Advertisement

Reading and Writing

, Volume 22, Issue 3, pp 261–276 | Cite as

The role of reading self-concept and home literacy practices in fourth grade reading comprehension

  • Tami Katzir
  • Nonie K. Lesaux
  • Young-Suk Kim
Article

Abstract

This study examined the relationships among reading comprehension, reading self-concept, and home literacy environment (HLE) in a sample (n = 67) of fourth grade children enrolled in an urban school district. Children’s reading comprehension, word reading, and verbal ability were assessed using standardized measures. Reading self-concept was assessed with a child-administered survey that is comprised of three subscales (i.e., competence in reading, perception of ease with reading, attitude towards reading). Information on child and family literacy practices was collected via a questionnaire administered to parents of participating children. Bivariate correlations and multiple regression analyses demonstrated that all three reading self-concept subscales were positively related to reading comprehension after controlling for verbal ability and word reading skills, and aspects of HLE were positively related to aspects of reading self-concept. The findings support the inclusion of psychosocial and family literacy measures in future studies designed to investigate the process of reading comprehension for children beyond the primary grades.

Keywords

Home literacy environment Reading comprehension Reading self-concept 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This research was supported directly by a Spencer Postdoctoral Fellowship awarded to Tami Katzir and in part by a Spencer Postdoctoral Fellowship awarded to Nonie K. Lesaux. The authors would like to thank Kimberly McMahon for editorial assistance and Michael Gerber for assistance with the home literacy component of the study. Finally, special thanks to the principals, teachers, and students who participated in this study.

References

  1. Alexander, P. A., & Jetton, T. L. (2000). Learning from text: A multidimensional and developmental perspective. In M. L. Kamil, P. B. Mosenthal, P. D. Pearson, & R. Barr (Eds.), Handbook of reading research (Vol. 3, pp. 285–310). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  2. Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  3. Burgess, S. R. (2002). The influence of speech perception, oral language ability, home literacy environment, and pre-reading knowledge on the growth of phonological sensitivity: A one-year longitudinal investigation. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 15, 709–737.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Baker, L., & Scher, D. (2002). Beginning reader’s motivation in relation to parental beliefs and home reading experiences. Reading Psychology, 23, 239–269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cain, K., Oakhill, J., & Bryant, P. (2004). Children’s reading comprehension ability: Concurrent prediction by working memory, verbal ability, and component skills. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96, 31–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Castles, A., & Coltheart, M. (1993). Varieties of developmental dyslexia. Cognition, 47, 149–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Chall, J. S. (1983). Stages of reading development. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  8. Chapman, J. W., & Tunmer, W. E. (1995). Development of young children’s reading self-concepts: An examination of emerging subcomponents and their relationship with reading achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 87, 154–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Chapman, J. W., & Tunmer, W. E. (2003). Reading difficulties, reading-related self-Perceptions, and strategies for overcoming negative self-beliefs. Reading and Writing Quarterly, 19, 5–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  11. Conlon, E. G., Zimmer-Gembeck, M. J., Creed, P. A., & Tucker M. (2006). Family history, self-perceptions, attitudes and cognitive abilities are associated with early adolescent reading skills. Journal of Research in Reading, 29, 11–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Cunningham, A. E., Perry, K. E., & Stanovich, K. E. (2001). Converging evidence for the concept of orthographic processing. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 14, 549–568.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Denney, M. K., English, J. P., Gerber, M., Leafstedt, J., & Ruz, M. (2001). Family and home literacy practices: Mediating factors for preliterate English learners at risk. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. Seattle, WA.Google Scholar
  14. Dweck, C. (1999). Self-theories: Their role in motivation, personality, and development. Philadelphia, PA: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
  15. Eccles, J. S., & Wigfield, A. (2002). Motivational beliefs, values and goals. Annual Review of Psychology, 53, 109–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Fletcher, J. M., Foorman, B. R., Boudousquie, A., Barnes, M. A., Schatschneider, C., & Francis, D. J. (2002). Assessment of reading and learning disabilities. A research based intervention-orientated approach. Journal of School Psychology, 40, 27–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Francis, D. J., Shaywitz, S. E., Stuebing, K. K., Shaywitz, B. A., & Fletcher, J. M. (1996). Developmental lag versus deficit models of reading disability: A longitudinal, individual growth curves analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 88, 3–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Gottfried, A. E. (1990). Academic intrinsic motivation in young elementary school children. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 525–538.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Guthrie, J. T., & Wigfield, A. (1999). How motivation fits into a science of reading. Scientific Studies of Reading, 3, 199–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Jacobs, J., Lanza, S., Osgood, D., Eccles, J., & Wigfield, A. (2002). Changes in children’s self-competence and values: Gender and domain differences across grades one through twelve. Child Development, 73, 509–527.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Johnson, D. W. (1981). Effects of cooperative, competitive and individualistic goal structures on achievement: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 89, 47–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Johnston T. J., & Kirby, J. R. (2006) The contribution of naming speed to the simple view of reading. Journal of Reading and Writing, 19, 339–361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Joshi, R. M., & Aaron, P. G. (2001). The component model of reading: Simple view of reading made a little more complex. Reading Psychology, 21, 85–97.Google Scholar
  24. Katzir, T., Kim, Y.-K., Wolf, M., O’Brien, B., Kennedy, B., Lovett, M., & Morris, R. (2006). Reading fluency: The whole is more than the parts. Annals of Dyslexia, 56, 51–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Kush, J. C., Watkins, M. W., & Brookhart, S. M. (2005). The temporal-interactive influence of reading achievement and reading attitude. Educational Research and Evaluation, 11, 29–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Lepola, J., Salonen, P., & Vauras, M. (2000). The development of motivational orientations as a function of divergent reading careers from pre-school to the second grade. Learning and Instruction, 10, 153–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Molfese, V. J., Modglin, A., & Molfese, D. L. (2003). The role of environment in the development of reading skills: A longitudinal study of pre-school and school- ages measures. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 36, 59–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Nation, K., & Snowling, M. J. (2004). Beyond phonological skills: Broader language skills contribute to the development of reading. Journal of Research in Reading, 27, 342–356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. National Reading Panel (2000). Teaching children to read: An evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.Google Scholar
  30. Nino, A. (1990). Early environmental experiences and school achievement in the second grade: An Israeli study. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 13, 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. RAND Reading Study Group. (2002). Reading for understanding: Toward an R&D program in reading comprehension. Washington, DC: RAND Education.Google Scholar
  32. Rashid, F. L., Morris, R. D., & Sevick, R. A. (2005). Relationship between home literacy environment and reading achievement in children with reading disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 38, 2–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Raz, I. S., & Bryant, P. (1990) Social background, phonological awareness, and children’s reading. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 8, 209–225.Google Scholar
  34. Saracho, O. N. (1997). Perspectives on family literacy. Early Child Development and Care, 127–128, 3–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Senechal, M., & LeFevre, J. (2001). The role of family literacy environments in promoting young children’s emerging literacy skills. New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development, 92, 39–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Senechal, M., LeFevre, J., Hudson, E., & Lawson, E. P. (1996). Knowledge of storybooks as a predictor of young children’s vocabulary. Journal of Educational Psychology, 88, 520–536.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Skinner, E. A., Zimmer-Gembeck, M. J., & Connell, J. P. (1998). Individual differences and the development of perceived control. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 63, 1–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Snow, C. E. (2003). Assessment of reading comprehension: Researchers and practitioners helping themselves and each other. In A. P. Sweet & C. E. Snow (Eds.), Rethinking reading comprehension (pp. 192–206). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  39. Snow C., Burns M., & Griffin P. (Eds.) (1998). Preventing reading difficulties in young children. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
  40. Snow, C. E., & Sweet, A. P. (2003). Reading for comprehension. In A. Sweet & C. Snow (Eds.), Rethinking reading comprehension. New York, NY: The Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  41. Stanovich, K. E. (1986). Matthew effects in reading: Some consequences of individual differences in the acquisition of literacy. Reading Research Quarterly, 21, 360–407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Stanovich, K., & Siegel, L. A. (1994). Phenotypic performance profile of children with Reading disabilities: A regression-based test of the phonological-core variable-difference model. Journal of Educational Psychology, 86, 24–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Wagner, R. K., Torgesen, J. K., & Rashotte, C. A. (1999). Comprehensive test of phonological awareness (CTOPP). Austin, TX: PRO-ED.Google Scholar
  44. Wechsler, D. (1999). Wechsler intelligence scale for children—revised. San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corporation.Google Scholar
  45. Weigel, D., Martin, S., & Bennet, K. (2005). Ecological influences of the child-care center on preschool-age children’s literacy development. Reading Research Quarterly, 40, 204–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Wiederhold, J. L., & Blalock, G. (2000). Gray silent reading test. Austin, TX: PRO-ED.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Graduate School of EducationHarvard UniversityCambridgeUSA

Personalised recommendations