Reading and Writing

, Volume 21, Issue 4, pp 349–369 | Cite as

Explicit instruction in phonemic awareness and phonemically based decoding skills as an intervention strategy for struggling readers in whole language classrooms

  • Janice F. Ryder
  • William E. Tunmer
  • Keith T. Greaney
Article

Abstract

The aim of this study was to determine whether explicit instruction in phonemic awareness and phonemically based decoding skills would be an effective intervention strategy for children with early reading difficulties in a whole language instructional environment. Twenty-four 6- and 7-year-old struggling readers were randomly assigned to an intervention or control group, with the intervention group being divided into four groups of three children each. The intervention program was carried out over a period of 24 weeks and comprised 56 highly sequenced, semi-scripted lessons in phonemic awareness and alphabetic coding skills delivered by a teacher aide who received training and ongoing support from a remedial reading specialist. Posttests results showed that the intervention group significantly outperformed the control group on measures of phonemic awareness, pseudoword decoding, context free word recognition, and reading comprehension. Two-year follow-up data indicated that the positive effects of the intervention program were not only maintained but had generalized to word recognition accuracy in connected text.

Keywords

Phonemic awareness Decoding skills Reading difficulties Reading intervention 

References

  1. Adams, M. J. (1990). Beginning to read: Thinking and learning about print. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  2. Adams, M. J., & Bruck, M. (1993). Word recognition: The interface of educational policies and scientific research. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 5, 113–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Adams, M. J., Foorman, B. R., Lundberg, I., & Beeler, T. (1998). Phonemic awareness in young children: A classroom curriculum. Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brooks Publishing Co.Google Scholar
  4. Blaiklock, K. E. (1997). Bring back the Burt: Some comments on the value of word recognition tests for the assessment of reading. New Zealand Reading Forum, 2, 13–16.Google Scholar
  5. Byrne, B. (2005). Theories of learning to read. In M. J. Snowling & C. Hulme (Eds.), The science of reading: A handbook (pp. 104–119). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Chapman, J. W., Tunmer, W. E., & Prochnow, J. E. (2001). Does success in the Reading Recovery program depend on developing proficiency in phonological processing skills? A longitudinal study in a whole language instructional context. Scientific Studies of Reading, 5, 141–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Clay, M. M. (1993). Reading recovery. Auckland, New Zealand: Heinemann.Google Scholar
  8. Connelly, V., Johnston, R., & Thompson, G. B. (2001). The effects of phonics instruction on the reading comprehension of beginning readers. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 14, 423–457.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Connor, C. M., Morrison, F. J., & Katch, L. E. (2004). Beyond the reading wars: Exploring the effect of child-instruction interactions on growth in early reading. Scientific Studies of Reading, 8, 305–336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cunningham, P. M., & Hall, D. P. (1998). Month by month phonics for first grade: Systematic multilevel instruction. Greensboro, NC: Casson-Dellosa Publishing Company, Inc.Google Scholar
  11. Educators Publishing Service, Inc. (1995). Primary phonics. Cambridge, MA: Author.Google Scholar
  12. Ehri, L. C. (1992). Reconceptualising the development of sight word reading and its relationship to recoding. In P. Gough, L. C. Ehri, & R. Treiman (Eds.), Reading acquisition (pp. 107–143). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  13. Ehri, L. C. (1997). Sight word learning in normal readers and dyslexics. In B. Blachman (Ed.), Foundations of reading intervention and dyslexia: Implications for early intervention (pp. 163–189). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  14. Ehri, L. C. (2004). Teaching phonemic awareness and phonics. In P. McCardle & V. Chhabra (Eds.), The voice of evidence in reading research (pp. 153–186). Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes Publishing Co.Google Scholar
  15. Ehri, L. C. (2005). Development of sight word reading: Phases and findings. In M. J. Snowling & C. Hulme (Eds.), The science of reading: A handbook (pp. 135–154). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Eldredge, J. L. (1995). Teaching decoding in holistic classrooms. Princeton, NJ: Prentice Hall, Inc.Google Scholar
  17. Elkonin, D. R. (1973). U.S.S.R. In J. Downing (Ed.), Comparative reading (pp. 551–580). New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  18. Gerber, S. B., Finn, J. D., Achilles, C. M., & Boyd-Zaharias, J. (2001). Teacher aides and students’ academic achievement. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 23, 123–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Gilmore, A., Croft, C., & Reid, N. (1981). Burt word reading test: New Zealand revision. Wellington, New Zealand: New Zealand Council for Educational Research.Google Scholar
  20. Glynn, T. (1994). Pause, prompt, praise: Seventeen years on. Best of set: Families and schools. Wellington, New Zealand: New Zealand Council for Educational Research.Google Scholar
  21. Gough, P. B., & Hillinger, M. L. (1980). Learning to read: An unnatural act. Bulletin of the Orton Society, 30, 179–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Gough, P. B., & Walsh, M. A. (1991). Chinese, phoenicians, and the orthographic cipher. In S. A. Brady & D. Shankweiler (Eds.), Phonological processes in literacy: A tribute to Isabelle Y. Liberman (pp. 199–209). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  23. Greaney, K. T., Tunmer, W. E., & Chapman, J. W. (1997). Effects of rime-based orthographic analogy training on the word recognition skills of children with reading disability. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89, 645–651.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Harm, M. W., & Seidenberg, M. S. (1999). Phonology, reading acquisition and dyslexia: Insights from connectionist models. Psychological Review, 106, 491–528.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hatcher, P. J., Hulme, C., & Ellis, A. W. (1994). Ameliorating early reading failure by integrating the teaching of reading and phonological skill: The phonological linkage hypothesis. Child Development, 65, 41–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Herman, R. (1993). The Herman method for reversing reading failure. Sherman Oaks, CA: Romar Publications, Inc.Google Scholar
  27. Hulme, C., Snowling, M. J., & Quinlan, P. (1991). Connectionism and learning to read: Steps toward a phonologically plausible model. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 3, 159–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Iversen, S. A., & Tunmer, W. E., (1993). Phonological processing skill and the Reading Recovery program. Journal of Educational Psychology, 85, 112–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Iversen, S., Tunmer, W. E., & Chapman, J. W. (2005). The effects of varying group size on the Reading Recovery approach to preventative early intervention. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 38, 456–472.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Juel, C., & Minden-Cupp, C. (2000). Learning to read words: Linguistic units and instructional strategies. Reading Research Quarterly, 35, 458–492.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Keith, M. (2002). Picking up the pace: A summary. Auckland, New Zealand: Ministry of Education.Google Scholar
  32. McGuinness, D. (1997). Why our children can’t read and what we can do about it. New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
  33. McNaughton, S. (2002). Meeting of minds. Wellington, New Zealand: Learning Media.Google Scholar
  34. Ministry of Education. (1996). Special education 2000. Wellington, New Zealand: Learning Media.Google Scholar
  35. Ministry of Education. (2003a). Effective literacy practice in years 1 to 4. Wellington, New Zealand: Author.Google Scholar
  36. Ministry of Education. (2003b). Sound sense: Phonics and phonological awareness. Wellington, New Zealand: Author.Google Scholar
  37. Modern Curriculum Press. (1986). Phonics practice readers. Cleveland, OH: Author.Google Scholar
  38. Morris, D., Tyner, T., & Perney, J. (2000). Early steps: Replicating the effects of a first-grade reading intervention program. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92, 681–693.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Neale, M. M. (1988). Neale analysis of reading ability—revised. Camberwell, Victoria, Australia: Australian council for educational research.Google Scholar
  40. Nicholson, T. (2000). Reading the writing on the wall: Debates, challenges and opportunities in the teaching of reading. Palmerston North, New Zealand: Dunmore Press.Google Scholar
  41. Nicholson, T. (2003). Risk factors in learning to read. In B. Foorman (Ed.), Preventing and remediating reading difficulties: Bringing science to scale (pp. 165–193). Timonium, MD: York Press.Google Scholar
  42. Oakhill, J., & Beard, R. (1999). Reading development and the teaching of reading. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  43. O’Connor, R. E., Notari-Syverson, A., & Vadasy, P. F. (1998). Ladders to literacy: A kindergarten activity book. Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brooks Publishing Co.Google Scholar
  44. Perfetti, C. A. (1985). Reading ability. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  45. Perfetti, C. A. (1991). The psychology, pedagogy, and politics of reading. Psychological Science, 2, 70–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Perfetti, C. A. (1992). The representation problem in reading acquisition. In P. Gough, L. Ehri, & R. Treiman (Eds.), Reading acquisition (pp. 107–143). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  47. Pressley, M. (2006). Reading instruction that works: The case for balanced teaching. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  48. Richardson, E., & DiBenedetto, B. (1985). Decoding skills test. Parkton, MD: York Press.Google Scholar
  49. Robertson, C., & Salter, W. (1997). The phonological awareness test. East Moline, IL: LinguiSystems, Inc.Google Scholar
  50. Shankweiler, D., & Fowler, A. E. (2004). Questions people ask about the role of phonological processes in learning to read. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 17, 483–515.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Share, D. L. (1995). Phonological recoding and self-teaching: Sine qua non of reading acquisition. Cognition, 55, 151–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Smith, J. W.A, & Elley, W. B. (1994) Learning to read in New Zealand. Auckland, New Zealand: Longman Paul.Google Scholar
  53. Snow, C. E., & Juel, C. (2005). Teaching children to read: What do we know about how to do it? In M. J. Snowling & C. Hulme (Eds.), The science of reading: A handbook (pp. 501–520). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Stanovich, K. E. (1986). Matthew effects in reading: Some consequences of individual differences in the acquisition of literacy. Reading Research Quarterly, 21, 340–406.Google Scholar
  55. Stanovich, K. E. (1994). Constructivism in reading education. The Journal of Special Education, 28, 259–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Steck-Vaughn Company. (1991). Phonics readers. Austin, TX: Author.Google Scholar
  57. Tracey, D. H., & Morrow, L. M. (2006). Lenses on reading: An introduction to theories and models. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  58. Tunmer, W. E., Chapman, J. W. (1998). Language prediction skill, phonological recoding ability and beginning reading. In C. Hulme & R. M. Joshi (Eds.), Reading and spelling: Development and disorder (pp. 33–67). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  59. Tunmer, W. E., & Chapman, J. W. (2002). The relation of beginning readers’ reported word identification strategies to reading achievement, reading-related skills, and academic self-perceptions. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 15, 341–358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Tunmer, W. E., & Chapman, J. W. (2003). The Reading Recovery approach to preventive early intervention: As good as it gets? Reading Psychology, 24, 337–360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Tunmer, W. E., & Chapman, J. W. (2006). Metalinguistic abilities, phonological recoding skills, and the use of sentence context in beginning reading development: A longitudinal study. In R. M. Joshi & P. G. Aaron (Eds.), Handbook of orthography and literacy (pp. 617–635). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  62. Tunmer, W. E., Chapman, J. W., & Prochnow, J. E. (2003). Preventing negative Matthew effects in at-risk readers: A retrospective study. In B. Foorman (Ed.), Preventing and remediating reading difficulties: Bringing science to scale (pp. 121–163). Timonium, MD: York Press.Google Scholar
  63. Tunmer, W. E., Chapman, J. W., & Prochnow, J. E. (2004). Why the reading achievement gap in New Zealand won’t go away: Evidence from the PIRLS 2001 international study of reading achievement. New Zealand Journal of Educational Studies, 39, 127–145.Google Scholar
  64. Tunmer, W. E., Chapman, J. W., & Prochnow, J. E. (in press). Literate cultural capital at school entry predicts later reading achievement: A seven year longitudinal study. New Zealand Journal of Educational Studies..Google Scholar
  65. Tunmer, W. E., Prochnow, J. E., Greaney, K. T., & Chapman, J. W. (in press). What’s wrong with New Zealand’s national literacy strategy? In R. Openshaw & J. Soler (Eds.), Reading across international boundaries: History, policy and politics. Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing, Inc.Google Scholar
  66. Whitehurst, G. J., & Lonigan, C. J. (2001). Emergent literacy: Development from prereaders to readers. In S. B. Neuman & D. K. Dickinson (Eds.), Handbook of early literacy research (pp. 11–29). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  67. Wilkinson, I. A. G., Freebody, P. M., & Elkins, J. (2000). Reading research in Australia and Aotearoa/New Zealand. In M. L. Kamil, P. B. Mosenthal, P. D. Pearson, & R. Barr (Eds.), Handbook of reading research (Vol. 3, pp. 3–16). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  68. Xue, Y., & Meisels, S. J. (2004). Early literacy instruction and learning in kindergarten: Evidence from the early childhood longitudinal study—kindergarten class of 1998–1999. American Educational Research Journal, 41, 191–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Janice F. Ryder
    • 1
  • William E. Tunmer
    • 1
  • Keith T. Greaney
    • 1
  1. 1.College of EducationMassey UniversityPalmerston NorthNew Zealand

Personalised recommendations