Reading and Writing

, Volume 21, Issue 4, pp 317–347 | Cite as

A synthesis of fluency interventions for secondary struggling readers

  • Jade Wexler
  • Sharon Vaughn
  • Meaghan Edmonds
  • Colleen Klein Reutebuch


Previous research studies examining the effects of fluency interventions on the fluency and comprehension outcomes for secondary struggling readers are synthesized. An extensive search of the professional literature between 1980 and 2005 yielded a total of 19 intervention studies that provided fluency interventions to secondary struggling readers and measured comprehension and/or fluency outcomes. Findings revealed fluency outcomes were consistently improved following interventions that included listening passage previewing such as listening to an audiotape or adult model of good reading before attempting to read a passage. In addition, there is preliminary evidence that there may be no differential effects between repeated reading interventions and the same amount of non-repetitive reading with older struggling readers for increasing reading speed, word recognition, and comprehension.


Secondary Fluency Interventions 


  1. Allinder, R. M., Dunse, L., Brunken, C. D., & Obermiller-Krolikowski, H. J. (2001). Improving fluency in at-risk readers and students with learning disabilities. Remedial and Special Education, 22, 48–54.Google Scholar
  2. Allington, R. L. (1983). Fluency: The neglected reading goal. The Reading Teacher, 36, 556–561.Google Scholar
  3. Becker, B. J. (1988). Synthesizing standardized mean change measures. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 41, 257–278.Google Scholar
  4. Biancarosa, G., & Snow, C. E. (2004). Reading next-A vision for action and research in middle and high school literacy: A report from Carnegie of New York. Washington, DC: Alliance for Excellence in Education.Google Scholar
  5. Carver, R. P. (1997). Reading for 1 s, 1 min, or 1 year from the perspective of rauding theory. Scientific Studies of Reading, 1, 3–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Carver, R. P., & Hoffman, J. V. (1981). The effect of practice through repeated reading on gain in reading ability using a computer-based instructional system. Reading Research Quarterly, 16, 374–390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Chall, J. S. (1983). Stages of reading development. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  8. Chard, D. J., Vaughn, S., & Tyler, B. (2002). A synthesis of research on effective interventions for building reading fluency with elementary students with learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 35, 386–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  10. Conte, R., & Humphreys, R. (1989). Repeated readings using audiotaped material enhances oral reading in children with reading difficulties. Journal of Communication Disorders, 22, 65–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Daly, E. J., & Martens, B. K. (1994). A comparison of three interventions for increasing oral reading performance: Application of the instructional hierarchy. Journal of Applied Behavioral Analysis, 27, 459–469.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Edmonds, M. S., Vaughn, S., Wexler. J., Reutebuch, C. K., Cable, A., Tackett, K, & Wick, J. (in press). A synthesis of reading interventions and effects on reading outcomes for older struggling readers. Review of Educational Research.Google Scholar
  13. Engelmann, S., Meyer, L., Carnine, L., Becker, W., Eisele, J., & Johnson, G. (1998). Corrective reading decoding strategies. Columbus, OH: SRA/McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  14. Freeland, J. T., Skinner, C. H., Jackson, B., McDaniel, E., & Smith, S. (2000). Measuring and increasing silent reading comprehension rates: Empirically validating a repeated readings intervention. Psychology in the Schools, 37, 415–429.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Fuchs, L. S., Fuchs, D., Hosp, M. K., & Jenkins, J. R. (2001). Oral reading fluency as an indicator of reading competence: A theoretical, empirical, and historical analysis. Scientific Studies of Reading, 5, 239–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Fuchs, L. S., Fuchs, D., & Kazdan, S. (1999). Effects of peer-assisted learning strategies on high school students with serious reading problems. Remedial and Special Education, 20, 309–318.Google Scholar
  17. Fuchs, D., Fuchs, L. S., Mathes, P. G., & Simmons, D. C. (1997). Peer-assisted learning strategies: Making classrooms more responsive to diversity. American Educational Research Journal, 34, 174–206.Google Scholar
  18. Gresham, F. M., MacMillan, D. L., Beebe-Frankenberger, M. E., & Bocian, K. M. (2000). Treatment integrity in learning disabilities intervention research: Do we really know how treatments are implemented? Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 15, 198–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Homan, S. P., Klesius, J. P., & Hite, C. (1993). Effects of repeated readings and nonrepetitive strategies on students’ fluency and comprehension. Journal of Educational Research, 87, 94–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Institute of Education Sciences (2003). What Works Clearinghouse Study Review Standards. Retrieved January 10, 2005 from What Works Clearinghouse Web site:
  21. Kim, A., Vaughn, S., Wanzek, J., & Wei, S. (2004). Graphic organizers and their effects on the reading comprehension of students with learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 37, 105–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Kuhn, M. R., & Stahl, S. A. (2000). Fluency: A review of developmental and remedial practices (Rep. No. 2-008). Ann Arbor, MI: Center for the Improvement of Early Reading Achievement.Google Scholar
  23. Kuhn, M.R., & Stahl, S.A. (2003). Fluency: A review of developmental and remedial practices (Rep. No. 2-008). Ann Arbor, MI: Center for the Improvement of Early Reading Achievement.Google Scholar
  24. LaBerge, D., & Samuels, S. J. (1974). Toward a theory of automatic information processing in reading. Cognitive Psychology, 6, 293–323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Lovett, M. W., Steinbach, K. A., & Frijters, J. C. (2000). Remediating the core deficits of developmental reading disability: A double-deficit perspective. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 33, 334–358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Lyon, G. R., & Moats, L. C. (1997). Critical conceptual and methodological considerations in reading intervention research. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 30, 578–588.Google Scholar
  27. Mercer, C. D., Cambell, K. U., Miller, M. D., Mercer, K. D., & Lane, H. B. (2000). Effects of a reading fluency intervention for middle schoolers with specific learning disabilities. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 15, 179–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Meyer, M. S., & Felton, R. H. (1999). Repeated reading to enhance fluency: Old approaches and new directions. Annals of Dyslexia, 49, 283–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. National Reading Panel (2000). Teaching children to read: An evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
  30. O’Shea, L. J., Sindelar, P., & O’Shea, D. J. (1987). Effects of repeated readings and attentional cues on the reading fluency and comprehension of learning disabled readers. Learning Disabilities Research, 2, 103–109.Google Scholar
  31. Paris, S. G., Carpenter, R. D., Paris, A. H., & Hamilton, E. E. (2005). Spurious and genuine correlates of children’s reading comprehension. In S. G. Paris & S. A. Stahl (Eds.), Children’s reading comprehension and assessment (pp. 131–160). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  32. Perfetti, C. A. (1985). Reading ability. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  33. Pressley, M. (2004). The need for research in secondary literacy education. In T. L. Jetton & J. A. Dole (Eds.), Adolescent literacy research (pp. 415–432). New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
  34. Rashotte, C. A., & Torgeson, J. K. (1985). Repeated reading and reading fluency in learning disabled children. Reading Research Quarterly, 20, 180–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Rasinski, T. V., Padak, N. D., McKeon, C. A., Wilfong, L. G., Friedauer, J. A., & Heim, P. (2005). Is reading fluency a key for successful high school reading? Journal of Adolescent and Adult Literacy, 49, 22–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Rose, T. L., & Beattie, J. R. (1986). Relative effects of teacher-directed and taped previewing on oral reading. Learning Disability Quarterly, 9, 193–199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Rose, T. L., & Sherry, L. (1984). Relative effects of two previewing procedures on LD adolescents’ oral reading performance. Learning Disability Quarterly, 7, 39–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Samuels, S. J. (1979). The method of repeated readings. The Reading Teacher, 32, 403–408.Google Scholar
  39. Scott, T. M., & Shearer-Lingo, A. (2002). The effects of reading fluency instruction on the academic and behavioral success of middle school students in a self-contained EBD classroom. Preventing School Failure, 46, 167–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Scruggs, T. E., Mastropieri, M. A., & Casto, G. (1987). The quantitative synthesis of single-subject research: Methodology and validation. Remedial and Special Education, 8, 24–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Shapiro, E. S., & McCurdy, B. L. (1989). Effects of a taped-words treatment on reading proficiency. Exceptional Children, 55, 321–325.Google Scholar
  42. Shinn, M. R., & Good, R. H. (1992). Curriculum-based measurement of oral reading fluency: A confirmatory analysis of its relation to reading. School Psychology Review, 21, 459–479.Google Scholar
  43. Skinner, C. H., Cooper, L., & Cole, C. L. (1997). The effects of oral presentation previewing rates on reading performance. Journal of Applied Behavioral Analysis, 0, 331–333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Skinner, C. H., & Shapiro, E. S. (1989). A comparison of taped-words and drill interventions on reading fluency in adolescents with behavior disorders. Education and Treatment of Children, 12, 123–133.Google Scholar
  45. Steventon, C. E., & Frederick, L. D. (2003). The effects of repeated readings on student performance in the corrective reading program. Journal of Direct Instruction, 3, 17–27.Google Scholar
  46. Strong, A. C., Wehby, J. H., Falk, K. B., & Lane, K. L. (2004). The impact of a structured reading curriculum and repeated reading on the performance of junior high students with emotional and behavioral disorders. School Psychology Review, 33, 561–581.Google Scholar
  47. Swanson, H. L., & Hoskyn, M. (2001). Instructing adolescents with learning disabilities: A component and composite analysis. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 16, 109–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Swanson, H. L., & Hoskyn, M. (1998). Experimental intervention research on students with learning disabilities: A meta-analysis of treatment outcomes. Review of Educational Research, 68, 277–321.Google Scholar
  49. Therrien, W.J. (2004). Fluency and comprehension gains as a result of repeated reading. Remedial and Special Education, 25, 252–261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Torgesen, J. K. (2004). Lessons learned from research on interventions for students who have difficulty learning to read. In P. McCardle & V. Chhabra (Eds.), The voice of evidence (pp. 355–382). Baltimore, Maryland: Paul H. Brookes.Google Scholar
  51. Torgesen, J. K., Alexander, A. W., Wagner, R. K., Rashotte, C. A., Voeller, K. K. S., & Conway, T. (2001). Intensive remedial instruction for children with severe reading disabilities: Immediate and long-term outcomes from two instructional approaches. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 34, 33–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Torgesen, J. K., Wagner, R. K., & Rashotte, C. A. (1997). Prevention and remediation of severe reading disabilities: Keeping the end in mind. Scientific Studies of Reading, 1, 217–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Valleley, R. J., & Shriver, M. D. (2003). An examination of the effects of repeated readings with secondary students. Journal of Behavioral Education, 12, 55–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Vaughn, S., Kim, A., Sloan, C. V. M., Hughes, M. T., Elbaum, B., & Sridhar, D. (2003). Social skills interventions for young children with disabilities: A synthesis of group design studies. Remedial and Special Education, 24, 2–15.Google Scholar
  55. Wolf, M., & Bowers, P. G. (2000). Naming speed processes, timing, and reading: A conceptual review. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 33, 387–407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Wolf, M., & Katzir-Cohen, T. (2001). Reading fluency and its intervention. Scientific Studies of Reading, 5, 211–238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Woodruff, S., Schumaker, J. B., & Deschler, D. (2002). The effects of an intensive reading intervention on the decoding skills of high school students with reading deficits (Report No. RR-15). Washington, DC: Special Education Programs (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED469293).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jade Wexler
    • 1
  • Sharon Vaughn
    • 1
  • Meaghan Edmonds
    • 2
  • Colleen Klein Reutebuch
    • 1
  1. 1.Special EducationThe University of Texas at AustinAustinUSA
  2. 2.Educational PsychologyThe University of Texas at AustinAustinUSA

Personalised recommendations