Reading and Writing

, Volume 21, Issue 8, pp 763–781 | Cite as

Morphological priming effects on children’s spelling

Article

Abstract

Previous research has suggested that children in the early grades of primary school do not have much awareness of morphemes. In this study, a priming paradigm was used to try to detect early signs of morphological representation of stems through a spelling task presented to Portuguese children (N = 805; age range 6–9 years). Primes shared the stem with the targets and contained well-articulated, stressed vowels; the stems of the target words and pseudo-words contained non-stressed schwa vowels, which typically result in spelling difficulties. If priming proved effective, the well-articulated vowels in the prime should result in an improvement in the spelling of the schwa vowels. Primes were presented in two conditions: in only-oral or in oral-plus-written form. Effectiveness of priming was assessed by comparison with a no-priming condition. For both words and pseudowords, there was a significant interaction between priming effects and grade. No priming effects were detected in 6- and 7-year-old children; oral-plus-written priming produced higher rates of correct vowel spelling for 8- and 9-year-olds; only-oral priming was effective in improving the vowel spelling of 9-year-olds. Thus older children can use morphological information under priming conditions when the prime and the target are not phonologically transparent but there is no evidence to suggest that younger children do so.

Keywords

Morphology Morphological priming Spelling Spelling of stems 

References

  1. Aidinis, A. (1998). Phonemes, morphemes and literacy development: Evidence from Greek. Unpublished Ph.D. Thesis, Department of Child Development and Learning, University of London, Institute of Education.Google Scholar
  2. Bowers, J. S. (2000). The modality-specific and -nonspecific components of long-term priming are frequency sensitive. Memory & Cognition, 28(3), 406–414.Google Scholar
  3. Bryant, P., Nunes, T., & Aidinis, A. (1999). Different morphemes, same spelling problems: Cross-linguistic developmental studies. In M. Harris & G. Hatano (Eds.), Learning to read and write: A cross-linguistic perspective (pp. 112–133). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Campbell, R. (1983). Writing non-words to dictations. Brain and Language, 19, 153–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Campbell, R. (1985). When children write nonwords to dictation. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 40, 133–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Caramazza, A., Laudanna, A., & Romani, C. (1988). Lexical access and inflectional morphology. Cognition, 28, 297–332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Carslisle, J. F. (1988). Knowledge of derivational morphology and spelling ability in fourth, sixth, and eighth graders. Applied Psycholinguistics, 9, 247–266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Chialant, D., & Caramazza, A. (1995). Where is morphology and how is it processed? In L. B. Feldman (Ed.), Morphological aspects of language processing (pp. 55–78). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  9. Emmorey, K. D. (1989). Auditory morphological priming in the lexicon. Language and Cognitive Processes, 4(2), 73–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Forster, K., & Azuma, T. (2000). Masked priming for prefixed words with bound stems: Does submit prime permit? Language and Cognitive Processes, 15, 539–561.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Giraudo, H., & Graigner, J. (2000). Effects of prime word frequency and cumulative root frequency in masked morphological priming. Language and Cognitive Processes, 15, 421–444.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Karmiloff-Smith, A. (1992). Beyond modularity: A developmental perspective on cognitive science. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  13. Kempley, S. T., & Morton, J. (1982). The effects of priming with regularly and irregularly related words in auditory word recognition. British Journal of Psychology, 73, 441–454.Google Scholar
  14. Laudanna, A., Badecker, W., & Caramazza, A. (1989). Priming homographic stems. Journal of Memory and Language, 28, 531–546.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Laudanna, A., Badecker, W., & Caramazza, A. (1992). Processing inflectional and derivational morphology. Journal of Memory and Language, 31, 333–348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Laudanna, A., Cermele, A., & Caramazza, A. (1997). Morpho-lexical representations in naming. Language and Cognitive Processes, 12, 49–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Leong, C. K. (2000). Rapid processing of base and derived forms of words and grades 4, 5 and 6 children’s spelling. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 12, 277–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Nunes, T., Bryant, P., & Bindman, M. (1997a). Morphological spelling strategies: Developmental stages and processes. Developmental Psychology, 33, 637–649.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Nunes, T., Bryant, P., & Bindman, M. (1997b). Learning to spell regular and irregular verbs. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 9, 427–449.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Nunes, T., Bryant, P., & Olsson, J. (2003). Learning morphological and phonological spelling rules: An intervention study. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 7, 289–307.Google Scholar
  21. Nunes, T., Bryant, P., & Bindman, M. (2006). The effects of learning to spell on children’s awareness of morphology. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 19, 767–787.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Raveh, M., & Rueckl, J. G. (2000). Equivalent effects of inflected and derived primes: Long-term morphological priming in fragment completion and lexical decision. Journal of Memory and Language, 42, 103–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Stolz, J., & Feldman, L. (1995). The role of orthographic and semantic transparency of the base morpheme in morphological processing. In L. Feldman (Ed.), Morphological aspects of language processing (pp. 109–129). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  24. Taft, M., & Zhu, X. (1995). The representation of bound morphemes in the lexicon: A Chinese study. In L. B. Feldman (Ed.), Morphological aspects of language processing (pp. 293–316). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Instituto Politecnico de LisboaEscola Superior de EducacaoLisboaPortugal
  2. 2.Department of Educational StudiesUniversity of OxfordOxfordUK

Personalised recommendations