Reading and Writing

, Volume 20, Issue 3, pp 201–223

Letter Processing and the Formation of Memory Representations in Children with Naming Speed Deficits



The ability to recognize letter patterns within words as a single unit is important for fluent reading. This skill is based on previously established memory representations of common letter patterns. The ability to form these memory representations may be impaired in some poor readers, particularly readers with naming speed deficits (NSD). This study explored factors that influence letter processing and the subsequent formation of memory representations of letter strings in children with and without a NSD. Children were presented with a letter string, followed by a probe unit that was either a single letter, a two-letter cluster, or a repetition of the whole string. Children indicated whether or not the probe had been present in the preceding string. Two factors were manipulated: (a) amount of time to process the initial letter string, and (b) level of orthographic structure present in the letter string. Results indicated that overall, children with NSD performed less accurately than children without NSD. However, children with NSD showed no differential benefit in performance as a result of longer time to process a letter string. In addition, all readers were able to make use of the orthographic structure in a letter string to aid performance. Implications of results for establishing memory representations of letter strings are discussed.


Development of orthographic knowledge Naming speed deficits Orthographic representations Rapid automatized naming 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Adams M. J. (1990). Beginning to read: Thinking and learning about print Cambridge, MA: The MIT PressGoogle Scholar
  2. Berninger V. W. (1987). Global, component, and serial processing of printed words in beginning of reading Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 43:387–418CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Blachman B. A. (1984). Relationship of rapid naming ability and language analysis skills to kindergarten and first-grade reading achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology 76:610–622CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bowers, P. G. (1995, April). Re-examining selected reading research from the viewpoint of the “double deficit hypothesis”. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Society for Research in Child Development, Indianapolis, INGoogle Scholar
  5. Bowers P. G. (2001). Exploration of the basis for rapid naming’s relationship to reading In: M. Wolf (Eds) Dyslexia, fluency, and the brain Timonium, Maryland: York Press pp. 41–63Google Scholar
  6. Bowers P. G., Kennedy A. (1993). Effects of naming speed differences on fluency of reading after practice. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 682:318–320CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bowers P. G., Swanson L. B. (1991). Naming speed deficits in reading disability: Multiple measures of a single process. Journal of Experimental Psychology 51:195–219Google Scholar
  8. Bowers P. G., Wolf M. (1993). Theoretical links among naming speed, precise timing mechanisms and orthographic skill in dyslexia. Reading and Writing 5:69–85CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bowers P. G., Sunseth K., Golden J. (1999). The route between rapid naming and reading progress. Scientific Studies in Reading 3:31–53CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cornwall A. (1992). The relationship of phonological awareness, rapid naming, and verbal memory to severe reading and spelling disability. Journal of Learning Disabilities 25:532–538Google Scholar
  11. Cunningham A. E., Stanovich K. E. (1993). Children’s literacy environment and early word recognition subskills. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal 5:193–204CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Denckla M. B., Rudel R. G. (1976). Rapid “automatized” naming (RAN): Dyslexia differentiated from other learning disabilities. Neuropsychologica 14:471–479CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Educator’s Word Frequency Guide (1996). Touchstone Applied Science Associates [Computer Software]Google Scholar
  14. Ehri L. C. (1992). Reconceptualizing the development of sight word reading and its relationship to recoding In: P. G. Gough, L. C. Ehri, R. Treiman (Eds), Reading acquisition. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, pp. 107–143Google Scholar
  15. Korhonen T. T. (1995). The persistence of rapid naming problems in children with reading disabilities: A nine-year follow-up. Journal of Learning Disabilities 28:232–239Google Scholar
  16. Levy B. A. (2001). Moving the bottom: Improving reading fluency In: M. Wolf (Eds) Dyslexia, fluency, and the brain Timonium, Maryland York Press pp. 357–379Google Scholar
  17. Levy B. A., Bourassa D. C., Horn C. (1999). Fast and slow namers: Benefits of segmentation and whole word training. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 73:115–138CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Lovett M. W., Steinbach K. A., Frijters J. (2000). Remediating the core deficits of developmental reading disability: A double-deficit perspective. Journal of Learning Disabilities 33:334–358Google Scholar
  19. Manis F. R., Doi L. M., Bhadha B. (2000). Naming speed, phonological awareness, and orthographic knowledge in second graders. Journal of Learning Disabilities 33:325–333Google Scholar
  20. Manis F. R., Seidenberg M. S., Doi L. M. (1999). See Dick RAN: Rapid naming and the longitudinal prediction of reading subskills in first and second graders. Scientific Studies of Reading 3:129–157CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Mayzner M., Tresselt M. E. (1965). Tables of single-letter and bigram frequency counts for various word-length and letter position combinations. Psychonomic Monograph Supplements 1:13–32Google Scholar
  22. Meyer M. S., Wood F. B., Hart L. A., Felton R. H. (1998). Selective predictive value of rapid automatized naming in poor readers. Journal of Learning Disabilities 31:106–117Google Scholar
  23. Meyler A., Breznitz Z. (2005). Impaired phonological and orthographic word representations among adult dyslexic readers: Evidence from event-related potentials. The Journal of Genetic Psychology 166:215–238Google Scholar
  24. Olson R., Forsberg H., Wise B., Rack J. (1994). Measurement of word recognition, orthographic, and phonological skills In: G. R. Lyons (Eds) Frames of reference for the assessment of learning disabilities: New views on measurement issues Baltimore, MD: Paul H Brookes Publishing Company pp. 243–277Google Scholar
  25. Perfetti C. A. (1992). The representation problem in reading acquisition In: P. B. Gough, L. C. Ehri, R. Treiman (Eds) Reading acquisition Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates pp. 145–174Google Scholar
  26. Rosner J. (1979). Test of auditory analysis skills Novato, CA Academic Therapy PublicationsGoogle Scholar
  27. Thaler V., Ebner E. M., Wimmer H. (2004). Training reading fluency in dysfluent readers with high reading accuracy: Word specific effects but low transfer to untrained words. Annals of Dyslexia 54:89–113Google Scholar
  28. Torgesen J. K., Wagner R. K. (1998). Alternative diagnostic approaches for specific developmental reading disabilities. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice 13:220–232Google Scholar
  29. Torgesen J. K., Wagner R. K., Rashotte C. A. (1994). Longitudinal studies of phonological processing and reading. Journal of Learning Disabilities 27:276–286CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Torgesen J. K., Wagner R. K., Rashotte C. A., Burgess S., Hecht S. (1997). Contributions of phonological awareness and rapid automatic naming ability to the growth of word reading skills in second to fifth grade children. Scientific Studies of Reading 1:161–185CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Wolf M., Bowers P. G. (1999). The double-deficit hypothesis for the developmental dyslexias. Journal of Educational Psychology 91:415–438CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Wolf M., Bally H., Morris R. (1986). Automaticity, retrieval processes and reading: A longitudinal study in average and impaired readers. Child Development 57:988–1005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Wolf M., Bowers P. G., Biddle K. (2000). Naming-speed processes, timing, and reading: A conceptual review. Journal of Learning Disabilities 33:387–407Google Scholar
  34. Wolf M., Miller L., Donnelly K. (2000). Retrieval, automaticity, vocabulary elaboration orthography (RAVE-O): A comprehensive, fluency-based reading intervention program. Journal of Learning Disabilities 33:375–386Google Scholar
  35. Wolf M., O’Rourke A. G., Gidney C., Lovett M., Cirino P., Morris R. (2002). The second deficit: An investigation of the independence of phonological and naming-speed deficits in developmental dyslexia. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal 15:43–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, Inc. 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.McMaster UniversityHamiltonCanada
  2. 2.Department of PsychologySt. Mary’s UniversityHalifaxCanada

Personalised recommendations