Reading and Writing

, 20:295 | Cite as

Syllable frequency in lexical decision and naming of English words

Article

Abstract

The importance of phonological syllables in recognition and pronunciation of visual words has been demonstrated in languages with a high degree of spelling-sound correspondence. In Spanish, multisyllabic words with frequent first syllables are named more quickly than those with less frequent first syllables, but receive slower lexical decisions. The latter effect is attributed to lexical competition from other words beginning with the same syllable. We examined syllable frequency effects on naming and lexical decision for 3029 visually presented words in English, a language with a high degree of irregularity in spelling/sound relationships, and in which phonological syllables are less clearly marked in printed words. The results showed facilitative effects of syllable frequency in both tasks, and these were stronger when syllables were defined orthographically than phonologically. The results suggest that activation of lexical candidates based on a syllabic code does not occur rapidly enough to interfere with lexical decision in English.

Keywords

Syllable Syllable frequency Orthography Phonology Neighborhood Similarity Orthographic syllable 

References

  1. Aichert I., Ziegler W. (2004). Syllable frequency and syllable structure in apraxia of speech. Brain and Language 88:148–159CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Álvarez C. J., Carreiras M., de Vega M. (2000). Syllable-frequency effect in visual word recognition: Evidence of sequential-type processing. Psicológica 21:341–374Google Scholar
  3. Álvarez C. J., Carreiras M., Taft M. (2001). Syllables and morphemes: Contrasting frequency effects in Spanish. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 27:545–555CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Andrews S. (1989). Frequency and neighborhood effects on lexical access: Activation or search? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 15:802–814CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Andrews S. (1992). Frequency and neighborhood effects on lexical access: Lexical similarity or orthographic redundancy? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 18:234–254CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Andrews S. (1997). The effect of orthographic similarity on lexical retrieval: Resolving neighborhood conflicts. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review 4:439–461Google Scholar
  7. Baayen R. H., Piepenbrock R., Gulikers L. (1995). The CELEX Lexical Database (English Version 2.5) [CD-ROM]. Philadelphia, PA: Linguistic Data Consortium, University of PennsylvaniaGoogle Scholar
  8. Balota D. A., Chumbley J. I. (1984). Are lexical decisions a good measure of lexical access? The role of word frequency in the neglected decision stage. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 10:340–357CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Balota D. A., Chumbley J. I. (1985). The locus of word-frequency effects in the pronunciation task: Lexical access and/or production frequency. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 24:89–106Google Scholar
  10. Balota D. A., Cortese M. J., Hutchison K. A., Neely J. H., Nelson D., Simpson G. B., & Treiman R. (2002). The English Lexicon Project: A web-based repository of descriptive and behavioral measures for 40,481 English words and nonwords. http://elexicon.wustl.edu/, Washington UniversityGoogle Scholar
  11. Balota D. A., Cortese M. J., Sergent-Marshall S. D., Spieler D. H., Yap M. J. (2004). Visual word recognition of single-syllable words. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 133:283–316CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Barber H., Vergara M., Carreiras M. (2004). Syllable-frequency effects in visual word recognition: Evidence from ERPs. Neuroreport 15:545–548CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Borgwaldt S. R., Hellwig F. M., de Groot A. M. B. (2005). Onset entropy matters – Letter-to-phoneme mappings in seven languages. Reading and Writing 18:211–229CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Brand M., Rey A., Peereman R. (2003). Where is the syllable priming effect in visual word recognition? Journal of Memory and Language 48:435–443CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Buchanan L., Westbury C., Burgess C. (2001). Characterizing semantic space: Neighborhood effects in word recognition. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review 8:531–544Google Scholar
  16. Carreiras M., Álvarez C. J., de Vega M. (1993). Syllable frequency and visual word recognition in Spanish. Journal of Memory and Language 32:766–780CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Carreiras M., Perea M. (2004). Naming pseudowords in Spanish: Effects of syllable frequency. Brain and Language 90:393–400CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Carreiras M., Perea M., Grainger J. (1997). Orthographic neighborhood effects on visual word recognition in Spanish: Cross-task comparisons. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 23:857–871CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Cholin J., Levelt W. J. M., Schiller N. O. (2006). Effects of syllable frequency in speech production. Cognition 99:205–235CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Coltheart M., Davelaar E., Jonasson J. T., Besner D. (1977). Access to the internal lexicon. In: S. Dornic (Ed) Attention and performance VI. London: Academic Press, pp. 535–555Google Scholar
  21. Conrad M., Jacobs A. M. (2004). Replicating syllable-frequency effects in Spanish in German: One more challenge to computational models of visual word recognition. Journal of Language and Cognitive Processes 19:369–390CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Crompton A. (1981). Syllables and segments in speech production. Linguistics 19:663–716CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Cutler A., Mehler J., Norris D., Segui J. (1986). The syllable’s differing role in the segmentation of French and English. Journal of Memory and Language 25:385–400CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. de Groot A. M. B., Borgwaldt S., Bos M., van den Eijnden E. (2002). Lexical decision and word naming in bilinguals: Language effects and task effects. Journal of Memory and Language 47:91–124CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Dell G. S. (1986). A spreading-activation theory of retrieval in sentence production. Psychological Review 93:283–321CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Dell G. S. (1988). The retrieval of phonological forms in production: Tests of predictions from a connectionist model. Journal of Memory and Language 27:124–142CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. de Vega M. & Carreiras, M. (1989). The role of graphemic frequency in visual word processing. Paper presented at the 3rd European Conference for Learning and Instruction, Madrid, SpainGoogle Scholar
  28. de Vega M., Carreiras M., Gutiérrez M., Alonso M. L. (1990). Lectura y comprensión: Una perspectiva cognitiva [Reading and comprehension: A cognitive perspective]. Madrid: Alianza EditorialGoogle Scholar
  29. Dominguez A., Cuetos F., de Vega M. (1993). Efectos diferenciales de la frecuencia silábica: Dependencia del tipo de prueba y características de los estímulos [Differential effects of syllabic frequency: Task and stimulus type dependency]. Estudios de Psicología 50:5–31Google Scholar
  30. Dominguez A., de Vega M., Cuetos F. (1997). Lexical inhibition from syllabic units in visual word recognition. Language & Cognitive Processes 12:401–422CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Ferrand L., Segui J., Grainger J. (1996). Masked priming of words and picture naming: The role of syllabic units. Journal of Memory and Language 35:708–723CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Ferrand L., Segui J., Humphreys G. W. (1997). The syllable’s role in word naming. Memory & Cognition 25:458–470Google Scholar
  33. Forster K. I. (2000). The potential for experimenter bias effects in word recognition experiments. Memory and Cognition 28:1109–1115Google Scholar
  34. Forster K. I., Shen D. (1996). No enemies in the neighborhood: Absence of inhibitory neighborhood effects in lexical decision and semantic categorization. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 22:696–713CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Goldinger S. D., Luce P. A., Pisoni D. B. (1989). Priming lexical neighbors of spoken words: Effects of competition and inhibition. Journal of Memory and Language 28:501–518CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Grainger J., Jacobs A. M. (1996). Orthographic processing in visual word recognition: A multiple read-out model. Psychological Review 103:518–565CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Grainger J., Muneaux M., Farioli F., Ziegler J. C. (2005). Effects of phonological and orthographic neighbourhood density interact in visual word recognition. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 58A:981–998Google Scholar
  38. Graybill F. A., Iyer H. K. (1994). Regression analysis: Concepts and applications. Belmont, CA: WadsworthGoogle Scholar
  39. Holcomb P. J., Grainger J., O’Rourke T. (2002). An electrophysiological study of the effects of orthographic neighborhood size on printed word perception. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 14:938–950CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Huntsman L. A., Lima S. D. (2002). Orthographic neighbors and visual word recognition. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 31:289–306CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Hutzler F., Bergmann J., Conrad M., Kronbichler M., Stenneken P., Jacobs A. M. (2004). Inhibitory effects of first syllable-frequency in lexical decision: An event-related potential study. Neuroscience Letters 372:179–184CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Hutzler F., Conrad M., Jacobs A. M. (2005). Effects of syllable-frequency in lexical decision and naming: An eye-movement study. Brain and Language 92:138–152CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Jared D., Seidenberg M. S. (1990). Naming multisyllabic words. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 16:92–105CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Katz L., Frost R. (1992). Reading in different orthographics: The orthographic depth hypothesis. In: R. Frost, L. Katz (Eds) Orthography, phonology, morphology and meaning. Amsterdam: North-Holland, pp. 67–84Google Scholar
  45. Kelly M. H., Bock J. K. (1988). Stress in time. Journal of Experimental Psychology{ Human Perception and Performance 14:389–403CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Kucera H., Francis W. N. (Eds) (1967). Computational analysis of present day American English. Providence, RI: Brown UniversityPressGoogle Scholar
  47. Lacruz I., Folk J. R. (2004). Feedforward and feedback consistency effects for high- and low-frequency words in lexical decision and naming. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 57A:1261–1284Google Scholar
  48. Levelt W. J. M., Roelofs A., Meyer A. S. (1999). A theory of lexical access in speech production. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22:1–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Levelt W. J. M., Wheeldon L. (1994). Do speakers have access to a mental syllabary? Cognition 50:239–269CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Luce P. A., Pisoni D. B. (1998). Recognizing spoken words: The neighborhood activation model. Ear and Hearing 19:1–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Mathey S., Zagar D. (2002). Lexical similarity in visual word recognition: The effect of sublexical units in French. Current Psychology Letters 8:107–121Google Scholar
  52. McClelland J. L., Elman J. L. (1986). The TRACE model of speech perception. Cognitive Psychology 18:1–86CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Nickels L., Howard D. (2004). Dissociating effects of number of phonemes, number of syllables, and syllabic complexity on word production un aphasia: It’s the number of phonemes that counts. Cognitive Neuropsychology 21:57–78CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Norris D. (1994). SHORTLIST: A connectionist model of continuous speech recognition. Cognition 52:189–234CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Paap K. R., McDonald J. E., Schvaneveldt R. W., Noel R. W. (1987). Frequency and pronounceability in visually presented naming and lexical decision tasks. In: M. Coltheart (Eds) Attention and performance XII. The Psychology of reading. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, pp. 221–243Google Scholar
  56. Perea M., Carreiras M. (1995). Efectos de frecuencia silábica en tareas de identificación [Syllable frequency effects in identification tasks]. Psicológica 16:483–496Google Scholar
  57. Perea M., Carreiras M. (1996). Efectos de vecindad ortográfica y silábica en la tarea de pronunciación mixta [Effects of orthographic and syllabic neighborhood in mixed pronunciation tasks]. Psicológica 17:425–440Google Scholar
  58. Perea M., Carreiras M. (1998). Effects of frequency and syllable neighbourhood frequency in visual word recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human, Perception, and Performance 24:134–144CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Prinzmetal W., Treiman R., Rho S. H. (1986). How to see a reading unit. Journal of Memory and Language 25:461–475CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Rapp B. C. (1992). The nature of sublexical orthographic organization: The bigram trough hypothesis examined. Journal of Memory and Language 31:33–53CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Schiller N. O. (1999). Masked syllable priming of English nouns. Brain and Language 68:300–305CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Schiller N. O. (2000). Single word production in English: The role of subsyllabic units during phonological encoding. Journal of Experimental Psychology; Learning, Memory, and Cognition 26:512–528CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Seidenberg M. S. (1987). Sublexical structures in visual word recognition: Access units or orthographic redundancy? In: M. Coltheart (Ed) Attention and performance XII: The psychology of reading. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, pp. 245–263Google Scholar
  64. Selkirk E. O. (1982). Syllables. In: H. van der Hulst, N. Smith (Eds) The structure of phonological representations (Part II). Dordrecht: Foris, pp. 337–383Google Scholar
  65. Simpson G. B., Kang H. (2004). Syllable processing in alphabetic Korean. Reading and Writing 17:137–151CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Spieler D. H., Balota D. A. (2000). Factors influencing word naming in younger and older adults. Psychology and Aging 15:225–231CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Spoehr K. T., Smith E. E. (1973). The role of syllables in perceptual processing. Cognitive Psychology 5:71–89CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Spoehr K. T., Smith E. E. (1975). The role of orthographic and phonotactic rules in perceiving letter patterns. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 104:21–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Taft M. (1979). Lexical access via an orthographic code: The basic orthographic syllabic structure (BOSS). Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior 18:21–39CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Taft M. (Ed.). (1991). Reading and the mental lexicon. Hove, England: ErlbaumGoogle Scholar
  71. Taft M. (2001). Processing of orthographic structure by adults of different reading ability. Language and Speech 41:351–376CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Taft M. (2002). Orthographic processing of polysyllabic words by native and nonnative English speakers. Brain & Language 81:532–544CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Taft M., Forster K. I. (1976). Lexical storage and retrieval of polymorphemes and polysyllabic words. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 15:607–620CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Treiman R., Bowey J. A., Bourassa D. (2002). Segmentation of spoken words in syllables by English-speaking children as compared to adults. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 83:213–238CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Treiman R., Zukowski A. (1990). Toward an understanding of English syllabification. Journal of Memory and Language 29:66–85CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Van Petten C. (1995). Words and sentences: Event-related brain potential measures. Psychophysiology 32:511–525CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Vitevitch M. S. (2002). The influence of phonological similarity neighborhoods on speech production. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 28:735–747CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Vitevich M. S., Sommers M. S. (2003). The facilitative influence of phonological similarity and neighborhood frequency in speech production in younger and older adults. Memory and Cognition 31:491–504Google Scholar
  79. Yates M., Locker L. Jr., Simpson G. B. (2004). The influence of phonological neighborhood on visual word perception. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review 11:452–457Google Scholar
  80. Ziegler J. C., Muneaux M., Grainger J. (2003). Neighborhood effects in auditory word recognition: Phonological competition and orthographic facilitation. Journal of Memory and Language 48:779–793CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Ziegler J. C., Perry C. (1998). No more problems in Coltheart’s neighborhood: Resolving neighborhood conflicts in the lexical decision task. Cognition 68:B53–B62CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Ziegler J. C., Stone G. O., Jacobs A. M. (1997). What’s the pronunciation for -OUGH and the spelling for /u/? A database for computing feed forward and feedback inconsistency in English. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers 29:600–618Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, Inc. 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PsychologyUniversity of ArizonaTucsonUSA

Personalised recommendations