in a consistent orthography. A sample of 150 subjects was selected and organized into four different groups: 53 low literacy adults, 29 reading disabled children, 27 younger normal readers at the same reading level as those with reading disabilities and low literacy adults, and 41 normal readers matched in age with the reading disabled group. We administered phonological awareness tasks which included items with different complexity of syllable structure. The results showed that the complexity of syllable structure had not a particularly marked effect on low literacy adults. Rather, the deletion task revealed the phonological deficit in low literacy adults across all syllable structures.

Keywords

Low literacy adults Dyslexia Transparent orthography Phonological awareness tasks Complexity of syllable structure Reading level match design 

References

  1. Arnqvist, A. (1992). The impact of consonant clusters on preschool children’s phonemic awareness: A comparison between readers and nonreaders. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 33, 29–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bryant, P. (2002). It doesn’t matter whether onset and rime predicts reading better than phoneme awareness does or vice versa. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 82, 41–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Campbell, P., & Malicky, G. (2002). The reading strategies of adult basic education students. Adult Basic Education, 12, 3–19.Google Scholar
  4. Carrillo, M. S. (1994). Development of phonological awareness and reading acquisition. A study in Spanish language. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 6, 279–298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cuetos, F., Rodríguez, B., & Ruano, E. (1996). Batería de Evaluación de los procesos lectores de los niños de Educación Primaria (PROLEC) [Battery for assessment of reading processes in children]. Madrid, Spain: T.E.A. Ediciones.Google Scholar
  6. de Jong, P. F., & van der Leij, A. (2003). Developmental changes in the manifestation of a phonological deficit in dyslexic children learning to read a regular orthography. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95, 22–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Durgunoğlu, A. Y., & Öney, B. (2002). Phonological awareness in literacy acquisition: Its not only for children. Scientific Studies of Reading, 6, 245–266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Goswami, U. (2002). In the beginning was the rhyme? A reflection on Hulme, Hatcher, Nation, Brown, Adams, & Stuart (2002). Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 82, 47–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Goswami, U., Ziegler, J. C., & Richardson, U. (2005). The effects of spelling consistency on phonological awareness: A comparison of English and German. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 92, 345–365.Google Scholar
  10. Greenberg, D., Ehri, L. C., & Perin, D. (1997). Are word-reading processes the same or different in adult literacy students and third-fifth graders matched for reading level? Journal of Educational Psychology, 89, 262–275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Greenberg, D., Ehri, L. C., & Perin, D. (2002). Do adults literacy students make the same word-reading and spelling errors as children matched for word-reading age? Scientific Studies of Reading, 6, 221–243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Guzmán, R., & Jiménez, J. E. (2001). Estudio normativo sobre parámetros psicolingüísticos en niños de 6 a 8 años: la familiaridad subjetiva [Normative study about psycholinguistic parameters in children from 6 to 8 years old: The subjective familiarity]. Cognitiva, 13, 153–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hulme, C., Hatcher, P., Nation, K., Brown, A., Adams, J., & Stuart, G. (2002). Phoneme awareness is a better predictor of early reading skill than onset-rime awareness. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 82, 2–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Jiménez, J. E. (1995). Evaluación de la conciencia fonológica [Assessment of phonological awareness]. In J. E. Jiménez & M. R. Ortiz (Eds.), Conciencia fonológica y aprendizaje de la lectura (pp. 74–78). Madrid: Síntesis. (Phonological awareness and learning to read).Google Scholar
  15. Jiménez, J. E., Alvarez, C., Estévez, A., & Hernández-Valle, I. (2000). Onset-rimes units in visual word recognition in Spanish normal readers and reading disabled children. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 15, 135–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Jiménez, J. E., García, E., Ortiz, M. R., Hernández-Valle, I., Guzmán, R., Rodrigo, M., et al. (2005). Is the deficit in phonological awareness better explained in terms of task differences or effects of syllable structure? Applied Psycholinguistics, 26, 267–283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Jiménez, J. E., & Haro, C. (1995). Effects of word linguistic properties on phonological awareness in Spanish children. Journal of Educational Psychology, 87, 193–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Jiménez, J. E., & Ortiz, M. R. (1993). Phonological awareness in learning literacy. Cognitiva, 5, 153–170.Google Scholar
  19. Jiménez, J. E., & Ortiz, M. R. (2000). Metalinguistic awareness and reading acquisition in the Spanish language. The Spanish Journal of Psychology, 3, 37–46.Google Scholar
  20. Jiménez, J. E., & Venegas, E. (2004). Defining phonological awareness and its relationship to reading skills in low literacy adults. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96, 798–810.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. McBride-Chang, C. (1995). What is phonological awareness? Journal of Educational Psychology, 2, 179–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. McMillan, B. M. (2002). Rhyme and reading: a critical review of the research methodology. Journal of Research in Reading, 25, 4–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Read, C., & Ruyter, L. (1985). Reading and spelling skills in adults of low literacy. Remedial and Special Education, 6, 43–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Schreuder, R., & van Bon, W. (1989). Phonemic analysis: Effects of word properties. Journal of Research in Reading, 12, 59–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Stahl, S. A., & Murray, B. A. (1994). Defining phonological awareness and its relationship to early reading. Journal of Educational Psychology, 86, 221–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Thompkins, A. C., & Binder, K. S. (2003). A comparison of the factors affecting reading performance of functionally illiterate adults and children matched by reading level. Reading Research Quarterly, 38, 236–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Treiman, R. (1985). Onsets and rimes as unit of spoken syllables: Evidence from children. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 39, 161–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Treiman, R. (1992). The role of intrasyllabic units in learning to read and spell. In P. B. Gough, L. C. Ehri, & R. Treiman (Eds.), Reading acquisition (pp. 65–106). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  29. Treiman, R., Bowey, J. A., & Bourassa, D. (2002). Segmentation of spoken words into syllables by English-speaking children as compared to adults. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 83, 213–238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Treiman, R., & Weatherston, S. (1992). Effects of linguistic structure on children’s ability to isolate initial consonants. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84, 174–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Wimmer, H., Mayringer, H., & Landerl, K. (2000). The double-deficit hypothesis and difficulties in learning to read a regular orthography. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92, 668–680.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Wise, B. W., Olson, R. K., & Treiman, R. (1990). Subsyllabic units in computerized reading instruction: Onset-rime vs post-vowel segmentation. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 49, 1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Juan E. Jiménez
    • 1
  • Eduardo García
    • 2
  • Enrique Venegas
    • 3
  1. 1.Universidad de La LagunaIslas CanariasSpain
  2. 2.Vrije UniversiteitAmsterdamThe Netherlands
  3. 3.Radio ECCA Centro de Educación de AdultosOrenseSpain

Personalised recommendations