Reading and Writing

, Volume 21, Issue 3, pp 177–203

The influence of reading unit size on the development of Stroop interference in early word decoding

  • Paula J. Schwanenflugel
  • Robin D. Morris
  • Melanie R. Kuhn
  • Gregory P. Strauss
  • Jennifer M. Sieczko
Article

Abstract

The purpose of the experiments was to determine the automatic use of large or small word reading units in young readers in the absence of word decoding strategies. Picture-word Stroop interference was examined from four types of conflicting labels: (a) words containing both highly predictable grapheme–phoneme correspondence (GPC) units and highly consistent rime units (henceforth, Hi-GPC + Hi-Rime); (b) words with highly predictable GPC units and less consistent rime units (Hi-GPC + Lo-Rime); (c) words with low predictability GPC units and highly consistent rime units (Low GPC + High Rime); (d) nonwords that contained both highly predictable GPC and highly consistent rime units. Naming time for pictures containing these labels was compared against that for pictures with random letter strings or no labels. In Experiment 1, Stroop interference was examined in first, second, and third grade children to determine whether there was developmental change in the presence of rime or GPC interference. In Experiment 2, Stroop interference was examined as a function of relative reading skill in first grade children. In Experiment 3, Stroop interference in adults was compared to the use of rime or GPC pronunciation strategies for nonword reading. In all experiments, Stroop interference in picture naming was longer for pictures with highly predictable GPC unit labels than less predictable GPC unit labels. However, in Experiment 3, even though adults showed interference from predictable GPC units in the Stroop task, they always preferred rime pronunciation for ambiguous nonwords in the nonword reading task. It is argued that the current experiments provide evidence for a flexible units model.

Keywords

Stroop Task Automaticity Reading units Word decoding 

References

  1. Adams, M. J. (1990). Beginning to read: Thinking and learning about print. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  2. Adams, M. J., Foorman, B. R., Lundberg, I., & Beeler, T. (1998). Phonemic awareness in young children: A classroom curriculum. Baltimore, MD: Brookes Publishing.Google Scholar
  3. Bakan, P., & Alperson, B. (1967). Pronounceability, attensity, and interference in the color-word test. American Journal of Psychology, 80, 416–420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Berent, I., & Marom, M. (2005). Skeletal structure of printed words: Evidence from the stroop task. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 31, 328–338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Berndt, R. S., Reggia, J. A., & Mitchum, C. C. (1987). Empirically-derived probabilities for grapheme-to-phoneme correspondences in English. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 19, 1–9.Google Scholar
  6. Bowey, J. A., & Underwood, N. (1996). Further evidence that orthographic rime usage in nonword reading increases with word-level reading proficiency. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 63, 526–562.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bowey, J. A., Vaughan, L., & Hansen, J. (1998). Beginning readers’ use of orthograpahic analogies in word reading. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 68, 108–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Brown, G. D. A. (1998). The endpoint of skilled word recognition: The ROAR model. In J. L. Metsala & L. C. Ehri (Eds.), Word recognition in beginning literacy (pp. 121–138). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  9. Brown, G. D. A., & Deavers, R. P. (1999). Units of analysis in nonword reading: Evidence from children and adults. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 73, 208–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bruck, M., & Treiman, R. (1992). Learning to pronounce words: The limitations of analogies. Reading Research Quarterly, 27, 374–388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bryant, P. E., Bradley, L., Maclean, M., & Crossland, J. (1989). Nursery rhymes, phonological skills, and reading. Journal of Child Language, 16, 407–428.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Chall, J. S. (1996). Stages of reading development (2nd ed.). Fort Worth: Harcourt Brace College Publishers.Google Scholar
  13. Christensen, C. A., & Bowey, J. A. (2005). The efficacy of orthographic rime, grapheme-phoneme correspondence, and implicit phonics approaches to teaching decoding skills. Scientific Studies of Reading, 9, 327–349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Coltheart, V., & Leahy, J. (1992). Children’s and adults’ reading of nonwords: Effects of regularity and consistency. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 18, 718–729.Google Scholar
  15. Comalli, P. E., Jr., Wapner, S., & Werner, H. (1962). Interference effects of Stroop color-word test in childhood, adulthood, and aging. Journal of Genetic Psychology, 100, 47–53.Google Scholar
  16. Cunningham, P. M., & Cunningham, J. W. (1992). Making words. Enhancing the invented spelling-decoding connection. The Reading Teacher, 46, 106–115.Google Scholar
  17. Cycowicz, Y. M., Friedman, D., Rothstein, M, & Snodgrass, J. G. (1997). Picture naming by young children: Norms for name agreement, familiarity, and visual complexity. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 65, 171–237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Deavers, R., Solity, J., & Kerfoot, S. (2000). The effect of instruction on early nonword reading strategies. Journal of Research in Reading, 23, 267–286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Duncan, L. G., Seymour, P. H. K., & Hill, S. (2000). A small-to-large progression in metaphonological awareness and reading? The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology A: Human Experimental Psychology, 53, 1081–1104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Ehri, L. C. (1976). Do words really interfere in naming pictures? Child Development, 47, 502–505.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Ehri, L. C. (1995). Phases of development in learning to read words by sight. Journal of Research in Reading, 18, 116–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Ehri, L. C. (1997). Learning to read and learning to spell are one and the same, almost. In C. A. Perfetti, L. Rieben, & M. Fayol (Eds.). Learning to spell: Research, theory, and practice across languages (pp. 237–269). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.Google Scholar
  23. Ehri, L. C., & Wilce, L. S. (1979). Does word training increase or decrease interference in a Stroop task? Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 27, 352–364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Engelmann, S. (1995). Reading Mastery V. Worthington, OH: SRA Macmillan/McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  25. Golinkoff, R. M., & Rosinski, R. R. (1976). Decoding, semantic processing, and reading comprehension skill. Child Development, 47, 252–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Gombert, J. E. (1992). Metalinguistic development. London: Harvester Wheatsheaf.Google Scholar
  27. Goswami, U. (1993). Toward an interactive analogy model of reading development: Decoding vowel graphemes in beginning reading. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 56, 443–475.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Goswami, U. (1999). Causal connections in beginning reading: The importance of rhyme. Journal of Research in Reading, 22, 217–240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Goswami, U., Ziegler, J. C., Dalton, L, & Schneider, W. (2003). Nonword reading across orthographies: How flexible is the choice of reading units? Applied Psycholinguistics, 24, 235–247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Guttentag, R. E., & Haith, M. M. (1978). Automatic processing as a function of age and reading ability. Child Development, 49, 707–716.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. LaBerge, D., & Samuels, S. J. (1974). Toward a theory of automatic information processing in reading. Cognitive Psychology, 6, 293–323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Logan, G. D. (1997). Automaticity and reading: Perspectives from the instance theory of automatization. Reading and Writing Quarterly: Overcoming Learning Difficulties, 13, 123–46.Google Scholar
  33. Maclean, M., Bryant, P., & Bradley, L. (1987). Rhymes, nursery rhymes, and reading in early childhood. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 33, 255–281.Google Scholar
  34. Manis, F. R., Szeszulski, P. A., Howell, M. J., & Horn, C. C. (1986). A comparison of analogy- and rule-based decoding strategies in normal and dyslexic children. Journal of Reading Behavior, 18, 203–218.Google Scholar
  35. Marmurek, H. H. C., Proctor, C., & Javor, A. (2006). Stroop-like serial position effects in color naming of words and nonwords. Experimental Psychology, 53, 105–110.Google Scholar
  36. Monsell, S., Taylor, T. J., & Murphy, K. (2001). Naming the color of a word: Is it responses or task sets that compete? Memory & Cognition, 29, 137–151.Google Scholar
  37. Perry, C., Ziegler, J. C., & Coltheart, M. (2002). How predictable is spelling? Developing and testing metrics of phoneme-grapheme contingency. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 55A, 897–915.Google Scholar
  38. Pritchard, V. E., & Neuman, E. (2004). Negative priming effects in children engaged in nonspatial tasks: Evidence of early development of an intact inhibitory mechanism. Developmental Psychology, 40, 191–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Rayner, K., & Posnansky, C. (1978). Stages of processing in word identification. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 107, 64–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Redding, G. M., & Gerjets, D. A. (1977). Stroop effect: Interference and facilitation with verbal and manual responses. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 45, 11–17.Google Scholar
  41. Rosinski, R. R. (1977). Picture-word interference is semantically based. Child Development, 48, 643–647.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Schadler, M., & Thissen, D. M. (1981). The development of automatic word recognition and reading skill. Memory and Cognition, 9, 132–141.Google Scholar
  43. Seymour, P. H. K., Duncan, L. G., & Bolik, F. M. (1999). Rhymes and phonemes in the common unit task: Replications and implications for beginning reading. Journal of Research in Reading, 22, 113–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Stahl, S. A., & Murray, B. A. (1994). Defining phonological awareness and its relationship to early reading. Journal of Educational Psychology, 86, 221–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Stanovich, K. E., Cunningham, A. E., & West, R. F. (1981). A longitudinal study of the development of automatic recognition skills in first graders. Journal of Reading Behavior, 13, 57–74.Google Scholar
  46. Stroop, J. R. (1935). Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 18, 643–662.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Stuart, M., & Coltheart, M. (1988). Does reading develop in a sequence of stages? Cognition, 30, 139–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Stuart, M., Masterson, J., Dixon, M., & Quinlan, P. (1999). Inferring sublexical correspondence from sight vocabulary: Evidence from 6- and 7-year-olds. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 52A, 353–366.Google Scholar
  49. Tipper, S. P., Bourque, T. A., Anderson, S. H., & Brehaut, J. C. (1989). Mechanisms of attention: A developmental study. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 48, 353–378.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Torgeson, J. K., Wagner, R. K., & Rashotte, C. A. (1999). Test of word reading efficiency. Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.Google Scholar
  51. Treiman, R., Goswami, U., & Bruck, M. (1990). Not all nonwords are alike: Implications for reading development and theory. Memory & Cognition, 13, 357–364.Google Scholar
  52. Treiman, R., Mullennix, J., Bijeljac-Babic, R., & Richmond-Welty, E. D. (1995). The Special role of rimes in the description, use, and acquisition of English orthography. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 124, 107–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Treiman, R., & Zukowski, A. (1991). Levels of phonological awareness. In S. A. Brady & D. P. Shakweiler (Eds.), Phonological processes in literacy: A tribute to Isabelle Y. Liberman (pp. 67–83). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.Google Scholar
  54. Venezky, R. L. (1970). The structure of English orthography. The Hague, The Netherlands: Mouton.Google Scholar
  55. Walton, P. D., & Walton, L. M. (2002). Beginning reading by teaching in rime analogy: Effects on phonological skills, letter-sound knowledge, working memory, and word-reading strategies. Scientific Studies of Reading, 6, 79–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Wilkinson, G. S. (1993). The wide range achievement test: Administration manual. Wilmington, DE: Wide Range Inc.Google Scholar
  57. Wood, C. (2002). Orthographic analogies and phonological priming effects. Journal of Research in Reading, 25, 144–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Zeno, S. M., Ivens, S. H., Millard, R. T., & Duvvuri, R. (1995). The educator’s word frequency guide. Brewster, NY: Touchstone Applied Science Associates.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, Inc. 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Paula J. Schwanenflugel
    • 1
  • Robin D. Morris
    • 2
  • Melanie R. Kuhn
    • 3
  • Gregory P. Strauss
    • 4
  • Jennifer M. Sieczko
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Educational Psychology and Instructional TechnologyUniversity of GeorgiaAthensUSA
  2. 2.Georgia State UniversityAtlantaUSA
  3. 3.Rutgers UniversityNew BrunswickUSA
  4. 4.University of Nevada-Las VegasLas VegasUSA

Personalised recommendations