Advertisement

Reading and Writing

, Volume 20, Issue 6, pp 539–552 | Cite as

Assessing more than you teach: the difficult case of transfer

  • Sara J. Hines
  • Deborah L. Speece
  • Caroline Y. Walker
  • Lisa M. W. DaDeppo
Article

Abstract

We conducted two case studies to evaluate the effectiveness of individualized remedial reading instruction linked to direct measures of student learning and transfer. The participants were two first grade children at serious risk of reading failure. The instruction targeted decoding of one syllable short vowel words and first emphasized onset-rimes and then phoneme manipulation. Forty words organized into 10 rime patterns were targeted for instruction. Probes consisting of all the instructional words were administered before each instructional session to monitor student progress. We also administered transfer probes to determine if the children could apply their knowledge more broadly. Instruction with onset-rime units yielded excellent maintenance and near transfer (novel words containing instructed rimes) but not far transfer (novel words derived from uninstructed rimes). The instructional change to phoneme manipulation yielded better far transfer for one of the two children. We consider the importance of administering measures that assess more than what is taught to get an accurate portrait of children’s responsiveness to instruction.

Keywords

Case study First grade Onset-rime instruction Reading disability Reading instruction 

References

  1. Adams, M. J. (1990). Beginning to read: Thinking and learning about print. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  2. Anthony, J. L., Lonigan, C. J., Driscoll, K., Phillips, B. M., & Burgess, S. R. (2003). Phonological sensitivity: A quasi-parallel progression of word structure units and cognitive operations. Reading Research Quarterly, 38, 470–487.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Elbaum, B., & Vaughn, S. (2003). Self-concept and students with learning disabilities. In H. L. Swanson, K. R. Harris, & S. Graham (Eds.), Handbook of learning disabilities (pp. 229–255). New York, NY: Guilford.Google Scholar
  4. Goswami, U. (1993). Toward an interactive model of reading development: Decoding vowel graphemes in beginning reading. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 56, 443–475.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Goswami, U. (1999). Orthographic analogies and phonological priming. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 72, 210–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Greaney, K. T., Tunmer, W. E., & Chapman, J. W. (1997). Effects of rime based orthographic training on the word recognition skills of children with reading disability. Journal of Educational Psychology, 889, 645–651.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Jenkins, J. R., & O’Connor, R. E. (2002). Early identification and intervention for young children with reading/learning disabilities. In R. Bradley, L. Danielson, & D. P. Hallahan (Eds.) Identification of learning disabilities: Research to practice (pp. 99–149). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  8. Kirtley, C., Bryant, P., McLean, M., & Bradley, L. (1989). Rhyme, rime and the onset of reading. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 48, 224–245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Levy, B. A., & Lysynchuk, L. (1997). Beginning word segmentation: Benefits of training by segmentation and whole word methods. Scientific Studies of Reading, 1, 359–387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Lovett, M. W., Barron, R. W., & Benson, N. J. (2003). Effective remediation of word identification and decoding difficulties in school-age children with reading disabilities. In H. L. Swanson, K. R. Harris, & S. Graham (Eds.), Handbook of learning disabilities (pp. 273–292). New York, NY: Guilford.Google Scholar
  11. Lovett, M. W., Laceranza, L., Borden, S. L., Frijers, J. C., Steinbach, K. A., & DePalma, M. (2000). Components of effective remediation for developmental reading disabilities: Combining phonological and strategy-based instruction to improve outcomes. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92, 1–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Moustafa, M. H. (1991). An interactive cognitive model of the acquisition of a graphophonemic system by young children. Unpublished master’s thesis, United Arab Emirates University, United Arab Emirates.Google Scholar
  13. O’Shaughnessy, T. E., & Swanson, H. L. (2000). A comparison of two reading interventions for children with learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 33, 257–278.Google Scholar
  14. Qi, S., & O’Connor, R. (2000). Comparison of phonological training procedures in kindergarten classrooms. The Journal of Educational Research, 93, 226–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Ritchey, K. D., & Speece, D. L. (2006). From letter names to word reading: The nascent role of sublexical fluency. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 31, 301–327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Savage, R., Carless, S., & Stuart, M. (2003). The effects of rime- and phoneme-based teaching delivered by learning support assistants. Journal of Research in Reading, 26, 211–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Slocum, T. A., O’Connor, R. E., & Jenkins, J. R. (1993). Transfer among phonological manipulation skills. Journal of Educational Psychology, 85, 618–630.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Snow, C., Burns, S., & Griffin, P. (1998). Preventing reading difficulties in young children. Washington, D.C.: National Research Council.Google Scholar
  19. Torgesen, J. K., Wagner, R. K., & Rashotte, C. A., (1997). Prevention and remediation of severe reading disabilities: Keeping the eye in mind. Scientific Studies of Reading, 1, 217–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Treiman, R., Mullenix, J., Bijeljac-Babic, R., & Richmond-Welty, E. D. (1995). The special role of rimes in the description, use, and acquisition of English orthography. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 124, 107–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Walton, P. D., Walton, L. M., & Felton, K. (2001). Teaching rime analogy or letter recoding reading strategies to prereaders: Effects on prereading skills and word reading. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93, 160–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Woodcock, R. W., McGrew, K. S., & Mather, N. (2001). Woodcock–Johnson III Tests of achievement. Itasca, IL: Riverside.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, Inc. 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sara J. Hines
    • 1
  • Deborah L. Speece
    • 1
  • Caroline Y. Walker
    • 1
  • Lisa M. W. DaDeppo
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Special EducationUniversity of MarylandCollege ParkUSA

Personalised recommendations