Reading and Writing

, 22:85 | Cite as

Effects of motivational and cognitive variables on reading comprehension

  • Ana Taboada
  • Stephen M. Tonks
  • Allan Wigfield
  • John T. Guthrie
Article

Abstract

The authors examined how motivational and cognitive variables predict reading comprehension, and whether each predictor variable adds unique explanatory power when statistically controlling for the others. Fourth-grade students (N = 205) completed measures of reading comprehension in September and December of the same year, and measures of background knowledge and cognitive strategy use in December. Teachers rated internal reading motivation of each student. Results from multiple regression analyses showed that motivation, background knowledge, and cognitive strategy-use made significant, independent contributions to children’s reading comprehension when the other predictor variables were controlled. Further analyses showed the same cognitive and motivational variables predicted growth over a 3-month period in reading comprehension. Possible explanations of the observed relations between motivation, cognitive variables, and reading comprehension are presented.

Keywords

Background knowledge Cognitive strategies Comprehension Comprehension growth Internal motivation Questioning 

References

  1. Alexander, P. A., & Jetton, T. L. (2000). Learning from text: A multidimensional and developmental perspective. In M. L. Kamil, P. B. Mosenthal, P. D. Pearson, & R. Barr (Eds.), Handbook of reading research (Vol. 3, pp. 285–310). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  2. Alexander, P. A., & Murphy, P. K. (1998). Profiling the differences in students’ knowledge, interest, and strategic processing. Journal of Educational Psychology, 90, 435–447.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Allen, L., Cipielewski, J., & Stanovich, K. (1992). Multiple indicators of children’s reading habits and attitudes: construct validity and cognitive correlates. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84, 489–503.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Almasi, J. (1995). The nature of fourth graders’ sociocognitive conflicts in peer-led and teacher-led discussions of literature. Reading Research Quarterly, 30, 314–351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Baker, L., & Wigfield, A. (1999). Dimensions of children’s motivation for reading and their relationships to reading activity and reading achievement. Reading Research Quarterly, 34, 452–477.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: W. H. Freeman.Google Scholar
  7. Brown, A., Palincsar, A. S., & Ambruster, B. (1984). Inducing comprehension-fostering activities in interactive learning situations. In H. Mandl, N. Stein, & T. Trabasso (Eds.), Learning and comprehension of texts (pp. 255–287). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  8. Chapman, J. W., & Tunmer, W. E. (1995). Development of young children’s reading self-concepts: An examination of emerging subcomponents and their relationship with reading achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 87, 154–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Chapman, J. W., Tunmer, W. E., & Prochnow, J. E. (2000). Early reading-related skills and performance, reading self-concept, and the development of academic self-concept: A longitudinal study. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92, 703–708.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cohen, R. (1983). Self-generated questions as an aid to reading comprehension. The Reading Teacher, 36, 770–775.Google Scholar
  11. Collins, A., Brown, J. S., & Newman, S. E. (1990). Cognitive apprenticeship: Teaching the crafts of reading, writing, and mathematics. In L. Resnick (Ed.), Knowing, learning, and instruction: Essays in honor of Robert Glaser (pp. 453–494). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  12. Dreher, M. J., & Gambrell, L. B. (1985). Teaching children to use a self-questioning strategy for studying expository prose. Reading Improvement, 22, 2–7.Google Scholar
  13. Duke, N. K., & Pearson, P. D. (2002). Effective practices for developing reading comprehension. In A. E. Farstrup & S. J. Samuels (Eds.), What research has to say about reading instruction (3rd ed., pp. 205–242). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.Google Scholar
  14. Eccles, J. S., & Wigfield, A. (2002). Motivational beliefs, values, and goals. Annual Review of Psychology, 53, 109–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Feldt, R. C., Feldt, R. A., & Kilburg, K. (2002). Acquisition, maintenance, and transfer of a questioning strategy in second-and third-grade students to learn from science textbooks. Reading Psychology, 23, 181–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Gernsbacher, M. A., Varner, K. R., & Faust, M. E. (1990). Investigating differences in general comprehension skill. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 16, 430–445.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Gottfried, A. E. (1990). Academic intrinsic motivation in young elementary school children. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 525–538.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Gottfried, A. W., Cook, C. R., Gottfried, A. E., & Morris, P. E. (2005). Educational characteristics of adolescents with gifted academic intrinsic motivation: A longitudinal investigation from school entry through early adulthood. Gifted Child Quarterly, 49, 172–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Graesser, A. C., McMahen, C. L., & Johnson, B. K. (1994). Question asking and answering. In M. A. Gernsbacher (Ed.), Handbook of psycholinguistics (pp. 517–538). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  20. Guthrie, J. T., Hoa, A. L. W., Wigfield, A., Tonks, S. M., Humenick, N. M., & Littles, E. (2007). Reading motivation and reading comprehension growth in the later elementary years. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 32, 282–313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Guthrie, J. T., & McCann, A. D. (1997). Characteristics of classrooms that promote motivations and strategies for learning. In J. T. Guthrie & W. Wigfield (Eds.), Reading engagement: Motivating readers through integrated instruction (pp. 128–148). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.Google Scholar
  22. Guthrie, J. T., Wigfield, A., Barbosa, P., Perencevich, K. C., Taboada, A., Davis, M., et al. (2004). Increasing reading comprehension and engagement through concept-oriented reading instruction. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96(3), 1–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Guthrie, J. T., Wigfield, A., Humenick, N. M., Perencevich, K. C., Taboada, A., & Barbosa, P. (2006). Influences of stimulating tasks on reading motivation and comprehension. Journal of Educational Research, 99, 232–245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Guthrie, J. T., Wigfield, A., Metsala, J. L., & Cox, K. E. (1999). Motivational and cognitive predictors of text comprehension and reading amount. Scientific Studies of Reading, 3, 231–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hidi, S. (1990). Interest and its contribution as a mental resource for learning. Review of Educational Research, 60, 549–571.Google Scholar
  26. King, A., & Rosenshine, B. (1993). Effects of guided cooperative questioning on children’s knowledge construction. Journal of Experimental Education, 61, 127–148.Google Scholar
  27. Kintsch, W. (1998). Comprehension: A paradigm for cognition. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  28. Meece, J. L., & Miller, S. D. (1999). A longitudinal analysis of elementary school students’ achievement goals in literacy activities. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 26, 454–480.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Meece, J. L., & Miller, S. D. (2001). Changes in elementary school children’s achievement goals for reading and writing: Results of a longitudinal and an intervention study. Scientific Studies of Reading, 3, 207–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. McNamara, D. S. (2001). Reading both high-coherence and low-coherence texts: Effects of text sequence and prior knowledge. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 55, 51–62.Google Scholar
  31. McNamara, D. S., Kintsch, E., Songer, N. B., & Kintsch, W. (1996). Text coherence, background knowledge and levels of understanding in learning from text. Cognition & Instruction, 14, 1–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. National Reading Panel. (2000). Teaching children to read: An evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction. Washington, DC: National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (Tech. Rep. No. 00-4769).Google Scholar
  33. Nolte, R. Y., & Singer, H. (1985). Active comprehension: Teaching a process of reading comprehension and its effects on reading achievement. Reading Teacher, 39, 24–31.Google Scholar
  34. Onatsu-Arvilommi, T., & Nurmi, J. (2000). The role of task-avoidant and task-focused behavior in the development of reading and mathematical skills during the first school year: a cross-lagged longitudinal study. Journal of Educational Psychology, 2, 478–491.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Palincsar, A. S., & Brown, A. L. (1984). Reciprocal teaching of comprehension-fostering and comprehension-monitoring activities. Cognition and Instruction, 2, 117–175.Google Scholar
  36. Pearson, P. D., & Fielding, L. (1991). Comprehension instruction. In R. Barr, M. L. Kamil, P. Mosenthal, & P. D. Pearson (Eds.), Handbook of reading research (pp. 815–860). White Plains, NY: Longman.Google Scholar
  37. Perry, N. E., Turner, J. C., & Meyer, D. K. (2006). Classroom contexts for motivating learners. In P. Alexander & P. Winnie (Eds.), Handbook of educational psychology (2nd ed., pp. 327–348). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  38. Pintrich, P. R. (2003). A motivational science perspective on the role of student motivation in learning and teaching contexts. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95, 667–686.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Pintrich, P. R., Marx, R. W., & Boyle, R. A. (1993). Beyond cold conceptual change: The role of motivational beliefs and classroom contextual factors in the process of conceptual change. Review of Educational Research, 63, 167–199.Google Scholar
  40. Pressley, M. (2000). What should comprehension instruction be the instruction of? In M. L. Kamil, P. B. Mosenthal, & P. D. Pearson (Eds.), Handbook of reading research (pp. 545–561). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  41. Pressley, M., Wharton-McDonald, R., Mistretta-Hampton, J. M., & Echevarria, M. (1998). The nature of literacy instruction in ten grade 4/5 classrooms in upstate New York. Scientific Studies of Reading, 2, 159–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Pressley, G. M., & Harris, K. H. (2006). Cognitive strategies instruction: From basic research to classroom instruction. In P. A. Alexander & P. H. Winne (Eds.), Handbook of educational psychology (2nd ed., pp. 265–286). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  43. Raphael, T. E., & Pearson, P. D. (1985). Increasing students’ awareness of sources of information for answering questions. American Educational Research Journal, 22, 217–235.Google Scholar
  44. Rosenshine, B., Meister, C., & Chapman, S. (1996). Teaching students to generate questions: A review of the intervention studies. Review of Educational Research, 66, 181–122.Google Scholar
  45. Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivations: Classic definitions and new directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25, 54–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Salmerón, L., Kintsch, W., & Cañas, J. J. (2006). Reading strategies and prior knowledge in learning from hypertext. Memory and Cognition, 34, 1157–1171.Google Scholar
  47. Scardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (1992). Text-based and knowledge-based questioning by children. Cognition and Instruction, 9, 177–199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Schiefele, U. (1996). Topic interest, text representation, and quality of experience. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 21, 3–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Schiefele, U. (1999). Interest and learning from text. Scientific Studies of Reading, 3, 257–279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Schiefele, U., & Krapp, A. (1996). Topic interest and free recall of expository test. Learning and Individual Differences, 8, 141–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Schunk, D. H., & Pajares, F. (2002). The development of academic self-efficacy. In A. Wigfield & J. S. Eccles (Eds.), Development of achievement motivation (pp. 16–32). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  52. Schunk, D. H., & Rice, J. M. (1993). Strategy fading and progress feedback: Effects on self-efficacy and comprehension among students receiving remedial reading services. Journal of Special Education, 27, 257–276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Singer, H., & Donlan, D. (1982). Active comprehension: Problem-solving schema with question generation for comprehension of complex short stories. Reading Research Quarterly, 17, 166–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Skinner, E., & Greene, T. (2008). Perceived control: Engagement, coping, and development. In T. L. Good (Ed.), 21st Century education: A reference handbook. Newbury Park: Sage Publications (in press).Google Scholar
  55. Skinner, E. A., Wellborn, J. G., & Connell, J. P. (1990). What it takes to do well in school and whether I’ve got it: A process model of perceived control and children’s engagement and achievement in school. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 22–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Stipek, D. J. (1996). Motivation and instruction. In D. Berliner & R. Calfee (Eds.), Handbook of educational psychology. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  57. Sweet, A. P., Guthrie, J. T., & Ng, M. M. (1998). Teacher perceptions and student reading motivation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 90, 210–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Taboada, A., & Guthrie, J. T. (2004). Growth of cognitive strategies for reading comprehension. In J. T. Guthrie, A. Wigfield, & K. C. Perencevich (Eds.), Motivating reading comprehension: Concept-oriented reading instruction (pp. 273–306). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  59. Taboada, A., & Guthrie, J. T. (2006). Contributions of student questioning and prior knowledge to construction of knowledge from reading information text. Journal of Literacy Research, 38, 1–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Taylor, B. M., & Frye, B. J. (1992). Comprehension strategy instruction in the intermediate grades. Reading Research and Instruction, 32, 39–48.Google Scholar
  61. Turner, J. (1995). The influence of classroom contexts on young children’s motivation for literacy. Reading Research Quarterly, 30, 410–441.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Unrau, N., & Schlackman, J. (2006). Motivation and its relation to reading achievement in an urban middle school. Journal of Educational Research, 100, 81–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. van den Broek, P., Rapp, D. N., & Kendeou, P. (2005). Integrating memory-based and constructionist processes in accounts of reading comprehension. Discourse Processes, 39, 299–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Wang, J. H. Y., & Guthrie, J. T. (2004). Modeling the effects of intrinsic motivation, extrinsic motivation, amount of reading and past reading achievement on text comprehension between U.S. and Chinese students. Reading Research Quarterly, 39, 162–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Wigfield, A., Eccles, J. S., Schiefele, U., Roeser, R., & Davis-Kean, P. (2006). Development of achievement motivation. In W. Damon (Series Ed.) and N. Eisenberg (Volume Ed.), Handbook of child psychology (6th ed., Vol. 3, pp. 933–1002).New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  66. Wigfield, A., & Guthrie, J. T. (1997). Relations of children’s motivation for reading to the amount and breadth of their reading. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89, 420–432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Wigfield, A., Guthrie, J. T., Tonks, S., & Perencevich, K. (2004). Children’s motivation for reading: Domain specificity and instructional influences. Journal of Educational Research, 97, 299–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Wong, B. Y., & Jones, W. (1982). Increasing metacomprehension in learning disabled and normally achieving students through self-questioning training. Learning Disability Quarterly, 5, 228–240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ana Taboada
    • 1
  • Stephen M. Tonks
    • 2
  • Allan Wigfield
    • 3
  • John T. Guthrie
    • 3
  1. 1.College of Education & Human DevelopmentGeorge Mason UniversityFairfaxUSA
  2. 2.Northern Illinois UniversityDeKalbUSA
  3. 3.University of MarylandCollege ParkUSA

Personalised recommendations